EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures
|
|
|
- Curtis Pitts
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EHR Incentive Program Stage 3 Objectives & Measures Crosswalk of Stage 3 Proposed Objectives, Measures & Corresponding Stage 2 Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Measures: 1 (Complete 1 Measure) Proposed Objective: Protect electronic protected health information (ephi) created or maintained by the certified EHR technology (CEHRT) through the implementation of appropriate technical, administrative, and physical safeguards. Objective 2: Electronic Prescribing (erx) Hospitals / CAHs, Eligible Professionals or Both (Stage 2 only) **For Stage 3 EPs, EHs & CAHs would have the same measure set** Stage 3 Objectives Stage 3 Measures Corresponding Stage 2 Conduct a security risk analysis in accordance to the requirements under 45 CFR (a)(1), including the encryption of data stored, implement security updates, and correct identified security deficiencies. Measures: 1 (Complete 1 Measure) Proposed Objective: EPs must generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically, and eligible hospitals and CAHs must generate and transmit permissible Risk analysis must be conducted or reviewed for each reporting period. EPs and EHs must conduct the security risk analysis upon installation of CEHRT or upon upgrade of a new Edition of certified EHR technology. Need to review the certification criteria to learn more about the audit log and tamper-resistance provisions. EP Measure: More than 80 percent of all permissible prescriptions written by an EP are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. EH Measure: More than 25 percent of hospital discharge medication orders for permissible prescriptions are queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT. 1 Conduct or review a security risk analysis in accordance with the requirements under 45 CFR (a)(1), including addressing the encryption/security of data stored in CEHRT in accordance with requirements under 45 CFR (a)(2)(iv) and 45 CFR (d)(3), and implement security updates as necessary and correct identified security deficiencies as part of the provider's risk management process More than 50 percent of all permissible prescriptions, or all prescriptions written by the EP and queried for a drug formulary and transmitted electronically using CEHRT
2 discharge prescriptions electronically Objective 3: Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Measures: 2 (Complete 2 Measures) Proposed Objective: Implement clinical decision support (CDS) interventions focused on improving performance on high-priority health conditions. Measure 1: EP and EH must implement five (5) clinical decision support interventions related to four (4) or more CQMs at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period. Measure 2: EP and EH has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug-allergy interactions checks for the entire EHR reporting period. 1. Implement five clinical decision support interventions related to four or more clinical quality measures at a relevant point in patient care for the entire EHR reporting period. Absent four clinical quality measures related to an EP, eligible hospital or CAH's scope of practice or patient population, the clinical decision support interventions must be related to high-priority health conditions. Objective 4: Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Measures: 3 (Complete all 3 measures) Proposed Objective: Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication, laboratory, and diagnostic imaging orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional, credentialed medical assistant, or a medical staff member credentialed to and performing the equivalent duties of a credentialed medical assistant; who can enter orders into the medical Measure 1: More than 80 percent of medication orders created by the EP or authorized providers of the EH during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. Measure 2: More than 60 percent of laboratory orders created by the EP or authorized providers of the EH during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. Measure 3: More than 60 percent of diagnostic imaging orders created by the EP or authorized providers of the EH during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. 2. The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH has enabled and implemented the functionality for drug-drug and drug allergy interaction checks for the entire EHR reporting period. More than 60 percent of medication, 30 percent of laboratory, and 30 percent of radiology orders created by the EP or authorized providers of the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department during the EHR reporting period are recorded using CPOE. 2
3 record per state, local, and professional guidelines. Objective 5: Patient Electronic Access to Health Information Measures: 2 (Complete both Measures) Proposed Objective: Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication, laboratory, and diagnostic imaging orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional, credentialed medical assistant, or a medical staff member credentialed to and performing the equivalent duties of a credentialed medical assistant; who can enter orders into the medical record per state, local, and professional guidelines. Objective 6: Coordination of Care through Patient Engagement Measures: 3, (Complete 2 of 3 Measures, submit data for all 3) Within 24 hours: Measure 1: For more than 80 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or discharged from the EH: The patient (or patient-authorized representative) is provided access to view online, download, and transmit their health information within 24 hours of its availability to the provider, or The patient (or patient-authorized representative) is provided an OCN-certified API that can be used by third-party applications or devices to provide patients (or patient authorized representatives) access to their health information, within 24 hours of its availability to the provider. There are three proposed alternatives. All three would require the API to be available. Measure 2: The EP and EH must use clinically relevant information from CEHRT to identify patient-specific educational resources and provide electronic access to those materials to more than 35 percent of unique patients seen by the EP or discharged from the EH during the EHR reporting period. (This is increased from the Stage 2 threshold of 10 percent) The patient must be able to access this information on demand, such as through a patient portal, personal health record, or API and have everything necessary to access the information even if they opt out. Proposed Measures: Providers must attest to the numerator and denominator for all three measures, but would only be required to successfully meet the threshold for two of the three proposed measures. 3 Visit Summary/ Clinical Summary Clinical summaries provided to patients or patient-authorized representatives within 1 business day for more than 50 percent of office visits. Patient Education Patient-specific education resources identified by CEHRT are provided to patients for more than 10 percent of all unique patients with office visits seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period. More than 10 percent of all unique patients admitted to the eligible hospital are provided patient- specific education resources identified by Certified EHR Technology. View, Download, Transmit (VDT) 1. More than 50 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period are provided timely
4 Measure 1: More than 25 percent of all unique patient seen by the EP or discharged from the EH actively engage with the electronic health record made accessible by the provider. EP and EH may meet the measure by either: Proposed Objective: Use communication function of certified EHR technology to engage with patients or their authorized representatives about the patient s care. or More than 25 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or EH IP or ED during the EHR reporting period view, download, or transmit to a third party their health information More than 25 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or EH IP or ED during the EHR reporting period access their health information through the use of an ONC-certified API that can be used by third party applications or devices. Measure 2: More than 35 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or EH during the EHR reporting period, a secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of CEHRT to the patient, or in response to a secure message sent by the patient. The secure message sent should contain relevant health information specific to the patient in order to the meet the measure. The provider is deemed to be the best judge of what should be considered relevant in this context. (within 4 business days after the information is available to the EP) online access to their health information subject to the EP's discretion to withhold certain information. 1. More than 50 percent of all patients who are discharged by an eligible hospital or CAH have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge 2. More than 5 percent of all unique patients seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period (or their authorized representatives) view, download, or transmit to a third party their health information 2. More than 5 percent of all patients (or their authorized representatives) who are discharged by an eligible hospital or CAH view, download or transmit to a third party their information during the reporting period. Secure Messaging Measure 3: Patient-generated health data from a nonclinical setting is incorporated into the certified EHR technology for more than 15percent of all unique patients seen by the EP or discharged from the EH during the EHR reporting period. A secure message was sent using the electronic messaging function of Certified EHR Technology by more than 5 percent of unique patients (or their authorized representatives) seen by the EP during the EHR reporting period Patient Generated Health Data 4
5 **New to MU** Was not an option under Stage 2 Objective 7: Health Information Exchange (HIE) Measures: 3 (Complete 2 of 3 Measures, submit data for all 3) Proposed Objective: The EP, EH provides a summary of care record when transitioning or referring their patient to another setting of care, retrieves a summary of care record upon the first patient encounter with a new patient, and incorporates summary of care information from other providers into their EHR using the functions of certified EHR technology. Providers must attest to the numerator and denominator for all three measures, but would only be required to successfully meet the threshold for two of the three proposed measures to meet the objective Measure 1: For more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals, the EP, EH that transition or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care: (1) creates a summary care record using CEHRT and (2) electronically exchanges the summary of care records. (The SOC documents must include the requirements and specifications included in the Common Clinical Data Set, CCDS specified by the 2015 ONC certification edition) Measure 2: For more than 40 percent of transitions or referrals received and patient encounters in with the provider has never before encountered the patient, the EP or EH incorporates into the patients EHR an electronic summary of care document from a source other than the provider s EHR system. Measure 3: For more than 80 percent of transitions or referrals received and patient encounters in which the provider has never before encountered the patient, the EP, EH performs a clinical information reconciliation. Medication Medication Allergy Current Problem List Measure: 1. The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals. Measure 2. The EP, eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 10 percent of such transitions and referrals either (a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient or (b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is a NwHIN Exchange participant or in a manner that is consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the nationwide health information network. Medication Reconciliation The EP, eligible hospital or CAH performs medication reconciliation for more than 50 percent of transitions of care in which the patient is transitioned into the care of the EP or admitted to the eligible hospital's or CAH's inpatient or emergency department (POS 21 or 23). 5
6 (Active engagement means that the provider is in the Labs to Public Health process of moving toward sending production data to a PHA or CDR, or is sending production data to a PHA or CDR.) Objective 8: Public Health and Clinical Data Registry Reporting Measures: 6 (EPs complete 3 of 5, EHs complete 4 of 6) Proposed Objective: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH is in active engagement with a PHA or CDR to submit electronic public health data in a meaningful way using certified EHR technology, except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Active Engagement Option 1 Completed Registration to Submit Data: The EP, EH registered to submit data with the PHA or CDR to which the information is being submitted; registration was completed within 60 days of the start of the EHR reporting period. Active Engagement Option 2 Testing and Validation: The EP, EH is in the process of testing and validation of the electronic submission of data. Providers must respond to request from the PHA or CDR within 30 days, failure to respond twice within the EHR reporting period would result in that provider not meeting the measure. Successful ongoing submission of electronic reportable laboratory results from Certified EHR Technology to public health agencies for the entire EHR reporting period. Syndromic Surveillance Successful ongoing submission of electronic syndromic surveillance data from Certified EHR Technology to a public health agency for the entire EHR reporting period Immunization History Active Engagement Option 3 Production: The EP, EH has completed testing and validation for the electronic submission and is electronically submitting production data to the PHR or CDR. Measure 1: Immunization Registry Reporting: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit immunization data and receive immunization forecasts and histories from the public health immunization registry/immunization information system (IIS). **NEW to MU** Registries **NEW to MU** Capability to identify and report specific cases to a specialized registry (other than a cancer registry), except where prohibited, and in accordance with applicable law and practice. Measure 2: Syndromic Surveillance Reporting: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit syndromic surveillance data from a non-urgent care ambulatory setting for EPs, or an 6
7 emergency or urgent care department for eligible hospitals and CAHs (POS 23). Measure 3: Case Reporting: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit case reporting of reportable conditions. Measure 4: Public Health Registry Reporting: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit data to public health registries. Measure 5: Clinical Data Registry Reporting: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH is in active engagement to submit data to a clinical data registry. Measure 6: Electronic Reportable Laboratory Result Reporting: The eligible hospital or CAH is in active engagement with a public health agency to submit electronic reportable laboratory results. This measure is available to eligible hospitals and CAHs only. 7
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3. Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates Stage 2 and 3 Julia Moore, Business Analyst SMC Partners, LLC July 8, 2015 Stage 2 Requirements 2015 EPs beyond 1st year of MU must report on a full year of data EPs in 1 st year
Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016. Meaningful Use Objectives for 2015 and 2016
Image Research, LLC Christopher B. Sullivan, Ph.D. 2901 Quail Rise Court, Tallahassee, FL 32309 Summary of the Final Rule for Meaningful Use for 2015 and 2016 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers
The Future of Meaningful Use
The Future of Meaningful Use Stage 3 Erin Dormaier, CHTS-IM, PCMH CCE Transformation Support Services Manager 2015 CORHIO All Rights Reserved CORHIO Proprietary Not For Redistribution 1 Agenda Stage 3
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview
EHR Incentive Programs: 2015 through 2017 (Modified Stage 2) Overview CMS recently released a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012
CORE OBJECTIVES (16 total) Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Hospitals and CAHs Last Updated: August, 2012 Stage 1 Objective Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2
Meaningful Use in 2015 and Beyond Changes for Stage 2 Jennifer Boaz Transformation Support Specialist Proprietary 1 Definitions AIU = Adopt, Implement or Upgrade EP = Eligible Professional API = Application
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison Table for Eligible Professionals Last Updated: August, 2012 CORE OBJECTIVES (17 total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Stage 2 Objective Stage 2 Measure Use CPOE for medication
TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES
294 TABLE B5: STAGE 2 OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES CORE SET Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities Use computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for medication, laboratory and
Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 Comparison for Eligible Professionals
Stage 1 vs. Comparison for Eligible Professionals CORE OBJECTIVES (17 Total) Stage 1 Objective Stage 1 Measure Objective Measure Use CPOE for Medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare
Meaningful Use Stage 3 Proposed Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers
Meaningful Use Stage 3 Rule: What it Means for Hospitals, Physicians & Health IT Developers Vernessa T. Pollard and Nicole Liffrig Molife April 2015 With the publication of the Stage 3 Meaningful Use Rule
APPENDIX A: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 (MODIFIED STAGE 2) EP Objectives and Measures
APPENDIX A: OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH (MODIFIED STAGE 2) Objectives for Measures for Providers in EP Objectives and Measures Objective 1: Protect Patient Health Information Objective 2:
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet CMS recently published a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals,
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview October 8, 2015 Elizabeth S. Holland Center for Clinical Standards and Quality Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Reporting Period: For Stage 2, the reporting period must be the entire Federal Fiscal Year.
Eligible Hospital and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) Attestation Worksheet for Stage 2 of the Medicare Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program The Eligible Hospital and CAH Attestation Worksheet
TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET
CMS-0044-P 156 TABLE 4: STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE OBJECTIVES AND ASSOCIATED MEASURES SORTED BY CORE AND MENU SET Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities Use computerized provider
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS
STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE CORE AND MENU MEASURES FOR ELIGIBLE PROFESSIONALS CORE MEASURES must meet all CPOE for Medication, Laboratory and Radiology Orders Objective: Use computerized provider order entry
Meaningful Use. Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Meaningful Use Medicare and Medicaid Table of Contents What is Meaningful Use?... 1 Table 1: Patient Benefits... 2 What is an EP?... 4 How are Registration and Attestation Being Handled?... 5 What are
Meaningful Use Modification Rules for 2015-2017 Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support
Meaningful Use Modification Rules for 2015-2017 Oct. 26, 2015 Author: Jennifer Swinnich, Associate Director, PAMED Practice Support The following is a summary of the Meaningful Use Modifications for 2015-2017.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Modified Stage 2: through 2017 November 10, Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] November 10, 1 Key Concepts for Modified Stage 2 Restructured
Meaningful Use Final Rule Update. Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists
Meaningful Use Final Rule Update Patti Kritzberger, RHIT, CHPS Tracey Regimbal, RHIT HIT-Quality Improvement Specialists Learning Objectives Gain understanding of Modified Stage 2 2015-2017 program requirements
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.)
EHR Incentive Program Stage 2 Objectives Summary CORE OBJECTIVES (You must meet all objectives unless exclusion applies.) TARGETING CANCER CARE Objective Objective Description Measure/Attestation Requirement
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
MEETING MEANINGFUL USE IN MICROMD -STAGE TWO- Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Proposed Rule On April 15, 2015 CMS Issued a new proposal rule for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017
Click to edit Master title style Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use 2015-2017 Bruce Maki, MA M-CEITA / Altarum Institute Regulatory & Incentive Program Analyst 12/14/2015 1 1 Agenda 1. Overview of M-CEITA
MEDICFUSION / HERFERT. MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015
MEDICFUSION / HERFERT MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 1 and 2 ATTESTATION GUIDE 2015 The following document is intended to aid in preparation for gathering necessary information to attest in early 2016. All Medicfusion
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program. Focus on Stage 2. Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected]
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Focus on Stage 2 Kim Davis-Allen, Outreach Coordinator [email protected] Understanding Participation Program Year Program Year January 1 st - December 31st. Year
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Meaningful Use: Stage 1 and 2 Hospitals (EH) and Providers (EP) Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Meaningful Use Stage 1 Focuses on Functional & Interoperability
EHR Incentive Program Updates. Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor
EHR Incentive Program Updates Jason Felts, MS HIT Practice Advisor An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123. Step 2: Enter code 2071585#. Step 3: Mute your
Meaningful Use Updates. HIT Summit September 19, 2015
Meaningful Use Updates HIT Summit September 19, 2015 Meaningful Use Updates Nadine Owen, BS,CHTS-IS, CHTS-IM Health IT Analyst Hawaii Health Information Exchange No other relevant financial disclosures.
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1
STAGES 1 AND 2 REQUIREMENTS FOR MEETING MEANINGFUL USE OF EHRs 1 Requirement CPOE Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed health care professional who can enter orders into the
Agenda. What is Meaningful Use? Stage 2 - Meaningful Use Core Set. Stage 2 - Menu Set. Clinical Quality Measures (CQM) Clinical Considerations
AQAF Health Information Technology Forum Meaningful Use Stage 2 Clinical Considerations Marla Clinkscales & Mike Bice Alabama Regional Extension Center (ALREC) August 13, 2013 0 Agenda What is Meaningful
Meaningful Use Stage 2
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presented by: Sarah Leake, HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 HTS Who We Are Stage 2 MU Overview Learning Objectives 2014 CEHRT Certification
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible Hospitals and Eligible Professionals (EPs)
Meaningful Use Criteria for Eligible and Eligible Professionals (EPs) Under the Electronic Health Record (EHR) meaningful use final rules established by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017
EHR/Meaningful Use 2015-2017 The requirements for Meaningful Use attestation have changed due to the recently released Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Electronic Health Record Incentive Program Stage 3
EMR Name/ Model. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP)
EMR Name/ Model EMR Vendor Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory (PowerWorks ASP) Cerner Corporation Core Set of Measures 1 Use CPOE for medication orders directly entered by any licensed healthcare professional
hospital s or CAH s inpatient or professional guidelines
EMR Name/ Model EMR Vendor XLEMR/XLEMR-2011-MU XLEMR Objective 1 Core Set of Measures Use CPOE for medication orders Use CPOE for medication orders More than 30% of unique patients directly entered by
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits
Meaningful Use Stage 2 MU Audits Presented by: Deb Anderson, CPHIMS HTS Consultant HTS, a division of Mountain Pacific Quality Health Foundation 1 CEHRT Certified Electronic Health Record Technology (EHR)
EMR Name/ Model. meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified
EMR Name/ Model EMR Vendor meridianemr 4.2 CCHIT 2011 certified meridianemr, Inc Core Set of Measures Objective Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures EMR Module/ Feature 1 Use CPOE for medication orders
Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013
New York State-Health Centered Controlled Network (NYS HCCN) Webinar #1 Meaningful Use: Stage 1 & 2 Comparison CPS 12 & UDS 2013 January 31, 2014 Ekem Merchant-Bleiberg, Director of Implementation Services
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements
Stage 2 Final Rule Overview: Updates to Stage 1 and New Stage 2 Requirements The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the Stage 2 Final Rule on September 4, 2012. The Stage 2 Final Rule
Eligible Professional s Checklist 2015 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use
This checklist provides a look into Ohio s Medicaid Provider Incentive Program (MPIP) system for eligible professionals and may be used as a guide to help eligible professionals gather information that
Presented by. Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society
Presented by Terri Gonzalez Director of Practice Improvement North Carolina Medical Society Meaningful Use is using certified EHR technology to: Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce errors Engage
Meaningful Use 2015: Modified Stage 2 Objectives and Measures
Meaningful Use 2015: Modified Stage 2 Objectives and Measures Table of Contents Meaningful Use 2015:... 1 Modified Stage 2 Objectives and Measures... 1 Introduction to Stage 2 in 2015 CEHRT... 3 Stage
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338
Contact Information: West Texas Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center 3601 4 th Street MS 6232 Lubbock, Texas 79424 806-743-1338 http://www.wtxhitrec.org/ Grant award - $6.6m Total number
Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations
Improving quality and safety Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations Clinical Decision Support Eligible Professionals (EPs)/Eligible Hospitals (EH) Core
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now
Overview of MU Stage 2 Joel White, Health IT Now 1 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Context 3. Adoption Rates of HIT 4. Overview of Stage 2 Rules 5. Overview of Issues 6. Trend in Standards: Recommendations v.
Using Medflow EHR V8.1 AMR for 2015 MMU2 Attestation 10/15/2015. 1. Introduction
1. Introduction Please review Medflow s document " Finalized!" in order to get background information on the recent CMS Final Rule for "Modified Stage 2" which is retroactively applicable to the 2015 Meaningful
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond. Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use 2015 and beyond Presented by: Anna Mrvelj EMR Training Specialist 1 Agenda A look at the CMS Website Finding your EMR version Certification Number Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 Final Recommendations
Contents Meaningful Use Stage 3 Final Recommendations... 2 HIT Policy Committee Member Concerns... 14 Objectives Considered for Inclusion - Not Included in Final Recommendations... 14 1 Meaningful Use
Changes with MU Stage 2. Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management
Changes with MU Stage 2 Presenter: Jennifer Oelenberger, Director and Acct Management We give back EHR Concepts takes pride in giving our clients resourceful information to prepare you for the next steps
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY
MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 2015 FOR ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS USING CERTIFIED EMR TECHNOLOGY STAGE 2 REQUIREMENTS EPs must meet or qualify for an exclusion to 17 core objectives EPs must meet 3 of the 6 menu measures.
Work Product of the HITPC Meaningful Use Workgroup DRAFT Meaningful Use Stage 3 Recommendations
Improving quality and safety Clinical Decision Support Eligible Professionals (EPs)/Eligible Hospitals (EH) Core Objective: Use clinical decision support to improve performance on highpriority health conditions
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome. Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Enabling Patients Decision Making Power: A Meaningful Use Outcome Lindsey Mongold, MHA HIT Practice Advisor Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality Today 1. Meaningful Use (MU) 2. 2/3rds of MU relates
Stage 2 of Meaningful Use Summary of Proposed Rule
Stage 2 of Meaningful Use Summary of Proposed Rule Background In order to receive incentives for the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) under either the Medicare or Medicaid (Medi-Cal) incentive
Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method
Core Set of Objectives and Measures Must Meet All 15 Measures Stage 1 Objectives Stage 1 Measures Reporting Method Use Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) for medication orders directly entered by
Meaningful Use Objectives
Meaningful Use Objectives The purpose of the electronic health records (EHR) incentive program is not so much the adoption of health information technology (HIT), but rather how HIT can further the goals
Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR
GE Healthcare Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR Are you Ready to Report? GE Healthcare EMR Consulting CHUG Fall Conference October 2010 Achieving Meaningful Use with Centricity EMR The EMR Consulting
MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know
MDeverywhere, Inc. Presents 2014 CMS EHR Incentive Program Requirements: What Providers Need To Know Presented by: Kristen Heffernan Director Product Management & Marketing, Henry Schein MicroMD Agenda
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012
Stage 2 Overview Tipsheet Last Updated: August, 2012 Overview CMS recently published a final rule that specifies the Stage 2 criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical
MICROMD EMR VERSION 9.0 2014 OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS
MICROMD EMR VERSION 9.0 2014 OBJECTIVE MEASURE CALCULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE Welcome to MicroMD EMR... i How This Guide is Organized... i Understanding Typographical Conventions... i Cross-References...
Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Ten Points of Interest
November 8, 2012 Practice Group: Health Care Stage 2 of Meaningful Use: Ten Points of Interest By Patricia C. Shea On September 4, 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare
HCCN Meaningful Use Review. October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway
HCCN Meaningful Use Review October 7 th, 2015 Louisiana Public Health Institute Kelly Maggiore Jack Millaway What is Meaningful Use? Federal and State incentive payment program for Eligible Professionals
STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs
EHR Incentive Programs A program administered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Eligible Professional s Guide to STAGE 2 of the EHR Incentive Programs September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS...
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption
Incentives to Accelerate EHR Adoption The passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 provides incentives for eligible professionals (EPs) to adopt and use electronic health records
Appendix 2. PCMH 2014 and CMS Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements
Appendix 2 PCMH 2014 and CMS Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements Appendix 2 PCMH 2014 and CMS Stage 2 Meaningful Use Requirements 2-1 APPENDIX 2 PCMH 2014 AND CMS STAGE 2 MEANINGFUL USE REQUIREMENTS Medicare
Health Care February 28, 2012. CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use,
ROPES & GRAY ALERT Health Care February 28, 2012 CMS Issues Proposed Rule on Stage 2 Meaningful Use, ONC Issues Companion Proposed Rule on 2014 EHR Certification Criteria On February 23, 2012, the Centers
Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015
Stage 3/2015 Edition Health IT Certification Criteria Proposed Rules Overview May 11, 2015 Disclaimer» CMS must protect the rulemaking process and comply with the Administrative Procedure Act. During the
Meaningful Use Stage 1:
Whitepaper Meaningful Use Stage 1: EHR Incentive Program Information -------------------------------------------------------------- Daw Systems, Inc. UPDATED: November 2012 This document is designed to
Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements
Meaningful Use and Lab Related Requirements ONC State HIE / NILA Workgroup August 20, 2013 What is an EHR? Electronic Health Record Information system used by healthcare providers to store and manage patient
Meaningful Use Stage 2. Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Presenter: Linda Wise, EMR Training Specialist 1 AGENDA 2 Agenda Meaningful Use in Review Moving Into Stage 2 Meaningful Use Learning the Requirements Understanding the Measures
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds. Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality
Stage 2 Meaningful Use What the Future Holds Lindsey Wiley, MHA HIT Manager Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality An Important Reminder For audio, you must use your phone: Step 1: Call (866) 906-0123.
CMS EHR Incentive Programs:
CMS EHR Incentive Programs: An Overview Meaningful Use Stages Vidya Sellappan Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of E-Health Standards and Services HIT Initiatives Group August 13, 2014 Table
