AirCost LCCA Software An overview of AAPTP 06 06 Paul M. Dalbey, P.E.



Similar documents
Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)

Eric Ross Federal Highway Administration Proposed Office of Performance Management

LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS FOR AIRPORT PAVEMENTS

LCCA Defined (FHWA) LCCA Policy Statement (9/96) LCCA Policy Statement (9/96) Policy Statement Con t... Use of LCCA. CE 4401 Pavement Design

Transportation Asset Management

700 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

LIFE-CYCLE COST COMPARISON FOR MUNICIPAL ROAD PAVEMENTS

Improving Rehabilitation Selection for Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis

CHAPTER 2 LCCA APPROACHES

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design

Report No. CDOT Final Report LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS AND DISCOUNT RATE ON PAVEMENTS FOR THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100

LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

Evaluation of Long-Lasting Perpetual Asphalt Pavement Using Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Arnar Agustsson Sulton Azamov

Guidelines for Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies

Whole of life cycle cost analysis in bridge rehabilitation

Thin Whitetopping Application at Williamsburg Regional Airport and Other Thin Whitetopping Airport Applications.

Rehabilitation Scenarios for Sustainable Water Mains. University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, PH (514) ext. 8779; FAX (514) ;

Final Report Evaluation of I-Pave Low Volume Road Design Software

Runway 12R-30L Lambert St. Louis International Airport

LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

Pavement Management Program

- centred on human factors (ie. ergonomics, desire to have a new computer system) - Are there unused computer terminals in the company now?

ENGINEERING ECONOMICS PROBLEM TITLES

2013 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants

Case Studies - Concrete Overlays

Engineering Economics Cash Flow

Quantitative Methods for Finance

Strategy and Analysis in Using NPV. How Positive NPV Arises

Traffic volumes adopted for pavement designs are based on the parameters contained in Section 7 of this report.

Using simulation to calculate the NPV of a project

Life Cycle Cost Analysis

Amajor benefit of Monte-Carlo schedule analysis is to

FAARFIELD 1.4. Updates, Improvements and New Capabilities. Federal Aviation Administration. 3 September, 2014

FAA AIRPORT BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS GUIDANCE

CHAPTER 23 LIFE-CYCLE COST ESTIMATE

ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR KANSAS COUNTIES: THE STATE OF PRACTICE KEVIN D. FRIEDRICHS. B.S., Kansas State University, 2006 A THESIS

Net Present Value and Capital Budgeting. What to Discount

LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS. William James Wilde, Steve Waalkes, and Rob Harrison

Practical Applications of Stochastic Modeling for Disability Insurance

Standards for Specifying Construction Of Airports

Mary C. Frederick, RCE PMP Division Chief. Caltrans Division of Aeronautics 1

MASTER PLAN PREPARATION

2006 Report Card for Pennsylvania s Infrastructure

Benefit Cost Models to Support Pavement Management Decisions

Chapter 11 Cash Flow Estimation and Risk Analysis ANSWERS TO SELECTED END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

Asset Management: How to Get Started! Thomas D. Keown, PE GHD

Rapid Pavement Construction Tools, Materials and Methods

Chapter 8 Benefit/Cost Ratios and Other Measures

LIFECYCLE COSTING FOR DATA CENTERS: DETERMINING THE TRUE COSTS OF DATA CENTER COOLING

Risk Analysis Overview

Cost Considerations of In-Place Recycling as a Pavement Rehabilitation Alternative Brian Diefenderfer, PhD, PE Alex Apeagyei, PhD, PE

Tools for Staying Ahead of the Curve

Capital Budgeting continued: Overview:(1) Estimating cash flows (2) CB examples (3) Dealing with uncertainty of cash flows

How To Calculate Discounted Cash Flow

Mehdi Akbarian (MIT)

Calculations for Time Value of Money

Schedule Risk Analysis A large DoD Development Program

Public Sector Comparator for Highway PPP Projects. Henry Kerali Lead Transport Specialist

The Cost of Capital, and a Note on Capitalization

TECHNICAL APPENDIX ESTIMATING THE OPTIMUM MILEAGE FOR VEHICLE RETIREMENT

A Fuel Cost Comparison of Electric and Gas-Powered Vehicles

Final Report Bid Evaluation and Selection Process For Wind-Generated Electricity Hydro-Quebec Distribution Call For Tenders Process.

Air Medical Transport Planning Good planning can save lives. Planning for air medical transport

Pavement Maintenance Management Katie Zimmerman, P.E. Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. (APTech)

CPM -100: Principles of Project Management

Software Project Scheduling under Uncertainties

Airline Fleet Planning Models J/1.234J Airline Management Dr. Peter P. Belobaba April 10, 2006

Construction Management Program

GAO U.S. INFRASTRUCTURE. Funding Trends and Federal Agencies Investment Estimates. Testimony

Performance Pillar. P1 Performance Operations. Wednesday 28 August 2013

Risk Analysis and Quantification

CHAPTER 17 ENGINEERING COST ANALYSIS

Which projects should the corporation undertake

Analytics That Allow You To See Beyond The Cloud. By Alex Huang, Ph.D., Head of Aviation Analytics Services, The Weather Company, an IBM Business

INT 3 Schedule Risk Analysis

Section 100 Contractor Quality Control Program

AMS 5 CHANCE VARIABILITY

TRANSPORTATION. Georgia s Strength in Transportation 4 TRANPORTATION SYSTEMS IN GEORGIA. Highways 2 Airport 3 Railroads 4 Ports 5. Inside this issue:

Pavement Type Selection for Highway Rehabilitation Based on a Life-Cycle Cost Analysis: Validation of California Interstate 710 Project (Phase 1)

USE OF A DIGITAL SURVEY VEHICLE FOR PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS AT AIRPORTS. Paul W. Wilke, P.E. Applied Research Associates, Inc.

Geoff Considine, Ph.D.

The Use of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis to Evaluate PublicPrivate Partnerships

Chapter 21: Savings Models

Course 3: Capital Budgeting Analysis

How To Plan For A New Airport In Charlotte

9. Time Value of Money 1: Present and Future Value

Pavement Management Implementation: Success Stories for Maryland Counties

MIT ICAT. Airline Revenue Management: Flight Leg and Network Optimization Transportation Systems Analysis: Demand & Economics

Transcription:

AirCost LCCA Software An overview of AAPTP 06 06 Paul M. Dalbey, P.E. American Concrete Pavement Association, Southeast Chapter Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Atlanta, GA Otb October 28, 2010

Overview Life Cycle Cost Analysis What is a LCCA? Why is an LCCA important to your project? What do we get as a result of our LCCA? Origins of AAPTP 06 06 AirCost Software ARA Proprietary 2010 Applied Research Associates, Inc. 2

What is a Life Cycle Cost Analysis? Analysis technique that helps managers, engineers, planners, and other decision makers determine the most cost effective pavement alternative over a given period of time Multiple options can be subjectively evaluated Initial construction or rehabilitation Major vs minor rehabilitation vs preventive maintenance Concretevs Asphalt 20 year design vs 40 year design Should be completed as early as possible in the project development phase Identifies total costs of different plans over the course of the analysis period LCCA IS A TOOL, NOT AN ANSWER!!!! 3

Possible Life CycleAlternativesofPavement Image courtesy of FHWA 4

Typical Life Cycle Cost Diagram Initial Construction B Initial Construction A Rehab 1B ($) Rehab 1A Rehab 2A Rehab 3A Cost ( End-of-Analysis Salvage Value Time 5

Alternatives Overall pavement cycle strategy Initial Construction Rehabilitation strategies LCCA Ingredients Variables Discount Rate Service Life Unit Costs Analysis Period 6

Discount Rate Variable that represents real value of money over time Allows analyst to convert costs of future rehabilitations into present day dollars. As general rule of thumb, discount rate = interest inflation Use a single discount rate for entire analysis Higher discount rate favor alternatives with higher future spending Lower discount rate favor alternatives with higher up front costs Typical value is 4%, values between 3 5% are acceptable OMB Circular No. A 94, Appendix C updated annually BasedonTreasury NotesandBonds 10 year 2.2%, 20 year 2.7%, 30 year 2.7% 7

Service Life Amount of time between construction activities Measured from completion of construction to the time when the pavement is structurally inadequate. Service life is typicallya a little longer than Design life Service life is typically the time associated with 50% reliability Design life generally has 85 95% reliability Each construction activity has its own service life Typically derived from historical performance data If performance dt data is unavailable, use expert opinion i 8

Unit Cost price per unit Unit Costs Typically, each pavement type and thickness is a separate line item. Concretevs Asphalt 14 vs 18, etc. May even include separate items for each layer Material ilcosts would generally include total construction cost Area of line item required to determine subtotal line cost To reduce bias, unit costs should be based on reliable historical values in project area. 9

Analysis Period MUST be long enough to include at least one future rehabilitation event for each alternative State highway agencies commonly use 40 years for new/ reconstruction projects State highway agencies commonly use 30 years for rehabilitation projects Using longer analysis periods may reduce reliability of performance models and unit cost projections One analysis period is to be used for all alternatives being considered. 10

Steps in Analysis Typically done with Excel or other software to expedite process. Start with Alternative 1 Start with Event #1 (initial construction) Get subtotal for each line item in event Sum each line to get event cost in base year dollars Use discount rate to determine required investment in base year dollars Repeat for each event/rehabilitation Sum costs for each event in Alternative Calculate Salvage value of pavement at end of analysis period Repeat for each Alternative Evaluate cost for each alternative 11

Net Present Worth/Value Results Sum of all costs for all events in a given alternative Represents the entire investment required, in base year dollars, to execute alternative Equivalent Uniform Annualized Cost Represents cost of an annuity to cover NPW based on discount rate If analysis period of different alternatives is equal, NPV and EUAC will yield equivalent results Useful when looking at budgets established tblihdon an annual basis 12

Net Present Value NET PRESENT VALUE $) ost ($ Co Time 13

Equivalent Uniform AnnualizedCost $) ost ($ Co Time 14

Agency (Direct) Costs Physical Costs of Maintenance Activities Cost of materials Cost of construction Cost of maintenance Supplemental Costs Administrative Costs Engineering i Costs Maintenance of Traffic (MoT) Often, these are percentages of Physical Costs (~5% typical) Salvage Value 15

Prorated (Remaining) Life Salvage Value Straight line depreciation of final pavement event Compliant with GASB 34 Very easy to calculate Does not account for structural use of underlying layers Residual Value Actual value of remaining pavement at end of analysis period if sold or recycled May be negative value if cost to remove material value of material Very difficult to estimate due several project specific factors Differences between alternatives is usually not large, especially when discounted over long periods of time. 16

User (Indirect) Costs Disruption of revenue as a result of construction activities Reductions in operations, passengers, and/or cargo Passenger Facility Charge Loss of Daily Operating Revenue Land fees lost for each arriving plane Fuel flowage fee Other fees charged by the airport Frequency AND duration of rehabilitation events play major roles inuser costs 17

Analysis Total cost = Agency Cost (incl. salvage value) + User Cost Due to complexities of calculating User Cost, some agencies use only direct costs, esp. in highway LCCA Finaldecisions are rarely madesolely on the results of an LCCA Many other factors play into decision of final alternatives Political Agency experience with construction Confidence in LCCA parameters Funding 18

Deterministic vs Probabilistic Analysis Deterministic One time through procedure All variables have exact values Discount Rate is fixed All units costs are fixed All service lives are fixed Result is a single value Comparison between alternatives can be done easily Agency often utilize a buffer to call alternatives economically equivalent. 19

Deterministic vs Probabilistic Analysis (cont.) Probabilistic 1,000 s of random iterations Some or all variables are selected based on statistical parameters Normal distribution μ, σ Triangular distribution min, max, mode Uniform distribution min, max For each iteration, software selects one set value of variables and performs a deterministic analysis Simulation typically runs up to 5,000 iterations or until convergence Result is a range of values with a mean and standard deviation May not give a clear cut winning alternative but requires analyst or agency to evaluate some acceptance of risk 20

Probabilistic Results 21

AAPTP 06 06 Life Cycle Cost Analysis For Airport Pavement Project to develop comprehensive overview of current airport LCCA practices Identify andprovide guidance on most appropriate procedures for airport LCCA Develop LCCA spreadsheet dh software to handle deterministic and probabilistic analysis Develop training materials for implementation of LCCA methodology 22

Current State of Airport LCCA Use of LCCA in airfield pavements far behind usage in highway applications i Most projects are analyzed using in house tools or software adapted from the highway industry Little documentation specifically aimed at airfield pavement FAA Northwest Mountain Region s Design Guide Supplement: PCC Airport Pavements (Scott, 2003) Operational Life of Airport Pavements (Garg, Guo, & McQueen, 2004) Full Cost Approach to Airport Pavement Management (McNerney & Harrison, 1995) 23

FAA Guidance Section 910, FAA Order 5100.38C FAA offices directed to encourage life cycle costing when certain conditions can be met: IFB states LCC will be used in determining low bidder Factors to be considered are specified and quantifiable IFB explains how costs for each factor will be calculated Unit costs Analysis period The item that meets the bidding specification and has the lowest life cycle cost is the successful bid. 24

FAAGuidance (cont.) FAA AC 150/5320 6E, Appendix 1 Step by Step procedure for conducting LCCA Recommendations Net Present Worth Discount Rate = 4.0% Analysis Period = 20 years Salvage value as remaining life of final rehabilitation Evaluate the most promising alternatives based on costs, time required, operational constraints, chance for success, etc. 25

AirCost Deterministic and probabilistic airport LCCA Built with Microsoft Excel VBA Excel 2000 or newer Someadditional features whenusing Excel2007or2010 2010 Allows 4 alternatives to be evaluated Each alternative can contain up to 7 events (Initial construction + 6 rehabs) hb) Maintenance operations handled separate from rehab events Runway and shoulder maintenance handled separately Maintenance activity service life always deterministic Activities have set frequency and maximum number of applications 26

AirCost Home Screen 27

AirCost Project Information 28

AirCost Project Details 29

AirCost LCCA Parameters 30

Analysis variables 31

Material Library 32

Mainline Runway Inputs 33

Maintenance Inputs 34

LCCA Execution 35

Deterministic Results 36

Probabilistic Results 37

Special Thanks Greg Dean, ACPA SE Airport Programs Director AAPTP 06 06 Project Technical Panel Mr. Monte Symons, chair Dr. Jim Hall, Ph.D, P.E. Applied Research Associates, Inc. Mr. Kll Kelly Smith Applied dpavement ttechnology, Inc. 38