SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program

Similar documents
Regulating Offshore Renewable Energy Leasing and Development

Chapter 8. List of Preparers

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council

121 FERC 62,167 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Public Utility District No. 1 of Project No Chelan County

Habitat Opportunities in the Duwamish Transition Zone

APPENDIX C LIST OF EA RECIPIENTS

WRIA 8 Staff Team DRAFT 2017 Work Plan

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

STREAMFLOW RESTORATION PRIORITY AREAS

There is a concerted effort in the regionto understand the sources, fate, transport and

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

COUNCIL OPERATING PROCEDURE Plan, Technical, and Management Teams

APPENDIX 5: CONSULTANT BIOGRAPHIES

Environmental Review Document Distribution Matrix

San Juan County / WRIA2 Lead Entity Program for Salmon Recovery

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

PROGRAMMATIC ESA 1 CONSULTATION Specific Project Information Form For Scientific Measurement Devices Version: May 2012

Comment Invited on Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed

LOCATION: In Elliott Bay, Puget Sound at Seattle, King County, Washington.

Memorandum (ISAB ) July 22, 2013

BETTER BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS: TRAINING AND GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS

Notice of Availability and Request for Public Comment on the Joint U. S. Fish and Wildlife

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH

2014 Oyster Restoration Implementation Update

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will invest $15 million for post-sandy cleanup and marsh restoration on Long Island

Federal Requirements Related to Coral Farming and Restoration Activities

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE June 28, 2016

Bolton Resource Management Tract Management Plan TRCA Delegation to Town of Caledon Council. July 8, 2014

STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1-

GOVERNOR S SALMON RECOVERY OFFICE & COUNCIL OF REGIONS COMMUNICATIONS PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS PLAN MAY 2014

PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT: Trans Bay Cable Maintenance Project

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Adaptive Management Ecological Restoration Conference

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

ESRI_UC_2015_No843_Integrating Flood Risk Management and Salmon Habitat Restoration_CampbellSW

Lower Dungeness River Estuarine & Floodplain Restoration

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

National Environmental Policy Act/ Clean Water Act Section 404 (NEPA/404) Merger Process and Agreement for Transportation Projects in Colorado

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

I.I Action Plan. Canada-US Cooperation in the Salish Sea: Environment Environnement ft EA~ United s tates. Canada Canada,,.

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

National Saltwater Recreational Fisheries Policy

SECTION 9 SUMMARY OF COORDINATION, PUBLIC VIEWS AND COMMENTS

WSDOT s Approach to Seismic Retrofit of Highway Structures

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

City of Kirkland 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update Environmental Impact Statement. Scoping Summary. Introduction

INNOVATION IN FLOW RESTORATION AND WATER BANKING CASE STUDY: DUNGENESS WATER EXCHANGE

The St. Lucie River is 35 miles long and has two major forks, the North Fork and the South Fork. In the 1880s, the system was basically a freshwater

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Snapshots: Resilient Lands and Waters Initiative

3. Adaptive Management Program

Subactivity: Habitat Conservation Program Element: National Wetlands Inventory

River Restoration Activities in the Rio Grande Canalization Flood Control Project. Upper Rio Grande Citizens Forum Elizabeth Verdecchia July 19, 2012

Chum Salmon recovery in Oregon tributaries to the lower Columbia River. Kris Homel Chum Reintroduction Coordinator

CLASS SPECIFICATION Environmental Specialist

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N

Evaluation Criteria and Performance Measures for the EAA Storage Reservoirs- Phase 1 Project

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

NOAA s Role in the Licensing of Offshore LNG Terminals

Department of Defense MANUAL

Volunteer Programs. Promoting Public Understanding, Support & Stewardship of the Channel Islands Marine Protected Areas

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

The Draft Framework for Developing the National System of MPAs

REGIONAL ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR WEST COAST MARINE FISHERIES DRAFT JANUARY 27, 2015

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. [Docket No ; NRC ] Pacific Gas and Electric Company;

Marine Protected Areas: An Overview Kate Smukler New England Regional Coordinator

PIEDMONT SOUTH ATLANTIC COAST COOPERATIVE ECOSYSTEM STUDIES UNIT. AMENDMENT TWO TO COOPERATIVE and JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT.

Incidental Harassment Authorization

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

PANEL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN: PREPARED FOR THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service National Fish Hatchery System

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 131 FERC 62,175 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. United Water Conservation District Project No.

Cedar River Side Channel PL84-99 Replacement Project

Master Deliverable List. Prepared by Headquarters Capital Program and Management Office PMRS Unit

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service West Virginia Ecological Services Field Office

21st International Conference of The Coastal Society

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

The North State: Implementing the California Water Action Plan February 24, 2014

Regulatory Features of All Coastal and Inland Ecological Restoration Limited Projects

Oklahoma Governor s Water Conference

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

GAO PIPELINE PERMITTING. Interstate and Intrastate Natural Gas Permitting Processes Include Multiple Steps, and Time Frames Vary

Statement of Qualifications for Natural Resource Management Services October 2014

Northern Middlesex Council of Governments

Chapter 11. Costs and Funding

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Limitation on Claims against a Proposed Transportation Project

Columbia River Basin Hatchery Scientific Review Group Professional Biographies

Transcription:

SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program I-5 to Medina, Bridge Replacement and HOV Project Michelle Meade Shane Cherry Chris Cziesla WSDOT Biologist SR 520 Mitigation Lead SR 520 Endangered d Species Act Lead Julie Meredith, P.E. SR 520 Program Director Paula Hammond, P.E. Secretary of Transportation WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council November 17, 2011

SR SR 520 520, I-5 I-5 to to Medina update Project Update Spring 2011 Published final EIS. Summer 2011 Received the Record of Decision. Spring 2012 - Begin construction of new floating bridge. 2014 - Open new floating bridge to drivers. 2

What is the I-5 to Medina mitigation planning process? WSDOT has worked for over four years on a comprehensive screening process of potential ti mitigation sites. The screening process has been conducted in coordination with local, state and federal regulatory agencies and stakeholders. The mitigation sites that were identified through the screening process are currently being reviewed for approval by regulatory agencies. 3

Natural Resources Technical Working Group Goals of Natural Resources TWG process: Identify and discuss project-related impacts to natural resources Identify and discuss appropriate avoidance and minimization measures Provide feedback on potential mitigation sites Provide input on mitigation planning, design and implementation. Stakeholders involved in the Natural Resources TWG: US Army Corps of Engineers US Environmental Protection Agency US Coast Guard National Marine Fisheries Service US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife Department of Ecology Seattle Dept. of Planning and Development Seattle Parks and Recreation Muckleshoot Indian Tribe University of Washington 4

Endangered Species Act (ESA) Steering Group The ESA Steering Group has met on an ongoing basis since spring 2008 and includes key staff from WSDOT, FHWA, NOAA-NMFS, and USFWS. The ESA Steering Group has provided a forum for: Early ESA consultation and collaboration between WSDOT and the Services to establish the appropriate analytical framework. Collectively identifying important issues or challenges. Incremental review of issue papers on the identified topics and challenging areas. 5

Project Project impacts to to Chinook Storm water Pile driving In-water work Overwater and inwater structures 6

Project Project impacts Storm water Reduction in impervious surfaces. Enhanced water quality treatment facilities. High efficiency street sweeping. 7

Project Project impacts Pile Pile driving Test pile project goals: Evaluate the noise effects of pile driving in Lake Washington. Identify the best methods for minimizing noise that could affect people, fish and wildlife during construction. Validate noise modeling based on empirical data. 8

Project Project impacts In-water work Project area divided into 8 work zones based on salmon use Examined various activities in zones to see which activities may or may not affect salmon. 9

Project impacts Overwater and in-water structures Overwater impacts: Zone 8 work windows Shading Altered migratory behavior In-water impacts: Predator habitat Pilings / columns 10

Draft Aquatic Mitigation Plan Overview of sites 11

Draft Aquatic Mitigation Plan Bear Creek 12

Draft Aquatic Mitigation Plan East Approach 13

Draft Aquatic Mitigation Plan Taylor Creek 14

Draft Aquatic Mitigation Plan South Lake Washington Restoration Site 15

Draft Aquatic Mitigation Plan Cedar River Elliott Bridge Reach 16

Next steps December 2011: Submit final mitigation plans to agencies. Spring 2012: Begin construction of floating bridge replacement. 2012 2018: Final design and construction of mitigation sites. Schedule for final design and construction will vary by site and will be a function of WSDOT and project partner timing constraints. Mitigation is concurrent with timing of impacts. 2014: Open new floating bridge to drivers. 17

Questions? For more information on the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program Please visit our website: www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/sr520bridge or contact: E-mail: SR520bridge@wsdot.wa.govwa gov Infoline: 1-888-520-NEWS (6397) 18