FAARFIELD 1.4. Updates, Improvements and New Capabilities. Federal Aviation Administration. 3 September, 2014



Similar documents
Standards for Specifying Construction Of Airports

Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100

Airport Safety Management Systems and New Technologies

DATA MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIONAL AIRPORT PAVEMENT TEST FACILITY (NAPTF)

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

PERFORMANCE TESTING OF BITUMINOUS MIXES USING FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER

Rehabilitation by cracking and seating of concrete pavement optimized by FWD analysis

Pavement Thickness. esign and RCC-Pave Software. Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavement: Design and Construction. October 24, 2006 Atlanta, Georgia

Final Report Evaluation of I-Pave Low Volume Road Design Software

Thin Whitetopping Application at Williamsburg Regional Airport and Other Thin Whitetopping Airport Applications.

Using Accelerated Pavement Testing to Evaluate Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement Performance

PCN Safety Standard, Design Criteria or Management Tool (ALACPA 2013, MEXICO)

Pavement Management Program

La Nueva AASHTO Guia de Diseno de Pavimentos Hormigon

Impacts of Increased Loading Due to Heavy Construction Traffic on Thin Pavements

Reinforcement HUESKER. HaTelit. Engineering with geosynthetics

Construction Specifications for Keyhole Pavement Coring and Reinstatement

AirCost LCCA Software An overview of AAPTP Paul M. Dalbey, P.E.

Chapter 7: Pavement Rehabilitation 7-1 Asphalt Pavement Overlays 7-1 Surface Preparation Methods 7-2 Concrete Pavement Preparation 7-3 Recycling

I-66 Pavement Rehabilitation

LOAD TESTING OF INSTRUMENTED PAVEMENT SECTIONS

Pavement Design. Guest Lecturer Dr. Sirous Alavi, P.E. SIERRA TRANSPORTATION Terminal Way, Suite 125 Reno, Nevada 89502

CHAPTER 7 ASPHALT PAVEMENTS

Modern Techniques for Concrete Pavement Design

USE OF A DIGITAL SURVEY VEHICLE FOR PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS AT AIRPORTS. Paul W. Wilke, P.E. Applied Research Associates, Inc.

5. Report Date GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING ROUTINE OVERWEIGHT TRUCK ROUTES. 8. Performing Organization Report No. Emmanuel G. Fernando and Jeong-Ho Oh

Runway 12R-30L Lambert St. Louis International Airport

Traffic volumes adopted for pavement designs are based on the parameters contained in Section 7 of this report.

Prestressed Pavement Rehabilitation

Airfield Pavement Rehabilitation Planning Choosing the right fix. Rob McLure, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Associate Hatch Mott MacDonald

Case Studies - Concrete Overlays

Applied Research Associates. Release Notes. Build 2.2

AIRCRAFT RESCUE AND FIRE FIGHTING GUIDE REVISION 0. AA Flight Safety Department.4601 Hwy 360; MD 849 GSWFA.Fort Worth Texas Phone

Technical Presentation: Follow up on HVS testing of Roller Compacted Concrete and Ultra-thin reinforced concrete test sections

SKER HUESKER HUESKER HUESKER HUESKER HUESKERHUES

Mehdi Akbarian (MIT)

WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS FOR 150/5220-4B AAS-100 AIRCRAFT FIRE AND RESCUE PROTECTION

Rehabilitation Strategies for Bonded Concrete Overlays of Asphalt Pavements

CollectMax System Requirements

QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR MOBILE RETROREFLECTIVITY UNITS

Lecture Notes CT 4860 Structural Pavement Design. Design of Flexible Pavements

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY EOARD WASH IN GTO N, D. C.

Hardware and Software Requirements for Sage 50 v15 to v22

Expected Service Life and Performance Characteristics of HMA Pavements in LTPP

Airport Safety and Construction Management Under The FAA

AASHTO Subcomittee on Materials Biloxi, Mississippi August 4-10, 2012 Chris Abadie, P.E.

Pavement Rehabilitation Using Hot Mix Asphalt. - National Perspective -

Oregon s Land Use Planning & Air Space Analysis (FAA )

research report Investigation of Proposed AASHTO Rut Test Procedure Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Virginia Transportation Research Council

CONTRIBUTION OF VISCOELASTICITY IN THE DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF HWD TESTS FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT ASSESSMENT

Numerical Analysis of the Moving Formwork Bracket Stress during Construction of a Curved Continuous Box Girder Bridge with Variable Width

CHAPTERS PAVEMENT ENGINEERING CHAPTER 600 GENERAL ASPECTS

Washington Airport Pavement Management System. Pavement Management Manual

FWD/HWD Void Detection Beneath Concrete Pavements or Overlaid Concrete Pavements. SWIFT 2010 Calgary, AB

Construction Management Program

SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.

CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Construction and Preliminary HVS Tests of Pre-Cast Concrete Pavement Slabs

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF WASHOE COUNTY

OHIO ASPHALT PAVING CONFERENCE

ALIZE-LCPC Software. version 1.3. User manual. January 2011

STUDY OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES RESISTANT TO FUEL

Rehabilitation Strategies for Highway Pavements

INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION

INTRODUCTION TO CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

FAA International Strategies 2010 to 2014 Western Hemisphere Region

Advisory Circular Updates Airport Planning and Environmental Division (APP-400)

Asphalt Pavement Association Of Michigan Selecting the Right Mix Atrium Drive, Suite 202 Okemos, MI

MASTER PLAN PREPARATION

Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

A View From The Bureau of Materials & Physical Research. IAPA March 2015 Matt Mueller, PE BMPR Illinois Dept of Transportation

Prerequisites Guide. Version 4.0, Rev. 1

Pavement Patching Repair for AC and PCC Pavement Surfaces. Vern Thompson

Advisory Circular. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration. AC No: Change: Date: 06/22/2011 Initiated by: AFS-460

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOINT HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROJECT FHWA/IN/JHRP-94/12 CONCRETE PAVEMENT CRACK AND SEAT PERFORMANCE AND OVERLAY DESIGN

CID STREET INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT

AN ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR LOAD-ZONING PAVEMENTS

700 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2011 Guide to features and requirements

NOTICE TO AERODROME CERTIFICATE HOLDERS (NOTAC) No. 02/2013

Software Development (PAKPAVE) for Flexible Pavement Design

Reference Manual DATAKIT

Mechanically stabilized layers in road construction

Recycling with CRM. John D Angelo D Angelo Consulting, LLC Phone johndangelo@dangeloconsultingllc.com

Porous Pavement Alternatives Cost Analysis

Eric Ross Federal Highway Administration Proposed Office of Performance Management

Structural Performance of Highway Bridges under Given Foundation Settlements

TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN München, Lehrstuhl und Prüfamt für Bau von Landverkehrswegen. Research Report No. 2362

Preface. This handbook supersedes Advisory Circular (AC) 91-23A, Pilot s Weight and Balance Handbook, revised in iii

Transcription:

FAARFIELD 1.4 Updates, Improvements and New Capabilities Presented to: XI ALACPA Seminar on Airport Pavements and IX FAA By: David R. Brill. P.E., Ph.D. Date: 3 September, 2014

Airport Technology R&D Program Research conducted at the FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City, NJ, USA. Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA Sponsor: FAA Office of Airport Safety and Standards (AAS-100), Washington, DC. Provide support for development of FAA pavement standards (Advisory Circulars). Santiago de Chile 2

Airport Technology R&D Branch, ANG-E26 Dr. Michel Hovan, Branch Manager Airport Safety Section ANG-E261 Jim Patterson, Manager Visual Guidance Runway Surface Technology Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Wildlife Hazard Mitigation Runway Incursion Reduction Planning and Design for New Large Aircraft (NLA) Airport Pavement Section ANG-E262 Jeffrey Gagnon, Manager Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation Aircraft/Airport Compatibility Advanced Pavement Materials Research Airport Pavement Maintenance and Management 3

Airport Pavement R&D Program R&D products are relied on worldwide by ICAO, aircraft industry & airport authorities. Four major R&D focal areas: 1. Pavement thickness design. 2. Aircraft/airport compatibility. 3. Airport pavement maintenance & management. 4. Advanced pavement materials.

National Airport Pavement Test Facility (NAPTF) Fully enclosed facility for accelerated traffic testing of airport pavements. Full-scale pavement structures and landing gear loads with programmed wander. Opened in 1999. Total construction contract was $21M. $14M from FAA $7M from Boeing Co. under FAA/Boeing CRDA. 5

Heavy Vehicle Simulator Airport Version (HVS-A) Wheel loads - 10,000 to 100,000 lbs. Pavement temperatures up to 150 F Test speeds - 0.17 to 5 mph Single and Dual-Wheel configuration. Single wheel is radial aircraft tires size 52x21.0R22 Dual wheel assembly is designed to accommodate smaller tires (B-737-800) Manufactured in USA by Dynatest. 6

FAA Pavement Computer Programs BAKFAA COMFAA 3.0 FAA PAVEAIR FAARFIELD 1.3 LEAF ProFAA ProGROOVE Layered elastic back-calculation software for FWD Pavement strength reporting (ACN-PCN) Web-based airport pavement management system Pavement thickness design and evaluation Layered elastic analysis program (run from BAKFAA) Airport pavement roughness and profile analysis Groove analysis from longitudinal runway profile All programs are free to download, freely distributable, and available from: www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/naptf/download/ FAA PAVEAIR web site: https://faapaveair.faa.gov/ 7

FAARFIELD 1.4 Beta version now available. Plan to release with next change to AC 150/5320-6E. Many significant changes. Reduces excess design conservatism. New design-based compaction procedure. Incorporates results of fullscale tests at the National Airport Pavement Test Facility. 8

FAARFIELD What Is It? Federal Aviation Rigid and Flexible Iterative Elastic Layered Design FAARFIELD is the new FAA airport pavement thickness design program. FAARFIELD superseded LEDFAA 1.3 as the standard design procedure in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5320-6E. Officially released September 30, 2009. Current version is 1.305 (posted 1/18/11) 9

FAARFIELD 1.4 What s New? FAARFIELD 1.4 has: Completely revised flexible and rigid failure models based on newest full-scale test data. Reduced excess stabilized base thickness requirement. Improved, more accurate 3D finite element model. Completely rewritten concrete overlay design procedure. Automated, software-based compaction criteria. Updated aircraft library aligned with COMFAA 3.0. Support for user-defined gear configurations. Advanced, energy-based asphalt fatigue models. All data files now stored in document directories. 10

Flexible Pavements New thickness designs are generally less conservative than FAARFIELD 1.305 designs for the same inputs. More compatible with COMFAA 1.3 (ACN-PCN method). Conventional Flexible Pavement Comparison Stabilized Flexible Pavement Comparison 11

Flexible Base Thickness The minimum stabilized base thickness is still 12.7 cm (5 inches). No additional stabilized base thickness requirement when improved subbase material (P-209) is used. Additional thickness requirement applies only if standard subbase (P-154) is used. 12

Rigid Pavements New thickness designs are generally less conservative than FAARFIELD 1.305 designs for the same inputs. New calibrations incorporate CC6 failure data. Effect of Subgrade Modulus E Rigid Design Example 13

Improved Rigid Failure Model Sensitivity to factors such as concrete strength, traffic level and subgrade support is similar to current version. 20 18 16 Concrete Thickness, in. 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Effect of Concrete Flex Strength 0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Traffic Factor FAARFIELD 1.305 FAARFIELD 1.41 Effect of Traffic 14

Improved 3D Finite Element Mesh More accurate stress results. Improved infinite foundation model. Still one slab model with assumed 25% load transfer. FAARFIELD 1.305 FAARFIELD 1.41 15

Rigid Overlay Design Procedure Completely rewrote overlay life program module. Eliminated gaps and illogical results, especially for overlays on new or undamaged PCC. FAARFIELD 1.305 FAARFIELD 1.41 16

Automated Compaction Criteria Computes compaction control points for rigid & flexible pavements. 17

Aircraft Libraries Aligned the aircraft libraries in COMFAA and FAARFIELD to the extent possible. Used the most current data from manufacturers. Included new aircraft: A350-900 (Preliminary) B747-8 B787-9 Embraer Fleet 18

Changes to Design Guidance Deployment of FAARFIELD 1.4 in next AC will require changes to parts of AC 150/5320-6E. Partial list of recommended changes: New guidance for applying automated compaction criteria. Changes to HMA fatigue criteria (new RDEC energy model). Revised shoulder design criteria. Modify conversion from CBR to k-value. Modified k-values for reduced subgrade strength (frost design) Guidance for use of external aircraft library. Modify Type A1 (reinforced isolation) joint detail. Update all design examples. 19

FAARFIELD 1.4 System/Software Requirements Minimum Windows XP or higher 2 GHz processor 2 GB RAM 200 MB of available space on hard drive. Recommended Windows 7 or higher* 3 GHz processor 4 GB RAM 64-bit operating system** Notes: *FAARFIELD 1.4 has not been fully tested on Windows 8. **FAARFIELD 1.4 supports 32-bit or 64-bit Windows operating systems. 20

Changes in Data File Storage All data files are now stored in document directories by default. Job files External aircraft library files Output files. C:\Users\[User Name]\Documents\FAARFIELD Previously, data files (including job files) were stored in the program directory. Required unrestricted read/write access for user. Risk of data loss when changing/upgrading PC. 21

External Aircraft Library A new feature allows users to specify arbitrary gear geometries in the external library. Coded as X in the external library. Allows multiple wheel groups to be defined. Uses rewritten internal pass/coverage computation routine. New user guidance for the external library. Wheel Group In this example, the externally defined A380 main gear gives the identical result as the internally stored airplane. 22

Future Developments FAARFIELD 2.0 (Rigid) Multiple-slab mesh. Variable joint spacing. Shear load transfer. Slab curling. Top-down slab stress. New rigid design considers: True slab size. Design thermal gradient. Critical position for full gear. Maximum tensile stress on slab surface. Currently in development. 23

Thank You! Muchas Gracias! http://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/ david.brill@faa.gov Acknowledgments: FAA Airport Technology R&D Branch: Dr. Michel Hovan, Branch Manager; Jeff Gagnon, Airport Pavement Section Manager; Dr. Navneet Garg; Al Larkin; Dr. Charles Ishee; Murphy Flynn; Ryan Rutter; Quinn Jia, Wilfredo Villafane FAA Airport Engineering Division: Doug Johnson; Greg Cline SRA International: Jerry Connelly; Dr. Izydor Kawa; Dr. Qiang Wang; Dr. Yuanguo Chen; Dr. Kairat Tuleubekov, Jeff Stein Gemini: Dr. Hao Yin Consultants: Dr. Edward Guo; Dr. Maria Lopez; Roy McQueen; Dr. Shelley Stoffels 24