2 Stage Ditch. Improving the function of Agriculture drainage ditches

Similar documents
Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Final Report. Dixie Creek Restoration Project. Funded by Plumas Watershed Forum

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Appendix A. Lists of Accomplishments and Project Costs. UMRWD 10 Year Plan Update. Appendix A UPPER MINNESOTA RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Multi-purpose Drainage Management (MDM) Plans

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

Waterway Technote Planning

Living on the Fox River

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

Wetlands in MN: Resource, Regulation, Restoration

Waterway Technote Drains

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE


Riprap-lined Swale (RS)

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

DANIELS RUN STREAM RESTORATION, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA: FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS REPORT

Ouachita River Floodplain Restoration Upper Ouachita NWR, Louisiana

Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

1 Introduction. 1.1 Key objective. 1.2 Why the South Esk

2012 Program Report. Agricultural Group Drainage Program

TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.

Computing Stormwater Runoff Rates and Volumes

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2014 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Water Quality Management

Appendix H Dredging and Stream Channel Restoration

RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Outlet stabilization structure

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

Town of Elkton & Cecil Soil Conservation District Checklist for Joint Agency Review Stormwater Management / Erosion and Sediment Control

REGULATORY GUIDANCE LETTER

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

3.4 DRAINAGE PLAN Characteristics of Existing Drainages Master Drainage System. Section 3: Development Plan BUTTERFIELD SPECIFIC PLAN

Long Term Flood Solutions

Rural Flooding: The Potential Role of Forestry

Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. CIVL 1112 Detention Ponds - Part 1 1/12

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

7.0 Stream Restoration

River Wensum Restoration Strategy Swanton Morley Restoration Scheme Reach 14a

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

13. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION/ RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Recognizing Wetlands. For additional information contact your local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers office. Pitcher plant.

Post-Flood Assessment

P-23 - DEVELOPMENT OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE INSPECTION PROGRAM

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

Scheduling Maintenance for Infiltration Basins and Trenches

SPA Annual Report for 2002 September, 2003 Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Page 125. Evaluation and Recommendations

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology

Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands

Addendum. Use Attainability Analysis for Site Specific Selenium Criteria: Alkali Creek. February 23, 2009

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST


Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

SITE-SPECIFIC BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (SSBMP) PLAN/STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) REVIEW CHECKLIST

Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.

10/4/ slide sample of Presentation. Key Principles to Current Stormwater Management

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Monitoring Riparian Areas With a Camera

Ginger Paige and Nancy Mesner University of Wyoming Utah State University

Total Suspended Solids: The Hows & Whys of Controlling Runoff Pollution

Ch. 15-Restoration Ecology

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

FLOOD PROTECTION BENEFITS

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

RESTORING streams to reduce flood loss

Adopted 9/23/98 CHATTAHOOCHEE CORRIDOR PLAN. The goals of the Chattahoochee Corridor Plan (hereinafter also referred to as the Plan ) are:

Transcription:

2 Stage Ditch Improving the function of Agriculture drainage ditches

2 Stage Ditch Designs

HYDROLOGY in our Environment 1. Hydrology and hydro-modification 2. Stream Channels and natural channel evolution 3. 2-Stage Ditches A design to help protect streams and improve water quality

Presentation Objective Understand the importance and gain an appreciation for why a ditch must be considered as part of a larger system that includes a connection to the adjacent area and the watershed as a whole.

Overall Goal Understanding how constructed channels seek their own stability will allow us to manage and construct ditches that in the long-term might require less maintenance, provide drainage conveyance, reduce sediment export, and better provide an ecological function.

Key Concepts Stable natural streams typically consist of a main channel with a particular width-depth ratio, and a floodplain connection. Stable channels just convey the effective (bankfull) discharge and larger flows widen out onto the floodplain. Bankfull discharge is the discharge which shapes and maintains the channel. In agricultural ditches where flows from subsurface drainage systems dominate, the bankfull discharge occurs more often with increased moisture levels.

Results of Altered Hydrology With changes in hydrology from filling in wetlands, removing trees, increasing the amount of tile drainage, increasing development, placing more impervious surfaces on the soil we have bypassed our natural filters placing more water more quickly into the systems that once were able to handle the loads they were receiving.

Design makes ditch banks and sides slopes more stable than a conventional U or V shaped ditch. Why 2-Stage Ditches? Use existing infrastructure ½ mile of 2 Stage Ditch removes approximately 105,000 pounds of sediment each year Removes Nitrogen and Phosphorus Allows for greater water holding capacity in the ditch

Before and After Shots of a 2-Stage Ditch Ditch Prior to 2-Stage Construction Ditch After 2-Stage Construction

2-Stage Ditch allows added storage capacity to keep water inside the ditch banks and out of the adjacent farm fields.

2-Stage Ditch Benefits 1. Reduced maintenance activity on that section of drain Reduced sedimentation and nutrient movement from construction and maintenance activities 2. Nutrient and sediment removal Deposition on and removal by the Floodplain benches 3. Increased capacity of the ditch system and floodwater retention 4. Helps to mitigate downstream flooding If applied at appropriate scale within a watershed 5. Improves ditch bank stability and reduces bank sloughing 6. Improved in-stream habitat

Biology Begins the Healing Process % Isopods in stream samples in both sections Control section Study Section Pre construction 79 87 Post construction 58 38 Isopods are aquatic crustaceans that are tolerant to water quality degradation Lower % of isopods in the samples leaves room for additional, more tolerant species to make a comeback Decrease in Isopods indicates water quality and habitat improvement and overall biological improvement.

More Biological Data Number of Sunfish Species Found in Samples Control section Study Section Pre-Construction 2006 1 1 2007 1 1 Post - Construction 2008 1 4 2009 1 2 Sunfish are indicative of good water quality and habitat Increase in sunfish species directly after construction of the 2-stage suggests that the water quality and habitat improvements are a result of the 2-stage construction

Isopod % in Macroinvertebrate Studies

Number of Sunfish Species Present

Nitrogen Management Total reach N removal increases with 2 Stage Construction % of N removal is the most when loads are the lowest most effective when coupled with other strategies such as nutrient management. 1800 Total N Removal (g N/day) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Sand Removal FBOM Removal Bench Removal Sep 06 Nov 06 Feb 07 Apr 07 Jun 07 Aug 07 Oct 07 Dec 07 Date Feb 08 Apr 08 Jun 08 Aug 08 Oct 08 Dec 08

Nitrogen Removal Area (m 2 ) Mean N-Removal (g d -1 ) Before After Before After Stream 1,502 1,502 1,931 1,931 Benches 756 3,780 1,870 9,360

Sediment Removal Potential Recent Studies show the removal of 53 tons of Sediment on an annual basis as a result of installation of a half mile of 2-stage ditch Reliability Longevity Maintenance savings Uses existing infrastructure

Channel Evolution

The INS and the OUTS 1. More drainage benefit with moderate topography, too much or too little not as conducive for 2 Stage 2. Too fast of gradient in stream may erode and make less stable, too slow of gradient and the 2 Stage may act more like a wetland 3. Select a project based on NEED erosion, sedimentation issues, or drainage concern; and not mere perception 4. Look for ditches that show signs of natural bench formation, if the ditch is stable leave it alone!!

Design and Engineering Site selection less than 4 tenths slope Conduct survey cross sections of ditch every 100ft noting features and tiles Gage station data and landuse information Import into program/engineer the design Implement the design

Design Resource http://www.dnr.state.oh.us/soilandwat er/water/streammorphology/default/ta bid/9188/default.aspx

When is a good time to construct these sites? It is essential to construct 2 Stage Ditch sites with the following criteria in mind Is a cover crop or other vegetation going to be able to establish quickly on the side slope and benches that are newly constructed What is the soil moisture, is it wet or dry conditions the drier the better Try to avoid times of year that have excessive moisture levels the spring rains and the late fall and winter cold temperatures with threats of both rain and snow Spreading spoil in many cases can be done in the adjacent farm fields planted crops will pose an issue, timing is important if there is corn or beans present, if you are able to plan ahead possibly a wheat crop in the area adjacent to the ditch would give the ability to construct during the growing season.

What it takes to make a project happen Secure a funding source IDEM 319 Grant Community Foundation Dollars LARE funding Mitigation dollars SWCD or RC&D EQIP program (cost share funding) Private funding in coordination with drainage maintenance fund Sit down and discuss project with County Surveyor and NRCS District Conservationist. Find willing landowners and project location Survey the ditch and develop a design Secure necessary permits through DNR, IDEM, US Army Corps. Implement the project

2-Stage Ditches A recipe for Success Figure out the right ditch to work on Showing signs of instability or flashy stream hydrology Headwater streams with little or no woody vegetation Determine flooding frequency for your benches A function of overall ditch hydrology and bench elevation Involve Critical Stakeholders from the beginning County Surveyor / Drainage Board Decision-Makers NRCS / SWCD / Engineers Technical Help Landowners Decision Makers

Funding needs Most 2-Stage Ditch projects will cost around $10/linear foot Funding Drainage Board, Grants, Lake and River Enhancement, Private sources, State and Federal cost share programs Additional expenses 1. Seed for benches and side slopes 2. Erosion control blanket 3. Trucking expense for soil, if it has to be moved off site 4. Fixing of tile outlets 5. Excessively deep ditches and banks All of this increases the expense of construction

Local Support Coordinate with Surveyors and Drainage Boards, collaborate with them on a drain that represents a need and is a problem drain for them due to bank slumping and instability which poses a regular maintenance issue for the county. Work with NRCS District Conservationist (DC) on coordinating designs and surveying, they will also be key on directing you to landowners that may be interested and save you time.

Find the Landowners Topics to discuss 1. Loss of soil is loss of production for them 2. 2-stage will be able to hold more water which results in less ponding in their fields 3. Increased capacity allows better drainage from tiles 4. Increased stability of the ditch which can result in a decrease in their maintenance payment if the county would decide to do so.

Permitting Talk to individuals from Army Corps about the project from the start, then send them results of the survey and detailed information on when you would like construction take place, where at, and specifics about the project including cross section data and soils information Discuss project with IDEM, you may need a permit through them, IDEM, or DNR

Common Scene

Good sites for a 2-Stage Ditch

Sites where a 2-Stage Ditch is not the right choice No added capacity for benches Expensive deep ditch lots of soil to move One side construction possible Too much woody vegetation

Is a 2-Stage Ditch what you need? Is this ditch a frequent problem requiring maintenance and clean-out Is there bank slumping occurring Does the drain need more water holding capacity, is there flooding downstream, high velocities during rains, excessive bank scouring Are there moderate/normal flows in the ditch Is there little or no woody vegetation present If you answerer yes to the majority of these questions, a 2-Stage Ditch may be the tool avoid/control/trap nutrients/sediments

Ditches as a part of a larger system Land-based conservation activities are still important Wetlands and ponding areas strategically placed in a watershed can help alleviate high flows Land-based erosion and sediment control measures and nutrient management strategies are still necessary

Closing Thoughts When managed for water quality, headwater streams and ditches have tremendous potential to improve downstream health of rivers. Many times ditches do not need maintenance performed but are viewed as functioning poorly because they look bad. As stream (ditch) habitat improves, fish and invertebrate communities improve.

Closing Thoughts (continued) Not every mile of every ditch needs to be constructed into a 2-stage channel. Strategically selected sections scattered throughout a watershed will make a difference in stream flows and velocities and enhance channel stability The goal is to install 2-stage ditches at a sufficient scale within a watershed to make a difference in flows, sediment movement, nutrient removal, and to achieve other desired environmental benefits

2-Stage Ditches in Indiana

The 2-stage ditch is the perfect marriage of a long-lasting, sensible conservation strategy with the need for drainage to support agricultural production 2-Stage Ditches and Agriculture

Questions or Concerns Contact The Nature Conservancy at 574-946-7491 or email kwamsley@tnc.org Contact your local NRCS District Conservationist or local Soil and Water District office Contact your County Surveyor