Demographic and Economic Profile. South Carolina. Updated October 2006

Similar documents
Demographic and Economic Profile. Mississippi. Updated May 2006

Demographic and Economic Profile. North Carolina. Updated June 2006

Demographic and Labor Market Profile of the city of Detroit - Michigan

Summary of Employment, Demographics, and Commuting Patterns for Marion County, Florida

A SNAPSHOT OF ALPENA COUNTY

Human Service - Understanding County populations

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q2 2014

Survey of Business Owners Veteran-Owned Firms

SELECTED POPULATION PROFILE IN THE UNITED STATES American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q3 2015

Changes in Self-Employment: 2010 to 2011

Population, by Race and Ethnicity: 2000 and 2011

Population, by Race and Ethnicity: 2000 and 2010

Technical Report 1: Regional Demographic Profile

HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE STATUS American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Rural America At A Glance

Wages of Employed Texans Who Attended Texas Public Schools

Vigo County, Indiana Economic Overview

Community Information Book Update October Social and Demographic Characteristics

Women-Owned Firms in the U.S. A Review of Important Areas of the 2007 U.S. Census Bureau s Survey of Business Owners

Liberty County, Florida

Calgary Small Businesses: Fact Sheet

Submitted by: MARKET STREET SERVICES, INC.

COUNTY PROFILE lauderdale county

REGIONAL SNAPSHOT. SET FOREVER Region, Louisiana

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

Demographic and Economic Data for Ocean Beach Hospital and Medical Clinics in Pacific County, Washington

A Portrait of Seattle s Low-Income Working Population

From Higher Education to Work in West Virginia, 2012

The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight. Carly Fiorina

Small Business Data Assess Your Competition Define Your Customers

COUNTY PROFILE tipton county

Characteristics of Minnesota Business, All Firms Firms with Paid Employees Firms without Paid Employees. Number of Paid Employees

EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

COUNTY PROFILE fayette county

Labor Market Report Spring 2014

Women, Wages and Work A report prepared by the UNC Charlotte Urban Institute for the Women s Summit April 11, 2011

Labor Force Analysis

Selected Socio-Economic Data. Baker County, Florida

Demographic, Socio-Economic, Schooling, and Labor Market Indicators for Year Olds in the City of Hartford

Miami County, Kansas. Employment and Workforce Profile. June Population: 32,822 Median Household Income: $60,622 Area: 590 square miles

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

The traditional work schedule for an

Minorities in Rural America

CHAPTER 2 - Population and Economy

Minorities in Business: A Demographic Review of Minority Business Ownership

St. Louis Region Labor Market Analysis

Demography. Focus on the three contributors to population change: Fertility, mortality, and migration

Monmouth County, NJ Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy:

Dynamics of Minority- Owned Employer Establishments,

Educational Attainment in the United States: 2003

Lloyd Potter is the Texas State Demographer and the Director of the Texas State Data Center based at the University of Texas at San Antonio.

I. HEALTH ASSESSMENT B. SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS

2007 Denver Regional Workforce Gap Analysis. New Picture Here (this is a placeholder)

Summary. Abbas P. Grammy 1 Professor of Economics California State University, Bakersfield

Changing Demographics of Colorado

The Office of Advocacy

Economic Impact of the Queen of Peace Hospital and Related Health Sectors of Scott County

In 2013, 75.9 million workers age 16 and older in the. Characteristics of Minimum Wage Workers, Highlights CONTENTS

REGIONAL QUARTERLY REPORT

Briefing Book- Labor Market Trends in Metro Boston

Competitive Analysis Economic Vision for the City of Burlington

CHAPTER ONE: DEMOGRAPHIC ELEMENT

Northeast Minnesota Labor Market Trends Pathways 2 Postsecondary Summit October 10, 2014

College Park Latitude: Edgewater Dr & W Princeton St, Orlando, FL Longitude: Ring: 1.5 Miles

Haverhill. Change in 58,969 60,953 1,984

Southwest Region Labor Market Analysis

The New indicator of Minnesota - A SimpleYet Complex Idea

Educational Attainment of the Population 25 Years and Over, by Selected Characteristics: 2011

New Mexico. Comparison Profile prepared by the New Mexico Economic Development Department State Data Center. Page 1 of 5

Florida s Families and Children Below the Federal Poverty Level

Home Computers and Internet Use in the United States: August 2000

Race and Ethnicity. Racial and Ethnic Characteristics for Bellevue

Health and Social Services Needs in Whitman County Community Needs Assessment Results General Report COMMUNITY REPORT OF RESULTS

Comparison Profile prepared by the New Mexico Economic Development Department State Data Center. Page 1 of 5

Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060 Population Estimates and Projections

Kentucky Population, Housing, and Jobs: Present and Future

Neighborhood Diversity Characteristics in Iowa and their Implications for Home Loans and Business Investment

Commonwealth of Virginia Job Vacancy Survey

Workforce Overview Greenville, South Carolina

Working Beyond Retirement-Age

The Non-English Speaking Population in Hawaii

Retirement Readiness in New York City: Trends in Plan Sponsorship, Participation and Income Security

USUAL WEEKLY EARNINGS OF WAGE AND SALARY WORKERS FIRST QUARTER 2015

Program Planning Summary For New Program. University of South Carolina Beaufort. Title of Program: Bachelor of Arts Major: Elementary Education

Ohio African Americans

Veteran-owned Businesses and their Owners Data from the Census Bureau s Survey of Business Owners

City of Buffalo Office of Strategic Planning Small Business Survey

The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs

Moving Beyond the Gap

Strategic Planning for Economic Development. Social and Demographic Profile. April-May, 2012

Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2012 Current Population Survey

Fort McPherson. Atlanta, GA MSA. Drivers of Economic Growth February Prepared By: chmuraecon.com

2015 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review. Employment. Unemployment. Economic Regions. Migration. Indigenous People. Industries

Educational Attainment of Veterans: 2000 to 2009

NEW RETAIL SPACE AVAILABLE

Cherokee Office of Economic Development. White Collar Workforce Analysis. April 2011

Demographic and Labor Market Profile: Detroit City

Rhode Island State Profile

These data were developed in cooperation with, and partially funded by, the Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)

Transcription:

Demographic and Economic Profile South Carolina Updated October 2006 Metro and Nonmetro Counties in South Carolina Based on the most recent listing of core based statistical areas by the Office of Management and Budget, 21 counties in South Carolina are part of metropolitan areas, and 14 counties are part of micropolitan areas. The micropolitan category defines counties that include an urban area with a population of 10,000 to 49,999 plus surrounding counties that are linked through commuting ties. These areas often represent important economic and trade centers in rural areas. The remaining 11 counties in South Carolina are considered noncore counties. Using these classifications and the population estimates for 2005, 75.6 percent of South Carolina residents live in metropolitan areas, 18.0 percent live in micropolitan areas and 6.5 percent live in noncore areas. Metro and Nonmetro Counties in South Carolina Metropolitan Counties Nonmetro Counties: Micropolitan Counties Noncore Counties Source: Office of Management and Budget and U.S. Census Bureau Map Prepared by RUPRI 1

Population South Carolina s population in July of 2005 was 4,255,083, up 6.1 percent from the 2000 Census. During the 1990s, the population in South Carolina increased 15.1 percent. Nationally, population increased 13.1 percent during the 1990s and 5.3 percent from April 2000 to July 2005. The population growth in South Carolina metropolitan areas outpaced the nonmetropolitan areas in both time periods. Percent Change in Population Area: 1990-2000 2000-2005 U.S. 13.1% 5.3% South Carolina 15.1% 6.1% Metropolitan 15.8% 7.1% Nonmetropolitan 13.0% 3.0% Micropolitan 14.9% 4.3% Noncore 8.2% -0.5% Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Percent Change, 1990-2000 Population decline Population increase less than 10% Population increase 10% to 29.9% Population increase 30% or more Source: US Census Bureau Census 1990 and 2000 During the 1990s, 4 counties in South Carolina lost population, all of them nonmetro. The fastest growth during this time period was in Beaufort County in the Hilton Head Island-Beaufort Micropolitan Area, with a population increase of 39.9 percent during the decade. Population Percent Change, 2000-2005 Population decline Population increase less than 10% Population increase 10% or more Source: US Census Bureau Population Estimates From 2000 to 2005, 13 counties in South Carolina lost population, 3 metro and 10 nonmetro counties. The fastest growth during this time period was in Dorchester County in the Charleston-North Charleston Metropolitan Area, with a population increase of 17.1 percent during the time period. 2

The Economic Research Service, USDA, classifies counties as population loss counties if they lost population between 1980 and 1990, and between 1990 and 2000. In South Carolina, 3 counties, all nonmetro, are classified as population loss counties. ERS County Typology: Population Loss Counties number of residents declined both between the 1980 and 1990 censuses and between the 1990 and 2000 censuses (ERS, USDA) ERS Population Loss Counties Other Counties Source: Economic Research Service, USDA Race / Ethnicity The population in South Carolina is 68.4 percent white and 29.2 percent African American. Nationally, the population is 80.2 percent white and 12.8 percent African American (2005 Census Bureau population estimates). Racial Composition of the Population in South Carolina and the U.S., 2005 90% 80% U.S. South Carolina 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% White African American Amer. Indian/ Alaska Native Asian Hawaiian/ Pac. Islander Two or More Races Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates 3

Within South Carolina, the metropolitan population is 70.9 percent white and 26.4 percent African American. The micropolitan population is 65.1 percent white and 33.3 percent African American, and the noncore population is 48.1 percent white and 51.1 percent African American. Racial Composition of the Population in South Carolina by CBSA Category, 2005 80% 70% 60% Metropolitan Micropolitan Noncore 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% White African American Amer. Indian/ Alaska Native Asian Hawaiian/ Pac. Islander Two or More Races Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates In 12 South Carolina counties, African Americans make up a majority of total population. Of these 12 counties, 1 is metro and 11 are nonmetro. African American Majority Counties, 2005 African Americans accounted for over 50% of total population Other Counties Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates 4

People of Hispanic origin make up 3.3 percent of South Carolina s population. Many areas have experienced significant growth in the Hispanic population over the past decade and a half. In all but 3 South Carolina counties, the Hispanic population more than doubled between 1990 and 2005. However, in only one county did the Hispanic population account for over 10 percent of total population (Saluda County, 12.5%). Counties in which the Hispanic population more than doubled between 1990 and 2005 Hispanic Growth Counties Hispanic Growth Counties Other Counties Source: U.S. Census Bureau 1990 Census and Population Estimates for 2005 Age The chart below shows the age distribution of the metro and nonmetro populations in South Carolina. The percent of the population in the 20 to 54 age groups is higher in the metro areas, while the percent of the population age 55 and over is higher in the nonmetro areas. 16.0% 14.0% Age Distribution of the Population in South Carolina Metro and Nonmetro Portions, 2005 Metro Nonmetro 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% <5 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-59 60-64 65-74 75-84 85+ Age Group Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Note: Some age groups have been combined 5

The Economic Research Service classifies counties as retirement destination counties based on population change due to inmigration. In South Carolina, 8 counties are classified as retirement destination counties, 3 metro and 5 nonmetro counties. ERS County Typology: Retirement Destination Counties number of residents 60 and older grew by 15 percent or more between 1990 and 2000 due to inmigration (ERS, USDA) ERS Retirement Destination Counties Other Counties Source: Economic Research Service, USDA Educational Attainment The percent of the population age 25 and over that has earned a Bachelor s Degree or higher is 24.4 percent in the U.S. and 20.4 percent in South Carolina. In metro areas of South Carolina, this percentage is 22.0 percent, compared to only 15.6 percent in nonmetro areas. Percent of Population 25 Years and Over with a Bachelor s Degree or Higher, 2000 Less than 10% 10% to 20% Higher than 20% Source: US Census Bureau Census 2000 6

The chart below compares the educational attainment of South Carolina s metro and nonmetro populations. The percent of the population with lower educational attainment (high school degree or lower) is greater in the nonmetro areas, while the percent of the population with high educational attainment (B.S. or higher) is greater in the metro areas. Educational Attainment in South Carolina Metro and Nonmetro Portions, 2000 Graduate/Professional Degree Bachelor's Degree Metro Nonmetro Associate Degree Some college, no degree High school graduate 9th-12th grade, no diploma Less than 9th grade 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Percent of Population Age 25+ The Economic Research Service classifies counties as low education counties if 25 percent or more of residents 25-64 years old had neither a high school diploma nor GED in 2000. In South Carolina, 22 counties are classified as low education counties, 5 metro and 17 nonmetro counties. ERS County Typology: Low Education Counties 25 percent or more of residents 25-64 years old had neither a high school diploma nor GED in 2000 (ERS, USDA) ERS Low Education Counties Other Counties Source: Economic Research Service, USDA 7

Health Services The designation of areas or populations as medically underserved is based on an index of four variables - the ratio of primary care physicians per 1,000 population, the infant mortality rate, the percent of the population with incomes below the poverty level, and the percent of the population age 65 and over (Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS). Within South Carolina, several areas of the state are considered medically underserved, shown in the map below. Medically Underserved Areas in South Carolina Medically Underserved Area Medically Underserved Population Data Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS Map created by RUPRI Community Information Resource Center Interactive Map Room: http://circ.rupri.orgc Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) are those areas that may have shortages of primary medical care, dental or mental health providers and may be urban or rural areas, population groups, or medical or other public facilities (Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS). Within South Carolina, several areas in the state are designated as primary care HPSAs for the total or low income population. Health Professional Shortage Areas (Primary Care) in South Carolina Total Population Low Income Population Data Source: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS Map created by RUPRI Community Information Resource Center Interactive Map Room: http://circ.rupri.org 8

Poverty The poverty rate in South Carolina in 2003 was 13.8 percent, compared to 12.5 percent for the U.S. (Census Bureau estimates). Within South Carolina, the 2003 poverty rate ranged from 10.5 percent in Lexington County to 28.4 percent in Allendale County. Percent of Population in Poverty, 2003 Less than 15.0% 15.0% to 19.9% 20.0% to 24.9% 25.0% or more Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates The Economic Research Service classifies counties as persistent poverty counties if they experienced poverty rates of 20 percent or higher in each census from 1970 through 2000. Nationally, there are 386 persistent poverty counties, and 12 are located in South Carolina. All 12 South Carolina persistent poverty counties are nonmetro. ERS County Typology: Persistent Poverty Counties 20 percent or more of residents were poor as measured by each of the last 4 censuses, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000 (ERS, USDA) ERS Persistent Poverty Counties Other Counties Source: Economic Research Service, USDA 9

Per Capita Income Per capita income in South Carolina has lagged behind national per capita income over the past several decades. In 2004, per capita income in South Carolina was $27,185, compared to $33,050 for the U.S. $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 Per Capita Income in South Carolina and the U.S., 1969-2004 ($2004) U.S. South Carolina $5,000 $- 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Source: Bureau of Ecoomic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System Nonmetro per capita income in South Carolina has lagged behind metro per capita income over the past several decades. In 2004, metro per capita income was $28,056, compared to $24,524 in nonmetro areas. $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 Per Capita Income in South Carolina Metro and Nonmetro Portions, 1969-2004 ($2004) Metro Nonmetro $5,000 $- 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Source: Bureau of Ecoomic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System The per capita income gap is measured with nonmetro per capita income as a percent of metro per capita income. In South Carolina, the gap has remained relatively steady over the past several decades. In 2004, nonmetro per capita income was 87.4 percent of metro per capita income. 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% Per Capita Income Gap in South Carolina: Nonmetro PCI as a percent of Metro PCI, 1969-2004 50.0% 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Source: Bureau of Ecoomic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System 10

Within South Carolina, 2004 per capita income ranged from $17,991 in Allendale County to $36,570 in Beaufort County. Seven counties in South Carolina, all nonmetro, had per capita income less than $20,000 in 2004. Per Capita Income, 2004 Less than $20,000 $20,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $29,999 $30,000 to $34,999 $35,000 or more Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System Transfer payments include retirement and disability payments, social security benefits, public assistance, and medical benefits. In South Carolina, 9 counties incomes rely significantly on transfer payments. In these counties, all nonmetro, transfer payments account for over 30 percent of total personal income in the county. High Transfers Counties Counties in which over 30% of total personal income was from transfer payments in 2004 High Transfers Counties Other Counties Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System 11

Employment In 2004, government and government enterprises accounted for the largest shares of employment in South Carolina (16.4%) and the U.S. (13.9%). Retail trade was the second largest employment sector in both South Carolina (12.1%) and the U.S. (11.0%). Employment by Industry in South Carolina and the U.S., 2004 Farm Forestry, fishing, related activities Mining Utilities Construction Manufacturing Wholesale trade Retail Trade Transportation & warehousing Information Finance & insurance Real estate & rental & leasing Professional & technical services Management of companies & enterprises Administrative & waste services Educational services Health care & social assistance Arts, entertainment, & recreation Accommodation & food services Other services, except public administration Government & government enterprises South Carolina U.S. Source: BEA, REIS 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% The ERS Economic Typology classifies counties into one of five industry categories of specialization or as nonspecialized. The map to the right shows the classification of South Carolina counties by this typology, illustrating the importance of manufacturing throughout the state. South Carolina Counties by ERS Economic Typology Farming Mining Manufacturing Government Services Nonspecialized Source: Economic Research Service, USDA 12

Unemployment The unemployment rate in South Carolina in 2005 was 6.8 percent, compared to 5.1 percent nationally. Within South Carolina, the unemployment rate ranged from 4.5 percent in Beaufort County to 13.8 percent in Marion County. The unemployment rate exceeded 10 percent in 10 South Carolina counties, all nonmetro. Unemployment Rate, 2005 Less than 5.0% 5.0% to 7.4% 7.5% to 9.9% 10.0% or more Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics The Economic Research Service classifies counties as low employment counties if less than 65 percent of residents 21-64 years old were employed in 2000. In South Carolina, 7 counties, all nonmetro, are classified as low employment counties. less than 65 percent of residents 21-64 years old were employed in 2000 (ERS, USDA) ERS County Typology: Low Employment Counties ERS Low Employment Counties Other Counties Source: Economic Research Service, USDA 13

Agriculture Agriculture plays an important role in South Carolina s economy. The map below shows the value of agricultural products sold in 2002 in South Carolina counties. In 12 counties the value was over $50 million. Market Value of Agricultural Products Sold, 2002 Less than $10M $10M to $49.9M $50M or more Source: Census of Agriculture, 2002 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Average farm size in South Carolina is 197 acres, and 8.3 percent of farms in the state are 500 acres or larger. Percent of Farms in County that are 500 Acres or Larger, 2002 Less than 10% 10% to 19.9% 20% or more Source: Census of Agriculture, 2002 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service 14

Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship is an important component to economic development today. Unfortunately, data that allow us to measure entrepreneurial activity and trends is difficult to ascertain, particularly at the county level. The 2004 CFED Development Report Card for the States rates each state on its entrepreneurial energy, evaluating the extent to which new firms are generated and whether they CFED Development Report Card for the States Entrepreneurial Energy Grade A B C D F Not shown: Alaska (C) and Hawaii (D) Source: CFED are contributing to employment growth. While this is a state-level ranking, it provides useful insight as to how a state is performing. South Carolina s ranking is C. As mentioned, county level indicators of entrepreneurship are difficult to ascertain, but a good indicator is the proportion of workers that are self employed. The map below shows self employed workers as a percent of nonfarm private employment in the county. Entrepreneurship in South Carolina: Self Employed as a Percent of Nonfarm Private Employment, 2004 Less than 10% 10% to 19.9% 20% or more Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Nonemployer Statistics and Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System Map Prepared by RUPRI 15

Data Sources and References Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System http://www.bea.gov/bea/regional/reis/ Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics http://www.bls.gov/lau/home.htm CFED Development Report Card for the States http://drc.cfed.org/ Economic Research Service, USDA, 2004 County Typology http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/typology/ Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Designations of Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Areas and Populations http://www.bhpr.hrsa.gov/shortage/ National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA. 2002 Census of Agriculture http://www.nass.usda.gov/census_of_agriculture/index.asp Office of Management and Budget, Statistical Area Definitions and Guidance on Their Uses http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/bulletins/fy05/b05-02.html RUPRI Community Information Resource Center Interactive Map Room http://circ.rupri.org/ U.S. Census Bureau Census 2000 http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html Population Estimates http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php Metropolitan and Micropolitan Area Classifications http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metrodef.html Nonemployer Statistics http://www.census.gov/epcd/nonemployer/ Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/saipe.html 16

For Comments and Questions on this Report: Kathleen K. Miller RUPRI Program Director (573) 882-5098 miller@rupri.org Contact RUPRI Rural Policy Research Institute Truman School of Public Affairs University of Missouri-Columbia 214 Middlebush Hall Columbia, MO 65211 (573) 882-0316 Voice [573] 884=5310 FAX http://www.rupri.org 17