Carroll Springs Project:

Similar documents
Fracture Technologies 9. Frac Candidate Selection

Well Testing. Buildup Tests Drill Stem Test Production History and Decline Analysis

Perforating Basics. How the perforating processes work. George E. King Engineering GEKEngineering.com 3/14/2009 1

Productivity Optimization of Oil Wells Using a New 3D Finite-Element Wellbore Inflow Model and Artificial Neural Network

Microseismic Fracture Mapping Results in the Woodford Shale

Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests (DFIT ) in Ultra Low Permeability Formations

Modelling and Simulation Multi-stage Fracturing Propagation in Tight Reservoir through Horizontal Well

A Review of Gel Polymer Treatments in the Arbuckle Formation of Kansas

ADX ENERGY. Sidi Dhaher Well test Briefing Live Webcast, 4 July Wolfgang Zimmer, Paul Fink

Geomechanical Effects of Waterflooding

Worst Case Discharge (WCD)

The Debrosse Memorial Report 2014 Oil & Gas Activity in Ohio

Is Practical Reservoir Simulation an Oxymoron?

Introduction of Gravel Pack with Inflow Control Completion in Brazil

Shale Field Development Workflow. Ron Dusterhoft

SPE Applying Hydraulic Fracture Diagnostics to Optimize Stimulations in the Woodford Shale

Status of existing and possible new production in Greece. S. Xenopoulos, N. Roussos, Hellenic Petroleum S.A., Athens, Greece

Exploring Success in Shale Zhiyong Zhao, Vice President, Hess Corp

Graduate Courses in Petroleum Engineering

BS PROGRAM IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING (VERSION 2010) Course Descriptions

Available online at Petroleum & Coal 55 (4) , 2013

Journal of Petroleum Research & Studies. Analytical and Numerical Analysis for Estimation. Hydrocarbon in Place for Fauqi Oil Field

HDD High Definition Data. defining a new standard for Open Hole, Cased Hole & Production Logging

OFFSHORE FIELD DEVELOPMENT

RULE 37 CASE NO DISTRICT 02

Mini frac (DFIT)Analysis for Unconventional Reservoirs using F.A.S.T. WellTest

HiWAY: The Quest For Infinite Conductivity Innovation for a step-change in Hydraulic Fracturing

Unconventional Challenges: Integrated Analysis for Unconventional Resource Development Robert Gales VP Resource Development

Formation Damage Effects and Overview

NOVEMBER 2015 UPDATE

Petrel TIPS&TRICKS from SCM

Pressure Coring, A New Tool for Unconventional Oil & Gas Characterization. Matt Bjorum Global Product Line Manager

I N T E R I M R E P O R T

DynaSlot System. 360 Certainty Well Abandonment

Forward-Looking Statements

Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: A 2,600 Well Study of Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) 2015 Update

Renewable Energy from Depleted Oil Fields using Geothermal Energy. Ramsey Kweik Southern Methodist University Geothermal Lab

4D reservoir simulation workflow for optimizing inflow control device design a case study from a carbonate reservoir in Saudi Arabia

Oil and Gas Terms. Anticline: An arch of stratified rock layers that may form a trap for hydrocarbons.

SPE Copyright 1999, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.

Forward-Looking Statements

Solving challenges. Drill out solutions Package

THE USE OF WATER FLOODING TO IMPROVE OIL RECOVERY BY USING RESERVOIR SIMULATION

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Workgroup Markup RRC Draft

CASE STUDIES: MARCELLUS, EAGLE FORD, NIOBRARA

Well deliverability test of Kailastila gas field (Well no. KTL-01, KTL-02)

Eagle Ford Shale Exploration Regional Geology meets Geophysical Technology. Galen Treadgold Bruce Campbell Bill McLain

Monterey Shale Potential

SPE Copyright 2004, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.

Argentina Tataru*, Marcel Adrian Piteiu*, Dan-Paul Stefanescu*, Ioana Vlasin*

DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Graduate Program (Version 2002)

Runnels County, Texas

EnerCom The Oil & Gas Conference. An Integrated Workflow for Unconventional Reservoirs

Economics of Coalbed Methane Recovery

Waterflooding. A Tried and True Technique for Secondary Oil Recovery. Houston Bar Association Oil, Gas and Mineral Law Section March 26, 2013

Step Rate Testing: Determining Fracture Pressure for Injection Wells 2016 UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL CONFERENCE DENVER, CO LEWIS WANDKE, PE

Reservoir Characterization and Initialization at Little Mitchell Creek

The ever increasing importance of reservoir geomechanics

For personal use only

Low Risk Glacier Montney Development, Strong Balance Sheet & Hedging Program Supports Profitable & Sustainable Growth

Fiber Optics in a Bakken Multi-Stage Fractured Well. Montana Tech 2011 SPE Drilling Symposium Presented by: Chelsea Kadler

Upstream Developments Generate Growing Hydrocarbon Gas Liquids Supply! Alan Farquharson, SVP - Reservoir Engineering & Economics!

May October Acquiring, Exploring and Developing Oil and Gas Projects in North and South America TSX.V: PTP

HPHT CAPPING STACKS AND NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR SUBSEA WELL CONTROL. December 3, 2014 Presenter: Mike Cargol

FracPT FZE. Stimulation Training Courses & Consulting.

Figure 2-10: Seismic Well Ties for Correlation and Modelling. Table 2-2: Taglu Mapped Seismic Horizons

Well Integrity Basics, Prevention, Monitoring, Red Flags & Repair Options

A new approach for dynamic optimization of water flooding problems

HiWAY. Putting Your Production into the Fast Lane. Place Date

Emerging Oil and Gas Development in Northwestern New Mexico HORIZONTAL GALLUP / MANCOS PLAY

Andrew K. Wojtanowicz* DOWN-HOLE WATER SINK TECHNOLOGY FOR WATER CONING CONTROL IN WELLS

Overview of the Hugoton Asset Management Project (HAMP) southwest Kansas and Oklahoma Panhandle

SPCC Plan - Calculation Guidance

SUSTAINABLE CONVENTIONAL RESOURCE COMPANY TSX: SGY DECEMBER, 2015

Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Tight Oil: Lessons Learned from Pilot Tests in the Bakken

PETROMINERALES ANNOUNCES ANOTHER RECORD QUARTER, PRODUCTION INCREASES AND NEW CORCEL DISCOVERY

Forward-Looking Statements

6 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0PD, England,UK

Creating a Sustainable Business

Rex Energy Corporate Presentation. January 2016

TD Calgary Energy Conference Stampede 2012

Drilling Introduction SCA, LLC

Shale Gas Production Decline Trend Comparison Over Time and Basins Jason Baihly, Raphael Altman, Raj Malpani, and Fang Luo, Schlumberger

Treatment, Beneficial Use and Management of CBM Produced Water Industry Perspective

Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2015 Global Energy Conference

RPSEA Sub contract Number: Abhishek Gaurav. University of Texas at Austin

CHAPTER 8, GEOMETRY. 4. A circular cylinder has a circumference of 33 in. Use 22 as the approximate value of π and find the radius of this cylinder.

October Guatemalan Oil Production and Exploration

Copper and Copper Alloy Tube, Pipe and Fittings

SUSTAINABLE CONVENTIONAL RESOURCE COMPANY TSX: SGY FEBRUARY, 2016

Study Assesses Shale Decline Rates

Understanding Porosity and Permeability using High-Pressure MICP Data: Insights into Hydrocarbon Recovery*

Introduction. The following is an outline of the contents of this paper: Definition of Artificial Lift Page 2. How an Oil Well is Produced Page 2

Range Resources Corporation Company Presentation April 2013

Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Third Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call October 23, 2014

Shale & Tight Reservoir Simulation. Jim Erdle - VP/USA & LA OCTOBER 2012

Introduction: Basic Well Completion Concepts

energy ltd February 2016 TSX: CQE

APPLICATION OF TRANSIENT WELLBORE SIMULATOR TO EVALUATE DELIVERABILITY CURVE ON HYPOTHETICAL WELL-X

Transcription:

Carroll Springs Project: A 12, Acre Rodessa (Gloyd) Coquina Limestone Oil Reservoir Well Evaluation Model Nodal Analysis of Typical Existing Completions vs. Improved Vertical and Short Lateral Wells

A fractured vertical well similar to those drilled 2 years ago, can be duplicated today at a cost of $1.7 million and a payout of 28 months. A horizontal well with multi-stage frac will cost approximately $3.7 million; and payout in 4 to 8 months depending on frac proppant compaction.

Coquina Prospect A Vertical and Horizontal Well Exploitation/Development Plan for the Coquina (Rodessa) Formation, in Henderson County, Texas Computer Simulation - Existing fractured vertical well performance is correlated to actual initial production rate and average initial monthly production rates. Simulation of 1 and 3 horizontal wells in the same Coquina (Rodessa) formation with multi-stage fracturing is demonstrated. Horizontal wells have approximately nine (9) times higher initial production rates Increased drainage areas are 125% for 1 HZ wells, and 165% for 3 HZ wells. This increases the EUR 125% (1 HZ) and 165% (3 HZ) over the equivalent vertical well in the Coquina (Rodessa). All example well simulations used the actual vertical well experience of initial average barrels of oil per day for the first month equal to 35% of the initial test rate (IP). Similar declines were created in HZ well simulations to match the drainage areas and corresponding EUR s.

Actual Carroll Springs Well FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) 5 4 3 2 1 Inflow/Outflow Plot Vertical completion with Frac Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.75 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 1. % GOR = 14. scf/bbl Pbp = 5267.8 psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 1. psig TVD = 9994. ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/2.375/ 998 Csg/4.5/185 Reservoir Data : Pr = 44. psig BHT = 262. deg F Perm = 1.25 md Re = 216.4 ft Bit Size= 7.75 in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Hmeas = 6.4 ft Segregated Flow Kw/Ko =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 4. ft Frac Wid= 24. in Kfrac = 2. md Porosity =.13 CARROLL CREEK AREA TYPICAL WELL MODEL AS CATFISH CREEK #1 WITH FRAC 5 TO 1 LBS FOR 4 TO 8 FT FRAC LENGTH 5 1 FLOW RATE (bbl/d) 15 IP = 155 BBLS/D 2 Base case data: 1.25 md, 8 ft section, (6.4 net) poro = 13% InflowPres = 44 InflowPres = 35 InflowPres = 25 InflowPres = 15 OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. Results of frac with 5, lb sand for 4 ft ½ length (wing length)

Actual Carroll Springs Well Radetsky (vert) - Tejas 1, Present Cuml = 131, bbls EUR = 3, bbls Economic Limit: 3/295 Economic Life: 996 mo Future Net Revenue: $1,673,456 Present Worth: $2,911,849 Rate of Return: >1 % Return on Invest:. Payout Date: n/a Daily Rate 1 1 Oil at Effective Date: 439 bbl Oil at Economic Limit: 15 bbl Rem Oil (Decline): 169,891 bbl Ult Oil (Decline): 34,883 bbl Oil Decline at Eff Date: 2.13 % Cum Oil at Eff Date: 134,992 bbl Gas at Effective Date: mcf Gas at Economic Limit: mcf Rem Gas (Decline): mcf Ult Gas (Decline): 265,336 mcf Gas Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Gas at Eff Date: 265,336 mcf 1 1992 1996 2 24 28 212 216 22 224 228 232 Time Results of frac with 5, lb sand for 4 ft ½ length (wing length) Water at Effective Date: 48 bbl Water at Economic Limit: 1 bbl Rem Water (Decline): 19,514 bbl Ult Water (Decline): 34,56 bbl

Expected Results, New Vertical Well Carroll Springs ETL 1 vert - Tejas Carroll Springs ETL 1 vert - Tejas Daily Rate 1, 1 1 CapEx = $1.7mm 6 = Avg BOPD EUR = 3, Bbls First month flow rate = 35% of IP, initial prod rate. Decline curve mimics the Radetsky #1 Economic Limit: 8/297 Economic Life: 125 mo Future Net Revenue: $6,377,688 Present Worth: $1,675,86 Rate of Return: 34.57 % Return on Invest: 4.87 Payout Date: 1/214 Oil at Effective Date: bbl Oil at Economic Limit: 166 bbl Rem Oil (Decline): 3,525 bbl Ult Oil (Decline): 35,25 bbl Oil Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Oil at Eff Date: 4,5 bbl Gas at Effective Date: mcf Gas at Economic Limit: mcf Rem Gas (Decline): 13,8 mcf Ult Gas (Decline): 16,68 mcf Gas Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Gas at Eff Date: 3,6 mcf 1 211 213 215 217 219 221 223 225 227 229 231 Time Water at Effective Date: bbl Water at Economic Limit: 32 bbl Rem Water (Decline): 1,294 bbl Ult Water (Decline): 1,794 bbl $9 oil, $3.25 gas, 77% NRI. 7/212 start date, 28 mo. payout.

FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) Carroll Springs Well, Large Frac 5 4 3 2 1 Inflow/Outflow Plot Vertical completion with large Frac Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.75 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 1. % GOR = 1. scf/bbl Pbp = 3819.3 psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 1. psig TVD = 9994. ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/2.375/ 998 Csg/4.5/185 Reservoir Data : Pr = 46. psig BHT = 239.9 deg F Perm = 1.25 md Re = 216.4 ft Bit Size= 7.75 in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Hmeas = 6.4 ft Segregated Flow Kw/Ko =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 8. ft Frac Wid= 24. in Kfrac = 2. md Porosity =.13 CARROLL SPRINGS CATFISH RANCH #1 DATA VERTICAL WELL FRAC 1 LBS FOR 8 FT FRAC 1/2 LENGTH(WING) 5 1 15 FLOW RATE (bbl/d) InflowPres = 46 InflowPres = 35 InflowPres = 25 InflowPres = 15 OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. 2 Results of frac with 1, lb sand for 8 ft ½ length (wing length) 25 IP = 28 BBLS/D 3 Base case data: 1.25 md, 8 ft section, (6.4 net) poro = 13%

Expected Results, New Vertical Well, LF Carroll Springs ETL 2 vert - Tejas Carroll Springs ETL 1 vert - Tejas Daily Rate 1, 1 1 CapEx = $1.8mm Avg BOPD= 95 BOPD EUR = 3, Bbls First month flow rate = 35% of IP, initial prod rate. Larger frac, higher decline rate Economic Limit: 11/274 Economic Life: 752 mo Future Net Revenue: $8,946,795 Present Worth: $3,864,576 Rate of Return: 8.177 % Return on Invest: 6.11 Payout Date: 8/213 Oil at Effective Date: bbl Oil at Economic Limit: 167 bbl Rem Oil (Decline): 296,825 bbl Ult Oil (Decline): 31,325 bbl Oil Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Oil at Eff Date: 4,5 bbl Gas at Effective Date: mcf Gas at Economic Limit: mcf Rem Gas (Decline): 174,6 mcf Ult Gas (Decline): 177,66 mcf Gas Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Gas at Eff Date: 3,6 mcf 1 211 213 215 217 219 221 223 225 227 229 231 Time Water at Effective Date: bbl Water at Economic Limit: 57 bbl Rem Water (Decline): 11,414 bbl Ult Water (Decline): 11,914 bbl $9 oil, $3.25 gas, 77% NRI. 7/212 start date, 14 mo. payout.

Porosity feet = 8 Porosity feet = 8 Area= 288 acres Area= 361 acres I.P. in Hz Well 9 times greater Drainage area.25 x greater Therefore a short HZ well gains NPV advantage over vertical wells Scale: 1 = 1

FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) Carroll Springs HZ Well, 5 Stage Frac 5 4 3 2 1 1 Hz Well Completion with Frac 2 Darcy Perm Frac Proppant 4 PSI Pwh Inflow/Outflow Plot 7 casing, 3 ½ tubing For high flow rates Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.75 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 1. % GOR = 14. scf/bbl Pbp = 5267.8 psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 1. psig TVD = 9995.7 ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/3.5/124 Csg/7./11275 Reservoir Data : Pr = 44. psig BHT = 262. deg F Perm = 1. md Lx = 5. ft Ly = 4. ft Gas Cap =NO Bit Size= 8.75 in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Xw = 25. ft Yw = 2. ft Zw = 3.2 ft Segregated Flow Kw/Ko =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Kx/Ky = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 4. ft Frac Wid= 12. in Kfrac = 2. md Porosity =.12 GOODE Pres Drop =NO HzWell Len= 1. ft Shot Den = 6. spf Perf Dia =.48 in Gun Phasing = 9 deg Perf Len = 38. in Kc/Kf =.3 5 1 FLOW RATE (bbl/d) InflowPres = 44 InflowPres = 35 InflowPres = 25 InflowPres = 15 OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. 15 IP = 155 BBLS/D 2 12% porosity, 1md permeability Perforating 5 2 intervals Fracture Stimulating each With 5, lbs 1 FT Hz WELL WITH 5-5, LB SAND FRAC STAGES FOR 4 ½ LENGTH (WING) FRACTURES, 1% OF HZ PERF D

Expected Results, 1 HZ well, ETL 1H 5 stg 1 frac 5 - Tejas Carroll Springs ETL 1H 5 - Tejas Daily Rate 1, 1 1 CapEx = $3.7mm EUR = 375, Bbls First month flow rate = 35% of WEM nodal analysis initial prod. Rate (IP). IP = 9 times greater than vert well, and EUR is 25% greater than vert well based on increased drainage area. Economic Limit: 7/229 Economic Life: 28 mo Future Net Revenue: $19,64,68 Present Worth: $14,111,37 Rate of Return: >1 % Return on Invest: 6.3 Payout Date: 11/212 Oil at Effective Date: bbl Oil at Economic Limit: 157 bbl Rem Oil (Decline): 345,194 bbl Ult Oil (Decline): 375,194 bbl Oil Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Oil at Eff Date: 3, bbl Gas at Effective Date: mcf Gas at Economic Limit: mcf Rem Gas (Decline): 395,12 mcf Ult Gas (Decline): 419,12 mcf Gas Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Gas at Eff Date: 24, mcf 1 211 213 215 217 219 221 223 225 227 229 231 Time Water at Effective Date: bbl Water at Economic Limit: 87 bbl Rem Water (Decline): 34,152 bbl Ult Water (Decline): 34,352 bbl $9 oil, $3.25 gas, 77% NRI. 7/212 start date, 5 mo. payout.

FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) Carroll Springs HZ Well, 15 Stage Frac 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 FLOW RATE Inflow/Outflow Plot 3 Hz Well Completion with 15 Stage Frac 2 Darcy Perm Frac Proppant (bbl/d) 7 casing, 3 ½ tubing for high flow rates 4 5 IP = 43 BBLS/D InflowXf = 1. InflowXf = 2. InflowXf = 4. OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. 6 Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.65 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 12. % GOR = 14. scf/bbl Pbp = 5728. psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 2. psig TVD = 9274. ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/3.5/1274 Csg/4.5/13274 Csg/./1529 Reservoir Data : Pr = 4627.2 psig BHT = 239.9 deg F Perm = 1. md Lx = 72. ft Ly = 42. ft Gas Cap =NO Bit Size= 6.125 in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Xw = 36. ft Yw = 21. ft Zw = 3.2 ft Fractional Flow kro =. krw =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Kx/Ky = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 4. ft Frac Wid= 12. in Kfrac = 2. md Porosity =.12 GOODE Pres Drop =NO HzWell Len= 3. ft Shot Den = 6. spf Perf Dia =.48 in Gun Phasing = 9 deg Perf Len = 38. in Kc/Kf =.3 12% porosity, 1md permeability Perforating 15 2 intervals Fracture Stimulating each With 5, lbs 3 FT Hz WELL WITH 15-5, LB SAND FRAC STAGES FOR 4 ½ LENGTH (WING) FRACTURES, 1% PERF S

Carroll Springs HZ Well, 15 Stage Frac FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) 5 4 3 2 1 5 1 15 FLOW RATE Inflow/Outflow Plot 3 Hz Well Completion with 15 Stage Frac 1 md Perm Frac Proppant 2 (bbl/d) 7 casing, 3 ½ tubing For high flow rates 25 3 IP = 25 BBLS/D InflowXf = 4. InflowXf = 2. InflowXf = 1. OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. 35 Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.65 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 12. % GOR = 14. scf/bbl Pbp = 5728. psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 2. psig TVD = 9274. ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/3.5/1274 Csg/4.5/13274 Csg/./1529 Reservoir Data : Pr = 4627.2 psig BHT = 239.9 deg F Perm = 1. md Lx = 72. ft Ly = 42. ft Gas Cap =NO Bit Size= 6.125 in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Xw = 36. ft Yw = 21. ft Zw = 3.2 ft Fractional Flow kro =. krw =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Kx/Ky = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 4. ft Frac Wid= 12. in Kfrac = 1. md Porosity =.12 GOODE Pres Drop =NO HzWell Len= 3. ft Shot Den = 6. spf Perf Dia =.48 in Gun Phasing = 9 deg Perf Len = 38. in Kc/Kf =.3 12% porosity, 1md permeability Perforating 15 2 intervals Fracture Stimulating each With 5, lbs 3 FT Hz WELL WITH 15-5, LB SAND FRAC STAGES FOR 4 ½ LENGTH (WING) FRACTURES, 1% of HZ PERF D

Expected Results, 3 HZ well, 15 stg frac 1, 1, ETL 1H 3 15 - Tejas Carroll Springs ETL 1H 3 15 - Tejas CapEx = $4.7mm EUR = 457, Bbls Economic Limit: 5/222 Economic Life: 122 mo Future Net Revenue: $16,453,13 Present Worth: $13,252,521 Rate of Return: >1 % Return on Invest: 4.16 Payout Date: 11/212 Daily Rate 1 1 Oil at Effective Date: bbl Oil at Economic Limit: 199 bbl Rem Oil (Decline): 427,972 bbl Ult Oil (Decline): 457,972 bbl Oil Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Oil at Eff Date: 3, bbl Gas at Effective Date: mcf Gas at Economic Limit: mcf Rem Gas (Decline): 53,937 mcf Ult Gas (Decline): 554,937 mcf Gas Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Gas at Eff Date: 24, mcf Water at Effective Date: bbl Water at Economic Limit: 55 bbl Rem Water (Decline): 186,942 bbl Ult Water (Decline): 187,142 bbl Water Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Water at Eff Date: 2 bbl Inj at Effective Date: bbl Inj at Economic Limit: bbl Rem Inj (Decline): bbl Ult Inj (Decline): bbl Inj Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Inj at Eff Date: bbl 1 211 213 215 217 219 221 223 225 227 229 231 Time $9 oil, $3.25 gas, 77% NRI. 7/212 start date, 5 mo. payout.

Carroll Springs HZ Well, 15 Stage Frac FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) 5 4 3 2 1 3 Hz Well Completion with 15 Stage Frac 5 2 PSI Pwh FLOW RATE Inflow/Outflow Plot 1 md Perm Frac Proppant (bbl/d) 7 casing, 3 ½ tubing For high flow rates 1 IP = 12 BBLS/D InflowXf = 4. InflowXf = 2. InflowXf = 1. OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. 15 Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.65 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 12. % GOR = 14. scf/bbl Pbp = 5728. psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 2. psig TVD = 9274. ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/3.5/1274 Csg/4.5/13274 Csg/./1529 Reservoir Data : Pr = 4627.2 psig BHT = 239.9 deg F Perm = 1. md Lx = 72. ft Ly = 42. ft Gas Cap =NO Bit Size= 6.125 in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Xw = 36. ft Yw = 21. ft Zw = 3.2 ft Fractional Flow kro =. krw =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Kx/Ky = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 4. ft Frac Wid= 12. in Kfrac = 1. md Porosity =.12 GOODE Pres Drop =NO HzWell Len= 3. ft Shot Den = 6. spf Perf Dia =.48 in Gun Phasing = 9 deg Perf Len = 38. in Kc/Kf =.3 12% porosity, 1md permeability Perforating 15 2 intervals Fracture Stimulating each With 5, lbs 3 FT Hz WELL WITH 15-5, LB SAND FRAC STAGES FOR 4 ½ LENGTH (WING) FRACTURES, 1% of HZ PERF D

1, ETL 1H 3 15 1md loperm - Tejas CapEx = $4.7mm EUR = 457, Bbls Economic Limit: 11/244 Economic Life: 392 mo Future Net Revenue: $2,62,545 Present Worth: $12,852,626 Rate of Return: >1 % Return on Invest: 4.17 Payout Date: 4/213 Daily Rate 1 1 Oil at Effective Date: bbl Oil at Economic Limit: 77 bbl Rem Oil (Decline): 426,876 bbl Ult Oil (Decline): 456,876 bbl Oil Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Oil at Eff Date: 3, bbl Gas at Effective Date: mcf Gas at Economic Limit: mcf Rem Gas (Decline): 448,95 mcf Ult Gas (Decline): 472,95 mcf Gas Decline at Eff Date:. % Cum Gas at Eff Date: 24, mcf 1 211 214 217 22 223 226 229 232 235 238 241 Time Water at Effective Date: bbl Water at Economic Limit: bbl Rem Water (Decline): 27,212 bbl Ult Water (Decline): 27,412 bbl $9 oil, $3.25 gas, 77% NRI. 7/212 start date, 9 mo. payout.

Weight of Proppant versus Fracture Dimensions Height of pay section 6 feet Red numbers are "input data". Frac sand weight 17 lbs per cu.ft. Fracture half length (wing length) feet----> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ellipse Shape Fracture, Coned Width at Perfs Lbs of Proppant - for frac diameter, and frac 1/2 length Cone factor =.25 12 inches 12,69 25,219 37,828 5,437 63,46 75,656 88,265 1,874 24 inches 25,219 5,437 75,656 1,874 126,93 151,311 176,53 21,749 36 inches 37,828 75,656 113,484 151,311 189,139 226,967 264,795 32,623 48 inches 5,437 1,874 151,311 21,749 252,186 32,623 353,6 43,497 6 inches 63,46 126,93 189,139 252,186 315,232 378,278 441,325 54,371 72 inches 75,656 151,311 226,967 32,623 378,278 453,934 529,59 65,246 Rectangular Shape Frac, Coned 12 inches 16,5 32,1 48,15 64,2 8,25 96,3 112,35 128,4 Cone factor =.25 24 inches 32,1 64,2 96,3 128,4 16,5 192,6 224,7 256,8 Height of pay, feet 6 36 inches 48,15 96,3 144,45 192,6 24,75 288,9 337,5 385,2 48 inches 64,2 128,4 192,6 256,8 321, 385,2 449,4 513,6 6 inches 8,25 16,5 24,75 321, 41,25 481,5 561,75 642, 72 inches 96,3 192,6 288,9 385,2 481,5 577,8 674,1 77,4 by SCD, Oct 11, 211

FLOWING BTM PRES (psig) 5 4 3 2 1 2 4 6 FLOW RATE Inflow/Outflow Plot 1 Hz Well Completion with Frac 2 md Perm Frac Proppant (crushed) 1 PSI Pwh 2 PSI Pwh (bbl/d) 7 casing, 3 ½ tubing for high flow rates 1 InflowNo Frac = 15. InflowNo Frac = 1. InflowNo Frac = 5. OutflowPwh = 1. OutflowPwh = 2. OutflowPwh = 4. 8 4 PSI Pwh 12 Fluid Properties : Oil Gr = 42. API Gas Gr =.75 Water Gr = 1.6 WLR = 12. % GOR = 1259. scf/bbl Pbp = 464.3 psig Wellbore Data : WHP = 2. psig TVD = 9994. ft Corr =Olgas Tbg/3.5/1274 Csg/4.5/15274 Reservoir Data : Pr = 44. psig BHT = 239.9 deg F Perm = 1. md Lx = 5394. ft Ly = 4394. ft Gas Cap =NO Bit Size= 6. in Hnorm = 6.4 ft Xw = 2697. ft Yw = 2197. ft Zw = 3.2 ft Fractional Flow kro =. krw =.25 Kh/Kv = 1. Kx/Ky = 1. Type = Hydrl Frac Cinco Model Xf = 4. ft Frac Wid= 24. in Kfrac = 2. md Porosity =.12 GOODE Pres Drop =NO HzWell Len= 1. ft Shot Den = 6. spf Perf Dia =.48 in Gun Phasing = 9 deg Perf Len = 38. in Kc/Kf =.3 12% porosity, 1md permeability Perforating 2 intervals Fracture Stimulating each With 5, lbs Permeability of Proppant = 2 md (crushed) 1 FT Hz WELL WITH 5, 1, or 15-5, LB SAND FRAC STAGES FOR 4 ½ LENGTH (WING) FRACTURES