Development and Application of a Benthic Macroinvertebrate Index for Pinelands Rivers and Streams

Similar documents
What types of monitoring do we do? Freshwater (rivers, streams) Marine Waters (bays, ocean) & Tidal Rivers Ambient Ground Water

SPA Annual Report for 2002 September, 2003 Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection Page 125. Evaluation and Recommendations

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Using R to Analyze Data from Probabilistic Monitoring in Oklahoma. Jean Lemmon

Stream Monitoring at Tumacácori NHP

Using Volunteer & AmeriCorps Monitoring Data

Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents

CAPS Landscape Metrics November 2011

Vulnerability Assessment of New England Streams: Developing a Monitoring Network to Detect Climate Change Effects

Urban Ecology: Watersheds and Aquatic Ecology A BIOBUGS program

Standards: Human activity has consequences on living organisms and ecosystems. (94412, )

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Aquatic Biomes, Continued

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

UPPER DESCHUTES R-EMAP TEMPERATURE SUMMARY

Natural surface water on earth includes lakes, ponds, streams, rivers, estuaries, seas and oceans.

LIMNOLOGY, WATER QUALITY

Course: Green Technology IV (or similar upper-level environmental science course) Instructor: Gregory Rusciano

Overview of Watershed Monitoring. WATERSHED ACADEMY WEB

UK ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS AND CONDITIONS (PHASE 1) Final report. April 2008

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Monitoring at Credit Valley Conservation. Presented by Jackie Thomas and Luke Harvey

The West Virginia Stream and Wetland Valuation Metric

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

How to Develop a Project Monitoring Program

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

Monitoring and Protection Program Recent Highlights and Future Directions

Questions & Answers on New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection s Draft Pesticide General Permit

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS & BIOMES

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

BiT Stream Study - Guided Observations:

Habitat rehabilitation for inland fisheries

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT FOR HYDROPOWER PEAKING OPERATIONS

Ch. 15-Restoration Ecology

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

Prepared by: Armand Ruby Armand Ruby Consulting in association with Brown and Caldwell

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Pond Ecosystem Field Study MOLS

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Response to Comments on the Goleta Sanitary District Draft NPDES Permit and 301(h) TDD

Broken Arrow Public Schools AP Environmental Science Objectives Revised

Rocky EEP Preliminary Findings Report Summary February 2005

Nipigon Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

How To Manage Water Resources

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for:

The Everglades & Northern Estuaries; St. Lucie River Estuary, Indian River Lagoon & Caloosahatchee Estuary. Water Flows & Current Issues

Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management.

NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS FOR THE NEW JERSEY COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM

Joel Tillery, P.E., CH2M HILL. SESWA 2010 Annual Conference October 7, 2010

There is a concerted effort in the regionto understand the sources, fate, transport and

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Sources to Seafood: Mercury Pollution in the Marine Environment Background on Presenting Scientists

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Turbidity (cm) Using Dot # ph. Dissolved Oxygen (ppm or parts per million) Nitrate (ppm) Phosphate (ppm) Color

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Biennial Review Request for Comments From DEQ (revised )

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

GLACier-fed rivers, HYDRoECOlogy and climate change; NETwork of monitoring sites (GLAC-HYDRECO-NET).

THE DETAILS OF REAL-TIME REPORT CARDING THROUGH LOUISIANA S COASTWIDE REFERENCE MONITORING SYSTEM

METHODS FOR THE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES IN WADEABLE STREAMS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Chesapeake Bay and Potomac Tidal Monitoring Programs Past, Present and Future

Where will data be collected? Specific Parameter Measurements. Funding required. Who would monitor and manage data? Partners.

Chapter 3 Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems


MARY LAMMERT* The Nature Conservancy 8 S. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2301 Chicago, Illinois 60603, USA

Lesson Plan Two - Ecosystems

MiCorps 101. Presented by Paul Steen. MiCorps Program Manager

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

Curt Kerns, M.S., R.P.Bio., C.F.S. WetlandsPacific Corp

SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAM AND LAND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVES INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS

Guide to Writing a Water Quality Monitoring Plan

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants

Human Impact to Wetlands

Water Quality Modeling in Delaware s Inland Bays: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Go?

DEQ Response to Comments regarding the Public Notice for a Coal Mining Project in the Panther Creek watershed In Craig and Nowata Counties.

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

Identifying Aquatic Insects From Your Pond

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

WELCOME. 20 th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CALIFORNIA AQUATIC BIOASSESSMENT WORKGROUP DAVIS, CALIFORNIA. OCTOBER 29 and 30, 2013

Efficacy of stream restoration as currently practiced

AZPDES ARIZONA PESTICIDE GENERAL PERMIT. SWVMA Annual Conference October 29, 2014

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems

The Cost of a Clean Bay

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy

Quantification of Reactive Phosphorus in Lake Mendota Sediments

Appendix B: Cost Estimates

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

National Park Service Inventory & Monitoring Project

RECOGNIZING THE VALUE OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Transcription:

Development and Application of a Benthic Macroinvertebrate Index for Pinelands Rivers and Streams Dean Bryson New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring Water Monitoring and Standards February, 2013

Overview Biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates NJDEP s Ambient Biomonitoring Network (AMNET) Results of initial sampling in Pinelands waters Development of the Pinelands Macroinvertebrate Index (PMI) Application of the PMI in the Pinelands Stewardship level Index

Biomonitoring using Benthic Macroinvertebrates Methods based on USEPA s Rapid Bioassessmnet Protocols for Use in Wadeable Streams and Rivers (1989, revised in 1999) Monitor in stream populations of benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality Benthic (bottom dwelling ) macroinvertebrates (organisms without backbones visible to the naked eye) inhabit all types of aquatic habitats Common forms aquatic insects, crustaceans, aquatic worms, and mollusks.

Examples of Common Types of Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Rationale for Biomonitoring Presence and relative abundance of organisms in a stream is governed by environmental conditions and by the pollution tolerances of the respective taxa Overall community is reflective of conditions in its environment Therefore, changes in water quality and/or instream habitat are evident by changes in the macroinvertebrate community structure

Some Advantages of using Benthic Macroinvertebrates Good indicators of localized conditions Sampling relatively easy and inexpensive Integrate cumulative effects of different stressors such as excess nutrients, toxins, and sedimentation Assess non chemical impacts to streams such as habitat effects, or altered flow regimes Sensitive to short term, episodic events, such as spills or intermittent discharges

Background of the AMNET Program Network began in 1990 Statewide network currently with 760 active sites in freshwater (non tidal) rivers and streams throughout New Jersey Sites sampled once every 5 years by Water Region on a rotational basis Initially, all sites were assessed using a multimetric index called the New Jersey Impairment Score (NJIS) Index comprised of 5 metrics, family level taxonomy, 0 30 scoring scale, and 3 ratings Nonimpaired, Moderately Impaired, and Severely Impaired

Data Usage Evaluating attainment of aquatic life use for the state s biennial Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (includes 303(d)&305(b) lists NJDEP s Environmental Trends report Designation of special protection waters (Category one or C1 waters) based on exceptional ecological significance.

Sampling is performed using a D framed net (800x900 micron) using the jab and sweep method, focused on the most productive habitats in Coastal Plain streams submerged banks, macrophytes, and snags (woody debris).

Visual based Habitat Assessment Method from Rapid Bioassessment Protocols, 2nd. Ed. Evaluations of instream habitat quality, sediment deposition, channel alteration and sinuosity, bank vegetation and stability, and riparian vegetative zone. Ten parameters scored on 0 20 scale. From total score, rating of optimal, suboptimal, marginal, or poor is assigned.

Other Data Collected Digital photographs taken Basic water chemistries (ph, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and specific conductance) Stream observations and measurements stream width and depth water clarity flow presence of stormwater outfalls surrounding land use canopy Any potential local sources of pollution

Samples preserved in the field and transported to laboratory for processing and identification to lowest practical level, usually genus

Pinelands Stressors As elsewhere in NJ, aquatic resources in Pinelands are threatened by numerous anthropogenic stressors related to urbanization and agriculture. In the Pinelands, development and associated pollution change the character of streams by raising both ph and specific conductance. Associated changes in other analytes are also observed such as increases in calcium, magnesium, ammonia, nitrate, and phosphorus.

Altered Watersheds Physical and chemical changes in the watershed and water column affect the resident biota and alter instream community structure Pinelands Commission have observed and documented that disturbed watersheds support a greater number of exotic species which can replace native Pinelands species (fish, plants, and frogs) A benthic macroinvertebrate index used in the Pinelands must be sensitive to the changes and responsive to the various stressors affecting Pinelands streams

AN0584 Springers Bk @ Rt. 206 Shamong Twp., Burlington Co. LU/LC: 26% urban, 33% Forest, 23% Ag, 17% wetlands 2005: ph 6.0 SC 188µS/cm NJIS 24, Non impaired

In Need of a Better Method Funding secured from USEPA Region 2 with the assistance of Jim Kurtenbach Contracted Tetra Tech Inc., Owings Mill, MD, with Benjamin Jessup as Project Lead. Task: To identify metrics of the macroinvertebrate community that are responsive to stressors in the Pinelands (discriminate degraded sites from least impacted sites) and integrate the most responsive metrics into an index of biological integrity for Pinelands macroinvertebrates.

Study Area Pinelands National Reserve boundary; plus 5 km buffer surrounding the Pinelands political boundary, to encompass streams which may flow into or out of the Reserve and also exhibit the characteristics of the unique Pinelands ecosystem (low ph and low specific conductance) For index development, sites in the Pineland Buffer could be considered reference, if the specific criteria are met

Index Development Steps Collect and organize the data, separating calibration and verification data; Define reference and degraded sites; Stratify natural biological conditions; Calculate biological metrics and determine sensitivity of each metric; Combine appropriate metrics into index alternatives; Select the most appropriate index for application in the Pinelands based on sensitivity and variability, and; Assess performance of the index.

ALK4 Reference and Degraded Site Criteria Environmental Parameter Reference Criterion Degraded Criterion Predicted intensive land use (PLU%) < 10% >25% Percent agricultural land cover < 10% >25% Percent urban land cover < 10% >50% Below Dam No No criterion PLU % 12 ph 61log( spec. cond.) 148 Dow and Zampella (2000):

Calibration Sites Reference Mt Misery Bk Black Run UNT to Black Run Blacks Br Old Hurricane Br Wrangle Bk Jakes Br Cedar Ck N Br Forked River Skit Br Penn Swamp Br Tulpehocken Ck Papoose Br E Br Bass River Mare Run Gibson Ck McNeals Br Manumuskin River Degraded Barton Run Kettle Run Haynes Ck UNT to Ridgeway Br Hays Mill Ck Albertson Bk Great Swamp Bk Cedar Bk Hammonton Ck Springers Bk S Br Absecon Ck Great Egg Harbor River (2 sites) Penny Pot Stream Hospitality Br (2 sites) Marsh Lake Br Collings Br

Metric Performance DE= Discriminatory Efficiency

ALK6 Metric Responses to > Stress Metric DE Expected Observed Insect taxa 66.7 - - Non-insect taxa 83.3 + + EPT taxa 61.1 - - Diptera taxa 33.3 - - Chironomidae taxa <25 - NR Orthocladiinae taxa 38.9 - - Tanytarsini taxa 44.4 - + Tanypodinae taxa <25 - NR %Diptera 61.1 + - %Diptera w/o Tanytarsini 72.2 + - %Orthocladiinae 38.9 + - %Tanytarsini 55.6 - + %Crustacea & Mollusca 77.8 + + %Mollusca & Amphipoda 77.8 + + %Plecoptera & Trichoptera 66.7 + + Beck s Biotic Index 55.6 + +

Pinelands Macroinvertebrate Index (PMI) 1. # of Insect Taxa (-) 2. # of Non-insect Taxa (+) 3. % Plecoptera and Trichoptera (-) 4. % Diptera excluding Tanytarsini (-) 5. % Mollusca and Amphipoda (+) 6. Beck s Biotic Index (-) 7. % Filterers (+)

Index Thresholds 80 EXCELLENT 70 60 GOOD PMI Score 50 40 FAIR 30 20 Non-Outlier Max/Min 75% - 25% Median Outliers POOR Reference Degraded

Index Performance Using calibration data set, PMI s DE was 94.4% With same data set, NJIS had a DE of 44.4% Mean separation of index scores between reference and degraded was 22.4 points ALK7

AN0584 Springers Bk PMI: 43.83, Fair

Conclusions PMI is efficient at distinguishing reference from degraded conditions, but may be more sensitive to severe stresses than moderate stresses. Future refinements may be necessary to better assess slight to moderately enriched conditions. PMI cannot determine the stressor or stressors causing degradation without further study. The mechanism by which stresses in the Pinelands cause changes in the benthic macroinvertebrate community are poorly understood partly because of the nature of the stresses is unusual.

Regional Indices High Gradient Macroinvertebrate Index (HGMI) Coastal Plain Macroinvertebrate Index (CPMI) Pinelands Macroinvertebrate Index (PMI)

Currently, 197 sites assessed using PMI Atlantic Basin data 2010 11 Lower Delaware Basin data 2006 07

Mullica Basin 2010 2011

Stewardship Level Macroinvertebrate Index Development Danielle Donkersloot, Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator NJDEP, Water Monitoring & Standards Water Quality Standards & Assessment Danielle.Donkersloot@dep.state.nj.us www.state.nj.us/dep/wms/bwqsa/vm/

NJDEP Volunteer Biomonitoring Protocol 2000 2005 protocols based on presences/ absences of taxa, developed by Save Our Streams, a program of the Izaak Walton League of America 2005 2010 added counting number of individuals One size fits all approach to metrics was not working Unreliable in the Pinelands & Coastal Plain Ecoregions

VPMI 1Percent Crustacea & Mollusca Taxa (+) 2 Number of Insect Taxa ( ) 3 Number of EPT Taxa/(Number of Tolerant Taxa + 1) ( ) 4 Percent Worm, Leech & Lunged Snail Individuals (+) 5 Number of Tolerant Taxa (+)

Better Tools for Biomonitoring Multimetric Indices Sensitve to Ecoregions High Gradient Pinelands Coastal Plain Align with NJDEP BFBM multimetric indices User friendly stream side identifications Stamp, J., and Benjamin Jessup, and Danielle Donkersloot. 2010. Stewardship Level Macroinvertebrate Index Development for Northern NJ High Gradient, Pinelands and Coastal Plain Streams.

NJDEP Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring website: www.state.nj.us/dep/wms/bfbm Questions?