THE 2014 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OHIO UNIVERSITY INNOVATION CENTER

Similar documents
Economic Impact Analysis of School Facility Construction

Prepared for: The Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District. Prepared by: Ziona Austrian, Ph.D. Candice Clouse, M.S. Iryna Lendel, Ph.D.

Wages of Employed Texans Who Attended Texas Public Schools

The Economic Impact of the New Hospital on the Economy of Drumright, Creek County, Oklahoma

Impacts of Government Jobs in Lake County Oregon

NOV The ECONOMIC VALUE of IDAHO PUBLIC COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES. Main Report. Analysis of the Economic Impact & Return on Investment of Education

VII. DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND INDUCED ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF UC SAN DIEGO

DEMONSTRATING ECONOMIC

A Lee County Economic Impact Study Prepared for

Public Relations Agencies in Los Angeles County

Virginia. Private and Public Educational Services Profile

KING COLLEGE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS KING COLLEGE REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KCRES) KCRES PAPER NO. 4, May 2012

Economic Impacts of Extending Health Care Coverage in Florida

Economic Consequences of Building the Black Hills Energy Power Plant in Pueblo County with a Project Labor Agreement

The Economic Impact of the Health Sector on the Economy of Dallas County, Iowa a. Daniel Otto and Georgeanne Artz b

Economic Impact of The Charleston International Airport Complex

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)

Serving the Community Well:

Economic Impact of Skidmore College on Saratoga County

HOSPITAL INDUSTRY IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation

September An Analysis of the Impacts of MIPS Program Spending and the Commercialization of MIPS Funded Projects on the State of Maryland

West Piedmont Workforce Investment Network (WIA) And Career Training

Business Overview (NAICS) By Type of Business Employees (NAICS) Establishments (NAICS)

THE INVISIBLE ENGINE:

A Labour Economic Profile of New Brunswick

planning market analysis & site location services Economic Impact Analysis:

The Economic Benefits of Oil and Natural Gas Production: An Analysis of Effects on the United States and Major Energy Producing States

These data were developed in cooperation with, and partially funded by, the Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas Final Report Prepared by: John D. Wong, J.D., Ph.D.

Contribution of S ESOPs to participants retirement security

Effective Federal Income Tax Rates Faced By Small Businesses in the United States

Demographic and Economic Data for Ocean Beach Hospital and Medical Clinics in Pacific County, Washington

The Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program. Compiled by the Office of the Illinois State Treasurer Treasurer Michael W. Frerichs

Topic 4: Different approaches to GDP

Estimated Economic Impact of Gulf Oil Spill on Virginia s Oyster Industry July 2010

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Ohio. May 2011

Nissan Corporate Headquarters Relocation to Cool Springs, Williamson County

Regional Economic Impact Analysis

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Prioritization: Responding to Regional and National Trends and Demands Jeremy Sage

The History of NAICS

Commonwealth of Virginia Job Vacancy Survey

Liberty County, Florida

The economic impact of Normandale Community College

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Catskills Focus

Where Value Meets Values: The Economic Impact of Community Colleges

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of the New Mexico Film Production Tax Credit

Demonstrating the Value of Arizona Community Colleges

Changes in Self-Employment: 2010 to 2011

Miami-Dade County - Downtown Miami Employment Center Census Tracts Selected for Analysis

Date 1/2/2014. Prepared for. Virginia Land Investments Patterson Ave., Suite 200 Richmond, VA Cleveland, Ohio. Richmond, Virginia

Victoria Government Gazette By Authority of Victorian Government Printer

Calgary Small Businesses: Fact Sheet

The Economic Impact of Tourism in New York Calendar Year Central New York Focus

Fort McPherson. Atlanta, GA MSA. Drivers of Economic Growth February Prepared By: chmuraecon.com

There are 6 base years in China GDP estimation history. The base year of

THE PROJECTED ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF A TENNESSEE HISTORIC REHABILITATION INVESTMENT INCENTIVE

Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary

The Impact of Publicly Supported Higher Education on the Charleston, South Carolina Region

Women Business Owners Create Jobs and Income - A Review

JOB OPENINGS AND LABOR TURNOVER APRIL 2015

The local economic impact of Bemidji State University

Jones. County Rank Census

An Economic Impact Analysis of Entergy Operations in Mississippi

The Economic Impact of Texas State University

College Park Latitude: Edgewater Dr & W Princeton St, Orlando, FL Longitude: Ring: 1.5 Miles

Agricultural ECONOMICS. The Use of Multipliers in Economic Impact Estimates

Martin County - Stuart Employment Center Census Block Groups Selected for Analysis. Prepared by the South Florida Regional Planning Council.

Saskatchewan Small Business Profile 2015

Casino Industry - Factors, Effects and Taxes

Miami County, Kansas. Employment and Workforce Profile. June Population: 32,822 Median Household Income: $60,622 Area: 590 square miles

2015 NEVADA TAX REFORMS. Commerce Tax, Modified Business Tax, Business License Fee

Supplier Diversity Program. Ensure a diversity of small businesses work with the Smithsonian to accomplish the Institution s mission.

The economic impact of Alexandria Technical and Community College

Retirement Readiness in New York City: Trends in Plan Sponsorship, Participation and Income Security

North Bay Industry Sector Rankings (By County) October 2015 Jim Cassio

VERMONT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE WAGES, BENEFITS, CONTRIBUTIONS AND EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY CALENDAR YEAR 2014

The economic impact of Dakota County Technical College

REGIONAL QUARTERLY REPORT

The Economic and Community Impact of Downsizing Postal Sorting Operations in New Orleans

Nonfatal Workplace Injuries and Illnesses in Maryland for 2010

Estimating the Effects of Spending

The Economic Impact of Fire Damage on Wyoming s Economy from a Business Perspective

The economic impact of Saint Paul College

Competitive Analysis Economic Vision for the City of Burlington

Nevada enacts Commerce Tax effective July 1, 2015

The Economic Impact of Health Services on the Economy of Sumter County, Alabama

Small Business Data Assess Your Competition Define Your Customers

Employment Impacts for Proposed Bay Delta Water Conveyance Tunnel Options

Ontario Mining: A Partner in Prosperity Building - The Economic Impacts of a Representative Mine in Ontario

Ohio Unified Certification Program (UCP)

SMALL BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AEROSPACE AND DEFENSE FIRMS ON THE STATE OF ARIZONA

The Economic Impact of Tourism in Maryland

Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5373: Professional Employers Organizations A report to the Governor and Legislature December 2010

Turning SIC to NAICS, where do we stand?

Trends in 401(k) Plans and Retirement Rewards. research. A Report by WorldatWork and the American Benefits Institute March 2013

The economic impact of Winona State University

Assessing Industry Codes on the IRS Business Master File Paul B. McMahon, Internal Revenue Service

Economic Impact of Proposed Tax and Spending Reductions in Kansas

The Economic Impact of Technical College System of Georgia Institutions on their Service Delivery Areas Economies in FY 2012

Transcription:

THE 2014 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OHIO UNIVERSITY INNOVATION CENTER MARCH 3, 2015 PREPARED FOR: THE INNOVATION CENTER OHIO UNIVERSITY 340 WEST STATE STREET, UNIT 7 ATHENS, OHIO 45701 PREPARED BY: G. JASON JOLLEY, PH.D. OHIO UNIVERSITY S VOINOVICH SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS THE RIDGES, BUILDING 21 ATHENS, OHIO 45701

Acknowledgements This report was commissioned by the Ohio University Innovation Center. This is an update to previous reports and research conducted by Voinovich School researcher Vlad Pascal with assistance from Sara Boyd and Holly Craycraft. G. Jason Jolley, Ph.D., an Assistant Professor in the Voinovich School conducted the 2013 analysis and completed this analysis as well. Most of text from prior year reports, drafted by Vlad Pascal, is retained in this version. Suggest Citation: Jolley, G.J. (2015). The 2014 Economic Analysis of Ohio University Innovation Center. Ohio University Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs.

The Economic Analysis of Ohio University s Innovation Center Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 2 Economic Analysis of Innovation Center Businesses... 3 Tax Impact of Innovation Center Businesses... 4 Project Methodology... 5

Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to identify the number of jobs and amount of labor income directly associated with businesses incubated by the Innovation Center and to estimate the indirect and induced effects of these businesses on the Athens County economy. This study employed the Impact Analysis for Planning (IMPLAN) economic modeling software program. Data on the number of full and part-time employees, total annual wages, and the North American Industrial Classification System Codes for each Incubator business were provided by the Innovation Center. The total economic activity of all businesses incubated by the Innovation Center on Athens County s economy in 2014 was estimated to be 140 jobs. These 140 jobs generated an estimated $6.1 million in labor income. Innovation Center businesses also generated an estimated $656,113 in state and local tax revenues. The 2014 Economic Analysis of Ohio University s Innovation Center 1

Introduction This report presents an assessment of the calculated effect of Ohio University s Innovation Center on the economy of Athens County in 2014. It identifies the number of jobs and labor income directly associated with the businesses the Center incubated and the total effect on the local economy from these businesses. This study employs the Impact Analysis for Planning (IMPLAN) economic modeling software program created by MIG Inc. of Stillwater, Minnesota. For more details, please see the project methodology section at the end of this report. All businesses have direct, indirect, and induced effect on the economy. Direct effects refer to the actual jobs and income created in the local economy from businesses. Indirect effects refer to second round expenditures made by these businesses within the local economy. Induced effects refer to the increased sales of goods and services in the local economy due to employees of these businesses living and working in the county. Another way of expressing these effects is that a dollar spent in any sector of a local economy will generate additional dollars in other sectors. For example, a newly-employed worker purchases clothes for his or her family at a local clothing store, generating income for the store s owner. The owner saves some of this money and spends the rest, thereby providing income for another local resident. The third person saves part of this money and spends the rest, which becomes income for a fourth person, and so forth. The sum of the total direct, indirect and induced income is the total income generated in the local economy. Employment works in much the same manner, and hence, a new business bringing several new jobs to the county results in additional employment in the remainder of the local economy. This study estimates the direct, indirect, and induced employment and labor income of Innovation Center businesses on the Athens County economy. This study also estimates state and local tax revenues generated as a result of these effects. Effect Type Employment Table 1: Summary of Impact Results Employee Compensation Value Added Proprietor Income Other Property Income Indirect Business Taxes Direct Effect 98.0 $4,418,826.02 $365,671.47 $1,886,166.94 $213,964.63 Indirect Effect 15.9 $388,187.81 $101,244.56 $455,584.44 $74,164.48 Induced Effect 25.9 $689,191.75 $109,306.17 $761,159.56 $187,283.30 Total Effect 139.8 $5,496,205.59 $576,222.20 $3,102,910.94 $475,412.41 Employee Compensation includes wage and salary, all benefits and employer paid payroll taxes (e.g., employer side of social security, unemployment taxes, etc.). Proprietor Income consists of payments received by self-employed individuals and unincorporated business owners. Other Property Income represents the amount of corporate profit realized from a business s own operations, payments for rents, dividends, interest income, etc. Indirect Business Taxes include both federal and state taxes on sales, property, and production, but it excludes employer contributions for social insurance and taxes on income. The 2014 Economic Analysis of Ohio University s Innovation Center 2

Economic Analysis of Innovation Center Businesses Table 2: Detailed Breakdown Total Economic Activity of Innovation Center Businesses, 2014 Employment Effect Labor Income Effect Industrial Sector Direct Indirect Induced Total Direct Indirect Induced Total Ag, Forestry, Fish & Hunting 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 $0 $3,437 $2,860 $6,296 Mining 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 $0 $4,053 $3,638 $7,691 Utilities 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 $0 $3,089 $8,883 $11,973 Construction 18.0 0.2 0.1 18.4 $1,054,282 $9,417 $6,979 $1,070,677 Manufacturing 47.0 0.3 0.1 47.4 $1,932,850 $15,995 $3,108 $1,951,952 Wholesale Trade 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.7 $0 $10,837 $18,524 $29,360 Retail trade 0.0 0.6 6.3 6.9 $0 $18,529 $178,152 $196,681 Transportation & Warehousing 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 $0 $11,350 $7,473 $18,823 Information 18.0 1.8 0.4 20.2 $665,741 $70,778 $15,804 $752,322 Finance & insurance 8.0 1.6 0.8 10.4 $645,951 $58,781 $30,653 $735,385 Real estate & rental 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.8 $0 $29,650 $17,087 $46,737 Professional, scientific & tech svcs. 4.0 3.8 0.9 8.8 $398,415 $100,601 $21,677 $520,693 Management of companies 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.5 $0 $29,084 $7,142 $36,226 Administrative & waste services 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.8 $0 $44,612 $8,295 $52,907 Educational services 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 $0 $61 $3,321 $3,382 Health & social services 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 $0 $5 $289,215 $289,221 Arts, entertainment & recreation 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 $0 $721 $4,575 $5,296 Accommodation & food services 0.0 1.4 4.7 6.1 $0 $23,416 $76,984 $100,401 Other services 0.0 1.2 2.5 3.7 $0 $40,434 $72,675 $113,109 Government & non NAICs 3.0 0.2 0.3 3.5 $87,259 $14,584 $21,453 $123,296 Total 98.0 15.9 25.9 139.8 $4,784,497 $489,432 $798,498 $6,072,428 Labor income includes employee compensation (salaries, wages and benefits) and proprietor income. The total effect of all businesses incubated by the Innovation Center on Athens County s economy in 2014 is estimated to be 139.8 jobs and $6.1 million in labor income. It should be noted that these effects will be repeated for each year in which these jobs exist. These businesses directly created an estimated 98.0 jobs. An estimated 15.9 jobs were indirectly supported in Athens County by businesses that supplied goods and services to the Innovation Center businesses. An estimated 25.9 additional jobs were supported in Athens County due to the induced effects of employees of Innovation Center businesses spending part of their wages at businesses in the county. Employment at all businesses generated approximately $4.8 million in labor income directly from employment within the businesses. An estimated $489,432 in labor income was generated by Athens County businesses that supplied goods and services to the Innovation Center businesses. An estimated $798,498 in labor income was generated in Athens County due to the induced effects of employees of Innovation Center businesses spending part of their wages within the county. The 2014 Economic Analysis of Ohio University s Innovation Center 3

Tax Impact of Innovation Center Businesses Table 3: Estimated State and Local Taxes Social Insurance Taxes Sales Tax Indirect Business Taxes Property Tax Other Taxes Income Tax Personal Taxes Other Personal Taxes and Fees Total State and Local $67,017 $203,427 $176,668 $56,207 $124,129 $28,665 $656,113 Table 4: Estimated Federal Taxes Social Insurance Taxes Indirect Business Taxes Income Tax Other Taxes Total $438,599 $48,211 $290,148 $204,180 $981,138 $656,113 was generated in state and local taxes in 2014 as a result of Innovation Center businesses. This represents a total effect, which includes direct, indirect, and induced effect. These revenues will continue each year in which the jobs created by the Innovation Center businesses exist. Overall, an estimated $981,138 in federal taxes was generated in 2014. The total effect includes direct, indirect, and induced effect. These tax revenues were generated as a result of Innovation Center businesses. The 2014 Economic Analysis of Ohio University s Innovation Center 4

Project Methodology This study employs the Impact Analysis for Planning (IMPLAN) economic modeling software and 2014 datasets created by IMPLAN Group, LLC. The Innovation Center provided information on the number of full and part-time employees, total annual wages and the North American Industrial Classification System Codes for each business. The total effect on the local economy by each industrial sector can be calculated through an economic model known as a multiplier. The multiplier expresses the number of additional jobs or amount of additional income created by each new job or each extra dollar earned. For example, if a new business bringing ten new jobs to the county created an additional seven jobs in the local economy through indirect and induced effects, the multiplier would be 1.7. For each new job brought to the county, an additional 0.7 jobs (1 + 0.7 = 1.7) would be created in existing industries in the local economy. The IMPLAN model generates the multipliers that are used to calculate indirect and induced effects for each industrial sector. A multiplier known as the Type Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) multiplier was used in this study. The Type SAM multiplier estimates the indirect and induced effect s on each industrial sector in the local economy as well as business, household and government transactions. In this study, the NAICS code for each business was cross-walked to one of 440 corresponding IMPLAN sectors. The employment level and/or wages were inputted for each sector. The model then calculated the direct, indirect, and induced impacts based on the type SAM multipliers for Athens County. State and federal tax revenue estimates were generated using IMPLAN. The 2014 Economic Analysis of Ohio University s Innovation Center 5