Challenges of the status and use of the Baltic Sea environment. Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky HELCOM

Similar documents
HELCOM perspective on clean Baltic Sea shipping. Helsinki Commission

@race4thebaltic #RFTBBCGReport. Barbara Jackson Programme Director Zennström Philanthropies

Restoring Waters in the Baltic Sea Region

HELCOM Ministerial Declaration

HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan

REPORT 2011 JUBILEUMS- SKRIFT Baltic Sea. Scorecard WWF Baltic Ecoregion Programme

Restoring Waters in the Baltic Sea Region

Washing our Dishes and Clothes without Polluting our Rivers and Seas

Cruise tourism the environmental effects in the Baltic Sea. Salla Muraja

Restoring Waters in the Baltic Sea Region. A strategy for municipalities and local

Water: The Environmental Outlook to 2050

Costs of mitigating eutrophication

Kari Hyytiäinen & Lassi Ahlvik. Prospects for cost-efficient water protection in the Baltic Sea

METIER Course No. 6: Remote Sensing & Hydrosphere Helsinki 6 November 2008 Kati Tahvonen Finnish Environment Institute

POLLUTION DAMAGE LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION ISSUES RELATED TO OFFSHORE ACTIVITIES

N-SINK Reduction of waste water nitrogen load: demonstrations and modelling. D7.1. Conceptual model of linking economic and ecological approaches

Kristina Veidemane, Baltic Environmental Forum Panevezys,

Finnish Marine Research Infrastructure FINMARI

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

COMMUNIQUÉ...4. New operating environment...6. Five waves of action for the Baltic Sea INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES...

Baltic Sea Perspective on - Building a Gas Pipeline and - Oil Spills

Sweden s Commitment under the Baltic Sea Action Plan. Socio-economic inpact assessment

Overview of the status of the network of Baltic Sea marine protected areas HELCOM

Hydrological and Material Cycle Simulation in Lake Biwa Basin Coupling Models about Land, Lake Flow, and Lake Ecosystem

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

EUROPEAN WATER RESOURCES AND POLICY

Shipping accidents in the Baltic Sea in 2012

Strategy for 2012 to An active player from rural areas to the metropolis

Danish Experiences with the Landing obligation in the Baltic Sea

State of play. State Secretary Risto Artjoki Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Baltic Sea Agri-Environmental -conference 27.8.

Developing responsible aquaculture in the Baltic Sea Region

14th October BSSSC 2009 Conference at Ringsted, Denmark 1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS PROPOSED PHASE 2 EXPANSION OF THE TRANSNET IRON ORE HANDLING FACILITY, SALDANHA

Efficient Biomatement of the Baltic Sea - A Review

Making strategies happen motivation and tools for a local actor

Turning adversity into opportunity. A business plan for the Baltic Sea

International Cooperation in Water Management and Pollution Control in the Danube River Basin. Joachim Bendow ICPDR Executive Secretary

Outcome from State and Conservation thematic online meeting on measures for regional coordination

Ministerial Meeting of the OSPAR Commission, Bergen: September 2010

Flagship project to ensure sustainable fishing of Salmon in. Laura Píriz 3rd meeting of Priority Area 9 Fisheries 18 November 2010

Bathing water results 2008 Italy

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities an updated assessment

FINLAND 1. THE CONTEXT... Part I POLLUTION CONTROL AND NATURE CONSERVATION

Development and marketing of the tourism destination of Lake Balaton

Maritime spatial planning in BSR and in Poland

Chapter 14 Quiz. Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Development of marine and coastal pollution training curriculum for master s study level

OUTCOME OF THE EIGHTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT WORKING GROUP ON RESPONSE ON THE SHORE (EWG SHORE )

Impacts of air pollution on human health, ecosystems and cultural heritage

Arctic for the Future. Sergei Tambiev. Action for the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment

Partnership in Environmental Governance. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

CENTRAL BALTIC PROGRAMME Cross-border co-operation programme under the European Territorial Co-operation objective

Mediterranean-Mare Nostrum Nature and Culture Common Destiny

GOFREP Master s Guide

BaltMet Network. Mayors of major metropolises in the Baltic Sea Region unified for the competitiveness and innovation of the Region

FRESHWATER COUNTRY PROFILE NORWAY

Results from the Baltic Biogas Bus project

Discharge of Water & Waste from Marine Vessels Standards & Regulations (MARPOL Convention)

Advice May 2014

How do storm water and wastewater networks function together with the wastewater treatment plant? Theo G. Schmitt, Kaiserslautern University (Germany)

Declaration on the 20th Anniversary of the Barents Euro-Arctic Cooperation. (Kirkenes, Norway, 3 4 June 2013)

SWEDEN OUTLINE OF THE REPORT THE CONTEXT... Part I POLLUTION CONTROL AND NATURE CONSERVATION

Northern Dimension Environmental Partnership

MIKAEL AMINOFF BSAG Senior Advisor (voluntary)

Official Journal of the European Communities. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Perspectives of the marine and maritime open access research infrastructure development in Lithuania

Barents Euro-Arctic Council (BEAC) Working Group on Environment Swedish Chairmanship Work Programme Subgroup on Water Issues

Clean Shipping. A Priority Area of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

5. Environmental problems 5.1. INTRODUCTION

Basin Management to Protect Ecosystem Health - Lessons from Estonia- Russian Cooperation

Northern Dimension Policy Framework Document (effective as 1 January 2007)

Quality. Quality Status report 2010 Ospar Commission. New Court 48 Carey Street London WC2A 2JQ

Interreg Baltic Sea Region 2 nd Call for Applications Priorities 1-3. Announcement Note for Step 1: Concept Note Timeline: 1 March June 2016

LAND USE AND POPULATION DENSITY IN THE BALTIC SEA DRAINAGE BASIN: A GIS DATABASE. 1. The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics,

Mapping of Institutional Architecture for Protection from Oil Spills in the Baltic Sea Region. Survey results and report

How To Manage Water Resources

Riga Facts & Figures. Riga Facts &

Barents Euro Arctic Council. Seventh Meeting of Environment Ministers

Environmental Liability Directive; Implementation, Enforcement,

TERMS OF REFERENCE. for an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. for a PROPOSED RESORT DEVELOPMENT

USE OF PHOSPHATES IN THE UNITED STATES NEAR COSTAL AREAS

Transboundary water management in Belarus: current situation

How To Develop A Waterborne

Development of innovative tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good environmental status: the progress of the EU project DEVOTES

waste management Ship-generated Ellen Kaasik Head of Quality and Environmental Management Department

Hydrological transport modeling

Liability for ecological damage: the added value of the Environmental Liability Directive for nature conservation

Cost effective water protection in the Gulf of Finland

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

The River Ribble is one of the longest rivers in the North West of England

CONSERVATION AREAS ACT

Public consultation on the establishment of a quantitative reduction headline target for marine litter

Regions of Portugal - Madeira

Water resources. The main problems of pollution that need to be addressed in the country are the following:

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF THE NETHERLANDS

Toxic Municipal Waste Water Treatment

EUROPE-INBO 2015 Roundtable TR2

GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND DATA MANAGEMENT IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION. Marrakech, May 2005

Sweden: Preliminary questions

Water management and challenges in Norway

Transcription:

Challenges of the status and use of the Baltic Sea environment. Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky HELCOM

Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Intergovernmental organisation 9 coastal countries & EU Marine area: 415,000 km 2 Catchment area: 1.72 million km 2 (4 x size of the sea area) 14 countries 85 million people

Estonian Chairmanship of HELCOM July 2014 - June 2016

PRIORITIES OF ESTONIAN HELCOM CHAIRMANSHIP REDUCTION OF POLLUTION LOAD EUTROPHICATION - Progress towards the targets of HELCOM Nutrient Reduction Scheme - Eliminate countries remaining HELCOM Hot- Spots by 2016 at latest. - Start developing quantitative environmental targets in other areas than eutrophication. REDUCTION OF IMPACT OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES REGIONAL MARINE LITTER ACTION PLAN

PLANNING, MANAGEMENT AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS Well-managed and ecologically coherent network of marine protected areas BIODIVERSITY Use, conservation and protection of the Baltic Sea regional coastal and marine areas Fish stock and other environmental resources ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS AND INFORMATION HELCOM's up to date monitoring programme Indicator- and environmental objectives based assessment Access to environmental information and visibility of HELCOM activities INFORMATION RESOURCES

Above and beneath the Baltic waves: still a lot to do!

Nutirent reduction scheme of the BSAP consists of two parts MAI Maximum allowable inputs: the basin-wise maximal nitrogen and phosphorus inputs that will result in a development towards reaching the ecological targets CART Country-wise allocation of reduction targets: the necessary nutrient input reduction distributed per Country according to agreed principles

BSAP nutrient reduction targets Baltic Sea Sub-basin Maximum Allowable Inputs (2013) TN TP Reference inputs 1997-2003 TN TP Needed reductions TN TP tons tons tons tons tons tons Kattegat 74 000 1 687 78 761 1 687 4 761 0 Danish Straits 65 998 1 601 65 998 1 601 0 0 Baltic Proper 325 000 7 360 423 921 18 320 98 921 10 960 Bothnian Sea 79 372 2 773 79 372 2 773 0 0 Bothnian Bay 57 622 2 675 57 622 2 675 0 0 Gulf of Riga 88 417 2 020 88 417 2 328 0 308 Gulf of Finland 101 800 3 600 116 252 7 509 14 452 3 909 Baltic Sea revised figures (2013) 792 209 21 716 910 344 36 894 118 134 15 178

Nutrient reduction targets Nutrient balanced fertilisation Red list of species and biotopes Marine litter, microplastics Underwater noise Shoreline response Impacts of pharmaceuticals Indicator-based monitoring

Country Allocated Reductions Targets, 2013 Reductions/ country (tonnes/year) (tonnes/year) Kattegat P 38 N 2890 Danish Straits P 110 + 60 N 7170 + 500 Bothnian Sea Bothnian Bay P 330 + 26 N 2430 + 600 Gulf of Finland P 530 N 9240 P 320 N 1800 Baltic Proper UNECE N 18720 Shipping N 6930 P 7480 N 43610 Gulf of Riga P 220 N 1670 P 1470 N 8970 P 3790 N 10380 P 800 N 3320

-18% -16% Reduction of inputs between 1994 and 2010 BUT ONLY 10% comparing 1997-2003 to 2008-2010

Total Flow waterborne and airborne inputs of phosphorus and nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 Country Flow Phosphorus (t) Nitrogen (t) m 3 /s Waterborne Airborne Total Waterborne Airborne Total Bothnian Bay 3,136 2,748 181 2,929 44,582 7,258 51,840 Bothnian Sea 2,926 2,045 394 2, 439 48,635 21,347 69,982 Gulf of Finland 4,068 6,114 150 6,264 95,536 12,015 107,551 Gulf of Riga 1,372 2,303 93 2,396 66,240 8,691 74,931 Baltic Proper 4,784 14,190 1,046 15,236 271,695 106,589 378,284 Danish Straits 238 1,369 105 1,474 36,955 20,091 57,046 Kattegat 1,173 1,392 118 1,510 46,260 16,564 62,824 Total 17,698 30,161 2,087 32,301 609,903 192,555 802,458

The annual total (air- and waterborne) nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to the Gulf of Finland during 1995-2010 (tonnes)

Agricaltural sector contribution to the nutrient load to the Baltic Sea Agriculture contribution to the diffuse load - 70-90% for nitrogen and 60-80% for phosphorus Total nitrogen Total phosphorus

Assessment and quantification of Neva river nutrient input in the years 2013-2014 HELCOM BASE project in cooperation with the North-West Department of Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring Data for calculation/period Ptot, t/a Ntot t/a Original data, obtained within BASE Project works/(07.2013-06.2014) 2538 63045 2448 56670 Extended data (concentrations obtained within BASE Project works + state monitoring monthly average flow data) /(07.2013-06.2014)

Assessment of the nutrient load to the Baltic Sea from small settlements of Leningrad region. About 377 thousands people permanently live in the settlements with population less than 2000 people. About 2.5 million people temporary se summer cottages in Leningrad region. The nutrient loads into the Gulf of Finland from scattered settlements of the Leningrad region are 4584,9 t/a for Ntot 836,6 t/a for Ptot. HELCOM BASE project in cooperation with Ecology and business.

Hazardous substances The reduction of atmospheric input of lead, cadmium, and mercury to the Baltic Sea is a result of abatement measures as well as economic restructuring in Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Russia in early 1990 Annual atmospheric deposition fluxes of dioxins over the surface of the Baltic Sea have decreased in period 1990-2011 by 66% Pharmaceuticals HELCOM BASE project (2013-2014). The study has shown that concentration of Diclofenac in the effluent varied from 355 ng/l to 550 ng/l. Taking into account daily sewage water release in St.Petersburg total annual input of pain killer is about 400 kg.

Marine litter and microplastic problem Central WWTPof St. Petersburg Litter type Influent Textile fibers Synthetic particles Black particles Particles per liter After mechanical After purification Purification % 467 33 16 96,57 160 21 7 95,63 3160 302 125 96,04 The Central WWTP of St. Petersburg purifies about 350 million cubic meters of waste water per year so the amount of microplastic ending up in the natural water environment is considerable.

Sources of ML in the BS Probable ML sources in the BS (ARCADIS, 2013) ARCADIS (2013): Household activities, including sanitary waste, waste collection and transport (48%) Coastal-based tourism and recreation (25%) Professional marine activities (e.g. fishing, shipping, port and maritime industries) (12%) Recreational boating (6%) Ghost nets: 5.500-10.000 per year (WWF Poland, 2011) Microparticles from land-based sources (e.g. fibres and road traffic) (Noren&Magnusson 2010)

2013 HELCOM Ministerial Declaration DECIDE to develop a regional action plan by 2015 at the latest with the aim of achieving a significant quantitative reduction of marine litter by 2025, compared to 2015 Measures addressing ML

Benefits of protecting the Baltic exceed the costs by 1,9-3,1 billion /year Costs 2007 2,3 billion /year Benefits 3,8-5 billion /year Costs of the revised reduction targets 2013 1,9 billion /year.

Dmitry Frank-Kamenetsky Professional Secretary Tel: +358 40 6309933; Skype: helcom68 E-mail: Dmitry.Frank-Kamenetsky@helcom.fi