E-Navigation Making Way Ómar Frits Eriksson & Morten Brix Laursen Danish Maritime Authority IFSMA Lean Ship of the Future pre-aga workshop Copenhagen Admiral Hotel 13 June 2012
EfficienSea Project Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea Goal: A common, consistent and efficient approach into maritime safety and protection of the environment through accident prevention and mitigation. EfficienSea project duration: June 2007 January 2012 Project budget: 7.746.871,11 EUR (NO funds: 853.352,31 EUR)
Four thematic work packages Vessel Traffic Data & Maritime Planning Competence and Recruitment Challenges Dynamic Risk Management e-navigation Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea
How a navigator should prioritize his work 1. Sail Lookout Situational awareness 2. Navigate A safe and executable Voyage Plan Use of Pilot services 3. Communicate Ship Reporting Systems / VTS Other ships Harbors Etc. 4. Administrate All things not directly contributing to a safe and secure navigation
Tanker reporting requirements en route Gibraltar - Helsinki Ship Reporting Systems Vessel Traffic Service Reporting of Dangerous or Polluting Goods Reporting of incidents Recommendations for large ships and ships carrying INF-Cargoes Port State Control Content of reports may vary remarkably Reporting mainly by VHF in spite of systems like SafeSeaNet and AIS
How a navigator is forced to prioritize his work
e-navigation e-navigation is the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of maritime information onboard and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation and related services, for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment Harmonization of the communication systems and data formats between ship-ship, ship-shore and maybe even shore-shore Minimizing the burden by obtaining the right information at the right time
Aim of esea e-navigation work To prepare/mature the participating organisations for the e-navigation era To undertake tasks that will support and benefit the overall development of e-navigation
Develop/Test e-navigation Prototypes 2009 Or a quick spin on the IMO e-navwheel Feeding results to IMO First results to COMSAR 16 2012 2014 2010
e-navigation test beds Consult Users on Services needed Develop Prototype Services and necessary infrastructure Test and evaluate services with real users Propose standards to IMO, IHO, IALA etc.
Our Test Fleet Variety of vessels in order to assess the value of different services for different users
Shore Side Users Sound VTS DMA SMA/Baltico Service: Route suggestion Services: METOC on route MSI (Danish waters) Services: MSI (Baltic Sea)
Service provider D Service level 3 Special test area Service provider A Service level 3 Service provider B Service level 3 Service provider C Service level 3 Service provider B Service level 5 Service provider C Service level 5
Ship Shore GSM ee-ins ethernet Com box VHF data Internet pilot plug Satellite AIS GPS AIS, area notice, environmental AIS, route exchange VTS e-navigation service provider METOC, MSI, Ice AIS route exchange Other ship Other service provider (wind)
Semi-operational Services Route exchange / route suggestion METOC on route MSI in chart - related to route Displayed in Prototype display Dynamic risk index No-Go area
Route Exchange
Route Suggestion
METOC
METOC
Navigational Warnings
Navigational Warnings
Dynamic Risk Index RISK = 10 USD/hour RISK = 10 USD/hour RISK = 100 USD/hour RISK = 10 USD/hour RISK = 100 USD/hour
NO GO Areas
Useful Services? 1. Route exchange / route suggestion 2. METOC on route 3. MSI in chart - related to route 4. Dynamic risk index 5. No-Go area
Mona Lisa 1. Dynamic and Proactive Sea Routes 2. Control and verification of Certificates 3. Sea Traffic Control Centre
Thank you very much for your attention www.efficiensea.org