Livestock Market Terms, Part III

Similar documents
Beef Cattle Frame Scores

United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef

BeefCuts. Primal & Subprimal Weights and Yields 1300-pound Steer Choice, YG3 Dressing Percentage: 62% Chuck Rib Loin. Round. Brisket. Plate.

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Breeds of Swine. Berkshire. Chester White

MARKET LAMB & GOAT SELECTION & EVALUATION. Aaron Renfroe Extension Assistant Sheep and Goat Texas AgriLife Extension Service San Angelo, Texas

Swine EPD Terminology

Understanding and Using Basis for Livestock Producer Marketing Management 1

In many areas of the country, the Holstein

Reviewed.March.2010 SHOW LAMB SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

U.S. Beef and Cattle Imports and Exports: Data Issues and Impacts on Cattle Prices

A comparison of beef breed bulls for beef production & carcass traits. Future cattle production -seminar Viikki Campus

GROSS MARGINS : HILL SHEEP 2004/2005

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

SHOW STEER SELECTION. Darrell Rothlisberger Rich County Agent Utah State University Extension

MCDONALD S SUSTAINABLE BEEF PILOT Information Sharing Initiative Report April 7, 2016

Meat Goats. January Kent Orrell Extension Educator, Kiowa Co. Okla.

Live, In-the-Beef, or Formula: Is there a Best Method for Selling Fed Cattle?

SYSCO Branded Premium Pork Products Produced By

How to Write a Dairy Job Description

Understanding Grid Marketing: How Quality Grades and Grid Conditions Affect Carcass Value. By Pete Anderson Ag Knowledge Services

Livestock Judging Manual Table of Contents

US Imported Beef Market A Weekly Update

This Little Piggy Math in the Pig Barn

Swine Feeding and Fitting Guidelines. Ryan Harrell Dec. 2008

Consumer Health and Safety

Final Report. Submitted to National Cattlemen s Beef Association, Centennial, CO. April 2012

Kansas State University Lean Value Marketing Program

HOW TO PREPARE THE PERFECT PRIME RIB

Terms: The following terms are presented in this lesson (shown in bold italics and on PowerPoint Slides 2 and 3):

Beef Cattle. Production MP184 DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

EBLEX BEEF BRP MANUAL 4. Beef production from the dairy herd

Livestock Budget Estimates for Kentucky

Selecting, Feeding, Fitting, Grooming and Showing Beef Cattle

Pacific County Market Livestock Project 4-H/FFA Organization Livestock Show and Auction

Managing cattle for the kind of beef you want your kids to eat.

How Profitable is Backgrounding Cattle? Dr. John Lawrence and Cody Ostendorf, Iowa State University

INDUSTRY INFORMATION:

Electrical Stimulation Purpose, Application and Results

IOWA STATE FAIR * AUGUST 11-21, 2016 * FFA BEEF CATTLE

Analysis of the determinants of prices and costs in product value chains

Ag in a Bag: Animals and Their Products

ESTIMATING GROSS MARGINS IN MEAT PACKING FOR BEEF, PORK, AND LAMB. Eric L. Sweatt, Derrell N. Peel, and Clement E. Ward *

The Costs of Raising Replacement Heifers and the Value of a Purchased Versus Raised Replacement

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

Selecting 4-H pigs. By: Ryan Harrell

Section 6: Cow-Calf Cash Flow Enterprise Budget Analysis 101

Home Slaughtering and Processing of Beef

Cattle Growth Dynamics and Its Implications

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

FUTURES TRADING OF LIVE BEEF CATTLE (HEDGING) by Clarence C. Bowen

Tyson Foods, Inc. FISCAL 2012 FACT BOOK

Understanding and Using Cattle Basis in Managing Price Risk

Abstract. Acknowledgments

Beef - Key performance indicators. Mary Vickers

Beef Cow Share Lease Agreements

Specifications of Futures and Options Contracts

MEAT INDUSTRY OPTIONS FEEDBACK SURVEY

Using the Futures Market to Predict Prices and Calculate Breakevens for Feeder Cattle Kenny Burdine 1 and Greg Halich 2

Beef Primal Cuts OUTSIDE FLAT 2050 OUTSIDE 2030

Livestock Risk Protection

Animal Life Cycles. Background. Procedure

COMPARISON OF DAIRY VERSUS BEEF STEERS

Livestock Risk Protection (LRP) Insurance for Feeder Cattle

Basic Terminology For Understanding Grain Options, G A

FCI-Standard N 105 / /GB FRENCH WATER DOG. (Barbet)

Economics of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination. Dr. Les Anderson and Paul Deaton University of Kentucky

Grid Base Prices and Premiums-Discounts Over Time

By Anne Wasko Gateway Livestock, Market Analyst

DETERMINING YOUR STOCKING RATE

Livestock Risk Protection Insurance for Stocker Operations

Cattle Producer's Library - CL 1280 CONVERSIONS FOR COMMONLY USED WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Meat processing is a complicated business, with tight

S P E C I F I C GRAVITY AS A MEASURE PORK CARCASS LEANNESS

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

South Dakota State University Livestock Judging Manual Designed for 4-H Seniors and Experienced Judges Second Edition South Dakota State University

Carcass Traits and Merit

PURCHASING AND RAISING YOUR 4H/FFA MARKET SHOW GOAT

DROUGHT ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS AND TAX IMPLICATIONS OF DROUGHT INDUCED LIVESTOCK SALES

Chicken. Beef. Pork. Mutton. agriculture, forestry & fisheries. Department: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Farm Tax Record Book SAMPLE

SWINE QUIZ BOWL QUESTIONS

LOCALLY PRODUCED LIVESTOCK PROCESSING AND MARKETING FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT

Characterization of the Beef Cow-calf Enterprise of the Northern Great Plains

** ANIMAL ID NUMBERS MUST BE DESIGNATED IN **

Agricultural Balance Sheet (Financial Statement)

Goat and Sheep Situation & Outlook

PRODUCERS can choose to use natural

cow-calf Risk Management Using Put Options and Futures

How to Raise and Show Pigs

Economic Feasibility of a Multi-Species Slaughter/Processing Facility in Northeastern Nevada

Preliminary Estimates of Potential Economic Losses to Stock Growers due to the Presence of Wolves in North Eastern Oregon

Market Report provided by American Restaurant Association

Agriculture, Food & Natural Resources Career Cluster Agriculture Meat and Dairy Product Processing

COW/CALF MANAGEMENT Minimizing Calving Difficulty in Beef Cattle

Beef Cattle Handbook

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Transcription:

G84-710-A Livestock Market Terms, Part III The third in a series of three*, this NebGuide discusses livestock grading terms for both live animals and carcasses. Allen C. Wellman, Extension Marketing Specialist Previous Category Catalog Order Info Livestock Grading USDA Grades for Live Animals USDA Feeder Cattle Grades Vealer and Slaughter Calf Quality Grades Slaughter Hogs Feeder Pigs Slaughter Lambs, Yearlings, Sheep USDA Grades for Carcass Meats Livestock producers and feeders, and others involved with agriculture are exposed daily to market news articles and broadcasts. Most people understand the terms used in the market news broadcasts and stories. Complete definitions of terms in the livestock marketing area are provided to eliminate any misunderstanding of a market news broadcast or article. Livestock Grading Grading is the segregation of a commodity into lots or groupings that have a relatively high degree of uniformity in certain specified attributes associated with market preferences and valuation. For livestock (live) grading, animals are first classified by species, expected use, class (based on sex and condition), and then graded. There are two federal grades for meat--quality grades and yield grades or cutability. Quality grades categorize meat on the basis of its acceptability for consumer-cuts; yield grades categorize carcasses on 1 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM

the basis of an expected yield of boneless, trimmed retail cuts. USDA Grades for Live Animals Slaughter Cattle Quality Grades. Slaughter cattle quality grades are based on factors related to the palatability of the lean. Quality is evaluated by directing attention to finish (the amount and distribution), muscling fullness and firmness, and physical characteristics related to maturity. When considering maturity, approximate maximum age limits for steers and heifers are 4, months for Prime and Choice and 48 months for Good and Standard. If these classes are past 48 months of age, Commercial grade applies. No age limits are recognized for any class in the Utility, Cutter and Canner grades. Steers, heifers Cows Bullocks Bulls Grade Prime, Choice, Good, Standard, Commercial, Utility, Cutter, Canner Choice, Good, Standard, Commercial, Utility, Cutter, Canner Prime, Choice, Good, Standard, Utility Not quality graded Slaughter Cattle Yield Grades. Yield grades for slaughter cattle depend on the same factors as those used for carcass beef-fat thickness over the ribeye; percentage of kidney, pelvic, and heart fat; carcass weight; and the area of the ribeye muscle. Although these factors cannot be measured directly in the live animal, live cattle can be evaluated according to muscling and fatness. The thickness and fullness of muscling in relation to skeletal size largely account for the area of the ribeye and carcass weight. External fatness largely accounts for the effects of the thickness of fat over the ribeye and the percentage of kidney, pelvic, and heart fat. The following grade numbers are assigned to all classes of slaughter cattle: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, with Yield Grade Number 1 being the most desirable. USDA Feeder Cattle Grades In the 1970s the cattle industry began using a new set of USDA grades for feeder cattle. Based on frame size and thickness of muscling, these grades were designed to provide a more adequate description of feeder cattle when used in conjunction with factors such as age, sex, weight and condition. The objective of these grades is to provide a system to separate animals into more uniform groups when they are bought and sold. Frame size refers to the end weight usually required before an animal can be expected to grade Choice--the larger the frame the higher the rate of gain, but the longer the required feeding period and the greater the live weight needed to grade Choice. Thickness relates to yield, ribeye size, and muscle-to-bone ratio. The following specifications for each category apply only to thrifty animals. Thriftiness refers to the ability of the feeder animal to gain weight and fatten rapidly and efficiently. Indicators of thriftiness are shape for age and alertness. Frame Size 2 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM

Thickness Large (L) frame feeder cattle have large frames and are tall and long for their age. Steers would not be expected to produce Choice carcasses until their live weight exceeded 1,200 lbs.; heifers, more than 1,000 lbs. Medium (M) frame feeder cattle have slightly large frames and are slightly tall and slightly long-bodied for their age. Steers would not be expected to grade Choice until they reached a live weight of between 1,000 and 1,200 lbs.; heifers, between 850 and 1,000 lbs. Small (S) frame feeder cattle have small frames and are shorter bodied and shorter in height than medium frame feeder cattle. Steers would be expected to grade Choice at less than 1,000 lbs.; heifers, at less than 850 lbs. No. 1: These cattle generally show a high proportion of beef breeding. They are slightly thick throughout, slightly thick and full in the forearm, showing a rounded appearance through the back and loin, with moderate width between the legs, both front and rear. No. 2: These cattle are narrow through the forequarter and the middle part of the rounds. The forearm is thin, and the back and loin have a sunken appearance. The legs, both front and rear, are set close together. No. 3: Feeder cattle included in this grade are thrifty animals which have less thickness than the minimum requirements specified for the No. 2 grade. Inferior: This grade includes those animals which are not expected to perform normally in their present state and those that are double-muscled. Cattle in this grade may have any combination of thickness and frame size. Vealer and Slaughter Calf Quality Grades Quality grades for vealers and slaughter calves are determined by conformation, finish and quality. Conformation relates to the general body proportions and to the ratio of meat and bone. Finish refers to the fatness of the animal, and quality is defined as the refinement of hair, hide and bone, and to the smoothness and symmetry of the body. Quality is also associated with carcass yield and the proportion of meat to bone. Quality grades for all classes of these animals are Prime, Choice, Good, Standard, Utility, and Cull. Yield grades are not established for vealer or slaughter calves. Slaughter Hogs Slaughter hog grades are also based on the quality of the lean and the yield of the four lean cuts. Belly thickness is a consideration as an indicator of bacon production. Softness and oiliness of the carcass is also a consideration. The amount and distribution of external finish, the firmness of fat and the firmness of the lean are used to indicate quality. Slaughter barrows and gilts that do not meet standards of acceptable quality are graded Utility. Those that meet the standards of acceptable quality are graded U.S. No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 on the basis of expected combined carcass yield of the four lean cuts. U.S. No. I represents the highest yield. 3 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM

Factors used to evaluate yield are average backfat thickness in relation to carcass length or live weight. Live weight is the only factor that can be readily determined and provision is made for superior muscling to compensate for greater fatness within certain limitations. Barrows,Gilts Sows Boars, Stags Grade Name U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 2, U.S. No. 3, U.S. No. 4, U.S. Utility U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 2, U.S. No. 3, Medium, Cull No official grade standards exist Feeder Pigs Grades for feeder pigs are U.S. No. 1, 2, 3, 4, Utility and Cull. Unthrifty pigs are graded Utility and Cull, depending on the degree of unthriftiness. Pigs classified as thrifty are graded U.S. No. 1, 2, 3, or 4 on the basis of logical slaughter potential. The logical slaughter potential of a thrifty feeder pig is the expected slaughter grade at a market weight of 220 pounds after a normal feeding period. Thriftiness in a feeder pig is its apparent ability to gain weight rapidly and efficiently. An indication of slaughter potential is derived by a composite evaluation of the development of the muscular and skeletal system. Indicators of thriftiness are size for age, health, and other general characteristics. Barrows, gilts, boar pigs (it is assumed that boar pigs will be castrated prior to the development of secondary physical characteristics of a boar). U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 2, U.S. No. 3, U.S. No. 4, Utility, Cull Slaughter Lambs, Yearlings, Sheep The live slaughter animal grade standards are based on factors that are directly related to the quality and yield grades for their carcasses. Quality grade names and yield grade designations are identical for both live animals and carcasses. The factors on which live quality and yield grades are based are also consistent with those of carcass grades. QUALITY GRADES Lambs, yearlings Sheep QUALITY GRADES Slaughter lambs, yearlings, sheep Feeder lambs, yearlings, sheep Prime, Choice, Good, Utility, Cull Choice, Good, Utility, Cull 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prime, Choice, Good, Utility, Cull USDA Grades for Carcass Meats 4 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM

Beef Quality Grades. The quality grade of a beef carcass is based on the palatability-indicating mostly the characteristics of the lean. The quality of the lean is determined by considering the degree of marbling and firmness in relation to maturity. Maturity is determined by evaluating the size, shape, and hardening of bones and cartilages, and by the color of the lean meat. Marbling refers to the flecks of fat interspersed among muscle fibers in the lean. The degree of marbling is considered to be positively associated with flavor, tenderness, juiciness and palatability. Steers, heifers Cows Bullock Bulls Prime, Choice, Good, Standard, Commercial, Utility, Cutter, Canner Choice, Good, Standard, Commercial, Utility, Cutter, Canner Prime, Choice, Good Standard, Utility Not quality graded Beef Yield Grades. Beef yield grades are based on the percentage yield of boneless, closely trimmed, retail cuts Mom the round, loin, rib, and chuck. There are five USDA yield grades numbered 1 through 5, with Yield Grade 1 carcasses having the highest yield of retail cuts, and Yield Grade 5 the lowest. A carcass typical of its yield grade would be expected to yield about 4.6% more in retail cuts than the next lower yield grade when USDA cutting methods are used (about 2/3 of the bone is removed and the cuts are trimmed of fat in excess of inch). Yield variations of retail cuts among carcasses are caused by the amount of fat that must be trimmed from the carcass in making the cuts, and the thickness and fullness of the muscling. The four measures yield grades are based on are: the amount of external fat, the size of the ribeye muscle, the amount of kidney, pelvic and heart fat, and the carcass weight. External fat is the most important yield grade factor because it is a good indicator of the amount of fat that must be trimmed in making retail cuts. A single fat thickness measurement over the ribeye muscle has proven to be the most practical indicator of external fatness. This measurement is made after the side of beef has been separated into a forequarter and a hindquarter. Four-tenths of an inch variation in fat thickness over the ribeye makes a full yield grade change. The area of the ribeye muscle is another factor used in determining yield grades. The ribeye muscle lies on each side of the backbone and runs the full length of the back. When a side of beef is separated into a forequarter and a hindquarter, a cross-section of the ribeye muscle is exposed and its area can be measured in square inches. A change of about 3 square inches in ribeye area makes a full yield grade change. Increases in fat deposits on the inside of the carcass around the kidney and in the pelvic and heart areas decrease the yield of retail cuts. A 5% change in the amount of these fats makes a full yield grade change. Carcass weight is the least important yield grade factor. When used with the other three factors, an increase in weight indicates a decrease in the yield of retail cuts. It takes a change of about 250 pounds in carcass weight to make a full yield grade change. 5 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM

Grade Name Beef yield grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Calf and vealer quality grade (Yield grades not established for calf and vealer carcasses) Prime, Choice, Good, Standard, Utility, Cull Pork Carcasses. Grades for pork carcasses taken from barrows and gilts are based on quality-indicating characteristics of the lean and the expected yields of the four lean cuts (specifically, the ham, loin, picnic shoulder, and Boston butt). Two general levels of quality are specified--acceptable and unacceptable. Acceptability is based on firmness, marbling and color. Indirect indicators are firmness of fat and lean, feathering between the ribs, and color. The degree of external fatness is not considered in evaluating the quality of the lean. Suitability of the belly for bacon (in terms of thickness), along with softness and oiliness of the carcass, is considered in quality evaluations. Carcasses having unacceptable quality of lean and/or bellies that are too thin and/or carcasses that are soft and oily are graded U.S. Utility. If a carcass qualifies as acceptable, it is graded U.S. No. 1, 2, 3, or 4, based entirely on the expected carcass yields of the four lean cuts. Carcasses grading U.S. No. 1 are expected to yield 53% or more of the four lean cuts based on chilled carcass weight; U.S. No. 2 carcasses 50 to 52.9%; U.S. No. 3 carcasses 47 to 49.9%; and U.S. No. 4 carcasses less than 47%. Variations in yield of the four lean cuts are associated with variations in fatness and muscling. Barrows, gilts U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 2, U.S. No. 3, U.S. No. 4, U.S. Utility Sows Boars, stags U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 2, U.S. No. 3, Medium, Cull No official grade standards Lamb, Yearling Mutton, and Mutton Carcasses. Grades for ovine carcasses are based on palatability indicating characteristics of the lean, conformation, and the estimated percentage of closely trimmed, boneless, major retail cuts to be derived from the carcass. The relevant retail cuts are from the leg, loin, hotel rack, and shoulder. Quality grades specified are Prime, Choice, Good, Utility and Cull. Mutton carcasses are not eligible for Prime grades. Five yield grades, Number 1 through 5, cover the range in cutability, with Yield Grade 1 indicating the highest yield. A carcass that is typical of its yield grade would be expected to yield 3.5% more in total retail cuts than the next lower yield grade when USDA cutting and trimming methods are followed. Variations in yield are attributed to the amount of fat trimmed off in making retail cuts and the thickness and fullness of muscling. The yield of an ovine carcass is determined by considering the amount of external fat, the amount of kidney and pelvic fat, and the conformation grade of the legs. Lamb and yearling mutton quality grades Lamb and yearling mutton, and mutton yield grades 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Prime, Choice, Good, Utility, Cull 6 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM

See NebGuides G82-590, Feeder Cattle Grades, and G83-675, Yield Grades and Quality Grades for Lamb Carcasses, for a more complete explanation of certain specific terms relating to beef and lamb carcasses and feeder cattle grades. * G84-708, Livestock Market Terms, Part I defines and categories general livestock and dressed meat terms, market types and marketing. G84-709, Livestock Market Terms, Part II covers general market and futures market terms. File G710 under: FARM MANAGEMENT K-17, Marketing Issued July 1984; 12,000 printed. Electronic version issued June 1996 pubs@unlvm.unl.edu Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Kenneth R. Bolen, Director of Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture. 7 of 7 8/4/99 12:27 PM