School of Health Sciences

Similar documents
School of Art, Design & Media

UNISTATS. Course statistics. PDF report. 18 Jun Applied Nursing (Learning Disability) and Generic Social Work. Sheffield Hallam University

UNISTATS PDF report Head office Notes unistats.gov.uk

UNISTATS. Course statistics. PDF report. 06 Jul Applied Economics. University Of St Andrews

UNISTATS. Course statistics. PDF report. 25 Jun Archaeology/Earth Science. University Of Glasgow. Head office University Avenue Glasgow G12 8QQ

UNISTATS. Course statistics. PDF report. 24 Jun Manufacturing Engineering. Birmingham Metropolitan College

UNISTATS. Course statistics. PDF report. 06 Jul Audio Engineering. University Of The Highlands And Islands

UNISTATS. Course statistics. PDF report. 21 Jun Network Security Management. Southampton Solent University

CODE OF PRACTICE ON STUDENT FEEDBACK AND EVALUATION

Academic Quality Academic Quality A c a mic Quality A c a d e m i c Quality Academic. A Guide to Using Student Feedback

Enhancing the student experience: Lessons from the NSS for Business Schools

Course and Subject Surveys

Policy on Surveying and Responding to Student Opinion

Subject Experience Survey Instrument Questions

2. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

The York Social Policy Masters Programme

Policy on Student Evaluation of Modules

Please provide any comments you may have regarding your preparation to teach instructional and pedagogical content.

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Postgraduate Pre-Experience Board of Studies

Career Competency Portfolio. Year NAME

Sample SWOT: Example of Initial Brainstorming:

Programme Specification: Professional Graduate Certificate in Education Post-Compulsory Education and Training (Level 6) July 2011

FOUNDATION DEGREE - BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Programme Specification

This Part is carried out in China and is exempt from classification for this programme.

Multiple Surveys are available containing core questions: Module. Tutorials. Seminars. Labs/Practicals. Placements. Clinical Placements

Awarding Institution: Institute of Education, University of London. Teaching Institutions: Institute of Education, University of London

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MA International Relations

School of Business, Management and Economics

Post-graduate Programmes in Construction. Royal Institution of Chartered surveyors (RICS), Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)

Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 25 th March 2015

The advanced study of organisations, their management and the changing external context in which they operate.

The following module is compulsory for students who do not have an A-level pass in Mathematics. CH1M Chemistry M 20 4

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

How To Assess The Program

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA/MSc Psychology of Education and the MA Education (Psychology)

Programme Specification

Responding to feedback from students. Guidance about providing information for students

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MSc Network Security and Pen Testing

Training trainee solicitors Guidelines on performance review and appraisals

For students entering in 2003 Date of specification: July 2003 Programme Director: Mr M. McQueen Board of Studies MSc Economics Accreditation: N/A

Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master in Business Administration

Personal Development Planning with tutor and peer student mentoring - Interim report of an experiment in implementation (warts and all)

Introduction to Teacher Aide

CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR INSPECTION 1 3. BACKGROUND TO THE COURSE 1 4. THE QUALITY OF PASTORAL CARE 2

Work experience Choosing a course Qualifications and admissions tests Personal statement The application form Interviews Other

2015 Course Calendar (Second Semester)

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MA Educational Planning, Economics, and International Development

Staff Development and Performance Management Policy & Procedure

M.A. in Counseling in Educational Settings (CES) Program Evaluation Report 2015

Assessing the quality of UK medical schools: what is the validity of student satisfaction

MSc International Banking and Financial Services For students entering in 2006

Programme approval 2006/07 PROGRAMME APPROVAL FORM SECTION 1 THE PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION. ECTS equivalent

STAFF. Summary of Results _University of Minnesota Crookston_STAFF. HumanResources. Office of

The use of design and problem solving with Foundation Year students

MA/Postgraduate Diploma in Counselling

Staff appraisals Developing the organisation and the individual. Human ResouRces Lund university MAY 2015

POLICY Personal Academic Tutoring Policy

Shell Mentoring Toolkit

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Postgraduate Pre-Experience Board of Studies

BSc Systems Engineering For students entering Part 1 in 2004

Programme Specification

UNIVERSITY OF KENT. Degree and Programme Title BA Liberal Arts with integral Year Abroad

1. Awarding Institution: Imperial College London. 2. Teaching Institution: Imperial College London

Programme Specification (Undergraduate) Date amended: 28 August 2015

Students must take and pass120 credits of taught modules 4. Exit awards. ECTS equivalent

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Eligible for British Computer Society Professional Certificate in Business Analysis Practice

Skills Audit for Researchers

Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management MSc Quality and Safety in Health Care Management MSc Leadership & Management Development

Note: The modules offered and their timing are conditional upon the availability of faculty and may be subject to change.

MSc Financial Risk Management

Measuring member satisfaction

CEM+ Employee experience survey. HOW DO YOu ALIGN YOUR PEOPLE TO DELIVER YOUR EXPERIENCE? Introduction

Programme Enhancement Plan (PEP) Template (Integrated Masters) Semester 1

Performance Appraisal Policy. Purpose

Sydney Nursing School

Evaluation of On-Site Supervisors Survey

Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: Aug 2013

STUDENT WORK EXPERIENCE GUIDE: HOW TO MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR WORK EXPERIENCE WHILE AT UNI

M.Tech. Control and Instrumentation Engineering

BSc Business Statistics UCAS Code: G390 For students entering Part 1 in 2003

Programme Specification and Curriculum Map for MA TESOL

MSc Research (Human Geography):

Our work. Advocacy Mentoring Participation Policy & research

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Chartered Institute of Management Accounting (CIMA) Certificate Level (C01 to C05)

University of Maryland Exempt Staff Employee Form

Colorado Community College System SPRING 2010 STUDENT SURVEY SUMMARY

Staff Survey 2011/12 Results Summary May 2012

PROGRAMME HANDBOOK and STUDENT GUIDE

Measuring the response of students to assessment: the Assessment Experience Questionnaire

Performance Review and Planning for Professional Staff. Conversation Guide for Supervisors

Bachelor of Commerce Online and Face to Face Course Evaluation Questionnaire

University of York Coaching Scheme

MSc/PG Diploma/PG Certificate in Project Management For students entering in October 2006

The Thesis 05. Training and Development 06

UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS LONDON STUDENT CHARTER

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications. CLINICAL MEDICINE: MB/PhD PROGRAMME. May 2011

Transcription:

This representation seeks to show strength of agreement to pairs of NSS questions and takes into account negative scores with the following weighting: Agree Completely x 2 Mostly Agree x 1.5 Neither x Mostly Disagree x -1.5 Completely Disagree x -2 Maximum Scale - to + + = % of respondents agree completely.

2. Staff have made the subject interesting. 4 (18 MONTH) 2 2 4 1. Staff are good at explaining things.

(18 MONTH) 3. Staff are enthusiastic about what they are teaching. 4 2 2 4 1. Staff are good at explaining things.

(18 MONTH) 4. The course is intellectually stimulating. 4 2 2 4 2. Staff have made the subject interesting.

6. Assessment arrangements and marking have been fair. (18 MONTH) 4 2-2 - 2 4 5. The criteria used in marking have been clear in advance.

8. I have received detailed comments on my work. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 7. Feedback on my work has been prompt.

9. Feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand. 4 2 - -2 - (18 MONTH) 2 4-4 7. Feedback on my work has been prompt.

9. Feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand. 4 2 - -2 - (18 MONTH) 2 4-4 8. I have received detailed comments on my work.

(18 MONTH) 11. I have been able to contact staff when I needed to. 4 2 2 4. I have received sufficient advice and support with my studies.

12. Good advice was available when I needed to make study choices. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 11. I have been able to contact staff when I needed to.

15. The course is well organised and is running smoothly. 4 2 - (18 MONTH) 2 4-2 - 13. The timetable works efficiently as far as my activities are concerned.

15. The course is well organised and is running smoothly. 4 2 - -2 (18 MONTH) -2-2 4-14. Any changes in the course or teaching have been communicated effectively.

17. I have been able to access general IT resources when I needed to. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 16. The library resources and services are good enough for my needs.

18. I have been able to access specialised equipment, facilities or rooms when I needed to. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 17. I have been able to access general IT resources when I needed to.

2. My communication skills have improved. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 19. The course has helped me to present myself with confidence.

21. As a result of the course, I feel confident in tackling unfamiliar problems. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 19. The course has helped me to present myself with confidence.

N3.2 I was allocated placement(s) suitable for my course. 4 2 (18 MONTH) -4 - -2-2 4 N3.1 I received sufficient preparatory information prior to my placement(s).

N3.4 I was given opportunities to meet my required practice learning outcomes/competences. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 N3.3 I received appropriate supervision on placement(s).

N3.6 My practice supervisor(s) understood how my placement(s) related to the broader requirements of my course. 4 2 (18 MONTH) 2 4 N3.5 My contribution during placement(s) as part of the clinical team was valued.

B1.2 Good advice is available for making career choices. 4 2-2 4-2 - -4 B1.1 As a result of my course, I believe that I have improved my career prospects.

B12.3 The course has stimulated my enthusiasm for further learning. 4 2-4 - -2-2 4 B1.3 Good advice is available on further study opportunities.

B2.2 There is an appropriate range of options to choose from on my course. 4 2 - -2 - -4 - - - 2 4 B2.1 All of the compulsory modules are relevant to my course.

B5.5 Practical activities on my course have helped me to learn. 4 2 2 4 B5.4 My learning has benefited from modules that are informed by current research.

B6.2 My feedback on the course is listened to and valued. 4 2 - -2 - -4 - - 2 4 B6.1 I have had adequate opportunities to provide feedback on all elements of my course.

B6.3 It is clear to me how students comments on the course have been acted upon. 4 2 - -2 - -4 2 4 - B6.1 I have had adequate opportunities to provide feedback on all elements of my course.

B11.5 I feel part of an academic community in my college or university. 4 2-2 4-2 B11.4 Within my course, I feel my suggestions and ideas are valued.

NSS Positivity - Correlation to Overall Satisfaction UoB Whole NSS Cohort 1. Perasons Correlation Q to Q 22.8.6.4.2. -.2 213 214 215 Mean