Integrating Quality into Facility Management Operations



Similar documents
Reducing Client s Hazardous / Landfill Waste; Improving Air Quality

QMS Manual 2350 Helen Street, N. St. Paul, MN Page 1 of 5. Quality Management System Manual

Campus Operations Service Level Agreement

Janitorial Service. Scope of Work

You Need From Today s Design/Construction Team

The schedule is based upon a five (5) day work week (Monday through Friday). Weekend service is only when requested.

How To Become A Tqm Professional

Commercial Maintenance Services

PMP Examination Tasks Puzzle game

Facilities Management in Kuwait. Opportunities, challenge and added value. Kuwait Municipality

Facilities Operations Customer Service Standards WORK ORDER PRIORITIES

CDC UNIFIED PROCESS PRACTICES GUIDE

Eagle Machining, Inc. Quality Management System

Six Sigma, ISO 9001 and Baldrige

A Framework for Business Sustainability

Lean and Six Sigma Healthcare Fad or Reality. Vince D Mello President

the Most Out of Your Facilities Christopher P. Hodges, P.E., CFM, LEED-AP, IFMA Fellow

PROJECT QUALITY MANAGEMENT

Administrative Procedure Manual Human Resources: Evaluations Custodian AP: 200C

Chris Hodges, P.E., CFM, LEED AP, IFMA Fellow, FRICS

Six Sigma Leadership Guide for Program Success: S-SLEF Framework

Project Management Professional (PMP) Examination Content Outline

University of Victoria Facilities Management Green Cleaning Policy. Green Cleaning Policy. Purpose:

DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORT OPERATIONS CLEANING SCHEDULE FOR CONTRACT 2014

Attached is one (1) copy of Addendum 1, hereby made a part of the above referenced ITB.

Quality Systems Manual

The importance of integrated management systems in Facilities Management. J.C. Swanepoel

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT GENERAL POLICY

How To Implement International Standard For Service Excellence (Tisse2012)

Quality Process in Engineering ISO 9000 and Beyond. Presented by: Roxanne L. Pillar, P.E. October 2014

RFID Journal Live! 2006 May 1-3, 2006 MGM Grand Conference Center Las Vegas, Nevada

Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE Washington, DC August 2, 2013 VHA ENTERPRISE FRAMEWORK FOR QUALITY, SAFETY, AND VALUE

Lean Management System LMS:2OI2

Florida Department of Transportation 1000 NW 111 th Avenue, Room 6203 Miami, Florida

BANK OF BARODA USHAKIRAN GUEST HOUSE PEDDAR ROAD, MUMBAI TENDER FOR PREMISES AND FACILITY MANAGEMENT

Creating a Human Capital Management Quality Management System

Supplier Quality Assurance

2.1 The total area of floor space to be cleaned is approximately 9120 m2 which includes:

Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma

MEANING & SIGNIFICANCE OF STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL [SPC] Presented by, JAYA VARATHAN B SANKARAN S SARAVANAN J THANGAVEL S

Lean Six Sigma Training The DMAIC Story. Unit 6: Glossary Page 6-1

Louisiana Tech University Lean Manufacturing Courses

Camber Quality Assurance (QA) Approach

Unit-5 Quality Management Standards

INDUSTRY INSIGHTS: TO INSOURCE OR TO OUTSOURCE THAT IS THE QUESTION

Module 13. Software Reliability and Quality Management. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Kennesaw State University. Health Sciences Building. Green Cleaning Manual

Owner Cleaning and Maintenance Checklist

SMA Custodial Schedules:

CORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL

The MSS Approach to BPM

Work Orders. Emergency Work Orders

QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL JPM OF MISSISSIPPI, INC.

ISO 9001 Quality Management System

Quality at GE Energy

Project Quality Management. Project Management for IT

Lean, Six Sigma, and the Systems Approach: Management Initiatives for Process Improvement

Using an Integrated Management System Approach to Increase Resilience

INTEGRATED QUALITY MANAGEMENT TRAINING. (Albert Balogh)

Enabling IT Performance & Value with Effective IT Governance Assessment & Improvement Practices. April 10, 2013

Housekeeping Standards general store areas.

(Dev + Ops) ITSM = Calamity

Quality System Overview

Pest Control Service. Scope of Work

Total Quality Management (TQM) presented by Dr. Eng. Abed Schokry

Quality Manual. ISO/TS 16949:2009 Quality Management System. Sensing and Control

L&S Associates, LLC. Educational, Environmental, Maintenance & Operations Consultants (EEMOCo)

Atlanta Public Schools Custodial Services, #

Occupational Profile and Curriculum Summary

CASTLEHEAD MEDICAL CENTRE JOB DESCRIPTION

Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plans for LEED. Matt Gregg, PE, LEED AP

CLEANING CONTRACT BID SPECIFICATIONS

Efficient Operations for Maintenance

A Best Practices Guide to Writing an RFP for Professional Commercial Cleaning Services

How To Understand And Implement Pas 55

Performance Management System

MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT

TRANSMISSION BUSINESS PERFORMANCE

How To Calculate Cost Of An Eco-Friendly Building

Operations Management and Lean Six Sigma. Presented by: David Muncaster Manager, CI and CSAT Staples Advantage Canada

Better Recycling - Less Waste Your Sustainable Campus Initiative

Body of Knowledge for Six Sigma Lean Sensei

Hong Kong Society for Quality

How To Choose A Test Maturity Assessment Model

SANITATION AND PEST CONTROL INSPECTION REPORT INSPECTOR: BUSINESS NAME:

Supplier Quality Management System Audit Checklist (ISO 9000:2000, TS 16949:2002)

QUIZ MODULE 1: BASIC CONCEPTS IN QUALITY AND TQM

Performance Management for Best Practice

Number Northern Arizona University Facility Services Section Page. Effective April 1, 2011

Supplier Management for Complex Outsourced Services: A Strategic Framework

Advancing Academic Facility Performance with IFMA s Sustainability Facility Professional Credential

Transcription:

Integrating Quality into Facility Management Operations Robert Dawkins, CSSBB VP, Operational Excellence ARAMARK Andrew Aldrich Resident District Manager ARAMARK

MANAGING CEUs AND CFM MAINTENANCE POINTS You are eligible to receive Continuing Education Units and Certified Facility Manager maintenance points for attending sessions at IFMA's World Workplace. To receive 20 CFM maintenance points: Record your attendance on your CFM Recertification Worksheet. At recertification time, submit your completed CFM Recertification Worksheet. To receive CEUs: Pay the US$12 processing fee when you register for the conference. Visit the CEU Kiosks at registration or log on to http://ceu.experientinc.com/wwc121 and pass a five-question assessment developed by the speaker. CEUs can only be earned upon successful completion of the assessment. Your transcript will be emailed to you. Individuals seeking CEUs or LUs from other organizations must contact those organizations for instructions on self-reporting credit hours.

Evaluate Sessions Take Assessments & Log CEUs (no more CEU codes) Visit the registration kiosks or go online at http://ceu.experient-inc.com/wwc121

Meet Our Presenters: Andrew Aldrich Resident District Manager ARAMARK Facility Services Over 26 years in FM/Hospitality industry Responsible for broad range of FM services at 3M World Headquarters Robert Dawkins VP, Operational Excellence ARAMARK Facility Services Almost 20 years in FM industry Responsible for standards, projects and program solutions

Session Objectives Provide an overview of Quality Management Systems (QMS) Define Facility Management-specific QMS attributes Link the QMS to continuous improvement Review a QMS case study

Quality Management System Overview

Quality Management Systems Overview What is a QMS? A management system consisting of core and supporting processes and elements whose primary purpose is to delivery high quality products and services that meet or exceed customer expectations. How does the Facility Manager use a QMS?

Quality Management Systems Overview Let s begin with a definition of Facility Management......a profession that encompasses multiple disciplines to ensure functionality of the built environment by integrating people, place process and technology. 1 1 IFMA Website, July 2012

Quality Management Systems Overview...a profession that encompasses multiple disciplines to ensure functionality of the built environment by integrating people, place, process and technology. INPUTS People Place Process Technology PROCESS Integrating OUTPUT Functionality of the built environment

Quality Management Systems Overview Which QMS makes the most sense for FM?

Quality Management Systems Overview ASQ/ANSI Total Quality Management Baldrige National Quality Program EFQM ISO There are many to choose from...

Quality Management Systems Overview ASQ/ANSI Process cycle that links customer requirements with satisfaction Key Elements Mgt Responsibility Resource Mgt Product Realization Measurement, Analysis and Improvement From ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q 90012008 Quality Management Systems Requirements

Quality Management Systems Overview Baldrige NQP Integrated management system built on measurement and knowledge Key Elements Leadership Strategic Planning Customer/Market Focus Workforce Focus Process Management Results Measurement, Analysis & Knowledge From 2008 BNQP Criteria for Performance Excellence

Quality Management Systems Overview EFQM Links Leadership to Results via Process Key Elements People Policy & Strategy Partnerships & Resources Results

Quality Management Systems Overview ISO A primary source for many companies Includes several standards QMS is described in ISO9000 TQM Philosophy for continuous improvement Key Elements Quality starts with customer Commitment to continuous improvement Measurement Employee empowerment Quality is a market differentiator

Customer Expectations Results Quality Management Systems Overview Performance Measurement Service Level Agreements Standard Metrics & Benchmarks Performance Management Policies & Playbooks Control Plans Body of Knowledge Industry & Performance References Quality Control & Assurance Customer Satisfaction Surveys Training Standard Reports Continuous Improvement Projects Organizational Structure, Roles, & Responsibilities Paul Henry and Robert Dawkins - 2012

Quality Management Systems Overview Benefits to Facility Managers Aligns processes and systems Provides listening post to gauge performance Facilitates a learning organization Builds a body of knowledge Identifies improvement opportunities

QMS Components and Facility Management

QMS Components and FM Four primary QMS components 1. Defining customer expectations 2. Measuring Performance 3. Managing Performance 4. Creating a Body of Knowledge

QMS Components and FM 1. Defining Customer Expectations A. Key Questions What is to be done? Where is it to be done? How often is it to be done? What does success look like? How will performance be measured? Is there a regulated standard to be met?

QMS Components and FM 1. Defining Customer Expectations B. Documentation The answers to the key questions Service parameters Relevant metrics Target results

QMS Components and FM 2. Measuring Performance A. Identify metrics Good sources of standards IFMA BOMA RS Means Use balanced approach People, place, process and cost Efficiency and effectiveness

QMS Components and FM 2. Measuring Performance B. Set Targets Use benchmarks Use process experience C. Perform Quality Control and Assurance Quality Control compliance evaluations meant to prevent issues prior to occurrence Quality Assurance inspection of end result to confirm it meets standard

QMS Components and FM 2. Measuring Performance D. Collect and Analyze Data IWMS and CMMS Consider value of information versus cost of data collection

QMS Components and FM 3. Managing Performance A. Use Policies, Standards and Tools Standard work provides the opportunity for evaluation B. Use control plans Set tolerances for metrics Define actions in event performance reaches warning level C. Establish standard reports Align with customer expectations and needs Conduct correct graphical and statistical analysis

QMS Components and FM 4. Creating a Body of Knowledge A. Reference Materials - Good practices from inside/outside the organization Original Equipment Manufacturer information Internal Standards B. Archived Results Exception reports CMMS or IWMS data Monthly and Quarterly Reports C. Project Documentation

Customer Expectations Results Quality Management Systems Overview Performance Measurement Service Level Agreements Standard Metrics & Benchmarks Performance Management Policies & Playbooks Control Plans Body of Knowledge Industry & Performance References Quality Control & Assurance Customer Satisfaction Surveys Training Standard Reports Continuous Improvement Projects Organizational Structure, Roles, & Responsibilities Paul Henry and Robert Dawkins - 2012

Knowledge to Action

The QMS... Knowledge to Action Helps identify issues by providing data Provides references to bring issues into control Occasionally, a CI project is needed to regain control...

Knowledge to Action Numerous CI process options Six Sigma Lean Six Sigma 8 Disciplines Plan-Do-Check-Act Theory of Constraints There are several elements common to these methods...

Knowledge to Action Linking Continuous Improvement and Quality Management Systems Common CI Method Characteristics Quality Management System Component Empirical Problem Statements Service Level Agreements Defined metrics and targets Measured Performance Gaps Whether under- or overachieving these gaps point to an opportunity to improve cost, delivery time or satisfaction Root Cause Identification and Analysis Standards Compliance Measuring compliance with job or process requirements helps determine if the issue is the process design or execution. Process Trends Measuring over time allows analysis to determine if the result is normal variation or if there is really a change. Trends also require additional investigation to understand the reason for the results. Solution Development and Testing Standards Documented work requirements makes it easier to identify and implement improvements. Projects Properly documented CI improvements are more easily leveraged across the organization. Impact Verification Standard Metrics and Measurement System Confirmation of operational and financial impact.

A QMS Case Study Facility Type: Headquarters Facility Size: 6 million square feet Facility Occupancy: Approximately 18,000 Facility Management Services: Cleaning Dining and Catering Shipping/Receiving Mailroom Sundries Shop Reception

The FM Specific QMS 1. Defining Customer Expectations Jointly developed service levels and associated metrics Consolidated various data streams Customer Satisfaction Vendor Inspections (QA) Client Inspections (QA) Peer benchmarking 2. Measuring Performance Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for all services Ability to stratify data by building and floor Let s focus the case study on client satisfaction with cleaning...

The FM Specific QMS 3. Managing Performance Gap analysis against 50 metrics Ability to isolate issues to specific buildings and floors Data analysis identifies training and performance issues Trend analysis identifies systemic issues 4. Creating a Body of Knowledge Monthly Operating Reviews Documentation of lessons learned The QMS enhancements have resulted in 100 basis point improvement in client satisfaction in six months!

Facility Services Site Cleaning Detail YTD Performance Volume CPC Performance Financial Consumable Cost Service Delivery Speed & Quality Due to change in metric, 2010 comparative data is not available Client Satisfaction Overall

2011_01 2011_02 2011_03 2011_04 2011_05 2011_06 2011_07 2011_08 2011_09 2011_10 2011_11 2011_12 2012_01 2012_02 2012_03 2012_04 2012_05 2012_06 2012_07 2012_08 OSAT Overall Satisfaction by Month 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.28 314 3.53 3.49 3.57 3.62 3.44 3.78 3.67 3.58 260 3.38 3.62 3.49 3.76 3.79 4.02 3.86 4.12 3.85 3.92 3.85 350 300 3.00 250 2.50 2.00 169 160 143 142 179 144 160 167 191 163 181 154 155 159 158 200 150 1.50 1.00 102 72 87 100 0.50 50 0.00 0 2011 2012 Year & Month Overall Satisfaction Number of Survey Responses

Victor Scharafanow Rosie Sundheim Osman Mohamed Norma Aguila Carbajal Nieves Chavarin Flores 2012 2011 2010 Joel Reyes Gonzalez Fahmud Abdi Ali Alejandro Dominquez Martinez 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

OSAT Overall Satisfaction Performance by Building 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.80 30 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.36 25 4.50 4.11 4.11 4.00 4.50 4.20 25 3.00 3.14 3.67 3.75 3.65 20 3.48 3.00 19 3.64 20 14 15 2.00 12 11 10 9 10 1.00 0.00 7 6 5 5 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 201 207 209 216 218 220 223 224 225 230 235 236 243 250 251 252 260 270 275 Lead 5 0 Overall Satisfaction Number of Survey Responses

Overall Satisfaction Overall Satisfaction by Building and Floor 5.00 10 9 4.00 8 7 3.00 6 5 2.00 4 3 1.00 2 1 0.00 2012_08 2012_08 2012_08 2012 2012 2012 1 3 5 225 Building, Year, Month and Floor 0 Overall Satisfaction Count of PanelistIdQuestion

Sum of SC Cultural Ethnicity of Staff Sum of SC Uniforming Sum of SC Doors Sum of SC Window(s) Sum of SC Wet Floor Signs Sum of SC Vacuumiung Sum of SC Vacuuming During Day Sum of SC Trash - Timing Sum of SC Trash - Recycling Sum of SC Trash - Office Bins Returned Sum of SC Trash - Missed Sum of SC Trash - Frquency Sum of SC Trash - Common Area Trash Overflowing Sum of SC Thoroughness Sum of SC Stairwell Cleanliness Sum of SC Staff Profressionalism Sum of SC Staff - Postive Sum of SC Staff - Negative Sum of SC Smell of Cleaner Sum of SC Showers Sum of SC Service Request Failure Sum of SC Schedule - When? Sum of SC Safe Work Practices Sum of SC Productivity Sum of SC Plant Engineering Maintenance Sum of SC Pest / Rodents Sum of SC Personal Hygeine Sum of SC Office Chairs Sum of SC Noise Level Sum of SC Microwave Cleanliness Sum of SC Lights Left On Sum of SC Language Sum of SC Lab Floors / Hallways Sum of SC Interrupt Meetings Sum of SC Information - ARAMARK Hospitality Services Sum of SC Glass Sum of SC Feminine Hygeine Machines Sum of SC Escalators Sum of SC Entrances Sum of SC Emergency Response Sum of SC Elevators Lockdown Sum of SC Elevator Cleanliness Sum of SC Dusting Sum of SC Day Cleaning is Embarassing Sum of SC Day Cleaning Sum of SC Conference Rooms Sum of SC Conference Room Chairs Sum of SC Cleaning Practices Sum of SC Cell Phone Sum of SC Carpet Cleanliness Sum of SC Can Liners Sum of SC Bathroom - Supplies Sum of SC Bathroom - Multiple Closed Sum of SC Bathroom - Dispensers Sum of SC Bathroom - Closed Sum of SC Bathroom - Cleanliness Sum of SC Back to Self Op Building Control Plan - Drivers of Dissatisfaction - OSAT 1 to 3 Survey Data: May to August 2012-5 0 225 1 2 3 4 5

Top 15 Comments August 2012 Survey Data Data Bldg Floor Staff +1 Vac / Day1 Vacuuming1 BR Clsd1 Tr Freq1 Day Clng1 BR Clng1 BR Supp1 Thorough1 Dusting1 Tr Missed Plant Eng.1 Int Mtgs1 Tr Timing1 Tr Common1 Total 201 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1B 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% B 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 201 Total 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 207 B 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 207 Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 209 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% B 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 209 Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 216 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% B 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% G 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 216 Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 218 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 218 Total 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 220 10 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 11 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 12 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 14 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 6 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 7 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 9 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 220 Total 16.0% 14.3% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.4% 223 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 4 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 6 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 223 Total 8.0% 7.1% 0.0% 7.7% 33.3% 14.3% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.6% 224 1 4.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.9% 2 0.0% 7.1% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 5 0.0% 7.1% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.6% 6 0.0% 28.6% 0.0% 7.7% 33.3% 28.6% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 50.0% 25.0% 11.4% 224 Total 4.0% 42.9% 50.0% 38.5% 33.3% 42.9% 33.3% 20.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0% 50.0% 25.0% 30.5%

Staff + Vacuuming During Day Vacuuming Bathroom Closed Frequency of Trash Day Cleaning Bathroom Cleanliness Bathroom Supplies Thoroughness Dusting Trash Missed PE Maintenance Interrupt Meetings / Offices Total Count Last Ranking % Total This Ranking % Total Total Comments % of Total Running Summary 5/31/2012 6/30/2012 7/31/2012 8/31/2012 Change From Previous Survey Staff + 1 1 746 15% 15% 46 40 29 25-4 Vacuuming During Day 2 2 560 11% 27% 16 15 12 14 2 Vacuuming 3 3 497 10% 37% 14 12 13 6-7 Bathroom Closed 4 4 495 10% 47% 9 16 13 13 0 Frequency of Trash 5 5 460 9% 56% 5 5 2 3 1 Day Cleaning 6 6 306 6% 63% 8 4 5 7 2 Bathroom Cleanliness 7 7 267 5% 68% 3 6 10 9-1 Bathroom Supplies 8 8 127 3% 71% 0 0 1 5 4 Thoroughness 9 9 116 2% 73% 2 6 4 2-2 Dusting 10 10 107 2% 75% 3 2 6 3-3 Trash Missed 11 11 98 2% 77% 1 3 5 2-3 PE Maintenance 12 12 95 2% 79% 6 1 3 5 2 Interrupt Meetings / Offices 14 13 74 2% 81% 0 0 1 5 4 Number of Surveys w/ Comments 2,922 56% 90 92 78 78 % of Total Surveys Completed 56% 58% 60% 51% 49% Avg # of Comments per Survey 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 Total Comments 4,886 134 141 126 135 Total Surveys Completed 5,190 154 154 154 158 Top 80% of Total Comments by Survey Period 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5/31/2012 6/30/2012 7/31/2012 8/31/2012

Conclusion FM seeks integration of people, place, process and technology QMS provides integration of various systems to achieve FM goal Client Expectations Performance Measurement Performance Management Body of Knowledge

Thank You! For attending this educational offering at IFMA s World Workplace. Be sure to evaluate the session at the registration kiosk or online at http://ceu.experient-inc.com/wwc121