Chapter 3. GROWTH AND POPULATION

Similar documents
Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

Texas Motor Speedway Area Master Plan January 2009 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE

REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT

DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

9.0 Alta Vista/Faircrest Heights/Riverview Park (Key Principles)

THREE MILE PLAN/URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT

Major General Plan Amendment. Project Narrative

3.1.8 Utilities and Service Systems

WEST MISSION AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN (Council Approved 11/5/03 - Resolution R)

Opal Service District Plan

FINAL WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR Adopted March 28, 2016

CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 2009 GENERAL RATE CASE CHAPTER: 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF APPLICATION

Since early 1994, The Northern Sacramento Valley Sustainable Landscapes

Michigan State University Ingham County Health Department Tri- County Regional Planning Commission Land Use and Health Resource Team

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

5. Environmental Analysis

# U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E S P E C I F I C P L A N Page 1-1 # 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 University Avenue, Historical Context

CHAPTER ONE: DEMOGRAPHIC ELEMENT

Market Analysis for Padre Boulevard Initiative in the Town of South Padre Island, TX

Presentation to Knox County Commission Monday, February 23, 2015

COUNTY BUSINESS ASSISTANCE CENTER GUIDE FOR OPENING, EXPANDING, OR RELOCATING A BUSINESS

Application No.: Steve Rush, representing Rocky Mountain Power Rocky Mountain Power Project Location: approximately 1600 N E.

Case Request: Rezone from (A) Agricultural District and (RA) Single Family Residential District to (RB) Two Unit Residential District

Greenway Area Study Recommended Master Plan Executive Summary November, 2007 Introduction

HIGHLANDS NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY AREA PARKING ANALYSIS

Philadelphia County. Land Use and Growth Management Profile

Chair Jim Wideman and Members of the Planning and Works Committee. Mid-Year 2013 Region of Waterloo Industrial and Business Park Vacant Land Inventory

SERVICING REPORT SITE PLAN AND PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM BLOCK 53 FERRIS DRIVE PLAN 58M-379 & PART OF LOT 4, REGISTERED PLAN 622 WELLESLEY, ONTARIO

CHAPTER 2 - Population and Economy

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

Staff Report General Development Plan/Master Plan Aldermanic District: 1 County Commission District: 2 MPC File No PLAN February 23, 2016

S. BLOCK 68 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA

21.03 SETTLEMENT AND HOUSING

Assisted Living & Memory Care

South Orange County Governance Visioning Process Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission

Overcoming the. Challenges of ORT Conversion in an Urban Environment. July 12, 2015

SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

2015 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS

Downtown Vancouver Full Block For Sale 1.03 Acre Redevelopment Opportunity

EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP AND LAND USE INFORMATION

Chapter 7: Sanitary Sewer Plan. Introduction. Metropolitan Council Coordination

Volume II Recommendations January 2006 City of Madison Comprehensive Plan

Evergreen Line Rapid Transit Project Business Case Executive Summary. February Reviewed by

AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

City of Opa Locka. Proposed Comprehensive Plan EAR Based Amendments. January 1, Florida International University Metropolitan Center

9988 REDWOOD AVENUE PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. April 24, 2015

Rocky View County. Background Report

CHAPTER SIXTEEN PLANNING STANDARDS AND RATIOS

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

SECTION ONE CHAPTER 2: A LAND USE PROFILE OF MANCHESTER

Economic Impact and Development Analysis. Proposed Sports Entertainment District

22.01 SETTLEMENT 24/04/2014 C73

Comprehensive Plan Update

Site No 23 Marston Trading Estate Location

Lents Town Center Mixed-Use Market Study Office Market Analysis Lents, Oregon

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

TEXT AMENDMENT SUMMARY INFORMATION

Appendix B Billboard Photos and Sign SUD Site View Simulation

Appendix A: Affordable Housing Site Inventory

Orange County LAFCO. South Orange County Governance. Visioning Process

Eagle Commuter Rail Denver, Colorado Final Design (Based upon information received by FTA in November 2010)

DRAFT POLICIES COUNTY OF HALIBURTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE

STAFF REPORT SUBJECT:

References (Statutes/Resos/Policies): Title 32 C.R.S.,, Land Development Regulation, Zoning Resolution; CC92-47; CC97-544;CC03-388, CC05-398

Request for Proposals for Preserve of Montrose

AGENDA LARIMER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Wednesday, April 20, 2016/6:30 P.M./Commissioners' Hearing Room

This section summarizes the relevant transportation policies, laws, and regulations that apply to the proposed project.

STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 20, Debbie Hill, Associate Planner 9386-A1

MEMORANDUM. Corinne Verdery, NBC Universal. Paul J. Silvern and David Berneman. Date: November 4, 2012

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

House Bill Land Conveyance Pictorial Package

Historic Tax Incentive For

Public Worksessions - A Summary of the New York City Zoning and Planning Study

Planning and Zoning Commission Johnston, Iowa June 29, 2015

AVALON PARK WEST (FORMERLY NEW RIVER) PD/MPUD- NARRATIVE FOR DRI RESCISSION, PD SUBAREA AMENDMENT AND MPUD SUBSTANTIAL MODIFICATION.

THE RUSKIN COMMUNITY PLAN

Government of the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Financial Officer

SHIRE OF GINGIN. Objects and Reasons. for. Differential Rates

Downtown Core Sub-district

PA-14-04/ORDINANCE (DTS# ) 24/7 DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS, LLC BAYSHORE BLACKROCK

DeSoto County is not a water service provider and does not operate any

PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN

Kendell Keith, RLA, AICP, LEED AP Executive Vice President RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application

Using Land Use Planning Tools to Support Strategic Conservation

Frederick. Frederick. Maryland. Smart Growth Successes. Frederick. Maryland Department of Planning

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

Revised General Plan Amendment Report (GPAR) PAA GPA BC R ER APN # APN #

In 2012 the commercial sector natural gas demand was 201 billion cubic feet (bcf) or 2.01e + 23 thousand British thermal units (kbtu).

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Restoration. a brief look at

A Break Even Analysis and Potential Profitability of a Proposed Residential Development within the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin USA

SUP07-6: Shenandoah Waste Services, LLC Special Use Permit Application for A Materials Recovery Center in a M1 (Industrial) Zoning District

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT

Urbana Enterprise Zone. October 21, 2014

Multifamily Housing: Sustainable Development in Efficient, Walkable Communities

Chapter 2 OVERVIEW - CITY PROFILE 2.1 REGIONAL SETTING 2.2 PLATTED LANDS

Transcription:

Chapter 3. GROWTH AND POPULATION

Chapter 3 GROWTH AND POPULATION Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate service needs based upon existing and anticipated growth patterns and population projections. The OPR Guidelines call for LAFCO to determine historic and projected growth and absorption patterns in relationship to an agencies boundaries and SOI. Additionally, LAFCO is asked to evaluate the impact and compatibility of such growth on land use plans, services, local government structures and growth patterns. 3.1 HISTORIC GROWTH AND GROWTH PROJECTIONS The City of Chico s population increased from 40,079 to 59,954 between 1990 and 2000, 1 with approximately 2,000 persons annually over this ten year period. As mentioned above, the California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates the current 2005 Chico population of 73,558, from a 2004 estimate of 71,154, and the City estimate for 2006 is 79,091. This characterizes more than a three percent annual increase (2,404 persons), which is significant. However, it is important to consider the implications of annexation when considering the City s population and housing unit growth. Of the growth during 2004, over 40 percent can be attributed to annexation. The historic City growth from new development averages 2 percent a year. For planning purposes, the City s General Plan projects a growth rate of 2 to 2.5 percent per year. The Butte County Association of Governments (BCAG) prepared population, housing unit, and employment projections in 2003 in conjunction with BCAG member jurisdictions and Caltrans. BCAG predicts significant growth of Chico s population and housing units through 2025 (Table 3 1). Comparably, Butte County s population and housing unit annual growth rate is at or just above one percent. Again, as with DOF estimates, BCAG s estimates for the City of Chico characterize more than a three percent annual increase in both population and housing units, with a 2025 population of 125,530 and 50,904 housing units. Chico has grown from an individual rancho in 1844 to the center of economic activity of the Tri county area, which includes Butte, Glenn, and Tehama counties. An estimated 46 percent of Butte County jobs are located in the Chico Planning Area, and Chico captures approximately half of Butte County s retail sales, largely because of the regional malls and major discount retailers that have located in the Chico community. 2 Chico and the Butte County region in general, are anticipated to remain an attractive area for development into the foreseeable future. Table 3 1 estimates more than a 2 percent annual growth rate for Butte County s employment through 2025. Employment projections for incorporated cities in Butte County were not available through BCAG. 1 US Census, 1990 and 2000, http://factfinder.census.gov, accessed March 9, 2006. 2 City of Chico General Plan (1994, revised 1999), p. 1 1. Municipal Service Review P:\Projects WP Only\51061.00 Chico MSR\Final MSR\3. Growth and Population.doc 3-1

Chapter 3. Growth and Population Table 3-1 BCAG Population, Housing Units, and Employment Projections for City of Chico and Butte County 2010-2025 2010 2015 2020 2025 Annual Growth Rate (%) Category City County City County City County City County City County Population 80,570 106,730 87,073 110,929 108,280 117,890 125,530 123,920 3.5 1.3 Housing Units 32,670 44,580 35,252 46,414 43,910 49,240 50,904 51,759 3.0 1.0 Employment -- 95,100 -- 101,310 -- 113,200 -- 123,800 -- 2.3 Source: Butte County Association of Governments, 2003. Determination 3-1 The City s growth has generally exceeded that of the County as a whole, with Chico s share of the County s total population and employment growth increasing over time. Determination 3-2 The estimated three percent housing unit growth rate and three and a half percent population growth rate for the City of Chico through 2025 should include a consideration of the implications of annexation. 3.2 GROWTH PLAN The City of Chico General Plan formalizes a long term vision for the physical evolution of the City. In addition to defining the Planning Area, the General Plan outlines policies, standards and programs to direct day to day decisions regarding development. During the General Plan update process, beginning in 1991, with adoption in 1994, annexation of areas outside of the city limits but within the City s SOI was minimal (less than one percent population growth attributable to annexations of existing development); however, during this same time period population growth attributable to new development was approximately between 2 and 6 percent annually. As Table 3 2 demonstrates, growth of the City s population and housing stock results from the construction of new units; however, annexation of existing units from the unincorporated island areas adjacent to the City from 1997 to present plays a significant role in varied annual growth spikes. Overall, population increases in the City with both new development and annexations resulted in a peak annual population percent increase of nearly eight percent between 2000 and 2001. Population increases fell to just over 2 percent; however, between 2005 and 2006 another growth spike occurred with over a 7 percent annual increase. Between 2006 and 2010, the City of Chico estimates a range of annual increase in population due to the City s current ambitious annexation program, and the annexations of existing development from 9 percent in 2007 to less than 1 percent during 2008, 2009, and 2010. The dramatic drop in annual population increase due to annexations is due to the January 1, 2007 state deadline for expedited island annexation approval, as mentioned previously in this chapter. During this same time period (2007 2010), 3-2 City of Chico

3.2 Growth Plan Table 3-2 Historic and Projected Growth New Development and Annexation 1991-2010 Year Population Estimate Population Increase Population Growth Attributable to New Development Population Growth Attributable to Annexation of Existing Development 1991 42,900 1126 (2.7%) 1018 (2.44%) 108 (.26%) 1992 45,550 2650 (6.18%) 2530 (5.9%) 120 (.28%) 1993 47,300 1750 (3.84%) 1619 (3.55%) 131 (.29%) 1994 48,300 1000 (2.11%) 557 (1.17%) 443 (.94%) 1995 50,100 1800 (3.73%) 1640 (3.4%) 160 (.33%) 1996 51,100 1000 (2.00%) 623 (1.25%) 377 (.75%) 1997 54,200 3100 (6.07%) 618 (1.19%) 2482 (4.86%) 1998 56,900 2700 (4.98%) 7.06 (1.30%) 1994 (3.68%) 1999 58,800 1900 (3.34%) 836 (1.44%) 1064 (1.90%) 2000 60,400 1600 (2.72%) 1397 (2.38%) 203 (.34%) 2001 65,175 4775 (7.91%) 1054 (1.75%) 3721 (6.16%) 2002 66,767 1592 (2.44%) 981 (1.50%) 611 (.94%) 2003 68,589 1822 (2.73%) 1347 (2.06%) 475 (.67%) 2004 71,317 2728 (3.98%) 1310 (1.92%) 1418 (2.06%) 2005 73,558 2241 (3.14%) 1452 (2.03%) 952 (1.35%) 2006 79,100 5545 (7.54%) 1475 (2%) 4040 (5.5%) 2007 87,775 8675 (11%) 1500 (1.9%) 7100 (9%) 2008 89,800 2025 (2.31%) 1525 (1.73%) 500 (.57%) 2009 91,550 1750 (1.95%) 1550 (1.72%) 200 (.23%) 2010 93,325 1775 (1.94%) 1575 (1.72%) 200 (.22%) Source: State Board of Equalization (SBE) Estimates 1991 2005 and City of Chico Community Services Department Estimates 2006 2010. population growth attributable to new development continues to remain steady with nearly a 2 percent annual population increase. Overall, the City of Chico projects a population estimate of 93,325 in 2010. This population estimate is roughly 13,000 more persons than what BCAG estimates as a 2010 City of Chico population. Determination 3-3 The City of Chico s annexation process will result in approximately 2,300 acres of annexed land with 6,163 estimated housing units and an estimated population of 14,000. The City General Plan identifies three areas for growth outside the current SOI. The areas are depicted on Figure 2 3. The Thorntree area is located east of the airport and Cohasset Road, and partially developed with commercial and industrial uses. The North Sycamore area is located west of the airport, north of Sycamore Creek and south of Mud Creek. This area is currently vacant land or rural residential, and proposed for mixed use urban development in the County prepared and adopted North Chico Municipal Service Review P:\Projects WP Only\51061.00 Chico MSR\Final MSR\3. Growth and Population.doc 3-3

Chapter 3. Growth and Population Specific Plan (the 1994 City General Plan reflects the specific plan designations for the area). The third area is the Northwest Chico Specific Plan area located south of Sycamore/Mud Creek, west of Hicks Lane, and generally north of Eaton Road. A portion of this area is within the current SOI; all of the area is on the urban side of the Greenline. In December 2005, the City adopted the specific plan for this area and is currently processing multiple applications for development entitlements in the area. Determination 3-4 The primarily undeveloped area northwest of Chico city limits, identified as the Northwest Chico Specific Plan area and depicted on Figure 2 3, is currently targeted by the City of Chico for potential expansion of the Cityʹs boundaries. 3.3 PROJECT ABSORPTION LAND USE SUPPLY VS. DEMAND The City of Chico s adopted General Plan Housing Element (March 2005) provides information on land use supply and demand. An analysis of available land and holding capacity was conducted and findings show that vacant residential land and approved tentative and recorded subdivision maps exist to support a maximum of 11,726 housing units. 3 In addition to the three major annexation areas targeted as expansion areas, which have the potential to provide residential housing units for the City (see Growth Plan section of this chapter), there are sites anticipated to develop residentially or as mixed use/residential from existing non residential designations and zoning add an additional estimated 350 acres and 3,000 housing units. 4 These sites include, with approximate acreage: NW Chico/Alkop (148 acres/800 units) (part of Northwest Chico Specific Plan) East 20 th Street Meriam Park project (152 acres/1,650 units) SR 32/W. 8 th Avenue (32 acres/256 units) Park Avenue at W. 12 th Street (2 acres/106 units) Lassen Corridor (20 acres/200 units) E. 20 th Street and Notre Dame Boulevard (3.5 acres/50 units) West 16 th Street Barber Yard project (135 acres/1,200 units) The projected City s BCAG Regional Housing Allocation Plan (2001 2008) demonstrates the need for 9,479 units between 2001 and 2008. The 2005 Housing Element reports that based on recent historical trends and local projections, the regional allocation for Chico is extremely high. New construction between 2001 and 2004 represents slightly more than 1,500 housing units. If this trend continues, less than 50 percent of the projected regional need would be constructed. 5 In summary, the total capacity of housing units within the City based on vacant residential land, approved tentative and recorded subdivision maps, and existing non residential sites anticipated to be 3 City of Chico General Plan, Housing Element, March 1, 2005, p. 10 73. 4 City of Chico General Plan, Housing Element, March 1, 2005, p. 10 74 and 10 83. 5 City of Chico General Plan, Housing Element, March 1, 2005, p. 10 84. 3-4 City of Chico

3.3 Project Absorption Land Use Supply vs. Demand rezoned for residential development is estimated at just under 15,000 units, significantly above the City s Regional Housing Allocation Plan allotment of 9,479 units. 6 Determination 3-5 The City s total capacity for new housing units is significantly above the projected regional housing demand. As a result, the City can accommodate additional growth beyond its current land use allocation. 3.3.1 Summary of Written Determinations 3 1 The City s growth has generally exceeded that of the County as a whole, with Chico s share of the County s total population and employment growth increasing over time. 3 2 The estimated three percent housing unit growth rate and three and a half percent population growth rate for the City of Chico through 2025 should include a consideration of the implications of annexation. 3 3 The City of Chico s annexation process will result in approximately 2,300 acres of annexed land with 6,163 estimated housing units and an estimated population of 14,000. 3 4 The primarily undeveloped area northwest of Chico city limits, identified as the Northwest Chico Specific Plan area and depicted on Figure 2 2, is currently targeted by the City of Chico for potential expansion of the Cityʹs boundaries. 3 5 The City s total capacity for new housing units is significantly above the projected regional housing demand. As a result, the City can accommodate additional growth beyond its current land use allocation. 6 City of Chico General Plan, Housing Element, March 1, 2005, p. 10 82. Municipal Service Review P:\Projects WP Only\51061.00 Chico MSR\Final MSR\3. Growth and Population.doc 3-5