CAS/CIA Exam 3 Spring 2007 Solutions

Similar documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS. A. Put-Call Parity 1 B. Comparing Options with Respect to Style, Maturity, and Strike 13

Institutional Finance 08: Dynamic Arbitrage to Replicate Non-linear Payoffs. Binomial Option Pricing: Basics (Chapter 10 of McDonald)

Exam MFE Spring 2007 FINAL ANSWER KEY 1 B 2 A 3 C 4 E 5 D 6 C 7 E 8 C 9 A 10 B 11 D 12 A 13 E 14 E 15 C 16 D 17 B 18 A 19 D

More Exotic Options. 1 Barrier Options. 2 Compound Options. 3 Gap Options

On Black-Scholes Equation, Black- Scholes Formula and Binary Option Price

Option Valuation. Chapter 21

Overview. Option Basics. Options and Derivatives. Professor Lasse H. Pedersen. Option basics and option strategies

Options/1. Prof. Ian Giddy

Caput Derivatives: October 30, 2003

S 1 S 2. Options and Other Derivatives

Option Values. Determinants of Call Option Values. CHAPTER 16 Option Valuation. Figure 16.1 Call Option Value Before Expiration

UCLA Anderson School of Management Daniel Andrei, Derivative Markets 237D, Winter MFE Midterm. February Date:

Pricing Formula for 3-Period Discrete Barrier Options

ACTS 4302 SOLUTION TO MIDTERM EXAM Derivatives Markets, Chapters 9, 10, 11, 12, 18. October 21, 2010 (Thurs)

Chapter 21 Valuing Options

Jorge Cruz Lopez - Bus 316: Derivative Securities. Week 11. The Black-Scholes Model: Hull, Ch. 13.

Lecture 21 Options Pricing

One Period Binomial Model

Lecture 5: Put - Call Parity

2. Exercising the option - buying or selling asset by using option. 3. Strike (or exercise) price - price at which asset may be bought or sold

Chapter 11 Options. Main Issues. Introduction to Options. Use of Options. Properties of Option Prices. Valuation Models of Options.

On Market-Making and Delta-Hedging

How To Value Options In Black-Scholes Model

EXP Capital Markets Option Pricing. Options: Definitions. Arbitrage Restrictions on Call Prices. Arbitrage Restrictions on Call Prices 1) C > 0

CS 522 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options

Finance 436 Futures and Options Review Notes for Final Exam. Chapter 9

American Options. An Undergraduate Introduction to Financial Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan. J. Robert Buchanan American Options

第 9 讲 : 股 票 期 权 定 价 : B-S 模 型 Valuing Stock Options: The Black-Scholes Model

The Black-Scholes Formula

Jorge Cruz Lopez - Bus 316: Derivative Securities. Week 9. Binomial Trees : Hull, Ch. 12.

where N is the standard normal distribution function,

Stock. Call. Put. Bond. Option Fundamentals

Use the option quote information shown below to answer the following questions. The underlying stock is currently selling for $83.

Valuing Stock Options: The Black-Scholes-Merton Model. Chapter 13

Four Derivations of the Black Scholes PDE by Fabrice Douglas Rouah

Chapter 14 Review Note Sample Excerpt

Exam MFE/3F Sample Questions and Solutions #1 to #76

Introduction to Options. Derivatives

Option Payoffs. Problems 11 through 16: Describe (as I have in 1-10) the strategy depicted by each payoff diagram. #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 #16

Lecture 3: Put Options and Distribution-Free Results

Financial Options: Pricing and Hedging

Session X: Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo. Module: Economics of Financial Markets. MSc. Financial Economics. Department of Economics, City University, London

Options: Valuation and (No) Arbitrage

Options Pricing. This is sometimes referred to as the intrinsic value of the option.

Lectures. Sergei Fedotov Introduction to Financial Mathematics. No tutorials in the first week

An Introduction to Exotic Options

Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology

Lecture 6: Option Pricing Using a One-step Binomial Tree. Friday, September 14, 12

Exam MFE/Exam 3F Review

(1) Consider a European call option and a European put option on a nondividend-paying stock. You are given:

CHAPTER 21: OPTION VALUATION

Lecture 12: The Black-Scholes Model Steven Skiena. skiena

Martingale Pricing Applied to Options, Forwards and Futures

Part V: Option Pricing Basics

Finite Differences Schemes for Pricing of European and American Options

Week 12. Options on Stock Indices and Currencies: Hull, Ch. 15. Employee Stock Options: Hull, Ch. 14.

Option pricing. Vinod Kothari

Call and Put. Options. American and European Options. Option Terminology. Payoffs of European Options. Different Types of Options

FINANCIAL OPTION ANALYSIS HANDOUTS

a. What is the portfolio of the stock and the bond that replicates the option?

Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Co. Shenzhen: June 14, 2008

Lecture 15. Sergei Fedotov Introduction to Financial Mathematics. Sergei Fedotov (University of Manchester) / 6

CHAPTER 5 OPTION PRICING THEORY AND MODELS

Consider a European call option maturing at time T

Lecture 7: Bounds on Options Prices Steven Skiena. skiena

FIN Investments Option Pricing. Options: Definitions. Arbitrage Restrictions on Call Prices. Arbitrage Restrictions on Call Prices

VALUATION IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS

Lecture 11: The Greeks and Risk Management

b. June expiration: = /32 % = % or X $100,000 = $95,

The Black-Scholes pricing formulas

Chapter 13 The Black-Scholes-Merton Model

CHAPTER 21: OPTION VALUATION

Additional questions for chapter 4

Options (1) Class 19 Financial Management,

1 The Black-Scholes model: extensions and hedging

Options Markets: Introduction

The Promise and Peril of Real Options

Options 1 OPTIONS. Introduction

Chapter 2: Binomial Methods and the Black-Scholes Formula

Option Values. Option Valuation. Call Option Value before Expiration. Determinants of Call Option Values

The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models

ENGINEERING AND HEDGING OF CORRIDOR PRODUCTS - with focus on FX linked instruments -

Black-Scholes and the Volatility Surface

Convenient Conventions

Option Pricing with S+FinMetrics. PETER FULEKY Department of Economics University of Washington

Chapter 21: Options and Corporate Finance

Option Markets 232D. 1. Introduction. Daniel Andrei. Fall / 67

A) 1.8% B) 1.9% C) 2.0% D) 2.1% E) 2.2%

1 The Black-Scholes Formula

Trading Strategies Involving Options. Chapter 11

Introduction to Binomial Trees

Lecture 4: The Black-Scholes model

Practice Set #7: Binomial option pricing & Delta hedging. What to do with this practice set?

THE BLACK-SCHOLES MODEL AND EXTENSIONS

Option Premium = Intrinsic. Speculative Value. Value

LECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS

A SNOWBALL CURRENCY OPTION

Pricing Options: Pricing Options: The Binomial Way FINC 456. The important slide. Pricing options really boils down to three key concepts

How To Value Real Options

Transcription:

CAS/CIA Exam 3 Note: The CAS/CIA Spring 007 Exam 3 contained 16 questions that were relevant for SOA Exam MFE. The solutions to those questions are included in this document. Solution 3 B Chapter 1, PutCall Parity We are asked to find the arbitrage profit per share, but it is not clear whether the question means that one share is involved at the outset or that one share is involved at the end of 6 months. Fortunately, both interpretations lead to the same answer. We can use putcall parity to understand this problem: rt d T CEur ( K, T) + Ke = S0e + PEur ( K, T) Putcall parity tells us that the following strategies produce the same cash flow at the end of 6 months: Purchase 1 call option and lend the present value of the $50 strike price. The cost of this strategy is: rt 0.03(0.5) CEur ( K, T) + Ke = + 50e = 51.556 0.0(0.5) Purchase e strategy is: shares of stock and purchase 1 put option. The cost of this d T 0.0(0.5) S0 e + PEur ( K, T) = 49.70e +.35 = 51.5555 Since the first strategy costs less than the second strategy, arbitrage profits can be earned by going long the first strategy and shorting the second strategy (buy low, sell high). The net payoff in 6 months is zero, and the arbitrage profit now is: 51.5555 51.556 = 0.999 Based on this result, Choice B is the correct answer. Note that the answer above is based on one share at the end of 6 months, but at the 0.0(0.5) outset, only e shares are sold. If we want to determine the arbitrage profits based on the sale of one share at the outset, then we must gross up the strategies above 0.0(0.5) by e. This results in an arbitrage profit of: 0.0(0.5) 0.999 e = 0.309 The correct answer remains B. ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 1

Solution 4 E Chapter 1, PutCall Parity We can use putcall parity to find the value of the put option: rt CEur ( K, T) + Ke = S0 PV0, T ( Div) + PEur ( K, T) 0.10(0.5) 0.10( /1) 0.10(5 /1) + 30e = 9 0.5e 0.5 e + PEur (30,0.5) PEur (30,0.5) =.508 Solution 1 A Chapter, Factors Affecting Premiums Statement I is true, because an American option provides all of the rights provided by a European option and more. Statement II is false, because a higher stock price produces a lower payoff for a put option. Statement III is false, because a higher strike price reduces the payoff of a call option. Solution 13 A Chapter 1, Synthetic Tbills We can use putcall parity to find the interest rate: C ( K, T) + Ke = S + P ( K, T) Eur r 0.5 r 0.5 rt 6.70 + 80e = 85 + 1.60 e = 0.99875 r 0.5 = ln(0.99875) r = 0.005 0 Eur ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page

Solution 14 D Chapter 3, TwoPeriod Binomial Model The riskneutral probability of an upward move is constant since: (0.050.00)1 90 ( rd ) h e e d p* = = 100 = 0.75636 u d 110 90 100 100 (0.050.00)1 99 ( rd ) h e e d p* = = 110 = 0.75636 u d 11 99 110 110 (0.050.00)1 81 ( rd ) h e e d p* = = 90 = 0.75636 u d 99 81 90 90 If the final stock price is $11, then the payoff of the call option is $11 $95 = $6. If the final stock price is $99, then the payoff of the call option is $99 $95 = $4. If the final stock price is $81, then the payoff of the call option is $0. The value of the call option is: n rhn ( ) n j n j j n j V( S0, K,0) e ( p*) (1 p*) V( S0u d, K, hn) j j 0 0.05() e [(0.75636) (6) (0.75636)(1 0.75636)4 0] 14.794 Solution 15 C Chapter 3, Riskneutral Probability The values of u and d are: ( r d) h+ s h (0.05 0.035)(1 / 3) + 0.30 1 / 3 u = e = e = 1.19507 ( rd) hs h (0.050.035)(1 / 3) 0.30 1 / 3 d = e = e = 0.84518 The riskneutral probability of an upward movement is: ( rd ) h (0.050.035)(1 / 3) e d e 0.84518 p* = = = 0.4568 ud 1.19507 0.84518 ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 3

Solution 16 C Chapter 3, Replication The option pays 6 in the upstate and 0 in the downstate: V V u d Max[0,18 1] 6 Max[0,4 1] 0 The dividend rate is zero, so the number of shares needed to replicate the option is: h Vu Vd 01 6 0 e e 0.4857 Su ( d) 10(18 /10 4 /10) Solution 17 D Chapter 3, TwoPeriod Binomial Model Since no dividend is mentioned, we assume that the dividend rate is zero. The values of u and d are: ( r d) h+ s h (0.05 0.00)(1) + 0.35 1 u = e = e = 1.4918 ( rd) hs h (0.050.00)(1) 0.35 1 d = e = e = 0.7408 The riskneutral probability of an upward movement is: ( rd ) h (0.050.00)(1) e d e 0.7408 p* = = = 0.41338 ud 1.4918 0.7408 The stock price tree and its corresponding tree of option prices are: Stock European Put 77.8939 0.0000 5.139 0.0000 35.0000 38.6810 3.9830 0.0000 5.986 7.1378 19.084 1.7916 The put option can be exercised only if the stock price falls to $19.084. At that point, the put option has a payoff of $1.7916. Although the entire table of put prices is filled in above, we can directly find the value of the put option as follows: n rhn ( ) ÈÊnˆ j nj j nj 0 = Â ÍÁ 0 j j = 0 ÎË 0.05(1)() VS (, K,0) e ( p*) (1 p*) VSud (, Khn, ) = e È0 + 0 + (1 0.41338) (1.7916) = 3.9830 Î ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 4

Solution 0 B Chapter 7, BlackScholes Call Price The BlackScholes Formula uses the riskfree interest rate, not the expected annual return. The first step is to calculate d 1 and d : We have: S K + r d + s T + + 1 = = ln( / ) ( 0.5 ) ln(58.96 / 60) (0.06 0.05 0.5 0.0 ) 0.5 d s T 0.0 0.5 =0.09985 d d s T 0.09985 0.0 0.5 0.19985 = 1 = = Nd ( 1 ) N( 0.09985) N( 0.10) 1 N(0.10) 1 0.5398 0.460 Nd ( ) N( 0.19985) N( 0.0) 1 N(0.0) 1 0.5793 0.407 The value of the European call option is: T rt CEur Se N( d1) Ke N( d) 0.05(0.5) 0.06(0.5) 58.96e 0.460 60e 0.407 1.9301 Solution 1 A Chapter 7, BlackScholes Put Price Since no dividend is mentioned, we assume that the dividend rate is zero. The first step is to calculate d 1 and d : We have: ln( S/ K) + ( r d + 0.5 s ) T ln(9.67 / 8.75) + (0.08 0.00 + 0.5 0.40 ) 0.5 d1 = = s T 0.40 0.5 = 0.69987 d = d1 s T = 0.69987 0.40 0.5 = 0.49987 Nd ( 1 ) N(0.69987) N(0.70) 0.7580 Nd ( ) N(0.49987) N(0.50) 0.6915 The value of the European put option is: rt T PEur Ke N( d) Se N( d1) 0.08(0.5) 0.00(0.5) 8.75 e (1 0.6915) 9.67 e (1 0.7580) 0.3058 ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 5

Solution 3 C Chapter 9, DeltaHedging We are not told the interval of time over which the stock price increases. Instead, we are told that the stock price quickly jumps. We can take this to mean that the stock price increase is instantaneous. Therefore there is no need to consider the impact from borrowing or lending at the riskfree rate. The delta of a call option covering 1 share is: d T 0.07 1 Call e N( d1 ) e 0.5793 0.540136 D = = = The marketmaker sold 100 call options, each of which covers 100 shares. Therefore, from the perspective of the marketmaker, the delta of the position to be hedged is: 100 100 0.540136 5,401.36 To deltahedge the position, the marketmaker purchases 5,401.36 shares of stock. When the stock price increases, the marketmaker has a gain on the stock and a loss on the call options: Gain on Stock: 5,401.36 (41 40) = 5,401.36 Gain on Calls: 100 56.08 = 5,608.00 Net Profit: 06.64 The marketmaker has a net loss of 06.64. Solution 33 D Chapter 9, MarketMaker s Profit If a marketmaker writes an option and deltahedges the position, then the marketmaker s profit is: e Marketmaker's profit ª Gt hqt rh( StDt Vt) Statement I is false, since the change in the stock price, e, is squared in the formula above. Statement II is true since time decay reduces the value of the option over time. Statement III is poorly worded. The first sentence of Statement III is not always true, so it would be reasonable for a student to conclude that Statement III is false. The ambiguity in Statement III does not prevent us from obtaining the correct answer. Since Statement I is false, the only possible correct answer is D. Since Statement III is poorly worded, so let s consider a clearer version: If in order to hedge, the marketmaker must purchase stock, then the net carrying cost is a component of the overall cost. This statement is true, because the marketmaker must pay interest on any funds that are borrowed. ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 6

The exam s version of Statement III appears at the bottom of page 40 in the textbook. Solution 34 E Chapter 10, Barrier Options All of the options have the same strike price. We can use the parity relationship for barrier options to find the value of a regular option. Making use of the downandout and downandin options that have a barrier of $30,000, we have: Knockin option + Knockout option = Ordinary option 30 + 5 = 55 Therefore, the value of the ordinary option is $55. We can use the parity relationship again, this time with the upandin and upandout options that have a barrier of $50,000: Knockin option + Knockout option = Ordinary option X + 15 = 55 X = 40 The value of the upandin option with a barrier of $50,000 is $40. Solution 35 B Chapter 15, Itô s Lemma This question contains a typo. The correct answer to the question as worded is: 1 ds(t) = ( a d s )S(t)dt + sdz(t) This correct answer does not appear as one of the choices, though. Based on the fact that Choice B is listed as the correct answer, it seems clear that a parenthesis was misplaced in the first bullet point in the question. The corrected expression is: ( a d 1 s s ) S(t ) = S(0) exp ( )t + Z(t ) The solution below is based on the corrected expression for S(t ) shown above. A lognormal stock price implies that changes in the stock price follow geometric Brownian motion: + ( a d 0.5 s ) t sz( t) St () = S(0) e dst () = ( a d) Stdt () + sstdzt () () The expression in Choice B is equal to ds( t ) : dst () = ( a d) Stdt () + sstdzt () () 1 1 = ( a d) S() t dt + ss() t dz() t + s S() t dt s S() t dt 1 1 = ( a d s ) S() t dt + ss() t dz() t + s S() t dt ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 7

Solution 36 E Chapter 19, Vasicek Model This question contains a typo. Before we answer it, let s make 3 modifications: In the first line, Vasieck should be Vasicek. The third bullet point should be: r = 0.05 The final line should be, Calculate the expected change in the interest rate, expressed as an annual rate. The process can be written as: dr = 0.15(0.10 r) dt + 0.05dZ The expected change in the interest rate is: Edr [ ] = E[0.15(0.10 rdt ) + 0.05 dz] = (0.015 0.15 rdt ) + 0.05 0 = (0.015 0.15 rdt ) Since r = 0.05, we have: [ ] E[ dr] = (0.015 0.15 r) dt = 0.015 0.15(0.05) dt = 0.0075dt To convert the expected change in the interest rate into an annual rate, we must divide by the increment of time: 0.0075dt = 0.0075 dt Solution 37 B Chapter 18, BlackDermanToy Model This question contains a typo. Just under the table, the phrase should be, where volatility refers to the volatility of the bond yield one year from today. The yield volatility for the 3year bond is: È 1/( T 1) 1/ P(1, T, ru) 1 ÈP(1,3, ru) 1 Yield volatility = 0.5 ln Í = 0.5 ln Í Í 1/( T 1) 1/ Î P(1, T, rd) 1 ÍÎP(1,3, rd) 1 È 1/ 0.8133 1 = 0.5 ln Í = 0.1398 1/ ÍÎ0.8537 1 ActuarialBrew.com 014 Page 8