Deficit Irrigation Influences Yield and Lycopene Content of Diploid and Triploid Watermelon



Similar documents
Ohio 9834 and Ohio 9816: processing tomato breeding lines with partial resistance to race T1 of bacterial spot.

El Dorado and La Estrella : New Tropical Pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata Duchesne)

QUALITY ASSURANCE OF HARVESTED HORTICULTURAL PERISHABLES

Chapter D9. Irrigation scheduling

EFFECTS OF VARYING IRRIGATION AND MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE APPLICATION ON COTTON HEIGHT, UNIFORMITY, YIELD, AND QUALITY. Abstract

Growing Balaton - Horticultural Considerations

Biodegradable Mulch Product Testing 2006

University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Gulf Coast Research and Education Center th Street East Bradenton, FL 34203

(1) Hybrid Cucumber Seed Production. Samuel Contreras Departamento de Ciencias Vegetales Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile

Effects of salinity on fruit yield and quality of tomato grown in soil-less culture in greenhouses in Mediterranean climatic conditions

INTEGRATED IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT ON VITICULTURE

Apricot Tree Prunus armeniaca

GARDEN FACTS. When are apples ripe?

WATER SAVING AND YIELD INCREASE OF SUGAR BEET WITH SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION

Horticulture Information Leaflet 33-E

Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage Application in Greenhouse Climatization

HORTSCIENCE 43(5):

Commodity Profile: Tomatoes, fresh market

AUTOMATIC COLLECTION, RADIO TRANSMISSION, AND USE OF SOIL WATER DATA 1

EFFECT OF MOISTURE STRESS ON COMBINING ABILITY VARIATION FOR BIRD RESISTANCE TRAITS IN SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.)

AUTOMATED SOIL WATER TENSION-BASED DRIP IRRIGATION FOR PRECISE IRRIGATION SCHEDULING

Pineapples. Ian Hewett Horticultural Marketing Inspectorate United Kingdom. Version - October 2011

WATER MANAGEMENT IN DRIP-IRRIGATED VEGETABLE PRODUCTION. T.K. Hartz Department of Vegetable Crops University of California, Davis, CA May 1999

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT WITH DRIP AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

Vegetable Planting Guide For Eastern North Carolina

Consumer Horticulture

Guidelines for Harvesting Vegetables

FIRMNESS DETERMINATION USING COMPUTER MACHINE VISION SYSTEM

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF OHIO. Dual MAGNUM. EPA Reg EPA SLN No. OH

Drip Irrigation Basics

Impact of Water Saving Irrigation Systems on Water Use, Growth and Yield of Irrigated Lowland Rice

Strawberry Anthracnose

What Are Burpless Cucumbers?

BANANA PRODUCTION. ARC-Institute for Tropical and Subtropical Crops. Banana Production - English

How To Precondition D'Anjou Pears

Phosphorus use efficiency, grain yield, and quality of triticale and durum wheat under irrigated conditions

How To Insure Cotton

Global Partnership Forms to Develop and Market Red-Flesh Apple Varieties

THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING

Harvesting and Preparing Vegetables for Exhibit

your distributor: powerplastics.com Dealer Price Book Effective from 01/11/2014 Rivulis Irrigation 3 - EMEA

RICE CULTIVATION: ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND WATER SAVING APPROACHES

Nature and Science, 3(1), 2005, Wang, et al, Water-saving and Anti-drought

MICRO IRRIGATION A technology to save water

Irish potatoes are one of America s most

Asparagus (Asparagus officinalis) is a

How To Know If You Can Get Rid Of Swd

COTTON WATER RELATIONS

Organic Farm Yield and Profitability. from NEON, NASS, and other sources

PINEAPPLE PRODUCTION. Introduction

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

SOLAR RADIATION AVAILABILITY FOR PLANT GROWTH IN ARIZONA CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS

Research Abstract for the CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH BOARD April 1, 2010 March 31, 2011

AgriInsurance in Canada

Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice cultivation

EFFECTS OF GREEN HARVESTING VS BURNING ON SOIL PROPERTIES, GROWTH AND YIELD OF SUGARCANE IN SOUTH TEXAS. Bob Wiedenfeld

J. Agrofor. Environ. 5 (2): 39-44, 2011 ISSN Effect of postharvest treatments on physical changes and shelf life of mango

Fertilization of Strawberries in Florida 1

Growing Giant Miscanthus in Illinois

UNECE STANDARD FFV-52 concerning the marketing and commercial quality control of EARLY AND WARE POTATOES 2011 EDITION

KIWIFRUIT, NEW FRUIT IN WESTERN CULTURE.

Ruminant Preference for Bermudagrass Hay With and Without Exposure to Swine Lagoon Effluent

The Effect of the Trichoderma harzianum Strains on the Growth of Tomato Seedlings

Impact of dry seeding with alternate wetting and drying on rice productivity and profitability in Punjab-Pakistan

Culture in field conditions - Challenges A South American point of view Roberto Campos Pura Natura, Argentina

Chapter B7. Managing saline soils

BREEDING AND GENETICS

Exporting Artichokes: Egypt

LARGE GROUP PRESENTATION: PRESENTER S NOTES

Risk Management for Greenhouse and Nursery Growers in the United States

Central North Carolina Planting Calendar for Annual Vegetables, Fruits, and Herbs

CUSTOMISING DRIP IRRIGATION FOR PROFITABLE VEGETABLE PRODUCTION

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Orange Fruit Processing

In this study, onions of

NODES ABOVE WHITE FLOWER AND HEAT UNITS AS INDICATORS OF COTTON HARVEST AID TIMING. A Thesis JOSHUA BRIAN BYNUM

Evaluation of Correlation between Within-Barn Curing Environment and TSNA Accumulation in Dark Air-Cured Tobacco

CONDUCTING A COST ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT: 142 EFFECT OF STORAGE ON SOYBEAN SEED VIGOR AND EMERGENCE

UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE. UNECE STANDARD FFV-46 concerning the marketing and commercial quality control of KIWIFRUIT

Blaine Hanson Department of Land, Air and Water Resources University of California, Davis

Settlement of Foundations on Expansive Clays Due to Moisture Demand of Trees CIGMAT 2008

Weather Indexed Crop Insurance Jared Brown, Justin Falzone, Patrick Persons and Heekyung Youn* University of St. Thomas

Transcription:

Deficit Irrigation Influences Yield and Lycopene Content of Diploid and Triploid Watermelon D.I. Leskovar, H. Bang and K. Kolenda P. Perkins-Veazie Texas A&M University, TAES USDA-ARS Horticultural Sciences Department South Central ARS Uvalde, Texas, 78801 Lane, Oklahoma 74555 USA USA J.A. Franco Departamento de Producción Agraria Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena Alfonso XIII 52, 30203 Cartagena Spain Keywords: fruit firmness, limited irrigation, seedless watermelon, subsurface drip irrigation Abstract Many vegetable production regions in the southwestern US are strictly regulated on water use. In addition, demand for high quality and nutritious vegetables has increased. This study was performed to explore the effects of deficit irrigation on yield, fruit quality and lycopene content of red-fleshed diploid and triploid watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb) Matsum & Nakai) cultivars. Irrigation treatments were 1.0, 0.75 and 0.5 evapotranspiration (ET) rates. Cultivars used were Summer Flavor 710, RWW 8036, Allsweet, Sugarlee, and SWD 7302 (diploids) and Summer Sweet 5244, SWT 8706, Sugar Time, and Tri-X- Sunrise (triploids). Total water applied through a subsurface drip system was 395, 298 and 173 mm, for the 1.0, 0.75 and 0.50 ET, respectively. Total yields were highest at 1.0 ET (53.9 t ha -1 ) compared with 0.5 ET (26.8 t ha -1 ). Triploids had a 34% higher total yield and fewer culls (2%) compared with diploid cultivars (25%). Highest yields were obtained for Sunrise, SWT 8706, and SWD 7302. Highest soluble solid content was measured for Sugar Time (13.4%) and was significantly higher than other cultivars (range 9.7-11.0 %). Triploid cultivars had more firm flesh, compared with diploids (12.0 vs. 9.9 N). Lycopene content increased slightly with maturity (55.8 to 60.2 :g g -1 fw), and was significantly higher at 0.75 ET than 1.0 ET in melons at ripe and overripe maturity stages. Lycopene content averaged over all treatments was 60-66 :g g -1 fw for triploids and 45 to 80 µg g -1 fw for diploid fruit. INTRODUCTION Watermelons are grown on over 2.43 million hectares worldwide, with consumption in the leading producing countries at 8 to 62 kg per capita in the US and Turkey, respectively (Maynard, 2001). Watermelon is a natural source of lycopene, a carotenoid known for its antioxidant properties, with its action as a potent free radical scavenger (Di Mascio et al., 1989). The average content of lycopene in watermelon fruit sampled from the retail produce was reported to be 48.7 µg g -1 fw, higher than reported for fresh market tomatoes (USDA, Carotenoid Database for US Foods, 1998). More recently, Perkins- Veazie et al. (2001) reported that seedless watermelons have more lycopene (> 50 µg g -1 fw) than seeded ones. That study also showed significant variability in lycopene content among watermelon germplasm. Watermelon constitutes one of the largest vegetable crop grown in southwest Texas. Depending on seasonal variation and location, they are generally produced using 305 to 559 mm of water. However, pumping restrictions from underground aquifers in the region are reducing the supply of high quality irrigation water. Consequently, more efficient irrigation systems, such as subsurface drip irrigation (SDI), are becoming critical

for watermelon production. In a study where deficit irrigation was applied through SDI immediately after fruit set, first harvest yields were significantly reduced (Leskovar et al., 1999). The effect of irrigation strategies and the interaction with cultivars on fruit lycopene content is unknown. The present study was conducted to determine the effects of deficit irrigation through a SDI system on yield, fruit quality characteristics and lycopene content of red-fleshed diploid and triploid watermelon cultivars. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four-week old watermelon transplants were mechanically established in the field at the Texas A&M Agr. Exp. Station, Uvalde, on 9 April 2001. Irrigation treatments were based on evapotranspiration (ET) rates of 1.0, 0.75 and 0.5 ET. Diploid (2x) cultivars used were Summer Flavor 710, RWM 8036, Allsweet, Sugarlee, and SWD 7302. Triploid (3x) cultivars used were Summer Sweet 5244, SWT 8706, Sugar Time, and Tri-X-Sunrise. Plants for each experimental plot were grown on three single raised beds on 2.03 m centers with one row/bed and 0.9 m within row spacing, giving a theoretical plant population of 5,388 pl ha -1. Plots were separated by a blank 2-m row, giving a 0.75 ratio of planted area (4,041 pl ha -1 ). A subsurface drip system (20 cm depth) and plastic mulch were used. Drip type used was T-Tape TSX 508 (0.2 mm wall thickness) with emitters spaced every 30 cm and a flow rate of 332 LAh -1 per 100 m of bed at 55 kpa (Tsystems International, Inc., San Diego, Calif.). Total irrigation applied was 395, 298 and 173 mm for the 1.0ET, 0.75ET and 0.50ET, respectively. Rainfall amounted to 165 mm. Harvests were made on 25 June, 16 July and 1 August 2001. In each harvest fruits were individually counted and weights measured according to the following class sizes: < 5 kg, 5-8 kg, 8-11 kg, and >11 kg (comparable to commercial watermelon grades #6, #5, #4, and #3 fruits per box). Culls fruits (small, bottleneck, or blossom end rot, BER) were counted and weighed. Total fruit weight and numbers for the three harvests combined were calculated. After each fruit was split in halves, fruit firmness was measured in Newtons (N) on three mesocarp spots around the center of the heart using a digital force meter (DFM 10, Chatillon, Greensboro, N.C.) with a 11 mm diameter round-head probe. Soluble solids content (SSC) was measured with a digital refractometer. Fruit lycopene content was extracted with hexane and measured spectrophotometrically at 503 nm as described by Sadler et al. (1990). Lycopene content was measured at ripe (25 June) and overripe (2 July) stages. The experiment was conducted using a split-plot experimental design with three replications. Irrigation rates were the main plots, and cultivars the subplots. Marketable yield, fruit quality and lycopene data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) by PROC GLM (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Yield Total yields were highest at 1.0 ET (53.9 t ha -1 ), with almost a 2-fold higher yield than melons grown at 0.5ET (Table 1). At the 1.0 ET rate, there was a significant increase in the weight of larger (> 8 kg) fruit sizes (data not shown). Triploids (3x) have a 34% higher average total marketable yield (45 t ha -1 ) and fewer culls than the diploid (2x) cultivars. Overall, highest yields were obtained for the triploids Sunrise and SWT 8706 and the diploids SWD 7302 and Summer Flavor 710 ; lowest yield was for Allsweet (2x). Irrigation rates did not affect the weight of cull fruit. However, cull fruit weight was significantly higher for the diploids (except for Sugarlee ) than the triploid cultivars. Fruit Quality and Lycopene Deficit irrigation had an effect on fruit quality characteristics (Table 2). Fruit flesh was slightly firmer at 0.5 ET compared with 0.75 ET, while minimum numerical differences were found in soluble solids content. In a previous study with muskmelon (Cucumis melo L. Group cantalupensis) irrigation systems - furrow, surface drip and SDI

- did not affect SSC (Leskovar et al., 2001). In this experiment, reducing the irrigation rate to 0.75 ET decreased the individual fruit length, diameter, and rind thickness compared with melons grown at 1.0 ET rate. When irrigation rates and timing of stress application were evaluated in a triploid and diploid cultivar, water deficit applied prior to or after fruit set decreased fruit number and size, while heart color of the flesh was not affected by irrigation (Leskovar et al., 1999). In that study, SSC of ripe melons increased in triploids irrigated with constant 0.5ET, or with irrigation reduced to 0.5ET after fruit set. Across all cultivars, generally triploids had firmer fruit flesh than the diploids, except for Sugarlee (Table 3). Sugar Time (3x) had the highest level of soluble solids content (13.4%), compared with other cultivars that ranged from 9.7 to 11.0%. Lycopene content increased slightly with maturity (55.8 to 60.2 :g g -1 fw) in all watermelons, and was significantly higher in both ripe and overripe melons grown at 0.75 ET than at 1.0 ET. Overall, lycopene content in overripe fruits ranged from 61-66 :g g -1 fw for triploids and 45 to 80 :g g -1 fw for diploid melons. CONCLUSIONS The present study indicates that acclimation, fruit yield, and fruit quality responses to deficit irrigation differ between triploid and diploid watermelons. If water pumping restrictions from underground aquifers are further imposed, deficit irrigation will become a reality for vegetable producers. Deficit irrigation (e.g. 0.75 or 0.5 ET constant rate) will directly reduce yield, but it is most likely that fruit set and subsequent fruit growth may be less affected in triploid than diploid watermelons. Even though lycopene content varied widely among red-fleshed 2x and 3x cultivars, deficit irrigation was not detrimental to lycopene content on a per fruit basis. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the Texas Department of Agriculture and USDA for their partial financial support, to Sakata, Novartis, Abbott & Cobb, Willwhite, and Sugar Creek Seeds for providing seeds, and to Tropical Star for growing the transplants. Literature Cited Di Mascio, P. Kaiser, S. and Sies, H. 1989. Lycopene as the most effective biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274:532-538. Leskovar, D.I., Perkins-Veazie, P. and Meiri, A. 1999. Deficit irrigation affects yield and quality of triploid and diploid watermelons. HortScience 34:523, Abstr. 454. Leskovar, D.I., Ward, J.C., Sprague, R.W. and Meiri, A. 2001.Comparison of irrigation and stand establishment systems on yield, quality and water use efficiency of cantaloupe. HortScience 35:1238-1240. Maynard, D. 2001. Watermelons. Characteristics, production and marketing. ASHS Press, Alexandria, Virginia. Perkins-Veazie, P., Collins, J.K., Pair, S. and Roberts, W. 2001. Lycopene content differs among red fleshed watermelon cultivars. J. Sci. Food. Agri. 81:983-987. Sadler, G., Davis, J. and Dezman, D.1990. Rapid extraction of lycopene and $-carotene from reconstituted tomato paste and pink grapefruit homogenates. J. Food Sci. 55:1460-1465. USDA-NCC, Carotenoid Database for US Foods 1998.

Tables Table 1. Effect of irrigation rate and cultivar on diploid (2x) and triploid (3x) watermelon on total marketable yield, culls, and lycopene content at ripe and overripe stage. Treatment Yield (t ha -1 ) Lycopene Culls (µg g -1 fw) (t ha -1 ) Ripe Overripe Irrigation rate 1.0 ET 53.9 a 7.7 54.3 b 58.8 b 0.75 ET 34.2 b 6.2 57.9 a 62.4 a 0.5 ET 26.8 c 5.8 55.3 ab 59.6 b LSD (0.05) 6.2 ns 2.5 2.1 Cultivar Ploidy Summer Flavor 710 2x 41.1 ab 7.5 bc 77.3 a 80.6 a RWM 8036 2x 28.9 cd 8.0 bc 50.1 cd 62.3 b Allsweet 2x 20.7 d 26.5 a 43.5 e 45.7 c Sugarlee 2x 36.1 c 2.9 cd 48.2 cd 49.0 c SWD 7302 2x 40.1 ab 10.8 b 47.2 de 46.8 c Summer Sweet 5244 3x 45.2 ab 0.4 d 62.2 b 65.9 b SWT 8706 3x 47.4 a 1.3 d 58.8 b 63.8 b Sugar Time 3x 40.0 ab 0.8 d 62.5 b 66.3 b Tri X Sunrise 3x 46.0 ab 0.8 d 51.8 cd 61.6 b LSD (0.05) 10.7 5.3 4.6 6.2 Two treatments (irrigation rate or cultivar) are significantly different if the difference between the means are larger than the LSD value (0.05).

Table 2. Effects of irrigation rates on watermelon fruit quality characteristics. Irrigation rate Firmness (N) SSC (%) Length Diameter Rind thickness 1.00 ET 10.7 ab 10.7 32.1 a 24.6 a 1.12 a 0.75 ET 10.1 b 11.1 26.9 b 20.5 b 0.96 b 0.50 ET 11.6 a 11.1 29.1 ab 21.2 b 0.94 b LSD (0.05) 1.3 ns 3.5 3.3 0.11 Each value is a mean of nine cultivars, three replications and four fruit/replication. N=newton; SSC=soluble solid content Table 3. Effect of diploid (2x) and triploid (3x) cultivars on watermelon flesh firmness and soluble solid content (SSC). Cultivar Ploidy Firmness (N) SSC (%) Summer Flavor 710 2x 7.7 c 11.0 ab RWM 8036 2x 8.8 bc 9.7 ab Allsweet 2x 10.8 ab 9.6 b Sugarlee 2x 12.7 a 11.1 ab SWD 7302 2x 9.0 bc 11.1 ab Summer Sweet 5244 3x 11.8 a 10.8 ab SWT 8706 3x 12.5 a 11.0 ab Sugar Time 3x 11.3 a 13.4 a Tri X Sunrise 3x 12.4 a 10.8 ab LSD (0.05) 2.2 3.2