WATER COOPERATION for a SECURE WORLD Focus on the Middle East HIGHLIGHTS Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, has expressed concern on several occasions about linkages between water, peace, conflicts and security. Water cooperation between countries sharing trans-boundary water resources is directly correlated with security of nations involved in such cooperation and peace in the continent or subcontinent they belong to. Conversely, absence of active water cooperation is directly correlated with risk of war between countries sharing trans-boundary water resources. Out of 148 countries having trans-boundary water resources, 37 face the risk of war and they are home to more people on the earth than others. These are precisely the countries which have avoided active water cooperation with their neighbours. Most of the countries in the Middle East are at risk of war as they have avoided regional cooperation in water. If they want to construct a river basin organisation or enter into another form of regional water cooperation arrangement, all the elements from experiences around the world are available. This report provides evidence of a problem that has been neglected for too long. It also provides detailed options for solutions.
water and war equation
world Water Cooperation Quotient 33.33 - - 33.33 No Data or No Shared Surface Water Risk of War
The Water Cooperation Quotient was calculated using the following parameters: 1 2 Agreement: if there is a formal agreement for cooperation Commission: if the cooperation has been institutionalised in the form of a permanent body such as a Commission or otherwise 3 Ministerial Meetings: if the cooperation is a matter of priority at the ministerial level as reflected in ministerial meetings as and when required. 4 5 Technical Projects: if there are joint projects at the technical level. Environmental Protection and Quality Control: if the riparian countries work together for environmental monitoring or quality control of the shared water body. 6 Joint Monitoring of Water Flows: if the riparian countries jointly monitor water flows with transparent verification mechanism and harmonised protocols for interpretation of data. 7 Floods, Dams and Reservoir: if the riparian countries collaborate actively and transparently in issues related to flood control, dams and reservoirs in border areas in a way that takes into interest of all relevant riparian countries and not merely the host country of the concerned project. 8 High Political Commitment: if there is a commitment at the highest political level such as Heads of Government, Parliaments or other institutions to the trans-boundary cooperation mechanism. 9 Integration into Economic Cooperation: whether cooperation in water resources is integrated with regional economic cooperation. 1 Actual Functioning of the Commission or Trans-boundary Water Cooperation Mechanism: if information available from open sources indicated whether the concerned cooperation mechanism is functioning efficiently and with dedication of the participation countries. The weightage is provided in ascending order with 1 for Agreement and 1 for Actual Functioning of the Commission.
WATER COOPERATION QUOTIENT Central American Action Plan for Integrated Management of Water Resources Trifinio Plan Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Finnish- Russian Joint Commission on the Utilization of Frontier Waters Latvia-Lithuania Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 1959 Nile Waters Agreement (Egypt - Sudan) South African Development Community (SADC) International Joint Commission (US - Canada) International Boundary and Water Commission (US - Mexico) European Union Water Framework Directive (EUWFD) International Commission for the Protection of Lake Geneva - Rhone (CIPEL) International Commission for the Protection of the River Danube (ICPDR) International Commission for the Protection of the Oder River against Pollution (ICPOAP) Organisation pour la Mise en Valeur du fleuve Sénégal (OMVS) 91. Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC) 87.36 La Plata Intergovernmental Co-ordinating Committee (CIC) 85.54 Mekong River Commission (MRC) 85.54 Bilateral agreement b/w Malaysia & Singapore 81.9 Joint Boundary Water Commission (Turkey - Georgia) 8.8 Malaysia and Thailand Collaboration Project 8.8 Finnish-Norwegian Transboundary Water Commission 74.62 Finnish- Swedish Frontier River Commission 74.62 Bilateral between India and Myanmar 7.98 Zambezi Watercourse Commission (ZAMCOM) 69.16 Bilateral coop b/w India- Bhutan 67.34 Bilateral cooperation b/w Brunei & Singapore 67.34 Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Arbitration (Haiti - Dom. Republic) 67.34 Bilateral between Russia and Kazakhstan (Ob-Irtysh) 65.52 Agreement between Moldova and Ukraine on the Joint Use and Protection of the Cross-Border Waters 65.52 Commission between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republic for the Rivers Chu and Talas 61.88 Bilateral treaty b/w Israel & Jordan 6.6 Joint River Commission b/w India and Bangladesh 6.6
58.24 Helmand River Delta Commission 56.42 Niger Basin Authority (NBA) 56.42 Mahakali River Commission 54.6 Gambia River Basin Development Organization (OMVG) 52.78 The International Commission on Limits and Waters between Mexico and Guatemala (CILA) 52.78 Salween River Strategic Cooperation Framework Agreement 49.14 Bilateral between Iran and Turkmenistan (Atrak) 49.14 The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) 47.32 International Dnieper Basin Council 43.68 Kazakhstan China Joint Commission on Use and Protection of Transboundary Rivers 43.68 Lake Chad Basin Commission 41.86 International Commission of Congo-Oubangui-Sangha (CICOS) 32.76 Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) 29.12 The Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) 27.3 Interstate Commission for Water Coordination of Central Asia (ICWC) 23.66 Permanent Indus Commission 2.2 Mano River Union (MRU) 12.74 Bilateral cooperation on River Brahmaputra 1.92 Israel and Palestine Aquifers 7.28 Bilateral cooperation between Lebanon and Syria (El Kabir and Orontes) 7.28 Bilateral cooperation between Jordan-Syria (Yarmuk) 1.82 Cooperation amongst Iraq-Turkey-Iran-Syria- (Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt Al Arab) Maritsa River Basin Trilateral cooperation between Jordan- Syria-Lebanon Astara Chay River Basin Juba-Shibeli River Basin Wadi Al Izziyah Terek??? Awash Volta Basin Authority was set up in 211 Struma River Basin - Joint group between Greece and Bulgaria was created only in 211 Daoura/Dra/Guir/Oude bon naima/tafna River Basins - Memorandum of cooperation in 211
population at risk Out of 148 countries sharing water resources, 37 do not engage in active water cooperation. Almost a fourth of the community of nations misses optimum benefits of cooperation in water resources and exposes its population to insecurity in its relations with its neighbours. Any two or more countries of these 37 countries face a risk of war in future. Countries with Active Water Cooperation Countries without Active Water Cooperation More people live in the countries NOT engaged in active water cooperation, and at risk of war, than those living in the countries engaged in active water cooperation and enjoying security and peace with their neighbours.
confidence building measures in shared basins Orontes El Kabir Mountain Aquifer Coastal Aquifer Yarmouk Jordan Tigris-Euphrates Rhine Great Lakes of North America Danube Rio-Colorado Senegal Mekong Amazon Zambezi La Plata Orange-Senque Demonstration of trust and political willingness among riparians Very High High Medium Low Continuous Dialogue and Meetings Treaties and Agreements Involvement of all riparian states in some form Cooperation in other areas such as Economic Holistic vision and goals for the future
TO COOPERATE OR TO COMPLAIN? Trans-boundary water relations are difficult. It is particularly possible for the countries adversely placed in a basin or a hydro-political region to detect injustice or unfairness. It is therefore natural for them to complain. But does mere complaining solve their problem? How are some countries using cooperation effectively and innovatively to overcome their difficulties? There are examples in almost every continent. Singapore: With no natural water resources of its own, almost all of Singapore s water came from Malaysia at the time of independence in 1965. Following failed negotiations over increased water rates, Singapore decided to achieve self-sufficiency through its four taps strategy: sourcing water from rainwater, recycling, desalination, and imports. With new water reservoirs, desalination and recycling plants, it has reduced its dependence on Malaysia to about 5 per cent and thus averted potential conflict in the future. South Africa: A downstream but powerful state, South Africa has used its economic position to collaborate with Lesotho, a lesser developed economy with abundant water resources. The Lesotho Highlands Water Project ensures that South Africa has greater access to the shared river to fulfil their water demand, in exchange for aiding infrastructure development in Lesotho. By building dams under the project, Lesotho is also getting sustained hydropower for the country, which is ultimately improving their economic output.
Argentina: Recognizing the shared resources between the countries and the need to co-operate and take joint actions for the sustainable development, Argentina, a downstream country, in 1966 paved the way for regional co-operation through the creation of Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee of the La Plata Basin Countries (CIC). The 1969 La Plata Basin treaty includes transboundary co-operation of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay on the management of the world s fifth largest basin with Parana, Paraguay and Uruguay rivers. The Netherlands: Following extreme floods in 1993/95, the province of Gelderland in The Netherlands in 1997 approached the German state of North-Rhine Westphalia to cooperate on flood control in the border area. In the Rhine river basin, Germany is an upstream country to the downstream Netherlands where 2/3rd of its land area is flood prone. The Dutch-German Working Group on High Water was formed for `communication and research to improve the flood protection at the Lower Rhine ( NiederRhein ). The group changed the flood control strategy from enforcing defence systems to `Room for the River policy which is now also included in the Rhine River Commission s Action Plan on Floods. Senegal: Senegal, a newly independent country in the 196s and under developed economy, soon realized the benefits of co-operation to resolve its internal problems of agriculture and drinking water supply. Prior to joining the OMVS, droughts and floods adversely affected agriculture production but with the joint construction of the Manantali dam, irrigation along the dam in Senegal has widely increased in the last 3 decades, and now an estimated 9 per cent of the rice is harvested here. The Diama dam which halts salt water intrusion, is also helping Senegal to achieve its Millennium Development Goal on drinking water supply. The dam provides water for Lake Guiers, which in turn supplies Dakar and Thies.