Support scheme for CHP and its sensitivity on heat wasting

Similar documents
THE EUROPEAN GREEN BUILDING PROGRAMME. Technical Module on Combined Heat and Power

ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN POWER PLANTS

Fact Sheet on China s energy sector and Danish solutions

Effects of a White Certificate trading scheme on the energy system of the EU-27

How To Improve The Energy Situation In Europe

ACCELERATING GREEN ENERGY TOWARDS The Danish Energy Agreement of March 2012

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document

of bioenergy and actions

English version. Manual for Determination of Combined Heat and Power (CHP)

Sharing cogeneration experience of Europe

Danish Energy Model RE Policy Tools MAIN Asian Dialog, Bali January Mr. Henrik Breum Special Advisor

Efficiency Metrics for CHP Systems: Total System and Effective Electric Efficiencies

Production of Electricity with RES & CHP for Homeowners

WELCOME TO THE CODE project 1st Eastern Region Workshop

Implications of Abundant Natural Gas

BIOMASS LOOKING FOR EFFICIENT UTILIZATION THE REHEAT CONCEPT. Jaroslav Lahoda Olaf Arndt Walter Hanstein. Siemens Power Generation (PG)

Enhanced Heating and Cooling Plans to Quantify the Impact of Increased Energy Efficiency in EU Member States

University of Melbourne Symposium on ICT Sustainability Dan Pointon 25 November 2008

Renewable energy sources penetration in most of BSEC countries

Russia: energy market developments. Marc-Antoine Eyl-Mazzega Russia Programme Manager Paris, 16 December 2014

Riga Smart City Concept. Timurs Safiuļins Riga Energy Agency

District Heating & Cooling in Helsinki

Allocation of Fuel Energy and Emissions to Heat and Power in CHP

Business Policy of CEZ Group and ČEZ, a. s.

Good Practice Form

HYBRIDE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES FOR AN EFFICIENT GEOTHERMAL HEAT UTILIZATION

OUTLOOK FOR NATURAL GAS IN EUROPE

District Heating & Cooling

Electric Utilities. Introduction to the module

Papapostolou 1, E. Kondili 1, J.K. Kaldellis 2

Work package 3 Comparison of member state approaches

Renewable Choice Energy

97 MW of Cat coal seam methane power in New South Wales, Australia

RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN LITHUANIA ACHIEVEMENTS AND DRAWBACKS

The European Renewable Energy Directive and international Trade. Laurent Javaudin Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S.

Critical Policy Options to Protect Industry Competitiveness

Technologies for small scale Biomass CHP-Plants an actual survey

Germany Energy efficiency report

How To Track Rsw Certified Material

GREEN COMFORT FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES.

Western Forest Economists 43 rd Annual Meeting May, 7, 2008

Micro-Turbine Combined Heat & Power Generators (CHP) Cold Climate Applications 2014 Polar Technology Conference Richard S.

DANISH DISTRICT ENERGY PLANNING EXPERIENCE

How To Power A Power Plant With Waste Heat

A macro-economic viewpoint. What is the real cost of offshore wind? siemens.com / wind

SIX REASONS TO DRY BIOGAS To A LOW DEWPOINT BEFORE COMBUSTION IN A CHP ENGINE STEVEN SCOTT MARKET DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ALTERNATIVE ENERGIES

Systematic implementation of CHP plants in Frankfurt am Main

Developments and trends shaping the future for Waste-to- Energy technology suppliers

1. What are your views on the proposed approach of legislating to require targets to be set for micropower?

A Weissenbach AUSTRIA Tel. +43/2672/890-0, Fax: Internet: office@polytechnik.at

INTRODUCTION OF DSM PROGRAMS. Ankara, November EVA MICHALENA Regulatory Authority for Energy, Greece Sorbonne University, France

Results Figure 1 Analyses the impact of three alternative methods considered for Emissions Trading EUETS Ref iii.

PROPERTY RIGHTS MARKET

Energy & Global Warming in Europe

New business segments for the energy saving industry Energy efficiency and decentralised energy systems in the building & housing sector

Status of the district heating and cooling infrastructures in Italy

CHP and DHC in Helsinki

Boilers and cogeneration/trigeneration. Abhi Sawant Business Development Manager Simons Green Energy

Economic Analysis of the Renewable Energy Policies in the European Union

How To Make A New Energy Efficiency Directive In European Law

NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY ACTION PLAN (NREAP) SLOVENIA

EU Heating and Cooling Strategy

Gas: the right choice for heating in Europe

Best Practice Examples

Energy Efficiency Indicators for Public Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels

Smart Energy Systems Energy Efficient Buildings and the Design of future Sustainable Energy Systems

Electric Utilities. Introduction to the module

Opportunities for the Georgian Hydropower industry to benefit from Directive 2009/28EC of the European Parliament

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

CA Energy Efficiency Directive

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Study of a Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Application in a Cogeneration Power Plant

CODE2 Cogeneration Observatory and Dissemination Europe

Roadmap for the Energy Union

Landfill Gas In Ireland - The Facts

Estimating the Price of ROCs

Briefing. European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) and NER300

Policy proposal by Urban Heat Energy Committee of Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy

AGFW-Statement. Public Consultation. Roadmap for a low carbon economy. Frankfurt am Main, 8th December 2010 Or

ANNEX D ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM: UPDATE ON THE EMISSIONS PERFORMANCE STANDARD

Waste-to-Energy in Europe

Sustainable Bio Energy technologies in the CDM market

FAS Training Course on Energy Efficiency / Renewable Energy

Report of the Republic of Hungary to the Commission on the promotion of the use of biofuels for transport

Comparison of Recent Trends in Sustainable Energy Development in Japan, U.K., Germany and France

Biowaste to Energy Examples from Germany

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Sources in Sweden

Country profiles: Austria

The IMES Master Programme

BIOENERGY (FROM NORWEGIAN FORESTS) GOOD OR BAD FOR THE CLIMATE?

Outline. Intro Methodology Background energy system Foreground system Conclusion. DTU Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark

Cogeneration Based District Heating Restoration Project in Avan District of Yerevan, Armenia

From today s systems to the future renewable energy systems. Iva Ridjan US-DK summer school AAU Copenhagen 17 August 2015

Welcome to Kristianstad The Biogas City

Hungary Energy efficiency report

Carbon free future of European cities

Carbon Emissions Trading and Carbon Taxes

AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF DISTRIBUTED ELECTRICITY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES

The potential of the usage of renewable energy in the Czech Republic

HOUSE BILL No Koch, VanNatter

Transcription:

Agronomy Research 14(Z), xxx ccc, 2016 Support scheme for CHP and its sensitivity on heat wasting R. Neděla 1* and R. Neděla 2 1 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Technical Faculty, CZ 16521 Prague 6 Suchdol, Czech Republic 2 University of Economics, Prague, Faculty of International Relations, CZ 13067 Prague 3, W. Churchill 4 SQ, Czech Republic * Correspondence: nedela@tf.czu.cz Abstract. This paper describes basic principles of the CHP, advantages and disadvantages, technologies. In first part of article are described principles of CHP from the viewpoint of the energy customer. Second part describes basic Directives by the European Commission on promotion CHP and third part the most important part focus on the sensitivity of primary energy saving (PES) on outputs especially heat wasting. Key words: Combined heat and power, cogeneration, primary energy savings, primary energy, heat wasting, efficiency, support. INTRODUCTION Combined heat and power production (CHP) also known as cogeneration is the simultaneous production of electricity and heat from a single fuel source, such as coal, natural gas, biomass, waste heat, biogas, oil and etc. High efficient CHP is one of supported technology which can help to achieve the 20-20-20 goals the third target climate change and energy suitability. This ambitious European target means a 20% increase in energy efficiency and a 20% reduction of CO 2 emissions and a 20% renewables by 2020. The main advantage is that the CHP systems are able to recover waste heat produced from the generation of electricity. That s why cogeneration has higher efficiency (Flin, 2010) than separate production of electricity and heat. The best example how to explain the principle of CHP is to look at it from a viewpoint of an energy customer. See Fig. 1 where principle separate production of electricity and heatis described. As we can see an overall efficiency of 58% is for separate production. Figure 1. Separate production of electricity and heat.

The same example is but with CHP system; see Fig. 2 with an overall efficiency of 85%. Figure 2. Cogeneration = simultaneous production of electricity and heat (Nedela & Nedela, 2013). As you can see in the both figures the first advantage is that for same necessary units of energy (electrical energy and heat) for the end customer we will need less fuel units = less primary energy. Inputs and outputs are re-calculated for the same energy units. If we have less fuel units and less distribution of production losses then we will have also lower emissions to the environment in particular CO 2. So these are some of the advantages of CHP. LEGISLATION One of the most important Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council was 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market and amending Directive 92/42/EEC. This directive shows potential for use of cogeneration as a measure to save energy. We can also find here a new important definition of high-efficiency cogeneration that provides primary energy savings calculated according to equation (1) of at least 10% compared with the references for separate production of heat and electricity, production from small scale and micro cogeneration units (defined by 1 MWe installed capacity) that must provide primary energy savings (that means higher than 0%) may be to qualify as high-efficiency cogeneration (EC Directive 2004). The issue of PES is briefly described in paper (Nedela & Nedela, 2013). PES calculation (EC Directive 2004): PES = (1 CHP Hη REF Hη 1 + CHP Eη REFEη ) 100% (1) where: CHPHη is the heat efficiency of the cogeneration production defined as annual useful heat output divided by the fuel input used to produce the sum of useful heat output and electricity from cogeneration. RefHη is the efficiency reference value for separate heat production. CHP Eη is the electrical efficiency of the cogeneration production defined as an annual electricity from cogeneration divided by the fuel input used to produce the sum of useful heat output and electricity from cogeneration. Where a cogeneration unit generates mechanical energy, annual electricity from cogeneration may be increased by an additional element representing the amount of electricity which

is equivalent to that of a mechanical energy. Ref Eη is the efficiency reference value for separate electricity production. In 2012 the new Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealling Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC, that is mostly about energy efficiency repeal the Directive 2004/8/EC and also sets important duties to Member States (Article 14) carrying out and notifying to the Commission a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the application of high-efficiency cogeneration and efficient district heating and cooling. This information will be important for the investors and will help to develop a whole CHP sector. Next important material is Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014 2020 (EC Guidelines 2014). This material follows a policy Framework for climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030, where are new pillars of the 2030: greenhouse gas emission reduction, increase amount of renewable energy and energy efficiency. For cogeneration and district heating and cooling is there special part that described support scheme for new application of CHP. SENSITIVITY OF PES PARAMETER The PES parameter compares CHP with reference separate heat and separate electricity production and it is the most important parameter which qualifies if the CHP producer can receive some state support. This state support must be in line with Guidelines on State Aid for Environmental Protection and Energy for actual period (now 2014 2020). Fig. 3 shows a basic CHP scheme. Input is a fuel energy which goes into a gas turbine and outputs are electrical energy and useful heat. Figure 3. CHP scheme. Overall efficiency is: = p + q f where: is an overall efficiency which is the ratio of all energy outputs to all energy inputs; p is an output of electrical energy; q is an output of useful heat; f is a fuel energy input. (2)

If is higher than 75% or 80% (depends on technology) than total electrical energy is an energy from cogeneration, if is lower than we have to calculate a part of energy which is from cogeneration. p CHP = q CHP C (3) where: p CHP is an amount of electricity from cogeneration; C is a power to heat ratio. Practical example: p CHP 20 units, q 65 units, f 100 units. Overall efficiency is: = p + q f = 20 + 65 100 = 0.85 = 85% (4) Sensitivity of primaryenergy savings (PES) on useful heat shows Fig. 4. Figure 4. Sensitivity PES on useful heat, backpressure turbine and condensing extraction turbine. The most importat information is in Table 1. Table shows a sensitivity of PES on useful heat. When an overall efficiency of condensing extraction turbine is between 75% to 78%;for a producer it is better to waste heat because a PES parameter is higher than 10% i.e. you are a high efficient cogeneration and you can receive a support from a government.

Table 1. Theoretical calculation backpressure turbine and condensing extraction turbine, primary energy savings and other important parameters q CHP 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 85% 84% 83% 82% 81% 80% 79% 78% 77% 76% 75% 74% pchp backpressure 20 20 20 20 20 20 18.15 17.84 17.53 17.23 16.92 16.61 pchp condensing 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 16.61 pnochp backpressure 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.85 2.15 2.46 2.77 3.08 3.38 pnochp condensing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.38 fnochp backpressure 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.23 10.77 12.31 13.85 15.38 16.92 fnochp condensing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16.92 fchp backpressure 100 100 100 100 100 100 90.76 89.23 87.69 86.15 84.61 83.07 fchp condensing 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 83.07 E backpressure 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% E condensing 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% T backpressure 65% 64% 63% 62% 61% 60% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% 65% T condensing 65% 64% 63% 62% 61% 60% 59% 58% 57% 56% 55% 65% PES backpressure 16% 15% 14% 14% 13% 12% 16% 16% 16% 16% 16% 16% PES condensing 16% 15% 14% 14% 13% 12% 11% 10% 9% 8% 7% 16% Fig. 5 shows sensitivity of PES parameter on an overall efficiency, as you can see there is same situation like sensitivity on useful heat. Figure 5. Sensitivity of PES on an overall efficiency, backpressure turbine and condensing extraction turbine. Fig. 6 shows PES sensitivity on an overall efficiency with a different value of useful heat and cogeneration electricity.

Figure 6. Sensitivity of PES on an overall efficiency, backpressure turbine and condensing extraction turbine. Fig. 7 shows sensitivity of a PES parameter on an overall efficiency with a different value of electricity from a cogeneration. As you can see the most important parameter is electricity from a cogeneration, if this parameter is too low, then you have no chance, even you use all heat which you have, to get a better PES parameter. Negative PES parameter means that it is better to have a separate production of electricity and heat. For a better understanding the goal of a producer is to get a support. Figure 7. Sensitivity of PES on an overall efficiency, backpressure turbine and condensing extraction turbine with different values of electricity from cogeneration and different values of useful heat.

CONCLUSION This paper briefly explains basic principles of a cogeneration andthe main legislation framework. The main focus is on primary energy savings parameter (PES) and sensitivity on heat waste. In a specific situation is better to waste heat according to use it. This is to be done because of virtual splitting possibility. REFERENCES Flin, D. 2010. Cogeneration A user s guide. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, 2010, ISBN 978-0-86341-738-2, p. 5. Nedela, R. & Nedela, R. Present and future combined heat and power in Czech Republic, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Conference Proceedings, Prague, 2013, ISBN 978-80- 213-2388-9. EC Directive. 2004. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market. April 2004. EC. Guidelines. 2014. Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014 2020, July 2014.