Sand Dunes Quality Early learning Centre Education Review

Similar documents
Mission Heights Junior College Flat Bush, Auckland. Confirmed. Education Review Report: Arotake Paerewa

Queens High School Education Review Report

Waihi Beach School Education Review

National Quality Standard Assessment and Rating Instrument

Bachelor of Teaching (Early Childhood Education) (Level 7) Course Synopses

Charter School No: 2971

Early Childhood Educator (Certificate III)

National Diploma in Teaching (Early Childhood Education, Pasifika) (Level 7)

Family Child Care Assistants: A Guide for Educators

Partnership, Voice & Excellence

Cygnets Group (Exminster Pre-School)

High Halden Church of England Primary School. Early Years Policy

National Certificate in Early Childhood Education and Care (Level 5)

Evaluation schedule for inspections of registered early years provision

Choosing an early childhood education centre for your child

St Teresa's Catholic Primary School

Wyvern Technology College (Childcare)

Ireland Wood Primary School

Framework and Resources for Early Childhood Education Reviews

Twinkle Stars Day Nursery

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION

Tātaiako - Cultural Competencies for Teachers of Māori Learners:

Early Years Educator (Level 3): Qualifications Criteria

Inspection report for early years provision. Unique Reference Number

Being in the leadership space online teachers voices

Health and wellbeing Principles and practice

Abbey College Cambridge

To investigate issues related to inclusive education in order to increase meaningful participation in reducing exclusion of diverse learners.

Assessment, Recording and Reporting Policy

Busy Bees Day Nursery at London Excel

Position Description

The Child at the Centre. Overview

National Certificate in Early Childhood Education and Care (Level 3)

Guide to the National Quality Standard

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS Demonstrate self awareness for social service work

Woolgrove School. Early Years Foundation Stage Policy.

Inspection report for early years provision. Unique Reference Number EY Inspection date 13 May 2005

Early Childhood Education / Course Outcomes

Handsworth Christian School

Seedlings Montessori at Moorlands

Twinkle Stars Day Nursery

Clewer Green CofE First School

Working in special education. Psychologist in Education

WHITINGS HILL PRIMARY SCHOOL JOB DESCRIPTION. Primary School Nurseries, Primary and Special Schools

Inspection report for early years provision. Unique Reference Number

The Family Services Manager s Handbook

Professional Development Plan for Child Care Center Employees Supplemental Documents

The Pyramid Model provides guidance for early childhood special education and early intervention personnel, early educators, families, and other

Blakesley Playgroup. Inspection report for early years provision. Unique reference number Inspection date 09/11/2010

Inspection report for early years provision. Unique Reference Number EY Inspection date 15 July 2005 Claire, Alexandra Parnell

Human Resources Management Plan

Twinkle Stars Nursery School

CHILD, HEALTH, WELFARE & DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT GUIDE

The New Regulations. the really simple guide to. For NSW centre-based early education and care services. NOVEMBER 2011

The Heathland School Wellington Road South, Hounslow, Middlesex, TW4 5JD

Guide to the National Quality Standard

A Guide for. Families. Using NAEYC Standards to Find Quality Programs for Young Children.

MSD Specialist Accreditation Standards: Care Services. Level 1

Brewood Secondary School

Children s centre self-evaluation form guidance

Induction & Orientation of Educators, Students & Volunteers

JOB TITLE: Community Manager, Mental Health & Addiction Services

Outreach Coordinator (Science)

Faculty of Health Te Kura Hauora

St Bede's Catholic High School

A parent s guide to licensed child care in Toronto

Learning & Behaviour Service TOOLKIT. Resource Teacher

GradDipECTch (Early Childhood) College of Education, Health and Human Development, Imagine. Education, Health and Human Development

Al-Madina Nursery. Inspection date. 26/02/2013 Not Applicable. Previous inspection: This inspection: 3

The Grange Nursery. Inspection report for early years provision. Unique reference number Inspection date 31/10/2011

A report on. Johnstown C.P. School Tre Ioan Caerfyrddin SA31 3HS. Date of inspection: May 2011

Policy Document Planning, Assessment, Recording and Reporting September 2010

THE REDWAY SCHOOL. This policy was written in line with the whole school Learning and Teaching Policy and Target Setting Policy.

HEAD START PERFORMANCE STANDARDS W/ MENTAL HEALTH FOCUS

Little Monkeys Day Nursery

Librarian (Reading Services/ Online Services)

Expanded Teaching Staff Survey For use in Step 1: Enrollment/Self-Study Only Page 1 of 8

Choosing Childcare and Early Education: Information for Parents

Job Title: Social Worker Marinoto CAMHS Position Description

Inspection report for early years provision. Unique Reference Number

Inspection report for early years provision. Unique Reference Number EY Inspection date 17 August 2005

Certificate in Leadership (Early Childhood Education) and Diploma in Leadership (Early Childhood Education) Programme Handbook

Christ Church CE School Intimate and Personal Care Policy April 2015

Becoming a Cambridge International School A guide to the registration process

VOCATIONAL SKILLS & EMPLOYABILITY TUTOR

South Molton Pre School

Inspection dates March Effectiveness of leadership and management

HOLTSPUR PRE-SCHOOL PROSPECTUS FOR PARENTS CHERRY TREE ROAD, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKS, HP9 1BH

The Sholing Technology College

JOB DESCRIPTION. Leadership: Provide vision, leadership and direction for the college.

Al-Furqan Community College

What are children learning in early childhood education in New Zealand?

Avanti House School. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. School report. Inspection dates July 2014

Program Administrator Definition and Competencies

SUPERVISION STAFF TO CHILD RATIOS AND GROUP SIZES

Self Assessment Tool for Principals and Vice-Principals

Literacy across learning Principles and practice

Standards for the Operation, Management and Administration Of Early Childhood Institutions

Evaluating teaching. 6.1 What is teacher evaluation and why is it important?

Transcription:

Sand Dunes Quality Early learning Centre Sand Dunes Quality Early learning Centre Education Review 2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews Evaluation of Sand Dunes Quality Early learning Centre How well placed is Sand Dunes Quality Early learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children? Not well placed Requires further development Well placed Very well placed ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below. Background Sand Dunes Quality Early Learning Centre is a privately owned centre in Porirua. It is licensed to provide all day education and care for 95 children, including 25 up to two years old. Full time care and education is offered in learning areas planned around the developmental stages of infants, toddlers and young children. The centre opened in 2007 and previously operated under two separate licences. These were combined in 2011. A new centre manager was appointed in December 2013. The Review Findings The Sand Dunes home away from home ethos is highly evident in the centre. Teachers have close ties with the children and their families. Respectful, collaborative practices result in an active, nurturing atmosphere. Children initiate the curriculum. Teachers successfully respond to individual and group interests in their planning. Children enjoy revisiting and sharing their past experiences at the Page 1 / 8

centre. Wall displays celebrate their learning and foster self esteem. Aspects of literacy are evident across the centre. Teachers provide appropriate resources to help children develop skills and knowledge in mathematics. Children s profiles show their participation in the programme and highlight their emerging interests. Teachers should continue to strengthen their evaluation of the breadth and complexity of children s learning over time. The high quality outdoor learning environment is a feature of the centre. It is well planned to support children s exploration and investigation. The garden and farm areas are well resourced to engage children s interest in the natural world. Children learn about sustainable practices as they tend and harvest crops, collect eggs and compost food waste. Infants and toddlers are nurtured and encouraged to explore their surroundings. Responsive care giving supports their need for secure attachments. Good information sharing between families and staff enables continuity in care routines. Children s transitions within the centre are sensitively planned. They are based upon careful assessment of each child s abilities and learning needs. Suitable processes support parents and children to prepare for progression to school. Well-established routines enable children to anticipate significant events during the day. These include programme activities and meal times. Centre teachers should continue to explore ways of supporting children s independence and self-help skills during meal times. Children interact positively with their peers and adults. Teachers skilfully manage and respond to individual needs. Consistent positive guidance from adults results in a calm environment. Children have a learning environment which reflects their culture and identity. Resources that affirm Māori children s sense of belonging are visible and accessible. Teachers have accessed external support to grow their knowledge of the local area and of hapū and iwi. Strategies to support Pacific children are evident. Managers are supporting teachers to continue to learn more about ways of teaching that reflect and respond to Māori and Pacific learners. Teachers are reflective and work well together. Frequent opportunities for leadership support their professional growth. Self review is becoming an established practice and is contributing to decision making leading to improved outcomes for children. Leadership is supportive and collaborative. The centre has well-developed systems and processes that provide clear expectations for operations. The senior leadership team Page 2 / 8

recognises that the current appraisal system needs strengthening to better support teachers professional growth. ERO agrees. Key Next Steps Management and ERO agree on the following key next steps to support ongoing improvement. Continuing to strengthen assessment and evaluation of children s learning. Continuing to develop strategies to promote children s independence during meal times. Developing an appropriate appraisal system which is regularly implemented for all staff. Management Assurance on Legal Requirements Before the review, the staff and management of Sand Dunes Quality Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to: curriculum premises and facilities health and safety practices governance, management and administration. During the review, ERO looked at the service s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing: emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection) physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures) suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios) evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake. All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Next ERO Review When is ERO likely to review the service again? Page 3 / 8

The next ERO review of Sand Dunes Quality Early Learning Centre will be in three years. Joyce Gebbie National Manager Review Services Central Region 27 August 2014 The Purpose of ERO Reports The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service s strengths and next steps for development. ERO s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. Page 4 / 8

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service Location Porirua Ministry of Education profile number 60064 Licence type Licensed under Education & Care Service Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 Number licensed for 95 children, including up to 25 aged under 2 Service roll 95 Gender composition Boys 48, Girls 47 Ethnic composition Māori NZ European/Pākehā Pacific Other ethnic groups 18 60 5 12 Percentage of qualified teachers 80% + 0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates Reported ratios of staff to children Under 2 1:4 Better than minimum requirements Over 2 1:7 Better than minimum requirements Review team on site July 2014 Date of this report 27 August 2014 Most recent ERO report(s) Education Review May 2010 Page 5 / 8

Education Review May 2007 Page 6 / 8

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews ERO s Evaluation Framework ERO s overarching question for an early childhood education review is How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children? ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here: Pou Whakahaere how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children Pou Ārahi how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children Mātauranga whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children Tikanga whakaako how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children. Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake self review and of whanaungatanga partnerships with parents and whānau. ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service. A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two. For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services. ERO s Overall Judgement and Next Review The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are: Very well placed The next ERO review in four years Well placed The next ERO review in three years Requires further development The next ERO review within two years Page 7 / 8

Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO s website. Review Coverage ERO reviews are tailored to each service s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service. Page 8 / 8