BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Similar documents
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION'^^ j E DIRECT TESTIMONY RAJESH GUPTA PROJECT MANAGER, ENTERGY SERVICES, INC.

Merchant Generation Site Selection On the AEP Transmission System

345 kv Brazos Valley Connection Project FAQs

Customer connection enquiry form (For the connection of loads and generators)

1. Who is CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC?

SOUTHERN MARYLAND ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. HUGHESVILLE, MD

Fourth Revised KCBPU Service Agreement

SPP Notification to Construct

PUC DOCKET NO DIRECT TESTIMONY AND EXHIBITS RALPH G. GOODLET, JR. ON BEHALF OF SHARYLAND UTILITIES, L.P. May 31, 2013

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RULES GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS BY THE ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

University of Denver, MBA, Business Administration, 1973 Regis University, BS, Business Administration, 1972

Eldorado-Ivanpah Transmission Project WELCOME To Southern California Edison Company s Eldorado-Ivanpah Transmission Project OPEN HOUSE

FILED IN THE MATTER OF THE P TITION OF ) ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. FOR AN ) ACCOUNTING ORDER AUTHORIZING ) ESTABLISHMENT OF A REGULATORY )

APSC FILED Time: 9/26/ :13:03 AM: Recvd 9/26/ :01:49 AM: Docket U-Doc. 1

Hyperlinks are Inactive

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIO~t~ Docket No. DE 15-

CENTRAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. NET METERING AGREEMENT

Electric Operations Manager

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Joint Con Edison LIPA Offshore Wind Power Integration Project Feasibility Assessment

Private Pay Telephone Service Provider Certification

121 FERC 61,143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

SCHEDULE OF RATES. For Electric Service in Allegheny and Beaver Counties. (For List of Communities Served, see Pages No. 4 and 5) Issued By

EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc.

INDEPENDENCE POWER & LIGHT DEPARTMENT Independence, Missouri. Schedule NM-1 Customer-Generator Net Metering Contract Service Rider

HOUSE BILL No Koch, VanNatter

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. ELECTRIC SERVICE Effective: November 30, 2015 Filed: December 10, 2015 Supersedes: PPACCR Effective 6/30/15

Green Power Connection Net Energy Metering Engineering Review Process in Delaware and Speeding Up the Application Fee Process

CITY OF GLENDALE CALIFORNIA REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL

PG&E Transmission Interconnection Handbook. Section L3: SUBSTATION DESIGN FOR LOAD-ONLY ENTITIES AND TRANSMISSION-ONLY ENTITIES

N.J.A.C. 14:8-4 NET METERING FOR CLASS I RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS

Transitions. Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc Annual Report

BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study Report-Web Version. PJM Generation Interconnection Request Queue Position Z1-055

NERC s New BES Definition: How Many CHP Units Will It Impact?

Docket No PU Complaint of Mad Hatter Utility, Inc. and Paradise Lakes Utility, LLC Against Verizon Florida LLC

Written Direct Evidence. Filed: April 24, 2008 EB Exhibit A Tab 5 Schedule 3 Page 1 of 12

Electrical System Studies

STATE OF VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD

On behalf of Ozarks Electric Cooperative Corporation, I respectfully submit the following documents for electronic filing in this matter:

Guideline for Energy Efficient Electrical systems for building. Presentation by TERI

Generation and Transmission Interconnection Process

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Testimony and Supplemental Testimony of David A. Schlissel. On behalf of The Office of Consumer Counsel

ARKANSAS STATE POLICE

Virginia Electric and Power Company Subsection A 4 Rate Adjustment Clause. Direct Testimony and Exhibits

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS (PUC) DOCKET NO

Emera Maine Proposed Potential Transmission Projects. Line Identification Line 75 - KR Sub. Estimated Cost $201,464 $0 $3,200,000

BEFORE THE INSURANCE COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF ARKANSAS ORDER. On Tuesday, October 21, 2008, at 1:00 p.m., in the Hearing Room of the Arkansas

Distributed Generation: Frequently Asked Questions

NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT NET METERING RULES

CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS:

How To Build A Data Center For Ragingwire

METERING CODE. Energy Market Authority of Singapore

Title 20 PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. Subtitle 50 SERVICE SUPPLIED BY ELECTRIC COMPANIES. Chapter 02 Engineering

ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSYF cc7 DOCKET NO U IN THE MATTER OF ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPETITION IF ANY, ON RETAIL CUSTOMERS

Virginia State Corporation Commission efiling CASE Document Cover Sheet

Fiber Winds Renewable Energy Project. Over $87 Million in U.S. Government Subsidies

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

LEGEND. Corp 1 = Corp 2 = Corp 3 = Corp 4 = Corp 5 = Corp 6 =

Treasure Valley Electric Plan - Community Advisory Committee

Welcome to our open house. Thanks for coming. Please sign in and help yourself to refreshments. Energizing your community.

DeSoto County is not a water service provider and does not operate any

Rule Fast Track Analysis for National Life Insurance Co.

NOTES ON AURORA LINE CHARGES FOR NETWORK DESIGNERS, CONSULTANTS AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS

The Alberta Electricity Market Frequently Asked Questions

Electricity from the Power Plant To the Consumer

Unitil Energy Systems, Inc. Interconnection Standards For Inverters Sized Up To 100 kva

AEP System Corporate Structure - As of December 31, 2014

STATEMENT OF CHARGING METHODOLOGY FOR USE OF ELECTRICITY NORTH WEST LIMITED S ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORK

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA LRK,'S UNCE AT RICHMOND, SEPTEMBER 7,2012 TRUL CE.. P 112 : 51 APPLICATION OF FINAL ORDER

South African Distribution Code

ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC TARIFF FOR TRANSMISSION SERVICE TO, FROM AND OVER CERTAIN INTERCONNECTIONS REVISION NO. 13

OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY REQUEST FOR INFORMATION. Solar Energy Purchase Power Agreement Information

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

This letter provides the response to requests for the information listed below.

Distribution Substation Manual (DSM) Section I - Introduction

Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

N O W A V A I L A B L E

Meeting #9 December 4, Magic Valley Electrical Plan Community Advisory Committee

Report to the Minister Responsible for the Qulliq Energy Corporation. Respecting:

Daily Daily Network Network Network Energy Rates Step Rates Capacity. Price Rates Rates

UTILITY RATE STRUCTURE

PROJECT EXPERIENCE Development/Transaction Support United States MANAGING DIRECTOR

PJM LMP Market Overview

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-33 EXPERIMENTAL PRICE PLAN FOR SUPER PEAK TIME-OF-USE GENERAL SERVICE

ATTACHMENT G. Network Operating Agreement

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL R. WOODRUFF ON BEHALF OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

APPENDIX D DISTRIBUTION WIRES ONLY RATE BASE

RR1-455 of

Electric system improvements near you South and West of Edmonton Area Transmission Development

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) Docket No. ER )

Q: PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS. A: Gerry Sheerin. Sheerin Technical, 25 Eastville Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Canada

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER. (Issued March 15, 2007)

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA STANDBY SERVICE

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE KENTUCKY STATE BOARD ON ELECTRIC GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION SITING

CONTENTS ABOUT US SALES OVERVIEW SALES PRODUCTS OTHER SERVICES OUR LOCATIONS ACCREDITATIONS RECENT PROJECTS 12 CASE STUDIES 13

A. 5MWp SPV Plant at Khimsar, Rajasthan. B. 5MWp SPV Plant Installed Technologies. D. 5MWp SPV Plant Challenges. E. 5MWp SPV Plant - Performance

TRANSMISSION SERVICE TARIFF OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY HOUSTON ELECTRIC, LLC FOR TRANSMISSION SERVICE TO FROM AND OVER CERTAIN INTERCONNECTIONS

SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA STANDBY SERVICE

Transcription:

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION ) OF SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER ) COMPANY FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC ) DOCKET NO. -0-U CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO ) CONSTRUCT A SWITCHING STATION ) ADJACENT TO ARKANSAS ELECTRIC ) COOPERATIVE CORPORATION S EXISTING ) EAST FAYETTEVILLE STATION LOCATED IN ) WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS ) DIRECT TESTIMONY OF FOREST KESSINGER ON BEHALF OF SOUTHWESTRN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY September, 0

Q. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME, POSITION WITHIN YOUR COMPANY, BUSINESS ADDRESS, AND ON WHOSE BEHALF ARE YOU APPEARING IN THIS PROCEEDING? A. My name is Forest Kessinger. My business address is Cooperative Way, Little Rock, Arkansas, 0. I am employed by ( AECC ) as the Director of Transmission Coordination and Planning. I am appearing on behalf of ( SWEPCO ) in this proceeding in support of SWEPCO s request for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity ( CCN ) to construct, own, and operate the proposed SWEPCO East Fayetteville Switching Station ( SWEPCO Switching Station ) at a location that is adjacent to AECC s East Fayetteville Substation and SWEPCO s existing Dyess to Hyland kv transmission line. Q. HAVE YOU APPEARED BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ( COMMISSION ) IN THE PAST? A. I have appeared before the Commission on many occasions. Over the past years, I have testified on behalf of AECC and its member cooperatives in such areas as: revenue requirement; cost of service; cost allocation; rate design; fuel and purchased energy riders; transmission riders; power factor riders; special rate contracts; generation plant sitings; transmission facility sitings; plant acquisitions; energy efficiency; end-use full 0 cycle energy efficiency; appropriate equity levels for cooperatives; promotional practices; load forecasting; financing; net-metering; co-generation and small power

production; avoided cost; retail open access; and numerous Commission rule makings. I have also testified before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Q. WHAT BENEFIT DOES THE PROPOSED SWEPCO SWITCHING STATION PROVIDE TO AECC? A. The requested SWEPCO Switching Station will allow AECC to have two kv positions within that Station. One of these positions will provide an additional kv feed to AECC so that Ozarks Electric Cooperative Corporation ( Ozarks ) can operate a section of its existing line extending from AECC s East Fayetteville Substation to an AECC kv to kv step-down transformer at AECC s Elkins Generation facility. This line is currently operated at kv but is built to kv standards. Operation at kv will provide Ozarks with greater line capacity and greater efficiency. In addition, Ozarks operation of the line at kv will provide much needed transformer capacity relief at AECC s East Fayetteville Substation. Additional details regarding these 0 outcomes will be provided later in my Direct Testimony. Q. WHAT CONDITIONS PROMPTED AECC TO REQUEST THAT SWEPCO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED SWITCHING STATION? A. Load growth and the need to maintain switching capabilities were the primary drivers behind AECC requesting that SWEPCO construct the SWEPCO Switching Station. Over the last ten years, loads at AECC s East Fayetteville Substation have grown at a very rapid rate. In 00, AECC s East Fayetteville Substation had one kv to kv stepdown transformer rated at 0 MVA. In 00, the maximum one hour loading on that transformer was MW. In 00, to accommodate load growth at the East Fayetteville

0 Substation, AECC installed a second 0 MVA kv to kva step-down transformer. By 0, the combined loadings on these two transformers reached MW. Both Ozarks and AECC anticipate that loads served out of the East Fayetteville Substation will continue to grow at a very high rate. Given current and anticipated loads, additional transmission capacity is needed by AECC and Ozarks. Q. HOW WOULD OZARKS OPERATING ITS EAST FAYETTEVILLE TO ELKINS LINE AT KV OFFER CAPACITY RELIEF FOR THE TWO EXISTING 0 MVA KV TO KV TRANSFORMERS LOCATED IN AECC S EAST FAYETTEVILLE SUBSTATION? A. In addition to providing wholesale capacity for the two Ozarks substations served off of the East Fayetteville to Elkins line, the two existing 0 MVA kv to kv transformers also provide transmission capacity for a number of other Ozarks substations that are not located along the East Fayetteville to Elkins line. By serving the two Ozarks substations at kv, existing kv to kv transformer capacity will be freed up to serve those Ozarks substations in the area that will continue to receive delivery at kv. Q. IN ADDITION TO THE NEED TO FREE UP TRANSFORMER CAPACITY AT THE EAST FAYETTEVILLE SUBSTATION, IS OPERATION AT KV DESIRABLE FOR OZARKS EAST FAYETTEVILLE TO ELKINS LINE? A. Currently, Ozarks East Fayetteville to Elkins line has sufficient capacity; however, given the existing and anticipated load growth in the area, there are a number of advantages to operating the East Fayetteville to Elkins line at kv. First, for a given conductor size,

transmission at kv has a much greater capacity to deliver electricity than does kv. Thus, operation at kv will provide additional transmission line capacity for future load growth and load transfer capability. Second, delivery at a higher voltage will reduce losses and voltage drop. A reduction in losses will reduce the cost of delivering 0 electricity and will provide greater energy efficiency. Lastly, as discussed later in my Direct Testimony, if the East Fayetteville to Elkins line is operated at kv, property owners may be impacted less as compared to alternative solutions. Q. WILL OZARKS NEED TO UPGRADE ITS EXISTING EAST FAYETTEVILLE TO ELKINS LINE, WHICH IS CURRENTLY OPERATED AT KV? A. No. Ozarks East Fayetteville to Elkins line is currently constructed to kv standards, but is operated at kv because a kv feed is not currently available. Q. WHAT ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS MUST OZARKS MAKE IN ORDER TO OPERATE ITS EAST FAYETTEVILLE TO ELKINS LINE AT KV? A. The operation of Ozarks East Fayetteville to Elkins line at kv will require Ozarks to remove two existing kv to. kv step-down transformers and replace them with kv to. kv step-down transformers at Ozarks Gulley Road and Baldwin Substations (other related equipment and metering may also be required). In addition, AECC will install a new kv to kv step-down auto transformer at its existing Elkins Generation facility. The future AECC kv to kv auto transformer will provide a termination for Ozarks East Fayetteville to Elkins kv line and provide a backup capability for Ozarks Baldwin and Gully Road Substations in the event of a loss of delivery from AECC s East Fayetteville Substation. A stronger electric source at Ozarks

0 Elkins Substation also results in a better electric flow west to Ozarks Greenland Substation, east to its Wesley Substation and south to its Wyola Substation (all served at kv). Q. WOULD YOU ELABORATE ON YOUR PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING A POSSIBLE REDUCED IMPACT ON PROPERTY OWNERS? A. Yes. If operation at kv is not possible, other alternative solutions might include the construction of new transmission lines and substations to achieve the needed transmission capacity. Additional transmission lines and substations will require additional property and transmission line rights-of-way. Operation of the existing East Fayetteville to Elkins Line at kv does not require additional property and rights-of-way. Q. HAS THE SOUTHWEST POWER POOL ( SPP ) BEEN INFORMED OF OZARKS INTENT TO OPERATE THE DESCRIBED LINE AT KV? A. Yes. However, because Ozarks plan to change the line voltage from kv to kv only pertained to voltage, and did not change loadings, a SPP study and approval was not required. Q. DOES AECC AGREE WITH THE PROJECT DESCRIPTION OFFERED IN THE DIRECT TESTIMONY OF SWEPCO WITNESS NATHAN M. KOCH AND ARE THE FACILITIES DESCRIBED ACCEPTABLE TO AECC? A. AECC agrees that Mr. Koch has correctly described the requested project and finds that the facilities described by Mr. Koch meet AECC s needs in an economic and efficient manner.

Q. MR. KOCH STATES THAT AECC WILL SELL SWEPCO APPROXIMATELY. ACRES OF LAND TO CONSTRUCT THE SWEPCO SWITCHING STATION. IS THIS CORRECT? A. Yes. In an effort to minimize property impacts on adjacent land owners, AECC will sell to SWEPCO the approximate. acres of land referenced in Mr. Koch s Direct Testimony to facilitate the building of the SWEPCO Switching Station. Q. IN HIS DIRECT TESTIMONY, MR. KOCH STATES THAT YOU WILL TESTIFY AS TO THE ARRANGEMENTS THAT ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION AND OWNERSHIP OF BOTH AECC AND SWEPCO S FACILITIES TO REMAIN CLEAR WHILE PROVIDING THE NECESSARY INTERCONNECTION. WOULD YOU PLEASE ELABORATE? A. While SWEPCO is providing the switching station, SWEPCO, Ozarks, and AECC all own interconnecting equipment and facilities that require electrical protection. The 0 arrangement between SWEPCO and AECC provides very clear protection, responsibilities, and property ownership for the interconnected facilities. On SWEPCO property, SWEPCO will install and maintain three SWEPCO-owned breakers that will have a primary purpose to protect SWEPCO s Dyess to Hyland kv transmission line. On AECC s property, AECC will install and maintain two breakers that will have a primary purpose to protect AECC s two existing kv to kv transformers and Ozarks East Fayetteville to Elkins line. In this way, each company has clearly defined property ownership and dedicated equipment for the protection of its equipment and facilities residing within its property.

Q. IS IT YOUR RECOMMENDATION THAT THE COMMISSION GRANT SWEPCO A CCN TO CONSTRUCT, OWN, AND OPERATE THE SWEPCO SWITCHING STATION AS DESCRIBED BY MR. KOCH? A. Yes. At the Commission s earliest convenience and in order to allow SWEPCO to maintain the construction schedule stated in Mr. Koch s Direct Testimony, I recommend that SWEPCO s requested CCN be granted for the following reasons: ) current and future load growth in the area requires that AECC find a capacity solution for its two existing kv to kv transformers located in its East Fayetteville Substation; ) the existing East Fayetteville Substation s to kv transformers will remain in service and continue to provide much needed 00 MVA kv capacity for wholesale delivery to Ozarks out of AECC s East Fayetteville Substation; ) the operation of Ozarks existing East Fayetteville to Elkins transmission line at kv will provide additional line capacity for future load growth and switching capabilities; ) the proposed project will allow Ozarks to reduce line losses, thus increasing energy efficiency and reducing the cost of losses; and ) the project will allow Ozarks and AECC to provide a strong kv to kv source at AECC s Elkins Generation facility. Q. DOES THIS CONCLUDE YOUR DIRECT TESTIMONY? A. Yes, it does.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Sarah L. Waddoups, attorney for SWEPCO, state that I have on this th day of September, 0, provided a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document to all parties of record electronically, by first class mail or both. By: /s/ Sarah L. Waddoups Sarah L. Waddoups