A Computational Approach for Optimizing the First Flyer Using STAR-CCM+

Similar documents
What did the Wright brothers invent?

AE Stability and Control of Aerospace Vehicles

A. Hyll and V. Horák * Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Military Technology, University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic

AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE Pressure Altitude And Density Altitude

Comparing and Contrasting Text Structures

Aeronautical Testing Service, Inc th DR NE Arlington, WA USA. CFD and Wind Tunnel Testing: Complimentary Methods for Aircraft Design

CFD Analysis of Civil Transport Aircraft

Lecture 8 : Dynamic Stability

APPENDIX 3-B Airplane Upset Recovery Briefing. Briefing. Figure 3-B.1

The Influence of Aerodynamics on the Design of High-Performance Road Vehicles

Application of CFD Simulation in the Design of a Parabolic Winglet on NACA 2412

Wright Brothers Flying Machine

Overset Grids Technology in STAR-CCM+: Methodology and Applications

The aerodynamic center

Behavioral Animation Simulation of Flocking Birds

Computational Aerodynamic Analysis on Store Separation from Aircraft using Pylon

Introduction to Flight

Multiplication and Division with Rational Numbers

ADVANCED TOOL FOR FLUID DYNAMICS- CFD AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN AUTOMOTIVE, AERODYNAMICS AND MACHINE INDUSTRY

AOE 3104 Aircraft Performance Problem Sheet 2 (ans) Find the Pressure ratio in a constant temperature atmosphere:

INTERIM STATEMENT. Accident occurred to AW609 registration marks N609AG, on 30 th October 2015, in Tronzano Vercellese (VC), Italy.

Light Aircraft Design

Flight Mechanics

Aerospace Engineering 3521: Flight Dynamics. Prof. Eric Feron Homework 6 due October 20, 2014

Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics

Computational Fluid Dynamics

Practice Problems on Boundary Layers. Answer(s): D = 107 N D = 152 N. C. Wassgren, Purdue University Page 1 of 17 Last Updated: 2010 Nov 22

Volunteers Devoted to Kids and Aviation

Chapter 6 Lateral static stability and control - 3 Lecture 21 Topics

Finite Element Method (ENGC 6321) Syllabus. Second Semester

Computational Fluid Dynamics in Automotive Applications

CHAPTER 4 4 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS

Cessna Skyhawk II / 100. Performance Assessment

HALE UAV: AeroVironment Pathfinder

The dynamic equation for the angular motion of the wheel is R w F t R w F w ]/ J w

Interactive Aircraft Design for Undergraduate Teaching

ESTIMATING R/C MODEL AERODYNAMICS AND PERFORMANCE

NACA Nomenclature NACA NACA Airfoils. Definitions: Airfoil Geometry

The Influence of Aerodynamics on the Design of High-Performance Road Vehicles

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

Lift and Drag on an Airfoil ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

CFD Based Reduced Order Models for T-tail flutter

Science, Technology, Engineering and Math. The program also seeks to recruit and integrate students of diversity into the aviation industry.

1996 IFAC World Congress San Francisco, July 1996

NACA airfoil geometrical construction

Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque

It s the Last Straw!

Aeroelastic Investigation of the Sandia 100m Blade Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

2013 Code_Saturne User Group Meeting. EDF R&D Chatou, France. 9 th April 2013

The ADREA-HF CFD code An overview

Coupled CFD and Vortex Methods for Modelling Hydro- and Aerodynamics of Tidal Current Turbines and On- and Offshore Wind Turbines

Design and Structural Analysis of the Ribs and Spars of Swept Back Wing

THE CFD SIMULATION OF THE FLOW AROUND THE AIRCRAFT USING OPENFOAM AND ANSA

How Do Paper Airplanes Fly?

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

Parachute Jumping, Falling, and Landing David C. Arney, Barbra S. Melendez, Debra Schnelle 1

NIFA REGIONAL SAFECON 2006 Manual Flight Computer Accuracy Explanations

Aircraft Theory of Flight and Operation

SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE LANDING GEAR FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE FOR SAE AERO DESIGN SERIES

4.2 Free Body Diagrams

QUT Digital Repository:

AIRCRAFT GENERAL GTM CONTENTS

Modeling and Autonomous Flight Simulation of a Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

High-Speed Demonstration of Natural Laminar Flow Wing & Load Control for Future Regional Aircraft through innovative Wind Tunnel Model

Automated moving mesh techniques in CFD

Express Introductory Training in ANSYS Fluent Lecture 1 Introduction to the CFD Methodology

Basics of vehicle aerodynamics

Flight path optimization for an airplane

A CFD Study of Wind Turbine Aerodynamics

A MONTE CARLO DISPERSION ANALYSIS OF A ROCKET FLIGHT SIMULATION SOFTWARE

NIFA NATIONAL SAFECON

Micro and Mini UAV Airworthiness, European and NATO Activities

Research Methodology Part III: Thesis Proposal. Dr. Tarek A. Tutunji Mechatronics Engineering Department Philadelphia University - Jordan

Fluid Mechanics Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

SIX DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM MODELING OF AN UNINHABITED AERIAL VEHICLE. A thesis presented to. the faculty of

Provided by TryEngineering -

Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group Case 4: Single- and multi-point optimization problems based on the CRM wing

Project: OUTFIELD FENCES

SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE FLIGHT PERFORMANCE OF A HOBBY ROCKET

Glenn L. Martin Maryland Aviation Museum P.O. Box 5024 Middle River, Maryland

AUTOMOTIVE COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF A CAR USING ANSYS

Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for improving cooling system efficiency for Data centers

Lab 8 Notes Basic Aircraft Design Rules 6 Apr 06

LED Anti-Collision Lighting System for Airbus A320 Family

I AM CONVINCED THAT HUMAN FLIGHT IS POSSIBLE AND PRACTICAL. Wilbur Wright 1899

Customer Training Material. Lecture 2. Introduction to. Methodology ANSYS FLUENT. ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary 2010 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.

Requirements to servo-boosted control elements for sailplanes

F1 Fuel Tank Surging; Model Validation

When the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid.

Experimental investigation of golf driver club head drag reduction through the use of aerodynamic features on the driver crown

Pre-requisites

Quadcopters. Presented by: Andrew Depriest

Chapter 3. Track and Wheel Load Testing

Swissmetro travels at high speeds through a tunnel at low pressure. It will therefore undergo friction that can be due to:

Automated Strength Analysis Processes for Aircraft Structures

Virtual Prototyping of Aerospace Systems Using Integrated LMS Virtual.Lab and IMAGINE AMESim

CFD Analysis of Swept and Leaned Transonic Compressor Rotor

General aviation & Business System Level Applications and Requirements Electrical Technologies for the Aviation of the Future Europe-Japan Symposium

Transcription:

A Computational Approach for Optimizing the First Flyer Using STAR-CCM+ Abdul H. Aziz* 1 Research Computing and Cyberinfrastructure The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA *Corresponding author: aziz007@psu.edu

Abstract: In this present study, STAR-CCM+ software was used to optimize the Wright brothers flyer shown in the historical photo in Figure 1. As can be seen from Figure1, there are sixteen vertical bars (struts) that connect the upper and lower wings. The main objective of this project is to reduce the weight of the airplane by removing four struts. STAR- CCM+ was used to compute the aerodynamics forces (lift and drag). These aerodynamics forces were used to calculate the flight duration and the horizontal distance travelled by the airplane. It was concluded that a three percent weight reduction resulted in a sixteen percent decrease in flight time for the same range of 892 feet. Orville and Wilbur Wright did four successful flights on Thursday 17 December, 1903 and the longest flight duration was fifty nine seconds and it was achieved by Wilbur in flight number 4. Table 1 shows operational data for the four successful flights. STAR-CCM+ software was used for aerodynamics analyses on this large model and due to the large size of the model, only half of the main wings were analyzed. 1. Introduction The subject of airplane flight dynamics is divided into three areas (performance, stability and control, aero-elasticity). The present analyses are focused on the performance of the first airplane to fly. The mathematical model of a rigid airplane is derived from Newton s laws of motion and is treated in details in reference 1. These six degrees of freedom equations (three in the longitudinal and three in the lateraldirectional directions) were programmed in FORTRAN and presented in

reference 2. These equations are generally second-order differential, nonlinear and highly coupled. In the present analyses, A simplified set of the equations of motion of the airplane in the longitudinal direction were integrated in MATLAB to obtain the duration of flight and the distance travelled by the airplane. The main objective of these analyses is to increase the flight time of the Wright brothers original flight machine by reducing the weight without altering the original design as depicted in Figure 2. The Wright brothers original flyer was modeled in SolidWorks, exported to STAR-CCM+ and is shown in Figure 3. The number of elements is 172K and the type of the elements is tetrahedral. The number of Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) is 1,027,470. The reduction in weight is achieved by removing four struts from the original design as shown in figure 4. The gross weight of the original flyer was (340.2 Kg or 750 lbs). The weight of each bar is 2.08 kg. The reduction of the weight is 2.35%, and as can be seen from table 2, this resulted in 16% gain in flight time. 2. Airplane Aerodynamics Model Assuming most of the lift available to the vehicle is provided by the biplane, and without taking into account the compliant nature of the fabric over the wings, the flow over the wings of the Wright Flyer was simulated in STAR-CCM+. Laminar, compressible flow of air was modeled at normal temperature and pressure. The velocity of the wind relative to the flyer (head wind) was taken as 30 mph. The domain was discretized with a mesh of 5.2 million tetrahedral elements, and 3.6 million degrees of

freedom were solved for using the geometric multigrid solver. The pressure distribution over the span of the wings is shown in Figure 4, while the velocity profile over the chord is shown in Figure 5. The values for lift and drag are obtained from this model integrating components of pressure over the wing surface, and used both for the structural integrity analysis as well as the flight dynamics calculation. 3. The Structural Model To ensure that the removal of struts from the flyer does not compromise the structural integrity of the aircraft, a static load test was performed on a symmetric half of the flyer model. Forces of lift, drag and weight due to gravity were applied for level flight conditions, i.e. the lift being equal to the weight of the aircraft. The removal of the two struts increases the first principal stress (maximum) from 9.1 MPa to 10.66 MPa as shown in Figures 6 and 7 respectively. This value is well below the strength of spruce used in the construction of the Wright Flyer. Table 3 shows the most important data that was used as an input in STAR-CCM+. 4. The simplified dynamics model The governing equations of motion for an airplane in a longitudinal mode may be reduced to the following set and reproduced from reference 3. (1) (2)

(3) A MATLAB script was developed to integrate the above equations to obtain the duration of flight for a travelled distance of 892 feet. 5. Conclusions One of the most important events in aviation history is the Thursday, seventeenth of December, 1903. It is named the dawn of aviation and the place where four successful flights occurred was Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. As reported in reference 6, Wilbur and Orville Wright spent many years in the development of their flyer. Computer tools, hardware and software could have helped the Wright brothers in flying longer time. This present study is a first step in modeling the geometry of the flyer and the use of the present day technological advances in running various analyses. Theses analyses are done using STAR-CCM+ STAR-CCM+ software package. Structural analyses were done on the original model and the modified model. Aerodynamic modeling was carried out to obtain the aerodynamic forces and moments were also carried out using STAR-CCM+. Further expansion of this model is needed to include the lateral-directional mode of motion. 6. References 1. Roskam, J. Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Controls, Part 1 (1982) 2. Aziz, A. H., The development of FORTRAN computer code to compute the stability and control derivatives of a rigid airplane in subsonic

flight, MS Thesis in Aerospace Engineering, The University of Kansas (1989) 3. Amteh, Ghassan M. et al, Design and Stress Analsyis of a General Aviation Aircraft Wing, Excerpt from the Proceedings of the STAR- CCM+ Conference 2010 Boston (2010) 4. http://wright.nasa.gov/first.htm 5. Gray, Carroll F. The Journal of the Early Aeroplane, Issue #177, pages 26-39 (August 2002) 6. Kelly, Fred C., How We Invented the Airplane (1953)

Figure 1: THE FIRST TWELVE SECONDS OF THE AGE OF POWERED FLIGHT, KITTY HAWK, N.C., DECEMBER 17, 1903 Figure 2: The Wright brothers original flyer as modeled using SolidWorks

Figure 3: The original Wright brother s was meshed using STAR-CCM+. Over a million DOF. Figure 4: Modified flyer model with four struts removed.

Figure 5: The pressure distribution on the two wings obtained from STAR-CCM+. Figure 6: The velocity profile on the two wings obtained from STAR-CCM+. Figure 7: First principal stress for the flyer with the original 8 struts.

Figure 8. First principal stress for the flyer with two struts removed. Table 1: The four flights of Orville and Wilbur Wright on 17 December, 1903 (reproduced from reference 5) Flight Number Time (sec) Distance (feet) Speed (mph) Headwind (mph) 1 12 120 6.8 24 2 13 175 9.2 21 3 15 200 7.9 21 4 59 852 8.5 21 Table 2: comparison of flight duration and altitude for the flyer (actual versus simulated) Flight Duration Flight Distance Actual data for flight 4 59 seconds 852 feet Simulated data for flight 4 49.5 seconds 852 feet Table 3: Flight conditions for flight 4 on December 17, 1903 Item Geometrical and Operational data Forward speed (mph) 9.8 Gross weight (lbs) 750 Headwind (mph) 21

Wing Span (ft) 40.33 Wing Chord (ft) 6.5 Wing Incidence 3 25