EPA s Climate Resilience Evaluation and Awareness Tool (CREAT): A Case Study



Similar documents
How To Use The Climate Ready Utilities Program

Tools from the US EPA s Climate Ready Water Utilities Initiative (CRWU) EPA Region 3 Conference Extreme Weather Events: Adapt, Mitigate, and Survive

Climate Projections for Transportation Infrastructure Planning, Operations & Maintenance, and Design

EPA Trends for wastewater Treatment in California

Climate Ready Tools & Resources

Implementation of the New York City Wastewater Resiliency Plan: Opportunities And Lessons Learned

The IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation

Climate Resilience Evaluation and Awareness Tool Exercise with North Hudson Sewerage Authority and New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program

A Self Assessment to Address Climate Change Readiness in Your Community Midwest Region

Visual Integration of Compound Events. A presentation to the Climate Compact of Southeast Florida

SECTION 3.2 CLIMATE AND PRECIPITATION

sample The IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation

Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005

Standard Operating Procedures for Flood Preparation and Response

1. GENERAL ADVISORY BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (ABFE) QUESTIONS

Pine Creek Culvert Upgrade $ 560,000. Located at exiting hump dike, just south of Fire Training Center

Critical Need to Rebuild Atlantic City and Protect Vulnerable Environmental Justice Populations Affected by Hurricane Sandy

Climate Change Long Term Trends and their Implications for Emergency Management August 2011

Climate Change in Coastal Florida: Economic Impacts of Sea Level Rise

Hoboken Resiliency & Readiness Plan

Climate Adaptation and Preparedness

Climate Change Adaptation in London. Alex Nickson, Policy & Programmes Manager Climate Change Adaptation & Water, Greater London Authority

chapter 9 conduct a climate change

Climate Futures Evaluation and Synthesis Tool

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Adaptation for City Infrastructure; A Case Study of East Boston, MA

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for New York City

Myths and Facts about the NFIP

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Mariana Leckner, Ph.D., Professor, American Military University Thomas O. Herrington, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Stevens Institute of Technology

Climate Change in North Carolina

Post-Sandy Municipal Needs Assessment for Long-Term Recovery and Resiliency Planning EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Adapting to Climate Change Through Asset Management Planning. Tiffany Batac David Rose, PhD Parsons Brinckerhoff

An Initial Assessment of the Impacts of Sea Level Rise to the California Coast

Click to edit Master title style

7) Coastal Storms: Multi-Hazard Analysis for New York City

City of San Diego Water Demand Forecast

Eastern Connecticut Risk & Vulnerability Assessment Workshop

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

HAZUS th Annual Conference

Submission by the United States of America to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Communication of U.S. Adaptation Priorities May 29, 2015

Malcolm L. Spaulding Professor Emeritus, Ocean Engineering University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02881

Infrastructure for Adapting to Climate Change Environmental Law Forum April 10, O Brien & Gere

Policy Clarifications on the Eligibility of Water and Wastewater Utility Projects for FEMA s Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW LONG-TERM CONTROL PLAN Executive Summary

JASPERS Networking Platform

Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Division of Emergency Management. Texas State Operations Center

Flood Risk Management Plans

United States Postal Service Climate Change Adaptation Plan

FLOOD STUDY Monmouth County, NJ. FEMA REGION II July 13, :00

Flood After Fire Fact Sheet

Flood Insurance: Government Backed vs. Private Market Alternatives

TeachingEnglish Lesson plans. Climate change. Worksheet A - Climate change the evidence Match the questions to the answers about climate change.

Guideline for Stress Testing the Climate Resilience of Urban Areas

New Orleans Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Tour March 23 24, 2012

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

Guideline: A risk assessment approach to development assessment in coastal hazard areas

FLOOD HAZARD IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPERS, DESIGNERS, AND ATTORNEYS

Climate Change on the Prairie:

Annex A TERMS OF REFERENCE PROTECTED CULTURE TECHNOLOGY AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Climate change impacts on city of Gdansk and its vicinity (Vistula Delta, Poland)

North San Jose Neighborhoods Planning Taskforce

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

City of Cambridge Climate Protection Action Committee. Recommendations for Adaptation to Climate Change. Purpose

SUFFOLK COASTAL DISTRICT COUNCIL DOMESTIC FLOOD PROTECTION POLICY

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

Hurricane Sandy Recovery Efforts

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Assessment of Vulnerability to the Health Impacts of Climate Change in Middlesex-London

Climate of Illinois Narrative Jim Angel, state climatologist. Introduction. Climatic controls

Dan Ott Managing Engineer Collection System Johnson County Wastewater, KS and Rick Nelson CH2M HILL

Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System

Costs of Global Warming for Alaska s Public Infrastructure

Storm tide is the water level rise during a storm due to the combination of storm surge and the astronomical tide.

CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, ILLINOIS Stormwater Management Fact Sheet

Resolution XII.13. Wetlands and disaster risk reduction

INFORMATION BULLETIN BUSINESS FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDE ACE GLOBAL RISK ENGINEERING. Flood risk assessment. Introduction

Storm tide is the water level rise during a storm due to the combination of storm surge and the astronomical tide.

Transcription:

EPA s Climate Resilience Evaluation and Awareness Tool (CREAT): A Case Study

South Monmouth Regional Sewerage Authority (SMRSA) Serves 9 Townships 9.1 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 11 pump stations 11. 8 miles of Force main Monmouth County, New Jersey South Monmouth Regional Sewerage Authority

Are you ready for climate change? SMRSA s Cost of Rehabilitation After: Triplepundit.com 2009 Nor'easter: $1.8 M 2011 Hurricane : $2.5 M 2012 Super Storm Sandy: $11.5 M Belmar, NJ after Super Storm Sandy

CREAT: Climate Resilience Evaluation Uses of CREAT: and Awareness Tool Developed specifically for water and wastewater utilities. Identifies potential climate change threats a utility s assets. Performs baseline assessment of the utility s current resilience to these threats. Designs strategies to build additional resiliency to projected climate changes. Helps utilities identify effective risk reduction strategies and associated capital costs.

Projected Climate Change Challenges MIDWEST More extreme heat Extreme precipitation Flooding Droughts Lower levels in rivers and Great Lakes NORTHEAST Warmer days (Temperatures above 90⁰ F) Severe flooding due to Sea level rise Heavy rain events Coastal Storm Surges Source : CREAT/EPA

Step 1: Asset Selection Two (2) Assets were selected for analysis in CREAT: Belmar Pump Station Located in flood zone; Received structural damage from Sandy 16 DIP Force Main 6 ft above sea level; Erosion concerns from future storm surges 16 DIP Force Main Belmar Pump Station (EL 15 ft)

Step 2: Climate-related Threat Identification CREAT identified three major threats to Belmar Pump Station and force main system: Beach erosion impact on station s force main Coastal storm surges Intense & frequent storm events

Asset Threat Pairs The assets and threats are linked into pairs. All CREAT identified threats are not applicable to every asset.

Risk Assessment Evaluation Each asset threat pair was analyzed for 2 future climate scenarios (using CREAT provided data): Hot and Dry Warm and Wet Each asset threat pair was analyzed for 2 time periods: Mid century (2021 2050), represented by the year 2035 Late century (2046 2075), represented by the year 2060 Increasing Precipitation Selected scenarios Increasing Temperature Multiple scenarios ( )within the distribution of climate model projections ( ) for a given location.

Step 3: Baseline: Existing Adaptive Measures Current protective measures taken at Belmar Pump Station: Follow Emergency Response Plan for Flooding Updated every 2 years Construct temporary flood barriers Use of sand bags Installation of plywood on doors and window Initiate Wastewater Bypass Pumping System Direct wastewater flow to force main with the use of a portable pump

Step 3: Baseline: Existing Adaptive Measures Existing Protective Measures for Belmar PS Force Main: Currently, there are no measures in place to protect the force main against erosion.

Baseline Analysis

CREAT provided Climate Data

Baseline Analysis Analyze each previously identified threat asset pairs for all time periods and climate scenarios Time Periods: Mid century, Late century Climate scenarios: Hot & Dry, Wet & Warm A total of 12 assessments were conducted in the case study

Step 4: Resilience Adaptive Measures Belmar Pump Station Building Future actions SMRSA is considering to protect the pump station against climate related threats: 4 ft Flood Doors at the existing Belmar Pump Station (estimated cost $12,500) Relocate Belmar Pump Station outside of flood zone. (estimated cost $ 4.4 M) A mobile enclosure that protects critical pump station components. (estimated cost $ 1.9 M)

Pump Station Mobile Enclosure Sea Girt Pump Station has a mobile enclosure that houses critical electrical and emergency power generation equipment that can be relocated to areas that are not flood prone before an impending storm.

Resilience Adaptive Measures: Belmar Force Main Future actions SMRSA is considering to protect the force main against climate related threats: Sheet piles in the location of the existing force main to protect from erosion (estimated cost $3 Mil) Install new force main in a location further inland and out of the flood/erosion zone (estimated cost $6.6 Mil)

Resilience Analysis

Risk Reduction Calculation CREAT calculates risk reduction based on the difference between consequence levels between baseline conditions and resilience analyses. Output: Risk Reduction Units (RRUs) Risk Reduction per adaptive measure Risk Reduction per dollar The adaptive measures can be selected to create a planning package that can be organized by risk reduction or cost.

Step 5: Adaptation Planning: Package #1 Most costly Adaptive Measures Capital Cost Annualized Capital Cost** Risk Reduction Units 2035 Risk Reduction Units 2060 Total RRUs Annualized $/RRU Relocate Belmar Pump Station $4,400,000 $295,749 46.8 57.8 104.5 $ 2,830 Relocate & install new force main $6,600,000 $433,324 0 44.0 44.0 $10,082 Total Risk Reduction Units for Package 1: 148.5 RRUs **Annualized Capital Cost is calculated over 20 years, with a 3% interest rate

Adaptation Planning: Package #2: Medium Cost Adaptive Measures Capital Cost Annualized Capital Cost** Risk Reduction Units 2035 Risk Reduction Units 2060 Total RRUs Annualized $/RRU Mobile enclosure $1,900,000 $127,710 46.8 57.8 104.5 $1,222.10 Relocate & install new force main $6,600,000 $433,324 0 44.0 44.0 $10,082.36 Total Risk Reduction Units for Package 2: 148.5 RRUs **Annualized Capital Cost is calculated over 20 years, with a 3% interest rate

Adaptation Planning: Package #3: Least Costly Adaptive Measures Capital Cost Annualized Capital Cost** Risk Reduction Units 2035 Risk Reduction Units 2060 Total RRUs Annualized $/RRU Flood doors for existing Belmar pump station Sheet piling for existing force main $12,500 $840 26.5 14.5 41.0 $20.49 $3,000,000 $201,647 0 11.0 11 $18,332 Total Risk Reduction Units for Package 3: 52 RRUs **Annualized Capital Cost is calculated over 20 years, with a 3% interest rate

Risk Reduction Units by Adaptation Package 39 Package 1 Package 2 Package 3 $11 M $8.5 M $3.0 M $11 M $8.5 M $3 M

Outcomes for SMSRA A CREAT generated report served as tool to communicate results to stakeholders and the community. Software assisted SMRSA in a regional planning effort by assisting the Authority in prioritizing their options. The pump station mobile enclosure strategy was the first ever recipient of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) s Least Cost Alternative Project award.

Thank You Rina N. Dalal, rdalal@tandmassociates.com