HIV and AIDS in Alberta 2011 Annual Report

Similar documents
Estimates of New HIV Infections in the United States

West Virginia HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report 2009 Update West Virginia HIV/AIDS Program

Hepatitis C Infections in Oregon September 2014

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HEPATITIS B IN IRELAND

STOP HIV/AIDS Quarterly Monitoring Report

HIV Infection Among Those with an Injection Drug Use*-Associated Risk, Florida, 2014

WISCONSIN AIDS/HIV PROGRAM NOTES

Georgia HIV/AIDS Surveillance Summary. Data Through December 31, 2010

HIV Surveillance Update

Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Prevalence Report, 2003 Data Source: Minnesota Department of Health HCV Surveillance System

STOP HIV/AIDS Quarterly Monitoring Report

Department of Epidemiological Surveillance and Intervention

HIV Epidemiology in New York State

4/3/2012. Surveillance. Direct Care. Prevention. Quality Management

HIV/AIDS Epidemiology Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: INTEGRATED EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE FOR HIV/AIDS PREVENTION AND CARE ELIGIBLE METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING, PHILADELPHIA

2011 STI Annual Report

HIV-Associated Risk Behaviour Among Drug Users at Drug Rehabilitation Centres

The HIV/AIDS Epidemic in California s Latino Population

New Brunswick Health Indicators

The Epidemiology of Hepatitis A, B, and C

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY SPECIAL SESSION ON HIV/AIDS. Country Progress Report Sweden

HIV prevention and the wider UK population. What HIV prevention work should be directed towards the general population in the UK?

IV. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE OLDER POPULATION

Maryland HIV Plan

SURVEILLANCE REPORT. Hepatitis B and C surveillance in Europe.

Drug Use and Abuse in San Diego County, California: 2013

Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Infection. Pablo Barreiro Service of Infectious Diseases Hospital Carlos III, Madrid

ABI Consumer Guide for gay men on HIV and Life Insurance

HIV/AIDS AND OTHER SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS 11

Get the Facts on Teen Sexuality

in children less than one year old. It is commonly divided into two categories, neonatal

A HISTORY OF THE HIV/AIDS EPIDEMIC WITH EMPHASIS ON AFRICA *

Using HIV Surveillance Data to Calculate Measures for the Continuum of HIV Care

Patterns and Trends of Drug Abuse in the Baltimore/Maryland/Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area Epidemiology and Trends:

Traffic Safety Facts Research Note

Drug Abuse Trends in the Seattle/King County Area: 2013

ESTIMATES OF MORTALITY INDICATORS

Chapter 1 Overview of Tuberculosis Epidemiology in the United States

Program Performance Indicators Revised Baseline & Target Setting Form January 1 June 30, 2004 Interim Progress Report

The ageing of the ethnic minority populations of England and Wales: findings from the 2011 census

2. Germany. (a) Past trends

HIV New Diagnoses, Treatment and Care in the UK 2015 report

Emergency Room Visits

HIV/AIDS: AWARENESS AND BEHAVIOUR

2015 Annual Alberta Labour Market Review. Employment. Unemployment. Economic Regions. Migration. Indigenous People. Industries

Integrating Medical Care Coordination Services into HIV Clinic Medical Homes

HIV/AIDS In the Houston Area

Injection Drug Users in Miami-Dade: NHBS-IDU2 Cycle Preliminary Results

Q&A on methodology on HIV estimates

PROFILE OF THE SINGAPORE CHINESE DIALECT GROUPS

Community Health. Status. Report

Seton Medical Center Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patterns of Care Study Rate of Treatment with Chemoembolization N = 50

Populations of Color in Minnesota

Epidemiologic Profile for HIV/STD Prevention & Care Planning

Are Booster Doses of Hepatitis B Vaccine Necessary?

EXPANDED HIV TESTING AND LINKAGE TO CARE (X-TLC) IN HEALTHCARE SETTINGS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHICAGO

Completeness of Physician Billing Claims for Diabetes Prevalence Estimation

GARPR Online Reporting Tool

HIV/AIDS Epidemic Status at-a-glance

Mid-year population estimates. Embargoed until: 20 July :30

AN OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHO INJECT DRUGS

Annual Surveillance Report 2014 Supplement

SUMMARY- REPORT on CAUSES of DEATH: in INDIA

LICENSED SOCIAL WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES, Chapter 2 of 4. Demographics

Age/sex/race in New York State

Primary School Net and Gross Attendance Rates, India. Primary School Net Attendance Rate in Urban and Rural Areas, India

HIV/AIDS in the Houston Area

Guidelines for Viral Hepatitis CTR Services

Overview: Section A: Business Environment Employment and Unemployment Numbers and Rates. 2. Industry s Growth. 3. Facts, Trends and Outlook

HIV and AIDS in Bangladesh

Understanding the HIV Care Continuum

Increase of sexually transmitted hepatitis C virus in HIV+ men who have sex with men in Barcelona, Spain. A problem linked to HIV infection?

Dublin Declaration. on Partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia

Hospitalizations for Hepatitis A, B, and C, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces,

Chapter 21. What Are HIV and AIDS?


Case Finding for Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C

2015 TRENDS IN THE SUPPLY OF ACCOUNTING GRADUATES AND THE DEMAND FOR PUBLIC ACCOUNTING RECRUITS

DC Comprehensive HIV Prevention Plan for : Goals and Objectives

Occupational Therapists in Canada, 2010 National and Jurisdictional Highlights and Profiles

Street Smart: Demographics and Trends in Motor Vehicle Accident Mortality In British Columbia, 1988 to 2000

Diversity Data Report Department of Educational Leadership and Research Methodology. EDLRM Faculty Retreat- Fall 2011

SUPPORTING. Immigrants and Immigration to Alberta AN OVERVIEW

June Federal Employee Participation Patterns in the Thrift Savings Plan

2. Incidence, prevalence and duration of breastfeeding

9 Expenditure on breast cancer

Minnesota HIV/AIDS Epidemiologic Profile

Drug Situation in Vancouver UHRI. Report prepared by the Urban Health Research Initiative of the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS

Undergraduate Degree Completion by Age 25 to 29 for Those Who Enter College 1947 to 2002

Ending the Epidemic in New York State. Federal AIDS Policy Partnership March 4, 2015

Correlates of not receiving HIV care among HIV-infected women enrolling in a HRSA SPNS multi-site initiative

The goal is to transform data into information, and information into insight. Carly Fiorina

Student Placement in Mathematics Courses by Demographic Group Background

Age In London TB is more common in younger adults aged years and peaks in the age group (3).

Transportation costs make up a

Primary School Net and Gross Attendance Rates, Kenya. Over-Age, Under-Age, and On-Time Students in Primary School, Kenya

Over-Age, Under-Age, and On-Time Students in Primary School, Tanzania

SalarieS of chemists fall

Student Statistics. HESA Equality data analysis

Transcription:

HIV and AIDS in Alberta 211 Annual Report November 212

212 Government of Alberta ISSN 1927-4157 November 212 Alberta Health, Surveillance and Assessment Send inquiries to: Health.Surveillance@gov.ab.ca

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 HIV in Alberta, 2 to 211... 2 HIV in Alberta, 211... 8 AIDS in Alberta... 16

Introduction Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) was first recognized in 1981 and became reportable in Alberta in 1983. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the cause of AIDS, became a notifiable disease in Alberta in 1998. Both AIDS and HIV are often associated with what are considered high risk behaviours. These risk factors include, but are not limited to, unprotected sex for heterosexuals, men who have sex with men, and needle sharing for intravenous drug users. Immigration patterns to our province also affect the number of new cases; foreign workers and refugees from HIV endemic countries (where a disease is present on a continuous basis) can also increase the number of new cases. Source of all data in this report is from: Alberta Health, 1) Communicable Disease Reporting System, as of September 5, 212 2) Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan Stakeholder Registry 212 Government of Alberta 1

HIV in Alberta, 2 to 211 The number of cases of HIV in Alberta between 2 and 211 has ranged between 161 cases per 1, persons, with the highest rates in 26 and 28. In 211, the rate of HIV was 5.7 cases per 1, persons, the third lowest rate since 2 (Figure 1). The lowest rate was in 23 and 21 with 5.1 cases per 1, persons. Figure 1: Number and Crude Rate of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 25 1 2 8 Cases 15 1 5 6 4 2 Rate (per 1,) 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Cases 194 178 181 161 173 174 221 226 233 219 191 218 Rate 6.5 5.9 5.9 5.1 5.4 5.4 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.1 5.1 5.7 212 Government of Alberta 2

Gender Table 1 and Figure 3 below show that the average age of newly diagnosed HIV cases for males ranged from 37 to 4 years while the average age of cases for females has been steadily increasing from 31 to 38 years over the past 12 years. Table 1: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases by Age Group & Gender in Alberta by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 FEMALE 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Mean 32.7 31.8 33.1 34.5 34.2 34.6 34.1 34.6 35. 36. 37.5 35. Median 31. 32. 33. 33. 32. 33. 33. 33. 34. 34. 38. 35. Range 37 39 39 42 61 4 55 59 71 5 62 46 Lowest 18 15 17 18 4 19 1 2 1 17 2 1 Highest 55 54 56 6 65 59 56 61 72 67 64 56 <15 1 1 3 3 1 1 15-19 3 4 4 1 4 1 3 1 4 2 1 3 2-24 1 11 7 7 9 9 6 5 2 7 4 9 25-29 9 9 1 8 3 8 14 12 11 11 8 6 3-39 24 2 25 12 17 27 29 26 39 25 18 28 4-59 15 12 11 11 17 2 21 2 2 21 16 19 6+ 1 2 1 2 3 3 ALL AGES 61 56 57 4 53 65 74 68 81 69 51 66 MALE 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Mean 37.8 38.4 38.8 38.3 4. 38. 4. 4.3 39.2 37.6 38.4 38.9 Median 37. 37. 38. 38. 39.5 38. 4. 4.5 39.5 37.5 38. 37. Range 45 56 47 44 53 46 51 79 74 56 48 79 Lowest 22 19 21 21 21 21 22 1 4 16 15 Highest 67 75 68 65 74 67 73 8 78 72 63 79 <15 1 1 2 15-19 1 1 1 3 3 1 2-24 8 4 4 1 5 1 7 11 16 18 14 16 25-29 16 17 16 12 12 11 17 23 14 21 17 24 3-39 6 49 47 51 43 41 43 36 44 42 44 41 4-59 45 46 56 42 56 44 77 79 68 6 54 57 6+ 4 5 1 6 4 3 3 7 8 6 8 11 ALL AGES 133 122 124 121 12 19 147 158 152 15 14 152 212 Government of Alberta 3

Figure 2 shows that historically in Alberta, males have had higher rates of HIV infection than females. In the past 12 years, males have had more than twice as many HIV cases annually per 1, persons than females. In 211, the rate of HIV was 3.5 cases per 1, persons for females and 7.9 cases per 1, persons for males. Figure 2: Gender Distribution of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases and Rates, Alberta by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 25 1 2 8 15 1 5 6 4 2 Rate per 1, 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 F Cases 61 56 57 4 53 65 74 68 81 69 51 66 M Cases 133 122 124 121 12 19 147 158 152 15 14 152 F Rates 4.1 3.7 3.7 2.6 3.3 4. 4.5 4. 4.6 3.8 2.8 3.5 M Rates 9. 8.1 8. 7.7 7.6 6.8 8.9 9.3 8.7 8.3 7.5 7.9 During the years 2 to 25, with the exception of 24, the range of ages between the youngest and oldest cases did not fluctuate significantly. Since 26, infants diagnosed with HIV were related to vertical transmission. At the same time, the ages of the oldest cases were as high as 72 years (females) and 8 years (males). Figure 3: Age Range and Mean Age of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases, Alberta, 2 to 211 9 8 7 Age in Years 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Male Mean Female Mean 212 Government of Alberta 4

Risk Exposure-Males Table 2 shows that prior to 23, for males the most common risk exposure among newly diagnosed HIV cases was intravenous drug use (IDU). The lowest percentage of IDU exposure reported from males after 23 was 1 per cent in 21. In 211, 16 per cent of males had IDU as the risk exposure for newly diagnosed HIV cases. Table 2 Proportion of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Risk Exposure Category Among Males by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 Exposure Category 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Blood/Blood Products 1 1 1 1 Heterosexual - Endemic 4 8 12 9 15 15 18 2 27 16 18 21 Heterosexual - Partner at Risk 8 12 1 13 3 11 14 11 11 11 15 11 IDU 5 45 44 22 23 21 25 24 2 17 14 25 MSM 55 34 34 64 59 48 53 7 69 75 77 73 MSM and IDU 3 6 4 3 1 1 7 3 4 5 3 1 NIR - Heterosexual 13 15 12 8 15 1 23 23 14 2 1 7 NIR - Other 2 8 2 2 5 6 5 5 3 1 Occupation 1 1 Perinatal 1 1 2 Unknown 1 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 133 122 124 121 12 19 147 158 152 15 14 152 Men having sex with men (MSM) has been a predominant risk exposure. The proportion of cases with MSM as an risk exposure ranges from 27 per cent in 22 to 55 per cent in 21. In 211, 48 per cent of male cases were attributed to the risk exposure category of MSM. Figure 4: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Selected Risk Exposure among Males by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Injection Drug Use Men Who Have Sex With Men Heterosexual - Endemic 212 Government of Alberta 5

Risk Exposure-Females Table 3 and Figure 5 show that among females, IDU exposure was the most common risk exposure until 23. After 22, the number of IDU exposed cases decreased, then increased to 17 per cent in 211. Table 3 Proportion of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Risk Exposure Category Among Females by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 Exposure Category 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Blood/Blood Products Heterosexual - Endemic 8 12 12 5 23 15 33 24 41 26 19 21 Heterosexual - Partner at Risk 15 11 12 11 1 18 15 12 14 15 8 18 IDU 35 27 26 9 11 16 2 13 12 9 9 11 MSM MSM and IDU NIR - Heterosexual 2 6 7 14 7 14 4 14 1 15 14 14 NIR - Other 2 1 3 2 4 Occupation Perinatal 1 1 2 2 1 2 Unknown 1 1 1 TOTAL 61 56 57 4 53 65 74 68 81 69 51 66 The number of female cases from endemic countries increased from 23, when 13 per cent of female cases were from endemic countries to 43 per cent in 24. The percentage of female heterosexual cases from endemic countries was 32 per cent in 211. Figure 5: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Selected Risk Exposure, Females by Year Of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Injection Drug Use Heterosexual - Endemic Heterosexual - Partner at Risk 212 Government of Alberta 6

Ethnicity Figure 6 shows that the ethnic background of newly diagnosed HIV cases has changed over the past twelve years. In the first half of the decade, Aboriginals made up the second largest group of HIV cases with known ethnicity. After 26 there have been more blacks diagnosed with HIV than aboriginals in Alberta. Caucasians have consistently represented the largest ethnic group newly diagnosed with HIV during this time period. Figure 6: Proportion of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Ethnicity and Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 211 (218) 21 (191) 29 (219) 28 (233) 27 (226) 26 (221) 25 (174) 24 (173) 23 (161) 22 (181) 21 (178) 2 (194) % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% Aboriginal Latin American Black Caucasian Asian Other Unknown 212 Government of Alberta 7

HIV in Alberta, 211 In 211, 218 Albertans were newly diagnosed with HIV. The age range was between and 79 years of age, with 7 per cent total cases (152/218 cases) being between 25 and 49 years of age. The male to female ratio of HIV cases in Alberta was 2.3:1 (152 males to 66 females). The highest HIV rates for both males and females were among 35 to 39 years olds with 16 cases (males) and 11 cases (females) per 1, persons in 211 (Figure 7.1, 7.2). Figure 7.2 shows the change in rates from 2 to 211. The most significant difference within this time was that females under 25 years of age had higher rates than males. In addition, the highest rates of newly diagnosed HIV cases for males in 2 were in the 3 to 34 age group, whereas in 211 it was in the 4 to 44 age group. Figure 7.1: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Age Group and Gender 211 (n=218) vs. 2 (n=194) 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 <15 15-19 2-24 25-29 3-34 35-39 4-44 45-49 5-54 55-59 6-64 65+ Female Cases 2 3 1 9 14 1 1 3 1 1 Female Cases 211 1 3 9 6 13 15 6 8 3 2 Male Cases 2 8 16 28 32 19 19 5 2 3 1 Male Cases 211 2 1 16 24 19 22 22 17 9 9 3 8 Figure 7.2: Newly Diagnosed HIV Rate per 1, in Alberta by Age Group and Gender 211 (n=218) vs. 2 (n=194) 3. 25. Rate (per 1,) 2. 15. 1. 5.. <15 15-19 2-24 25-29 3-34 35-39 4-44 45-49 5-54 55-59 6-64 65+ Female Rate 2. 2.8 9.7 8.5 12.6 7.5 7.6 2.7 1.1 1.5.. Female Rate 211.3 2.5 6.6 3.8 8.9 11.1 4.5 5.6 2.1 1.7.. Male Rate 2.. 7.6 15. 25.5 24.6 14.2 16.7 5.4 3. 5.8.8 Male Rate 211.5.8 11.7 15.5 12.9 15.7 16. 11.6 6.2 7.3 3.2 4.2 212 Government of Alberta 8

HIV 211-Gender and Risk Exposure In 211, Figure 8 shows that 48 per cent of male cases reported their risk exposure as MSM. The most common risk exposure category for females was heterosexual endemic followed by heterosexual partner at risk. Since 2, the proportion of newly diagnosed HIV cases related to the various risk exposures has changed. In 2, the most common risk exposure for females was IDU (57 per cent). IDU was the second most common reported exposure in males (38 per cent) in 2. The most common male risk exposure in the year 2 was MSM, with 41 per cent or 55/133 cases per 1, persons. Figure 8: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Risk Exposure Category and Gender, 211 vs. 2 1% Other/Unknown 9% 8% 7% Perinatal NIR - Other 6% NIR - Heterosexual 5% MSM and IDU 4% MSM 3% IDU 2% 1% % Female Cases 2 Female Cases 211 Male Cases 2 Male Cases 211 Heterosexual - Partner at Risk Heterosexual - Endemic *NIR refers to No Identified Risk In 211, there is a difference in ethnicity between males and females with HIV. The vast majority of male cases with known ethnicity were Caucasian, while the largest ethnic group for females was black, followed by aboriginal (Figure 9). Figure 9: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Sex and Known Ethnicity, 211 Asian 2 7 Caucasian 18 83 Black 24 23 Latin American 9 Aboriginal 18 19 Male Female 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 212 Government of Alberta 9

HIV 211-Gender and Risk Exposure Table 4 shows that two-thirds of male caucasians reported MSM as the risk exposure in 211. Eighty seven per cent of Black female cases reported heterosexual endemic as the risk exposure category. The most common risk exposure for aboriginal female cases was IDU. The remaining aboriginal female cases reported either partner at risk or no identified risk. Table 4 Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Gender, Known Ethnicity and Risk Exposure Category, 211 Aboriginal Latin America Black Caucasian Asian Other TOTAL Female 19 23 18 2 1 63 Heterosexual - Endemic 2 2 Heterosexual - Partner at Risk 4 1 11 2 18 IDU 7 3 1 MSM MSM and IDU NIR - Heterosexual 8 4 1 13 NIR - Other Perinatal 2 2 Male 18 9 24 83 7 4 145 Heterosexual - Endemic 1 19 1 21 Heterosexual - Partner at Risk 2 7 1 1 IDU 1 1 11 1 23 MSM 2 7 1 55 4 2 71 MSM and IDU 1 1 NIR - Heterosexual 1 1 4 1 7 NIR - Other 1 1 1 6 1 1 Perinatal 1 1 2 Both 37 9 47 11 9 5 28 212 Government of Alberta 1

HIV 211-HIV by Health Zone The HIV cases by Alberta Health Services Zone shows the differences in newly diagnosed HIV cases and their risks by smaller geographic regions. This may help focus prevention programs to certain sub-populations depending on the zone. Figure 1: Cases and Rates (per 1, persons) of HIV by Alberta Health Zones, 211 (n=218) North Edmonton Central 17 3.8 13 2.9 95 7.9 Calgary South 11 3.8 82 5.8 2 4 6 8 1 12 (Rates in italics) In 211, the zones with the greatest population (Edmonton and Calgary) had higher rates of HIV than the provincial rate of 5.7 cases per 1, persons (Figure 11). Breaking down the zones by sex and known ethnicity of cases, male Caucasians made up the largest number of cases in the two urban Zones in 211 (Figure 12). Figure 11: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Gender Known Ethnicity and Zone, 211 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male SOUTH CALGARY CENTRAL EDMONTON NORTH Aboriginal Latin American Black Caucasian Asian Other 212 Government of Alberta 11

Figure 12 shows HIV cases by gender for each health zone in 211. Cases with the risk exposure heterosexual endemic are seen in all health zones and in both females and males. Risk exposure from IDU was reported in all health zones for males only. MSM was the risk exposure for the largest proportion of male HIV cases. MSM was the risk exposure for the largest proportion of male HIV cases in the Calgary zones. In 2, IDU was the predominant risk exposure for both males and females. Figure 12: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases in Alberta by Risk Exposure Category, Gender and Zone, 2 (n=194) vs. 211 (n=218) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 2 211 North Edmonton Central Calgary South North Edmonton Central Calgary South FEMALE MALE Other Perinatal MSM IDU Heterosexual - Partner at Risk Heterosexual - Endemic 212 Government of Alberta 12

HIV 211-HIV among First Nations in Alberta The rate of HIV among First Nations populations is higher than for non-first Nations populations. In 211, the rate of newly diagnosed HIV is 25.4 cases per 1, persons. This is down from 54.8 cases per 1, persons in 2 to (Figure 13). Figure 13: Number and Crude Rate of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases of First Nations Populations vs. Non-First Nations Populations in Alberta by Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Rate per 1, 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 FN Cases 59 48 52 28 29 37 44 33 37 31 28 33 Non-FN Cases 135 13 129 133 144 137 177 193 196 188 163 185 FN Rate 54.8 43.1 45.4 23.9 24.2 3.2 35.3 26.1 28.8 23.9 21.4 25.4 Non-FN Rate 4.7 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.7 4.4 5.6 5.9 5.8 5.4 4.5 5. Figure 14: Crude Rate of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases for First Nations, Alberta by Gender And Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 6. 5. 4. 3. 2. 1.. 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 FN Female Rate 5.6 35.1 31.2 26. 24. 36.9 31.9 31.4 32.1 23.4 21.7 22.8 FN Male Rate 45.8 41.5 5. 16.8 19.5 17.8 32.2 15.8 19.8 19.5 16.5 21.7 212 Government of Alberta 13

Table 5 shows that the rate of HIV among First Nations has decreased since 2, but the rate is still higher than among the non-first Nations population in Alberta. Table 5 Number and Crude Rate of Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases for First Nations Populations in Alberta by Gender and Year of Diagnosis, 2 to 211 Year 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 FN Female Cases 31 22 2 17 16 25 22 22 23 17 16 17 Rate per 1, 5.6 35.1 31.2 26. 24. 36.9 31.9 31.4 32.1 23.4 21.7 22.8 FN Male Cases 28 26 32 11 13 12 22 11 14 14 12 16 Rate per 1, 45.8 41.5 5. 16.8 19.5 17.8 32.2 15.8 19.8 19.5 16.5 21.7 FN Both Cases 59 48 52 28 29 37 44 33 37 31 28 33 Rate per 1, 48.2 38.3 4.6 21.4 21.7 27.4 32. 23.6 26. 21.5 19.1 22.3 In 211, the largest proportion of newly diagnosed HIV cases among First Nations populations was in the Edmonton Zone (Figure 15). Figure 15: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases by Zone in Alberta, First Nations, 211 North 18% Edmonton 64% Central 6% Calgary 9% South 3% % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% Percent of Cases 212 Government of Alberta 14

In the past 12 years, the First Nations populations with HIV have been different from that of non-first Nations populations in Alberta. Even though IDU identified as a risk exposure has decreased from the start of the decade, it still remains the most common risk factor among First Nations (Figure 16). Figure 16: Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases by Year and Risk Exposure as IDU in Alberta First Nations Persons, 2 to 211 7 6 Other IDU 5 4 3 2 1 17 25 21 24 17 21 18 42 14 15 23 21 2 27 27 19 2 13 15 16 15 1 1 8 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 Government of Alberta 15

AIDS in Alberta Figure 17 shows that AIDS cases in Alberta have declined since peaking in 1994. In 211, there were 31 newly diagnosed cases of AIDS. The rate of AIDS in Alberta for 211 was.8 cases per 1, persons. Figure 17: Number of Newly Diagnosed AIDS Cases in Alberta by Year of Diagnosis, 1986 to 211 14 12 134 1 8 6 4 2 23 43 65 83 75 82 1 95 92 65 5 35 36 57 43 36 34 38 35 58 59 59 38 35 31 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 Figure 18 shows that in 211, the number of AIDS cases decreased predominantly in the Calgary zone while slightly increasing in Edmonton. Figure 18: Newly Diagnosed AIDS Cases in Alberta by Alberta Health Services Zone, 29 to 211 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 2 26 21 13 1 7 6 5 3 3 3 2 2 North Edmonton Central Calgary South 1 29 21 211 212 Government of Alberta 16

Figure 19 shows the newly diagnosed AIDS cases by ethnicity in the past three years. The proportion of AIDS among Caucasians and Aboriginal decreased while the proportion of black cases increased. In 211, 57 per cent of cases with known ethnicity were Caucasian. Figure 19: Newly Diagnosed AIDS Cases in Alberta by Known Ethnicity, 29 to 211 211 (n=31) 14 2 6 5 1 21 (n=35) 17 2 3 6 1 29 (n=38) 2 3 6 5 2 % 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 1% Number of cases Caucasian Asian Black Aboriginal Latin American 212 Government of Alberta 17

Figure 2 shows that for AIDS cases in Alberta, males continue to have a higher rate of disease than females. Overall, in 211, the disease rate for males was 1.3 cases per 1, persons and.3 cases per 1, persons for females. Among those in the age group of 35-44 years, males had the highest disease rate (4. cases per 1, persons), followed by males in the age group of 45-54 with the rate of 3.8 cases per 1, males. Figure 2: Newly Diagnosed AIDS Rates per 1, in Alberta by Gender and Age Group, 211 (n=31) 5 4 Rate per 1, 3 2 1-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Female Rate..3.7 1.1.. Male Rate..3 4. 3.8.5.5 Figure 21 shows the newly diagnosed AIDS cases by gender and risk exposure category in 211. In Alberta in 211, ninety per cent of newly diagnosed AIDS cases were male; of which 28 per cent reported their risk exposure category as MSM. The second most common risk category for all AIDS cases was IDU. Figure 21: Newly Diagnosed AIDS Cases in Alberta by Gender and Risk Exposure Category, 211 (n=31) MSM and IDU Other/Unknown Male Female Heterosexual - Endemic Heterosexual - Partner at Risk IDU MSM NIR - Heterosexual & Other 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 212 Government of Alberta 18