Student Statistics. HESA Equality data analysis

Transcription

1 Student Statistics HESA Equality data analysis Gender by level and mode In general, as can be seen in the graph below, female students outnumber male students. The exceptions to this were in postgraduate research PT and postgraduate taught FT which are small categories. 8 Gender by level and mode Women Men Full time Part time Full time Part time Full time Part time Full time Part time Postgraduate research Postgraduate taught First degree Other Undergraduate The source for this was HEIDI 09-10

2 Degree class by gender A greater proportion of females achieved first class degrees (13.6% compared to 10.2% of males). However, this was reversed when it came to upper second class degrees. 41.7% of males achieved this whereas 35.8% of females did so. 51.9% of males achieved a first or 2.1 which is more than the 49.4% of females. 45.0% 35.0% Degree Class by gender 25.0% % Women Men 5.0% First Class Upper second class Lower second class Third class/pass Unclassified The source for this was HEIDI 09-10

3 Ethnicity Just under half of the student population were white. The next largest category were black students. Ethnicity Total Percentage White % Black or Black British Caribbean % Black or Black British African % Other Black background % Asian or Asian British Indian % Asian or Asian British Pakistani % Asian or Asian British Bangladeshi % Chinese % Other Asian background % Mixed - White & Black Caribbean % Mixed - White & Black African % Mixed - White & Asian % Other Mixed background % Other Ethnic background % Not known % Information refused % Total Ethnicity is shown by level and mode below Level Other undergraduate First Degree Postgraduate taught Postgraduate research Mode FT/SWOUT PT FT/SWOUT PT FT/SWOUT PT FT/SWOUT PT Grand Total White Black Asian Other including mixed Not known/information refused Total The source for both of these was HESA data

4 Disability Disability status Total Percentage No known disability % Two or more impairments and/or disabling medical conditions % A specific learning difficulty such as dyslexia, dyspraxia or AD(H)D % A social/communication impairment such as Asperger's syndrome/other autistic spectrum disorder 8 0.1% A long standing illness or health condition such as cancer, HIV, diabetes, chronic heart disease, or epilepsy % A mental health condition, such as depression, schizophrenia or anxiety disorder % A physical impairment or mobility issues, such as difficulty using arms or using a wheelchair or crutches % Deaf or a serious hearing impairment % Blind or a serious visual impairment uncorrected by glasses % A disability, impairment or medical condition that is not listed above % Total Derived from HESA 10-11

5 Degree class by disability A lower proportion of firsts were achieved by disabled compared to non disabled students. 45.0% Degree class by disability 35.0% 25.0% % 5.0% Disabled Not Disabled First class honours Upper second class honours Lower second class honours Third class honours / Pass Unclassified The source for this was HEIDI 09/10

6 Age Age by mode and level is shown below. This data was taken from HESA 10/11 internal data. Mode First Degree Other undergraduate Postgraduate research Postgraduate taught Level FT/SWOUT PT FT/SWOUT PT FT/SWOUT PT FT/SWOUT PT 21 and under and over Grand Total Grand Total Degree class by age The proportions of firsts and upper seconds did not vary much with age although the youngest students did show the best achievement. 6 Degree class by age 5 2 First class Upper second class Lower second class Third class/pass 21 and under and over The age data was all from HESA

7 Student Complaints by Ethnicity / Gender/ Disability vs. Institutional Profile 2010/11 for comparison purposes The Equality and Diversity Advisory Group (EDAG) monitors the way in which the strategic objectives from the Equality and Diversity Statement are monitored. EDAG prepares an Annual Report by collating data from across the Institution regarding impact assessment of policies, procedures, guidance and regulatory matters in respect of equality. This student complaints data will be considered by this group as part of the Annual Report. Complaints by Ethnicity Ethnic Master Group 2010/11 (%) Institutional Profile % White British/Irish/Scottish 19 (34) 34 Other White Background 5 ( 9) 12 Black, Black British and other black background 18 (32) 21 Asian or Asian British, Chinese 7 (13) 19 Mixed or other ethnic background 3 (5) 9 Information refused /not known 4 (7) 4 Complaints by Gender Gender 2010/11 (%) Institutional Profile % Women 28 (50) 60 Men 28 (50) 40 Complaints by Disability Disability 2010/11 No known disability 12 A special learning disability e.g. dyslexia 1 An unseen disability, e.g. diabetes, epilepsy, asthma 1 Not recorded 42