Single Process Arsenic and Antimony Removal Using Coagulation and Microfiltration

Similar documents
Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

Granular Ferric Hydroxide for Elimination of Arsenic from Drinking Water


Chemistry at Work. How Chemistry is used in the Water Service

Guidelines for Arsenic Removal Treatment for Small Public Drinking Water Systems

Enhanced Organic Precursor Removals Using Aged Filter Media Page 1. Enhanced Organic Precursor Removals Using Aged Filter Media

Treatment of Arsenic Residuals from Drinking Water Removal Processes

DRINKING WATER - LAB EXPERIMENTS. Coagulation and flocculation LAB EXPERIMENTS. Jartest

In-Situ Bioremediation Demonstration of Coal-Based Acid Mine Drainage. Tide Mine Site Indiana County, Pennsylvania

WISCONSIN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOCIATION

Comparative Studies for Selection of Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water

Chemical Feed Systems Best Practices

Hardness - Multivalent metal ions which will form precipitates with soaps. e.g. Ca 2+ + (soap) Ca(soap) 2 (s)

8 Chemicals from water treatment and distribution

Wastewater Reuse. Typical treated wastewater is:

HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM REMOVAL FROM INDUSTRIAL WATSEWATER BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION METHOD

Ion Exchange Softening

TREATMENT OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANT WASTE WATER IN FLORIDA FOR DISCHARGE AND RE USE PURPOSES

Metal Ion + EDTA Metal EDTA Complex

OXIDATION-REDUCTION TITRATIONS-Permanganometry

Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water

Chemical Handling : Bulk Liquid Chemical Unloading. Northern Michigan Wastewater Operators Seminar September 23, 2008

DEIONIZATION IN A "NUT SHELL"

Coagulation and Flocculation

Treatment Technologies for Arsenic Removal

Arsenic Removal with Bayoxide E33 Ferric Oxide Media & SORB 33 As Adsorption

How To Remove Selenium From Water

Subject: Technical Letter 22 April 1977 Removal of Water Supply Contaminants -- Copper and Zinc

Removal of Turbidity, Organic Matter, Coliform and Heterotrophic Bacteria by Coagulants Poly Aluminium Chloride from Karoon River Water in Iran

POTW PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL PROCESSES

The Control of ph and Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) in Cooling Tower Applications By Charles T. Johnson, Walchem Corporation

Experiment 16-Acids, Bases and ph

Feasibility study of crystallization process for water softening in a pellet reactor

Arsenic Removal Technologies for Drinking Water in Vietnam

Appendix B: Water Treatment Scenarios from AMD Treat

Removal of Sulfate from Waste Water by Activated Carbon. Mohammed Sadeq Salman Computer Centre/ University of Baghdad

1. Read P , P & P ; P. 375 # 1-11 & P. 389 # 1,7,9,12,15; P. 436 #1, 7, 8, 11

The Relationship between ph and Deionized Water

Microfiltration for Removal of Manganese from Surface Water

Molarity of Ions in Solution

Indiana s Newest Filtration Facility; East Chicago

Swimming Pool and Spa Water Chemical Adjustments

Name: Class: Date: 2 4 (aq)

Basic Chemistry of Chlorination

QUESTION (2012:3) (a) (i) Complete the table below showing the conjugate acids and bases. CO 3 H 2 O OH HCN CN -

Neutralization of Acid Mine Drainage Using Stabilized Flue Gas Desulfurization Material

Life Cycle Assessment of Three Water Scenarios: Importation, Reclamation, and Desalination

Tutorial 4 SOLUTION STOICHIOMETRY. Solution stoichiometry calculations involve chemical reactions taking place in solution.

Marina Bay on Boston Harbor Water-treatment system by OilTrap Environmental

Water remediation: Passive Treatment Technologies

2.0 PHOSPHORUS FORMS IN RAW WASTEWATER AND IN THE EFFLUENT 4.0 CHEMICALS USED FOR PHOSPHORUS PRECIPITATION Overview of Aluminum Based Chemicals

MOLARITY = (moles solute) / (vol.solution in liter units)

Dissolved Mineral Radioactivity in Drinking Water

HOMEWORK 4A. Definitions. Oxidation-Reduction Reactions. Questions

Experiment 8 - Double Displacement Reactions

CWD BALDWIN PLANT NEW RESIDUALS HANDLING SYSTEM

Comparison of natural radioactivity removal methods for drinking water supplies: A review

Moles, Molecules, and Grams Worksheet Answer Key

Nitrate and Nitrite Removal from Municipal Drinking Water Supplies with Electrodialysis Reversal

Solutions and Dilutions

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Irrigation Water Quality for Greenhouse Production

AP FREE RESPONSE QUESTIONS ACIDS/BASES

Treatment options for hydrogen sulfide. Testing for hydrogen sulfide

Nomenclature and Household Items

Calculating Molar Mass of a Compound

Decomposition. Composition

Chemical Reactions in Water Ron Robertson

The formation of polluted mine water

THE NWF WATER PURIFICATION PROCESS FRESH WATER IN A NATURAL WAY. Esko Meloni Ferroplan Oy

Chem 116 POGIL Worksheet - Week 10 - Solutions Weak Acid and Base Equilibria

What is Chlorination?

Nine Industrial Scale V SEPs. Feed Tank V SEP. Feed Pumps (Three) Concentrate. Tank. V SEP Treatment System

Facility Classification Standards

ENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING. Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan

Standard methods in water analysis

Use of Nano-scale materials in Water Purification

Writing and Balancing Chemical Equations

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

David A. Katz Chemist, Educator, Science Communicator, and Consultant Department of Chemistry, Pima Community College

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

CHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF EVERYDAY HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS

ION EXCHANGE FOR DUMMIES. An introduction

Complexometric Titrations

Removal of Mercury and Arsenic from Produced Water ABSTRACT

Soil contamination and remediation. Introduction to soil chemistry

Syllabus OC18 Use litmus or a universal indicator to test a variety of solutions, and classify these as acidic, basic or neutral

DOW Ultrafiltration. Case History. High Turbidity and Temperature Fluctuation No Obstacle for DOW Ultrafiltration

OBJECTIVE: To measure Chemical Oxygen Demand. BACKGROUND AND PRINCIPLE: SELECTION OF METHODS. Page 1

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: CLEAN WATER RESEARCH AS RELATED TO ACID MINE DRAINAGE

Chapter 16: Tests for ions and gases

REMOVAL OF ANTIMONY FROM WATER BY SORPTION MATERIALS

Solution a homogeneous mixture = A solvent + solute(s) Aqueous solution water is the solvent

Iron and Manganese BACTERIA AND IRON AND MANGANESE

Storage-stable Aqueous Solutions of Chlorine Dioxide

Name: Block: Date: Test Review: Chapter 8 Ionic Bonding

Transcription:

Single Process Arsenic and Antimony Removal Using Coagulation and Microfiltration Presented by: Joe R. Tamburini, PE H.C. Liang, PhD Sam J. Billin, PE October 18, 2010 Tailings and Mine Waste 10

Outline Project Overview Arsenic Removal Technologies and Applications Coagulation-assisted microfiltration Arsenic and Antimony Chemistry Ferric Hydroxide Chemistry Bench Scale Test Results Full Scale Implementation Process flow description

Background on Project Location Nome, Alaska Water Source Gold mine dewatering wells Issues Elevated arsenic, antimony, and manganese Arsenic removal well understood, but antimony removal chemistry largely unknown Manganese issue developed after startup Hypothesis Coagulation-assisted microfiltration, ph adjustment

Arsenic Treatment Technologies Media Adsorption Granular iron oxide media Aluminum oxide media Ion Exchange Coagulation/Sedimentation/Filtration Coagulated-Assisted Microfiltration Reverse Osmosis

Arsenic Treatment Technologies

Coagulation and Microfiltration Iron Coagulants Ferric chloride Ferric sulfate, ferrous sulfate Ferric Salts Become Ferric Hydroxide FeCl 3 + H 2 O Fe(OH) + 2 (at ph < 7.3) Oxidized Arsenic Adsorbs to Ferric Hydroxide H 2 AsO 4- + Fe(OH) 2+ Precipitant Microfiltration Removes Precipitant

Coagulation and Microfiltration Schematic Representation of the Chemistry Arsenic (III) Oxidant As Fe(OH) 2 + As(III) OCl - As As - As(III) As(V) No Attraction Creates Negatively Charged As(V) Arsenic (V) As - As(V) Fe(OH) 2 + Chemically Bound to Ferric

Arsenic Treatment Technologies

Arsenic Treatment Technologies

Background on Project Water Quality Data Parameter Well 1 Well 2 Well 3 MCL Alkalinity, mg/l 200 262 172 N/A ph, s.u. 7.7 7.6 7.9 N/A TDS, mg/l 324 410 232 N/A Antimony, ug/l 0.0 171 6.0 6 Arsenic, ug/l 79 205 155 10

Arsenic and Antimony Chemistry

Stability Diagram for As Speciation Stability diagrams also called Pourbaix Diagrams

Stability Diagram for As Speciation For optimal As removal, oxidize uncharged arsenic(iii) to charged arsenic(v) species

Stability Diagram for Sb Speciation

Stability Diagram for Sb Speciation Similarly to As, antimony must be in the Sb (V) oxidation state before it can be adsorbed by ferric hydroxide

Ferric Hydroxide Speciation 50% 7.3

Bench-Scale Study Parameters Solution ph Adjusted between 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and natural ph Ferrous Sulfate Dose Adjusted between 10 and 160 mg/l Oxidant NaOCl Adjusted between 0 and 20 mg/l

Bench-Scale Results (Well 2) Antimony Conce entration (mg/l) 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 FeSO4=80, NaOCl=20 FeSO4=120, NaOCl=20 FeSO4=120, NaOCl=10 FeSO4=120, NaOCl=0 FeSO4=160, NaOCl=20 MCL for Sb 0.00 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 ph

Full-Scale WTP Optimization Optimum Operating Parameters Parameter Value Coagulant (Ferrous Chloride), mg/l 60 Oxidant (Sodium Hypochlorite), mg/l 10 ph, s.u. 6.0

Full-Scale WTP Results Effluent Sb Conc. (ug/l) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 MCL for Sb 0 20 40 60 80 100 Ferric Chloride Dose (mg/l)

Full-Scale Implementation Raw Water Tank FeCl 3 Polymer Plate Settlers NaOH Treated Water Tank To Injection Wells Tailing Storage Facility Calcium Hypochlorite Reaction Tank NaOCl (if needed) Microfilter Membranes Waste Sump

Full-Scale WTP Results Effluent Mn Conc (ug/l) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Manganese Removal MCL for Mn

Full-Scale Implementation

Full-Scale Implementation

Full-Scale Implementation

Project Conclusions Arsenic and antimony can be removed simultaneously using coagulation/microfiltration Effective arsenic removal was readily apparent Effective antimony removal improved with decreasing ph and increasing coagulant values A high coagulant dose was required for antimony removal Manganese removal dependant on effluent ph and ORP Manganese removal required adequate residence time

Questions??

Bench-Scale Results (Well 2) 100% 90% 80% FeSO4=80, NaOCl=20 FeSO4=120, NaOCl=20 FeSO4=120, NaOCl=10 FeSO4=120, NaOCl=0 FeSO4=160, NaOCl=20 Antimony Removal 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 ph

Bench-Scale Study Procedure Filled 4 Beakers with Raw Water Added Oxidant Sodium Hypochlorite (bleach) Adjusted ph Used sulfuric acid Added Coagulant Varied dose on each test run Repeated procedure for several coagulant doses with each of three raw water sources