FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TESTING

Similar documents
WHITE PAPERS. Food Processing Plant Design

COMMISSIONING OF FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS

Building Commissioning

Lockout / Tagout Program

A. The Commissioning Authority (CxA) has been contracted or will be contracted directly with the Owner for this project.

Energy Design Resources Commissioning Plan Outline Template

GLUTEN-FREE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

Mechanical Installation

Sample Company SECTION GENERAL COMMISSIONING REQUIREMENTS PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY AND CONTRACT RESPONSIBILITIES

Demand Forecast. Actual Orders. Order Forecast Collaboration: Benefits for the Entire Demand Chain. Integrating people, process and IT.

Houston Service Center Medium Voltage Service and Aftermarket Solutions

Exhibit F. VA CAI - Staff Aug Job Titles and Descriptions Effective 2015

A better way to calculate equipment ROI

Guide Specification SECTION COMMISSIONING OF HVAC PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY

OVERVIEW OF STANDARD 7E & STANDARD 20

Statement of Work. 3.0 Details of Service Pre Start-up Cooling Start-up Service. Installation Service. Table of Contents. 1.0 Executive Summary

Square D Power Management Services. Complete Custom Solutions for Your Power System

How to Mimic the PanelMate Readout Template with Vijeo Designer

Position Classification Standard for Management and Program Clerical and Assistance Series, GS-0344

Covance Construction Management Staffing Plan Chandler, Arizona

Machine Safety Design: Safety Relays Versus a Single Safety Controller

Information Technology Projects Evaluation Process

LOCKOUT GUIDELINE. To ensure that a piece of equipment cannot be turned on, pressurized or switched on accidently while an employee is working on it.

Hertsmere Borough Council. Data Quality Strategy. December

Mobile Application Testing

The Make vs. Buy Scenario: Reducing Total Cost and Improving Time to Market

Fire Alarm Systems Certification

Medical Billing and Ensuring Compliance With the State of Montana

Design Verification. Introduction

The integrated HMI-PLC

Position Classification Standard for Traffic Management Series, GS Table of Contents

Whitepapers on Imaging Infrastructure for Research Paper 1. General Workflow Considerations

Testing Automated Manufacturing Processes

True Product Lifecycle Management Begins When Design Ends. strategy may dictate involvement in all or just a few implemented according to design

How to go from Concept to Customer: Best Practices in Product Delivery Cheryl Tulkoff, Randy Schueller, Greg Caswell and Jim McLeish

SOFTWARE-IMPLEMENTED SAFETY LOGIC Angela E. Summers, Ph.D., P.E., President, SIS-TECH Solutions, LP

VERIFICATION (TEST) PLAN GUIDELINES

Engineering Support Services

WRITING A FEASIBILITY STUDY

FAT Factory Acceptance Testing SAT Site Acceptance Testing

PRODUCT INFORMATION. SICK LifeTime Services. LifeTime Services for Machines and Systems

Five steps to a successful material handling CMMS implementation

SECTION PACKAGED ROOFTOP AIR CONDITIONING UNITS NON-CUSTOM

44-76 mix 2. Exam Code:MB Exam Name: Managing Microsoft Dynamics Implementations Exam

ISA CERTIFIED AUTOMATION PROFESSIONAL (CAP ) CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

To Integrate or Stand Alone? Data Collection Solutions for The Small & Medium Size Business

Service solutions for sustainable business sucess. Customer Service Bakery & Ingredient Handling.

Prepared by David Willson, OCIO in consultation with Marc Buchalter, Procurement Please send comments to David Willson at

Elements of a Successful Preventive Maintenance (PM) Program

Generic CMMS Quality Assurance Plan

Position Classification Standard for Supply Clerical and Technician Series, GS Table of Contents

Packaging for the Less-than-Truckload Environment

Essential Power System Requirements for Next Generation Data Centers

section 5 machine guarding and lockout

Lean Manufacturing: Part 1. Charles Theisen, CPIM, CIRM. Lean Manufacturing Part 1

IP Address Assignment in Large Industrial Networks

PROGRAM CRITERIA FOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY

GPD 506/P5 Start-up Procedure and Checklist

CATALYST Frequently Asked Questions

WEEKLY SAFETY MEETING All Euramax Subsidiaries LOCKOUT / TAGOUT. Safety Meeting Contents. Meeting Notice. Leaders Guide.

Tailored Automation Solutions for Performance-Driven Machinery. Executive Overview Business Case for External Collaboration...

Field Service and Replacement Parts for Air Cooled Heat Exchangers

Nothing in this job description restricts management's right to assign or reassign duties and responsibilities to this job at any time.

QUICK FACTS. Facilitating Application Packaging on Behalf of a Global Professional Services Company

Manufacturers versus Component Part and Raw Material Suppliers: How to Prevent Liability By Kenneth Ross *

AS9100 Quality Manual

Guidance Document For The Use of Lasers and Intense Pulse Light in Licensed Special Treatment Premises Within The London Borough of Brent

How Do I know If I Need RCx HOW TO CHOOSE A MANAGED SERVICES PROVIDER.

Overview of Medical Device Design Controls in the US. By Nandini Murthy, MS, RAC

ALVERNIA UNIVERSITY OSHA REGULATION: 29 CFR THE CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY (LOCKOUT / TAGOUT) SECTION: 2400

Risk Management Primer

Utilizing Automation Standards in Engineering Education

SEVEN WAYS TO AVOID ERP IMPLEMENTATION FAILURE SPECIAL REPORT SERIES ERP IN 2014 AND BEYOND

Application Technique. Safety Function: Magnetic Door Switch Monitoring

Position Classification Standard for Procurement Clerical and Technician Series, GS Table of Contents

Rapid Machine Change Over SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Dies)

Commissioning Plan Preparation Guide. Version 2.0 (Replaces Project Test Plans Preparation Guide, Version 1.0, September 2012)

Power transformers. Generator step-up and system intertie power transformers Securing high-quality AC transmission

Alain Nifenecker - General Electric Manager Controls Engineering

Model 1756 Test Lead Kit

T146 Electro Mechanical Engineering Technician MTCU Code Program Learning Outcomes

D. Infrared scanning reports with pictures printed in a final report with any deficiencies and actions taken to rectify.

Clearing the Hurdles to Energy Management Centralization

TABLETTING BUYER S GUIDE

COST ESTIMATING METHODOLOGY

ISO 9001 for Purchasing Professionals

Predictive Maintenance in a Mission Critical Environment

Classification Appeal Decision Under Section 5112 of Title 5, United States Code

SECTION HEAT PUMPS

Outage Management System Implementation. Status Report

Laser Scanning for an Integrated BIM

Executive Intro. Outsourcing the Computer/Display portion of your program allows you to allocate resources to core competencies :

Health and Safety in the Engineering Workplace

CEILING CASSETTE FAN COIL UNIT

MEM234009A Design computer-integrated manufacturing systems

West Des Moines Community School District Performance Evaluation Report Support Staff

Manage Deliverables - Construction Step 6. July 12, 2012

KELLER S 5-MINUTE WORKPLACE SAFETY TALKS

MANUFACTURING PROCESS MANAGEMENT. Manufacturing Process Management Domain presentation

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION FAT refers to a Factory Acceptance Test. This is a way to ensure that equipment/systems being purchased meet the agreed upon design specifications. Ideally this happens before arriving at the customer s plant, however, for complex systems with high integration, tests may need to be performed at the customer s location. Factory Acceptance Tests allow any issues to be corrected either at the vendor s location or before production leveraging the technical expertise and resources of the vendor, preventing any potential cross-contamination with the customer s plant and improving the general quality of the product delivered to the customer. While there are some general guidelines for FATs, each FAT is a customized procedure. The complexity of the Factory Acceptance Test performed is generally determined by factors such as the degree of customization, familiarity with equipment, familiarity with the vendor and degree of integration. When consideration of these factors has been made the Baker (customer) and supplier may involve several people in the Factory Acceptance Test. From the Baker (customer) this might include plant support such as engineering, maintenance, quality assurance, technicians and/or corporate engineering. The supplier may include designers, manufacturing representatives and sales as participants. To ensure a successful Factory Acceptance Test it is important to communicate effectively throughout the process, setting clear expectations and clarifying roles long before the FAT is to be performed. The high-level process for a Factory Acceptance Test involves Planning, Performing Test Activities, Gathering Test Results, Identifying and Correcting Issues (if necessary) and Sign-off. PLANNING Planning determines and documents the tests to be carried out, test criteria, protocols, tools needed and what to look for, along with specifics for variances and acceptability. The personnel who should be involved along with their responsibilities should also be determined. PERFORM TEST ACTIVITIES OEM and Baker work together to coordinate and perform tests according to requirements, specifications and agreements as planned. COMMUNICATION GATHER TEST RESULTS IDENTIFY ISSUES & CORRECT The specified results and outcomes are collected and measured according to the plan. It is determined whether objectives and criteria of tests have been met or not. Faults, failures, errors and hazards are identified according to pre-determined criteria. Issues needing resolved are corrected for acceptance (may require re-testing). SIGN-OFF OEM and Baker sign-off on acceptance of equipment/systems. BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 1

LEVEL 1 - FAT Overview A Level 1 - FAT is the most basic level of equipment/system testing conducted at the OEM. This is often the level of acceptance test for equipment that is similar to other equipment in the plant or for equipment that has simple to moderate upgrades and/or modifications. Generally a Level 1 - FAT will review equipment/system dimensions, fit/finish and quality of fabrication, dry cycle of motors and electro/mechanical devices. Considerations for Level 1 - FAT Purchase of new equipment/system If purchasing from a new vendor If the machine/system has simple to moderate custom designs/features For development of plant/corporate personnel or if there is an opportunity for plant/team to become familiar with equipment/system *Example: New team members involved in the project or equipment specified by one group to be used by another (i.e. corporate specified equipment to be used in a particular plant) Introduction of simple to moderate new technologies to the plant *Note: If the equipment purchased is off-the-shelf and/or the same as other equipment from the vendor, the Level 1 - FAT may be waived Level 1 - FAT Details Contract Written and Timelines Developed Baker (customer) provides Checklist and Acceptance Sign-Off documentation to Supplier Checklist Considerations: Equipment/System Dimensions Fit/Finish and Quality of Fabrication Dry Cycle of Motors and Electro/Mechanical Devices Safety - Correct Guarding - E-Stop Functionality - Safety Switch Functionality - Rough/Sharp Edges & Surfaces Electrical Panel I/O High-level overview/summary of PLC Program Approximately 1-2 weeks before shipment, Customer Representatives (1-3 depending on size/scope of purchase) meet at Supplier to review the equipment per the Checklist *The supplier may have their own approval checklist for internal measures If necessary, any items identified as unsatisfactory or requesting change are discussed for resolution. A timeline for the corrective actions is agreed upon *If there are changes requested that were outside the scope of the original purchase agreement, cost and timing will be impacted If required, changes are made Equipment is crated and shipped to Baker BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 2

Cost, Time, Quality Implications Cost Level 1 - FATs are typically a no-cost line item on the original purchase agreement Baker covers their own costs to send any representatives to the supplier Time Per the project timeline, the Level 1 - FAT is typically scheduled to be conducted approximately 1-2 weeks prior to the promised ship date A Level 1 - FAT should be able to be completed in 1 working day (depending on size of equipment/system) Benefits Piece-of-mind knowing that the equipment being purchased meets all requirements before arriving on your dock Baker/Vendor does not have to work on equipment at the job site (Cost/Timing/Expertise implications) Reduction of installation/start-up time LEVEL 2 - FAT Overview The Level 2 FAT involves significantly more planning, time and effort than the Level 1 FAT. Often a Level 2 FAT is a means for not only acceptance testing the equipment/systems, but for research and development and training of Baker personnel. Due to the complexity of Level 2 FATs, documenting clear expectations and thorough planning are essential for its success. Additionally, the dynamic and complex nature of a Level 2 FAT means the involvement and coordination of more people, so ensuring the right people participate is critical. Considerations for Level 2 - FAT Custom Equipment Level 2 FAT advisable for custom equipment designed for unique applications that are either proprietary or one-of-a-kind systems Equipment/systems that have never been implemented before *If the customer design is iterative of previous designs, testing may be advisable but is determined by Baker and supplier New Models Level 2 - FAT advisable for new models or designs being released by the OEM *R&D may be a joint effort by both parties, Baker looking for new technology and supplier undertaking development in anticipation of future business. A Level 2 FAT in this situation is often a fact finding and R&D test conducted by OEM with input, direction, or advice from the Baker Existing Models with Significant Modifications or Upgrades Significant modifications or upgrades to standard equipment make it advisable to conduct a Level 2 FAT for sign-off of modifications/upgrades. Simulation testing may prove out proper functionality of requested upgrades and further justify the Level 2 FAT New Bakery Products New Bakery products offer unknown s to both parties because lab testing, while generating a viable product, may have complications for the OEM equipment selected. A Level 2 FAT can provide information for both the Baker and OEM in order to make alterations in product formulation and/or the OEM equipment to achieve the best production results at full capacity. Testing may include variables to help the Baker identify possibilities in product variations that may occur with the equipment BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 3

Customer s Products are New for OEM s Equipment or Expectations are Unclear In situations where a piece of OEM equipment is highly effective at a particular task, but the Bakery product poses a new challenge that can potentially be solved by the OEM; the unclear expectations of both parties may warrant a Level 2 FAT for simulation to determine required modifications/upgrades and/or to confirm success. New Technology for Plant Personnel If the equipment/system is a new process for the plant and the OEM is experienced with it, a Level 2 - FAT enables the Baker to learn the equipment prior to installation at their plant. This enables plant representatives from production, sanitation and engineering to receive training prior to installation as well. It also allows them to identify impacts to existing processes, reducing time and frustration at start-up Extreme Change in Production Procedures If the new equipment will cause an extreme change in existing procedures or processes for particular line or product a Level 2 FAT may be beneficial. This allows for implementation of any required changes prior to delivery and installation Level 2 - FAT Details Temporary Mechanical and Electrical Installation within the OEM Facility With temporary provisions all safety precautions are met as much as possible Verification of Equipment Systems, Dimensions, and Specifications Prior to simulation testing a complete Level 1 FAT review must take place in order to ensure all machine components are ready for operation. Internal OEM quality control standards should be completed prior to temporary installation. The Level 1 - FAT is an additional walk-thru with Bakery personnel to ensure all specifications and quality of fabrication standards are met Under no circumstances shall electrical panels be energized without proper testing, burn in, and I/O checks being performed. With temporary electrical connections extreme caution should be utilized When possible the Baker sends necessary pans and ingredients necessary to simulate testing to OEM facility 1-2 weeks in advance. If refrigeration or baking units are required to simulate testing, provisions should be made in advance Testing should be performed and analyzed per specifications, with allowances for OEM facilities and temporary installation that may not meet the same conditions of the final installation location. Some Bakery environments or production conditions cannot effectively be recreated within an OEM facility, all quality or performance measures should have the allowance and flexibility to accommodate for this difference OEM trains Bakery personnel on machine functions and options prior to simulation testing Baker collects performance variables per their needs OEM supports the Baker as needed during the simulation test, ensuring proper safety and operation standards are used in a temporary state of installation. OEM also ensures there is firm understanding of machine operation to prevent unnecessary damage of any kind prior to shipment Obtain approvals and signatures for required changes and to permit shipment Cost, Time, Quality Implications Cost Level 2 - FATs typically entail additional cost to conduct and should be negotiated into the original contract and/or change order. Costs are due to the temporary installation of equipment/systems that might not otherwise need to be pretested, which requires labor and/or special provisions. Additionally, plant supplied pans, materials or ingredients add to cost. Depending on the situation either or both parties together may cover the cost determined by who benefits from testing and is allocated proportionately. BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 4

Time Per the project timeline, a Level 2 - FAT is typically conducted 2-4 weeks prior to the ship date given the complexity of the system more time may be required. This allows time for the temporary installation and internal testing and preparation for the OEM. It also allows time for alterations prior to shipment and dismantling and crating of the temporary installed items after the Level 2 - FAT A Level 2 - FAT is typically completed in 2-3 working days (depending on size of equipment/system) and the level of testing or product combinations Benefits Peace-of-mind that the equipment being purchased meets all requirements and that any required changes have been completed before arriving on your dock. Baker/Vendor does not have to work on equipment at the job site (Cost/Time/Expertise implications) Reduction of installation/start-up time and reduction of unforeseen issues from either side LEVEL 3 - FAT Overview The third level of the factory acceptance test is the most critical and complex which generally involves production of the Baker s goods. The purpose of the Level 3 - FAT is for the Baker and OEM to confirm that the goals have been reached and the line can be handed over to the customer. Prior to this occurring, the equipment must be prepared physically, mechanically and electrically. Level 3 - FATs can be conducted at the equipment manufacturer s facility or at the final site. This is dictated by the size of the project, ability to assemble equipment/system at OEM facility, time restrictions, and cost. Often this occurs at the customer location, especially if the scope is an entire line. Unit machines and simple Level 1 FATs may be performed at the OEM factory. Considerations for Level 3 - FAT All Level 2 FAT considerations apply to Level 3 FATs as well the defining characteristic of Level 3 FATs is commissioning. If the acceptance is to be conducted at the Baker s location, Physical placement, mechanical installation and electrical installation must occur prior to the acceptance of the equipment. The physical and mechanical installation often occur using local contractors directed by an installation supervisor from the OEM in conjunction with the Baker s project manager. The electrical installation is generally completed by local contractors using electrical installation drawings provided by the OEM and approved by the Baker s project manager or plant engineering staff. Due to the complexity and components involved in a Level 3 FAT, communication is critical. Here are some considerations for communication. Goals are clearly set by the Baker and OEM at the start of the project The OEM clearly set the Bakers expectations as to what is being supplied and when according to Baker s goals All goals and expectations are documented in writing with specifications, drawings and photos If possible, a visit to a current installation using the same equipment is conducted Regular meetings, generally via phone, are conducted to update on progress The OEM should visit the installation site to see where the equipment will be installed A general fit, finish, and design acceptance is completed BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 5

FAT Level 3 Details *This process begins after equipment, mechanical and electrical installations are completed to the Baker s specifications I/O Checkout (can be thought of as individual motor checkout) Each motor is started and stopped from the operator interface individually Rotation and current draw are confirmed All safety and process lock outs and run enable signals are also confirmed Noise level and any vibration are addressed Engineering Test Runs Once the operation of each motor in the system is confirmed, operation is confirmed for the entire system in both maintenance and automated modes. Line speeds, belt speeds, and system interlocks are confirmed Safety circuits are all confirmed to be functional Interlocks and permissive circuits with up and downstream equipment are confirmed Raw materials are brought to the line to confirm the basic system operation. *Quality of products is not considered at this time, only the ability to move product through the equipment is confirmed at this time Commissioning It is at this point that product can actually be produced on the line. Any attempt to short circuit the process will result in a frustrating commissioning process. During this process product is produced to meet the standards sets early in the project A critical point to understand is that a standard or target needs to exist to confirm successful acceptance testing. There needs to be a target product and rate. Make the best product possible is not a standard the equipment manufacturer can be held to. Match this product which you became familiar with at the start of the project is the best standard It is important for the equipment manufacturer to understand that not only will he be judged on the quality of the equipment and the quality of the finished product, he will be judged on the amount of time required to complete the onsite FAT process Cost, Time, Quality Implications Cost (Highest cost for a FAT, which can be as much as 10% to 25% of the equipment cost.) is determined by Time at vendor s factory or customer s location Amount of Equipment Complexity of Equipment Number of Products Commissioned Time This depends on the complexity of the equipment, but two weeks to complete is typical Depending on the number of SKU s, the commissioning process alone can last between two days and three weeks Benefits Time from equipment delivery to production can be greatly reduced because the equipment manufacturer is very involved = Reduction of installation/start-up time BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 6

CONCLUSION The value of a factory acceptance test can be found in each of the cost, time and benefit areas. If issues are identified early on and the Baker can rely on OEM expertise, it will save money and time over the project life cycle. Additionally, the training and learning opportunities before operation provide significant preparation prior to operation in the plant. It is important to have an in-depth conversation about what the Baker and OEM needs are, the possibility and practicality of different levels of FAT and to take into consideration the factors discussed here primarily degree of customization, familiarity with equipment, familiarity with the vendor and degree of integration. Once that conversation has taken place, it s important to invest in proper planning and communication to ensure successful completion of the FAT and to reach the desired outcomes. If you are trying to figure out where to start, begin with the FAT Infographic, which can serve as a guide for your discussion. Although not intended to determine the correct level of FAT for you or the details of your FAT, this infographic will help you think through your needs and the implications. BAKING INDUSTRY FORUM 7 0-6