ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DISODIUM OCTABORATE TETRAHYDRATE (DOT) WOOD PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT SYSTEMS PREFACE

Similar documents
December 28, 2012 PARTIES INTERESTED IN PROPRIETARY WOOD PRESERVATIVE SYSTEMS COMMON REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATMENT PROCESS, TEST METHODS AND PERFORMANCE

Specifying Treated Wood Paul I Morris, Group Leader Durability and Protection

Enhanced Wood Performance with Environmental Responsibility

Specification. Guide for. Wolmanized. Pressure-Treated. Wood

Fire-Retardant-Treated (FRT) Plywood

DIVISION: WOOD, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES SECTION: WOOD, PLASTIC, AND COMPOSITE FASTENINGS REPORT HOLDER:

THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY Issued: August 1, LARKIN CENTER 1605 JOSEPH DRIVE MIDLAND MICHIGAN (989)

REPORT HOLDER: JENWEST ENTERPRISES LLC, DBA ADVANCED CONNECTOR SYSTEMS 321 SOUTH 1240 WEST #15 LINDON, UTAH EVALUATION SUBJECT:

ESR-1190 Reissued December 1, 2009 This report is subject to re-examination in two years.

Types of Wood Preservatives

MicroPro /LifeWood Construction Product Specification Guide

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Reissued March 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in one year.

Frequently Asked Questions LP SmartSide Siding, Trim, and Soffit

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: CONCRETE ROOF TILES REPORT HOLDER:

RESIDENTIAL ROOFING & RE-ROOFING, ROOF VENTILATION AND ROOF SHEATHING REQUIREMENTS MICHIGAN RESIDENTIAL CODE 2000

Figure 1A. Typical brick veneer installation over wood frame construction.

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS REPORT HOLDER: FIRESTONE BUILDING PRODUCTS COMPANY, LLC

ICC-ES Evaluation Report

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

(800) (562) A Subsidiary of the International Code Council *Revised April 2014

Product Guide. FrameGuard Total Wood

Underwriters Laboratories Testing Information

DRICON FIRE RETARDANT TREATED WOOD APPLICATION GUIDE

Nordic requirements for quality control of preservativetreated

An International Termite Field Test of Wood Treated with Insecticides in a Buffered Amine Oxide Carrier

Requirements for Fire Protection of Light Weight Floor Systems **Act 1 Revisited**

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: DEXERDRY. For: Deck Weatherproofing System Installed with AZEK Deck Boards

Know the Code: Using Spray Foam Insulation In Attics and Crawl Spaces

CHAPTER 3.0 TIMBER PILE PROPERTIES

Tried, Tested and Proven Timber Protection

ATI Evaluation Service A Division of Architectural Testing Certification Services

SUPERHEATED STEAM/VACUUM DRYING TIMES FOR THICK LUMBER

ASTM E 1886 / ASTM E 1996 AND ASTM E 283, ASTM E 330, ASTM E 331 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: BEKAERT SPECIALTY FILMS, LLC

ICC-ES Evaluation Report. ESR-3493 Reissued September 2014 This report is subject to renewal September 2015.

West-Guard Termite Control 400 S. Ramona Ave. #212-R Corona CA 92879

Mold prevention makes sense...

Flame Spread Performance of Wood Products

LP OSB Sheathing & Structural 1 Sheathing

Use Preservative-treated Wood & Integrated Pest Management When Rebuilding

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES. Adoption of Chapter Hawaii Administrative Rules SUMMARY

Load-Span Tables for PS-1 Plywood

This handout is a guide only and does not contain all of the requirements of the Minnesota State Building Code or city ordinances.

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: THERMAL INSULATION REPORT HOLDER: ICYNENE, INC.

Fire Testing of Recycled Materials for Building Applications

Long-Term Durability of Pressure-Treated Wood in a Severe Test Site

Trusted SECTION: 04 HILTI, INC. TULSA, Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. not specifically. Copyright 2015

BORA-CARE. Effective Wood Treatment.

THERMAL BARRIERS FOR THE SPRAY POLYURETHANE FOAM INDUSTRY

What Home Builders Need To Know About Termites: Termite-deterring Construction Practices:

Consumer Aid for Post Construction Contracts and Termite Treatments

Global Hybrid Roofing Solutions (Delaware) LLC

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

Your Pest Company inc.

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Reissued September, 2010 This report is subject to re-examination in one year.

2009 IECC Update. Scope. Content. International Energy Conservation Code

Water Vapor Permeance of Wood Structural Panels and Wood Wall Construction

DRAFT TERMITE PROTECTION IN BUILDINGS

Treating Treated Wood Decks. Terry L. Amburgey and Kevin W. Ragon

NAHB National Green Building Program National Association of Home Builders NAHB Green Approved Product Cert. No

Chapter 2 Basis of design and materials

Common Problems with Walls

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

Three Counties Termite Control

ASTM E 1886 and ASTM E 1996 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: NORSE, INC.

FM 4473 TEST REPORT. Rendered to: VTECH INDUSTRIES, LLP. SERIES/MODEL: 4 x 4 CMC Hurricane PRODUCT TYPE: Skylight

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: CONCRETE ROOF TILES REPORT HOLDER: BORAL ROOFING

Fire Retardant Cladding

ICC EVALUATION SERVICE, LLC, RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION REPORTS

Wood use in Type I and II (noncombustible) construction

September 3, Ric Boyd, Public Works Director Ketchikan Gateway Borough 344 Front St. Ketchikan, AK 99901

FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF MOISTURE IN BUILDING MATERIALS AND ASSEMBLIES: PITFALLS AND ERROR ASSESSMENT

HOOVER TREATED WOOD PRODUCTS, INC. TECHNICAL NOTE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: TEC-WOOD ( )

10DBMC International Conference On Durability of Building Materials and Components LYON [France] April 2005

Building Performance Series No. 6

Residential Building Permits Information

Final inspections are completed by site visit only. Access to fenced yards shall be planned.

Load Design Charts. R-CONTROL SIPs STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS. CONTROL, NOT COMPROMISE.

Test Report No. C829QPEN

POWER PRESERVED GLULAM BEAMS AND COLUMNS. Certified Building Products

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: INTEX MILLWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC. For: Rigid Cellular PVC Guardrail System Hampton RS40

How To Prevent Water Damage To A Home

Joseph Laquatra Cornell University

LEGACY REPORT. (800) (562) A Subsidiary of the International Code Council RETAINED ON U.S.

COMMONLY USED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODES

GigaCrete Specification PlasterMax

MASTERFORMAT SPECIFICATION

April 25, 2014 Page 1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION PRODUCT FEATURES

bout your HOUSE before you start Repairing And Replacing Materials Exterior Walls

Wood Decks Zoning and construction requirements for open non-sheltered wood decks for residential dwellings.

SFI SPECIFICATION 28.1 EFFECTIVE: SEPTEMBER 23, 2011 *

Asphalt Shingle Application Requirements

cement Masonry Cement Engineered for quality and reliability, Lafarge cements for masonry deliver consistent performance. page 2 Lafarge Cement

THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH GROUP ON WOOD PRESERVATION. Test Methodology and assessment.

FOREWORD. The Plastics Pipe Institute. This Technical Note, TN-30, was first issued in January 2006 and was revised and republished in September 2013.

G VYCOR DECK PROTECTOR. For longer lasting decks, install Grace Vycor Deck Protector. It s an easy add-on to your deck projects.

03/05/14 REVISOR RSI/JC RD3945

CHAPTER 6 CONSTRUCTION TYPES

DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES. Adoption of Chapter Hawaii Administrative Rules SUMMARY

STANDARD OPEN PATIO COVER

Transcription:

ICC EVALUATION SERVICE, INC. Evaluate P Inform P Protect ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DISODIUM OCTABORATE TETRAHYDRATE (DOT) WOOD PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT SYSTEMS AC62 Approved December 2006 Effective January 1, 2007 Previously approved February 2006, June 2005, October 2004, February 2004 January 1998, September 1995, July 1991 PREFACE Evaluation reports issued by ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. (ICC-ES), are based upon performance features of the International family of codes and other widely adopted code families, including the Uniform Codes, the BOCA National Codes, and the SBCCI Standard Codes. Section 104.11 of the International Building Code reads as follows: The provisions of this code are not intended to prevent the installation of any materials or to prohibit any design or method of construction not specifically prescribed by this code, provided that any such alternative has been approved. An alternative material, design or method of construction shall be approved where the building official finds that the proposed design is satisfactory and complies with the intent of the provisions of this code, and that the material, method or work offered is, for the purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that prescribed in this code in quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and safety. Similar provisions are contained in the Uniform Codes, the National Codes, and the Standard Codes. This acceptance criteria has been issued to provide all interested parties with guidelines for demonstrating compliance with performance features of the applicable code(s) referenced in the acceptance criteria. The criteria was developed and adopted following public hearings conducted by the ICC-ES Evaluation Committee, and is effective on the date shown above. All reports issued or reissued on or after the effective date must comply with this criteria, while reports issued prior to this date may be in compliance with this criteria or with the previous edition. If the criteria is an updated version from the previous edition, a solid vertical line ( ) in the margin within the criteria indicates a technical change, addition, or deletion from the previous edition. A deletion indicator (º) is provided in the margin where a paragraph has been deleted if the deletion involved a technical change. This criteria may be further revised as the need dictates. ICC-ES may consider alternate criteria, provided the report applicant submits valid data demonstrating that the alternate criteria are at least equivalent to the criteria set forth in this document, and otherwise demonstrate compliance with the performance features of the codes. Notwithstanding that a product, material, or type or method of construction meets the requirements of the criteria set forth in this document, or that it can be demonstrated that valid alternate criteria are equivalent to the criteria in this document and otherwise demonstrate compliance with the performance features of the codes, ICC-ES retains the right to refuse to issue or renew an evaluation report, if the product, material, or type or method of construction is such that either unusual care with its installation or use must be exercised for satisfactory performance, or if malfunctioning is apt to cause unreasonable property damage or personal injury or sickness relative to the benefits to be achieved by the use of the product, material, or type or method of construction. Copyright 2007 Business/Regional Office P 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 P (562) 699-0543 www.icc-es.org Regional Office P 900 Montclair Road, Suite A, Birmingham, Alabama 35213 P (205) 599-9800 Regional Office P 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478 P (708) 799-2305

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DISODIUM OCTABORATE TETRAHYDRATE (DOT) WOOD PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose: The purpose of this criteria is to establish requirements for disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (DOT) wood preservative treatment systems, for both interior and exterior applications in accordance with the applicable EPA labeling, of lumber and plywood by pressure processes (proprietary), to be recognized in an ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. (ICC-ES), evaluation report under the 2006 International Building Code (IBC), the 2006 International Residential Code (IRC), the BOCA National Building Code/1999 (BNBC), the 1999 Standard Building Code (SBC), and the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The bases of recognition are IBC Section 104.11, IRC Section R104.11, BNBC Section 106.4, SBC Section 103.7 and UBC Section 104.2.8. For applicable code sections, refer to AC326. The reason for the development of this criteria is to evaluate a proprietary wood preservative for resistance to decay and termites, since Section 2304.1.1 of the IBC and Sections R319 and R320 of the IRC do not provide test methods and performance requirements for documenting resistance to decay and termites. 1.2 Scope: The ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for Proprietary Wood Preservative Systems Common Requirements for Treatment Process, Test Methods and Performance Requirements (AC326) shall be used for evaluating disodium octaborate tetrahydrate (DOT) wood preservative systems, except when noted otherwise in this criteria. Preservative-treated lumber and plywood that is in accordance with this acceptance criteria is subject to the following exposure limitations: 1.2.1 Preservative-treated Wood Exposure Limitations: 1.2.1.1 DOT Preservative: Lumber and plywood treated solely with DOT preservative to the minimum retention and penetration specified in Table 1 shall be limited to locations that are not in contact with the ground and are not subject to contact with liquid water (AWPA UC2). 1.2.1.2 DOT and Proprietary Polymer Binder: Lumber and plywood treated with DOT and proprietary polymer binder to the minimum retention and penetration as determined in accordance with Section 4.0 shall be specified in Table 2 and noted in the final evaluation report, shall be considered acceptable for interior and exterior use, but shall be limited to locations that are not in contact with the ground (AWPA UC3B). 1.2.1.3 DOT and Proprietary Organic Binder: Lumber and plywood treated with DOT and proprietary organic binder to the minimum retention and penetration as determined in accordance with Section 4.0 shall be specified in Table 2 and noted in the final evaluation report; shall be considered acceptable for interior and exterior use; but shall be limited to locations that are not in contact with the ground (AWPA UC3B). DOT-insecticide: Lumber and plywood treated with DOT-insecticide shall have retentions and penetrations specified in the approved quality control manual submitted by the applicant for an evaluation report, and shall be limited to locations that are not in contact with the ground and are not subject to contact with liquid water (AWPA UC2). 1.3 Codes and Reference Standards: Where standards are referenced in this criteria, these standards shall be applied consistently with the code upon which compliance is based. Codes and standards are listed in Section 1.3 of AC326. Standards not listed in AC326 that are required for evaluation of DOT wood preservative systems are listed below: 1.3.1 American Wood-Preservers Association (AWPA): 1.3.1.1 2006 American Wood-Preservers Association (AWPA) Book of Standards. 1.3.1.2 AWPA Standard A2-06, Standard Methods for Analysis of Waterborne Preservatives and Fire-Retardant Formulations. 1.3.1.3 AWPA A21-00, Standard Method for the Analysis of Wood and Wood Treating Solutions by Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometry. 1.3.1.4 AWPA Standard C31-02, Commodity Standard for Lumber Use Out of Contact with the Ground and Continuously Protected from Liquid Water Treatment by Pressure Processes. 1.3.1.5 AWPA E15-03, Evaluating the Efficiency of Diffusible or Volatile Internal Remedial Preservatives. 1.3.2 ASTM International Reference Standards: 1.3.2.1 ASTM D 1758-02, Standard Test Method of Evaluating Wood Preservatives by Field Tests with Stakes. 1.3.3 ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria: 1.3.3.1 Acceptance Criteria for Quality Control Manuals (AC10). 1.3.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for Test Reports (AC85). 1.3.3.3 Evaluation Guideline for Fire-retardant-treated Wood Roof Systems (EG107). 1.3.3.4 Acceptance Criteria for Proprietary Wood Preservative Systems Common Requirements for Treatment Process, Test Methods and Performance (AC326). 1.4 Definitions: 1.4.1 DOT Wood Preservative Systems: 1.4.1.1 Disodium Octaborate Tetrahydrate (DOT): Disodium octaborate tetrahydrate is a sodium borate having the approximate composition Na 2 B 8 O 13 4 H 2 O, and formula weight 412.52. 1.4.1.2 DOT with Proprietary Polymer Binder: DOT followed by a secondary pressure treatment process including a proprietary sodium fixation agent having the approximate composition Na Si O 2 + C 12 H 14. 1.4.1.3 DOT with Proprietary Organic Binder: The composition of the organic binder shall be specified in the 2

quality control documentation complying with AC10 that is submitted by the manufacturer. 1.4.1.4 DOT-Insecticide: DOT with a proprietary insecticide. The composition of the treatment formulation shall be specified in the quality control documentation complying with AC10 that is submitted by the manufacturer. 1.4.2 Preservative-treated Wood: Wood treated with the wood preservative listed in this criteria shall be referred to using a proprietary trade name listed in the ICC-ES evaluation report on the preservative system. The wood shall be manufactured in accordance with an approved quality control manual. 2.0 BASIC INFORMATION Basic information required for DOT wood preservative systems shall be provided in accordance with Section 2.0 of AC326. 3.0 PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT PROCESS 3.1 Preservative Treatment of Lumber and Plywood: The preservative treatment with DOT wood preservative systems shall comply with preservative treatment by pressure processes, quality control standards published by the American Wood Preservers Association, and AC326 except for the following: 3.2 General Requirements: 3.2.1 Steaming prior to conditioning or treatment is permitted for a total period not to exceed the maximum duration specified in Tables 1 and 2, as applicable. The steam temperature shall not exceed 245/F (118/C). 3.2.2 Minimum Vacuum: 3.2.2.1 Minimum vacuum for lumber and plywood treated solely with DOT preservative must be 22 inches (559 mm) of mercury at sea level. 3.2.2.2 Minimum vacuum for lumber and plywood treated with DOT preservative with proprietary polymer binder, DOT preservative with proprietary organic binder or DOT-insecticide shall be as stated in the manufacturer s proprietary treater s manual for the selected wood species. 3.2.3 Incising is required as noted in Tables 1 and 2. 3.2.4 Incising of lumber shall be in accordance with Section 3.2.4 of AC326. 3.3 Treatment Requirements: Treatment process shall be in accordance with Section 3.3 of AC326 and Tables 1 and 2, as applicable. 3.4 Results of Treatment: 3.4.1 Retention shall be determined by assay analysis of the treated wood. 3.4.1.1 Number of borings per charge shall be 20. 3.4.1.2 Sampling zone for assay, measured from the surface, shall comply with Tables 1 and 2. 3.4.2 Minimum retention of, and penetration for, preservative treatment of lumber shall comply with Tables 1 and 2. 3.4.3 Penetration shall be determined by boring 20 pieces that are well distributed throughout each charge. The charge will be accepted if 90 percent of the borings comply with penetration requirements. 3.4.4 Redrying after treatment is required for Table 1 DOT-only treated wood and DOT-insecticide. Redrying after treatment is optional for Table 2 DOT with proprietary polymer binder or for Table 2 DOT with proprietary organic binder treated wood. The maximum permissible kiln temperature shall not exceed 165/F (74/C) for spruce-pinefir and ponderosa pine. The maximum permissible kiln temperature for all other species noted in Table 1 shall not exceed 160/F (71/C). 3.5 Boron Determination Requirements: Determination of boron in treated wood shall be in accordance with AWPA Standard A2, Sections 15 and 16. 4.0 TEST METHODS AND PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS The performance characteristics of the wood-preservatives listed in this acceptance criteria shall be documented by testing. Testing shall be in accordance with AWPA and ASTM standards and the test procedure indicated in Annex A. The wood-preservative products listed in this acceptance criteria shall demonstrate resistance to rot, mold, mildew, and fungal decay; and resistance to subterranean termites, including Formosan termites. DOT with a proprietary polymer binder or DOT with a proprietary organic binder shall also demonstrate appropriate use in aboveground unprotected applications (AWPA UC3B). The following documentation (Sections 4.1 to 4.5) is needed to substantiate the performance characteristics of the wood-preservative products listed in this acceptance criteria: 4.1 Laboratory Tests: Testing shall be in accordance with Section 4.1 of AC326. Alternate to Termite Testing: As an alternate to testing, an independent engineering analysis using prior product testing may be submitted which demonstrates termite resistance at minimum retention values specified for the product. The analysis shall be signed, sealed and dated by the responsible engineer. 4.2 Preservative Permanence: Testing in Sections 4.2.1, 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 shall be performed for ground contact use; testing in Section 4.2.4 shall be performed for aboveground unprotected use. The testing documenting this performance must include analysis by the approved testing laboratories which conclude that the product may be used exposed to the weather (AWPA UC3B). Conditions of Acceptance: Testing shall demonstrate level of use recommended for the product, either aboveground unprotected (AWPA UC3B) or protected from contact with liquid water (AWPA UC2). See Section 1.2 of this criteria. 4.2.1 Testing shall be in accordance with Section 4.4.1 of AC326. 4.2.2 Depletion from soil bed testing in accordance with AWPA E 14. 4.2.3 Testing shall be in accordance with Section 4.4.2 of AC326. 4.2.4 Testing in accordance with Annex A is used when evaluating product for installation in aboveground, unprotected applications (AWPA UC3B). 3

4.3 Effects on Wood Properties: Testing shall be in accordance with Section 4.5 of AC326. 4.4 Corrosion: Testing shall be in accordance with Section 4.6 of AC326. 4.5 Treatment Testing: Testing shall be in accordance with Section 4.7 of AC326. 5.0 QUALITY CONTROL Quality control shall be in accordance with Section 5.0 of AC326. 6.0 EVALUATION REPORT RECOGNITION Conditions of use shall be in accordance with Section 6.0 of AC326.# REQUIREMENTS TABLE 1 DOT PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT PROCESS VALUES SOUTHERN PINE EASTERN WHITE PINE COASTAL DOUGLAS FIR HEM-FIR SPRUCE- PINE-FIR PONDEROSA PINE 1.0 General requirements 1.1 Maximum duration of steaming 17 hours 4.5 hours 4 hours 4 hours 6 hours 6 hours prior to conditioning treatment 1.2 Minimum vacuum 22 22 22 22 22 22 1.3 Incising Not required Not required Required Not required Required Not required 2.0 Treatment DOT 2.1 Range of pressure during DOT 75-200 50-150 50-150 50-150 75-175 75-200 treatment process (psig) 2.2 Maximum temperature of DOT preservative during entire pressure period (/F) 200 200 200 200 240 240 3.0 Results of treatment 3.1 Retention shall be determined by assay analysis of the treated wood. 3.1.1 Number of borings per 20 20 20 20 20 20 charge 3.1.2 Sampling zone for assay measured from surface (inches) Sizes up to 2 inches thick 0.0-0.6 Complete 0.0-0.6 0.0-0.6 0.0-0.6 0.0-0.6 cross-sect. Sizes over 2 inches thick 0.0-1.0 0.0-1.0 0.0-1.0 0.0-1.0 0.0-1.0 0.0-1.0 3.2 Minimum retention for DOT preservative treatment of lumber, pcf B 2 0 3 3.3 Minimum penetration 2.5 inches or 85 of sapwood, less 0.17 1 or 0.17 1 or 0.17 1 or 0.17 1 or 0.17 1 or 0.17 1 or 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.5 inch or 90 of sapwood, 0.4 inch or 90 of sapwood, 1 Products treated at this retention level are not suitable for exposure to Formosan termites. 2 Minimum retention level for exposure to Formosan termites. 0.4 inch or 90 of sapwood, 0.4 inch or 90 of sapwood, 2.5 inches or 85 of sapwood, less 4

TABLE 2 DOT WITH PROPRIETARY POLYMER BINDER PRESERVATIVE TREATMENT PROCESS VALUES REQUIREMENTS SOUTHERN PINE 1.0 General requirements 1.1 Maximum duration of steaming prior to conditioning treatment 17 hours 1.2 Minimum vacuum Refer to treater s manual 1.3 Incising Not required 2.0 Treatment DOT 2.0.1 Range of pressure during DOT treatment process (psig) 30-200 2.0.2 Maximum temperature of DOT preservative during entire pressure period 200 (/F) 2.1 Binding proprietary polymer 2.1.1 Range of pressure during DOT treatment process (psig) 30-200 2.1.2 Maximum temperature of DOT preservative during entire pressure period (/F) 200 2.2 Organic Binder 2.2.1 Range of pressure during DOT treatment process (psig) 30-200 2.2.2 Maximum temperature of DOT preservative during entire pressure period (F ) 200 3.0 Results of treatment 3.1 Retention shall be determined by assay analysis of the treated wood. 3.1.1 Number of borings per charge 20 3.1.2 Sampling zone for assay measured from surface (inches) Sizes up to 2 inches thick 0.0-0.6 Sizes over 2 inches thick 0.0-1.0 3.2 Minimum retention for DOT preservative treatment of lumber, pcf B 2 0 3 See Note A 3.3 Minimum penetration See Note A Note A: Minimum retention and minimum penetration shall be determined in accordance with Section 4.0 of this acceptance criteria and noted in the final evaluation report. 5

A1.0 INTRODUCTION ANNEX A TEST METHOD FOR EVALUATING PRESERVATIVE PERMANENCE WHEN EXPOSED TO LEACHING FROM RAINWATER, ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT EXPOSURE, WETTING AND DRYING CYCLE, AND FREEZE-THAW CYCLING The performance of proprietary wood preservative systems depends on the permanence of the active ingredients under a wide range of environmental exposure conditions. Typical exposures include leaching from rainwater, ultraviolet light exposure, shrinkage and checking from repeated wetting and drying cycles, and freeze/thaw cycling. There are no standard test procedures that evaluate all of these conditions. The closest simulation of this exposure is to combine weatherometer exposures, weathering tests typically used for fireretardant-treated wood, and a procedure developed by the University of Illinois to age railway ties. The weatherometer is designed to accelerate the testing of preservatives and typically includes periodic water spray and intense UV exposure. Fire-retardanttreated wood evaluation involves repeated cycling between water spray and kiln drying. The accelerated exposure test used by the University of Illinois to simulate long-term weathering exposure of preservative-treated railway ties involves exposure to water, freezing, and high-temperature drying. The following test procedure for borates combines existing accelerated procedures but allows exposure conditions more representative of natural rain, light, and variable temperature exposure in accordance with industry-accepted accelerated test methodology. A2.0 PROCEDURE A2.1 Treated wood samples of standard size lumber decking material shall be expose to combined ultraviolet (UV) exposure in accordance with EG107 and infrared lamp exposure for 48 hours (thermostatically controlled to maintain the chamber temperature at 50 to 60/C). This assures significant drying. Total exposure is two days (48 hours). Six sets of decking samples required in accordance with EG107 shall be used for exposure in this procedure. A2.2 Expose wood samples to water spray for 72 hours. Use an intermittent spray over the period, with 3 hours of spray followed by 3 hours of rest for 12 cycles. During each three-hour spray, the water spray shall be applied in accordance with EG107 on the test specimens. Determine the amount of borate retention following each three-hour cycle or immediately following each 72-hour rain procedure. The borate retention samples shall include the surface exposed to water spray. A2.3 Expose the wood samples to freezing conditions at 15/C for 48 hours. Total exposure time is two days (48 hours). A2.4 Repeat the procedure for a minimum of six times, or until the amount of retained borates becomes relatively constant, whichever occurs first. Monitor the borate retention in accordance with Section A2.2. A2.5 Samples which have been weathered in accordance with the above procedure, shall be subjected to soil block decay testing in accordance with AWPA E10, to evaluate the efficacy of the remaining preservative against brown rot fungi. A2.6 Control wood samples treated with DOT only shall be included in procedure A2.1 through A2.5 to establish relative performance reference. A2.7 Perform an evaluation of the preservative gradient after leaching to ensure that resistance to leaching is significant even at the vulnerable surfaces. A2.8 The testing performed in accordance with Sections A2.1 through A2.7 shall be correlated with field studies of existing sites with proprietary wood preservative treated lumber and plywood. The field study report shall be prepared by an approved testing laboratory, or inspection agency, or by a registered design professional. The field study shall identify the site and include specific information on deck location, installation date, the age of the deck, exposure to weather, and weather conditions during aging. Core samples of the treated wood shall be taken. The treated wood shall be documented by identifying the treater, species of wood and details of retention and penetration. Alternate: As an alternate to the above correlation procedure, twelve cycles of testing outlined in A2.1 through A2 may be performed for the ICC-ES evaluation report (ESR) issuance provided that outdoor weathering tests are in progress per Section 1.2 of EG107. Core sample data from such outdoor tests shall be submitted at the time of the first and second renewals of the ESR. A3.0 CONDITIONS OF ACCEPTANCE A3.1 At the conclusion of the testing in accordance with Sections A2.1 through A2.4, the amount of retained borates shall not be less than the amount of minimum retention as detailed in Table 1. 6

A3.2 Testing in accordance with Section A2.5 shall demonstrate that the weathered samples with the minimum retention specified in Table 1 shall resist brown rot fungi in accordance with AWPA E10. A3.3 The field study report of existing sites required under Section A2.8 above shall include a conclusions statement that the proprietary wood treatment with the minimum retention and penetration specified based on the testing in Section A2.1 through A2.5 are considered acceptable for use in exterior use, not in contact with the ground. 7