Seasonal Variations of the Metal Concentrations in the Waters of Lake Gölbaşı in Northern East Mediterranean Area of Turkey

Similar documents
PERSONAL INFORMATION or WORK EXPERIENCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Available online at International Journal of Research in Pure and Applied Chemistry

Trace Elemental Contents in Tissues of Talang Queenfish, Scomberoides commersonnianus, from Karachi Coast, Pakistan

Stream Monitoring at Tumacácori NHP

Sources to Seafood: Mercury Pollution in the Marine Environment Background on Presenting Scientists

Upper Workings. Waste Rock. Adit. Millsite

Dimethylglyoxime Method Method to 6.0 mg/l Ni TNTplus 856

Determination of Metals in a 3% Sodium Chloride (NaCl) Matrix by Axially-Viewed ICP-OES

Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents

Environmental Technology March/April 1998

Organophosphate Pesticides as Pollutants of Urban Lakes and Streams

TOUR DE TABLE CANADA

Heavy Metals in Cocoa

Metal Ion + EDTA Metal EDTA Complex

CHAPTER 7. Conclusions

Water Quality of Rooftop Runoff: Implications for Residential Water Harvesting Systems

How to read your Oil Analysis Report

Impact of utilised bottom ash

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

Impact of Long-range Atmospheric Transport of Heavy Metals to the Terrestrial Environment in Norway

VALIDATION REPORT. Investigation of the major interferences for proposed Horizontal ICP AES method. ECN protocol

Effectiveness of wetland remediation on heavy metals in storm water runoff

Rapid Thermophilic Digestion Technology

Lead Testing and On Site Calibration for Water Testing Detection Range: 2 100ppb

The ECN Concept for Quality Assurance of Compost

A role (or roles) for passive sampling in regulatory monitoring

HEAVY METALS IN THE UPPER AND MIDLE ODRA RIVER SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRANSBOUNDRY RIVER CHEMICAL MONITORING

Sludge Treatment Facility Stack Gas Monitoring Report February 2016

Distribution of Chemical Elements In Urban Sediments in Slovenia (Extended Abstract)

Decomposition. Composition

Composition of Fecal Waste from Commercial Trout Farms in Ontario: Macro and Micro Nutrient Analyses and Recommendations for Recycling

Nomenclature and Formulas of Ionic Compounds. Section I: Writing the Name from the Formula

Appendix D lists the Field Services Standard Operating Procedures. Appendix E lists the Biological Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures.

A White Paper Describing a Watershed-based Monitoring Network Design for the Purgatoire River Basin

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET SECTION 1 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION SECTION 2 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS SURFACE WATER MONITORING. Masanori Ando Musashino University, Japan

Produced water from oil and gas production

HS 1003 Part 2 HS 1003 Heavy Metals Test

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

A User s Guide for the Ambient Water Quality Guidelines for Cadmium

WATER QUALITY STATUS OF RIVER YAMUNA IN DELHI WITH REFERENCE TO PRESENCE OF HEAVY METALS: A REVIEW

Revealing the costs of air pollution from industrial facilities in Europe a summary for policymakers

The Laboratory for Oceanology

SDS SC Rev 11 01/15

Standard methods in water analysis

How To Use The Nexion 300

Ecological Risk Assessment of Metals in Savannah River Tributaries on the Savannah River Site

DETERMINATION OF METALS IN TAP WATER USING ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY: A CASE STUDY IN BANDAR SUNWAY RESIDENTIAL AREA

4 Decades of Belgian Marine Monitoring. presented by Karien De Cauwer, RBINS, Belgian Marine Data Centre

LAKE OHRID CONSERVATION PROJECT (Case Study on Monitoring &Evaluation)

WHERE DOES THE WATER GO IN THE WATER CYCLE?

Elemental Analysis of Opaque Thin Film Coating on Mobile Phone Scratch Cards

Neeraj K. Manglik Hydrological Observation Circle, Central Water Commission, Noida Uttar Pradesh, India

Building Electrochemical Cells

UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION DIRECTORATE FOR LABORATORY SCIENCES DIVISION OF CHEMISTRY 5 RESEARCH PLACE ROCKVILLE, MD 20850

Name Date Class CHAPTER 1 REVIEW. Answer the following questions in the space provided.

MILESTONE CLEAN CHEMISTRY LINE DUOPUR TRACECLEAN ULTRA-TRACE INSERTS. A Breakthrough in Reduction and Control of the Analytical Blank MILESTONE

Naming Compounds Handout Key

Costs of air pollution from European industrial facilities an updated assessment

FAMILY PROTECTION FROM WATERBORNE DISEASES

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Hydropower

Sequential leaching procedure tool for risk assessment of contaminated sites

What are the controls for calcium carbonate distribution in marine sediments?

WATER: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Syllabus

This example of a completed sampling plan worksheet has been included to illustrate the information

TEST REPORT Job No./Report No TR Date:5 January 2015 Page 1 of 11

A Low Cost Chemical Remediation Technology for Heavy Metals in Shipyard Stormwater. SBIR Topic N06 133

OLIVÉR BÁNHIDI 1. Introduction

Freshwater Resources and Water Pollution

Trace and Major Element Concentration in Cottage Cheese from Latvia

Wipe Analysis to Determine Metal Contamination on Critical Surfaces

EUROPEAN WATER RESOURCES AND POLICY

Human history and civilization are inexorably linked to natural resources

CHAPTER Naming Ions. Chemical Names and Formulas. Naming Transition Metals. Ions of Transition Metals. Ions of Transition Metals

GUIDELINES FOR USE BY CLASS A LICENSEES IN MEETING SNP REQUIREMENTS JULY 1996

Water Quality Protection Guidelines No. 5. Mining and Mineral Processing. Minesite water quality monitoring

The Electrical Control of Chemical Reactions E3-1

ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SITES IN FLOOD DISASTER IN SERBIA 2014

Electrochemical Half Cells and Reactions

Guidance and Reporting Instructions on Temporary E-reporting for the MATS Rule

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Response to Comments on the Goleta Sanitary District Draft NPDES Permit and 301(h) TDD

SCP SCIENCE Certified Reference Materials. Materials

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER QUALITY PROTECTION. Policy for Permitting Surface Water Diversions

WATER FOR PEOPLE AND PEACE The Need for Safe Water

EXPERIMENT 7 Reaction Stoichiometry and Percent Yield

APPENDIX B: EXERCISES

The ground water region in the area of the proposed Project site is made-up of sedimentary rocks (Figure 5.6-1)

Trace and Major Elements in the Atmosphere at Rural Locations in the UK: Summary of Data for 1999

Welcome to NOAH and Langøya!

Solutions and Dilutions

Electrochemistry Voltaic Cells

Hardness Comparisons

case study 7: south east queensland healthy waterways partnership

1332 CHAPTER 18 Sample Questions

Federal Research and Development in South Dakota

Andy Selle. Dam Removal A Primer

HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM REMOVAL FROM INDUSTRIAL WATSEWATER BY CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION METHOD

How To Assess The Vulnerability Of The Neman River To Climate Change

EXPERIMENT 8: Activity Series (Single Displacement Reactions)

Transcription:

Seasonal Variations of the Metal Concentrations in the Waters of Lake Gölbaşı in Northern East Mediterranean Area of Turkey Mustafa TÜRKMEN*, Canan CİMİNLİ** * Giresun University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Giresun, TURKEY ** Mustafa Kemal University, Faculty of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Hatay, TURKEY * Corresponding author: mturkmen65@hotmail.com Abstract Seasonal variations of manganese, copper, cadmium, iron, lead, zinc, nickel, chrome, and cobalt were determined in water from Lake Gölbaşı in northern east Mediterranean area. The concentrations of the metals such as Cu, Fe and Zn in water were found higher than Turkish permissable concentrations. Besides, the metal levels in water were compared with national and international water quality criteria, background concentrations and permissible limits. Keywords: Metals, Seasonal Variations, Lake Gölbaşi, Water Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / The Black Sea Journal of Sciences ISSN: 13094726 Sayfa/Page 8693

87 Introduction Metals are introduced into the aquatic ecosystems such as lakes, rivers and seas in a number of ways. They may be accumulated by aquatic organisms such as fish and mussels and may be a potential risk for ecosystem health and organisms. Industrial wastes, geochemical structure and mining of metals create a potential source of heavy metals pollution in the aquatic environment (Lee & Stuebing, 1990; Gümgüm, Ünlü, Tez, & Gülsün, 1994). Metals such as iron, copper, zinc and manganese, are essential metals since they play an important role in biological systems, whereas mercury, lead and cadmium are nonessential metals, as they are toxic, even in traces. The essential metals can also produce toxic effects when the metal intake is excessively elevated. Lake Gölbaşı is a natural lake located in the southern east Mediterranean region of Turkey. Total area of this lake is about 1 ha which consists of 400 ha with marshy area. In this region, lake is supported by underground water and used for irrigation. Flow rate of underground water is about 2.53.0 2,53 m 3 /sn. In summer, the water level of the lake decrease until 4 meters because of irrigation or evaporation with average depths of 1 or 1.5 meters. On the other hand, in winter, maximum depth becomes 6 meters with average depths of 3.5 or 4.0 meters. The lake includes a number of economically valuable fish species such as Clarias gariepinus, Cyprinus carpio, Leuciscus lepidus, Anguilla anguilla, Tilapia sp., Carasobarbus luteus, Mugil saliens, and mussels species such as Unio terminalis delicatus and Potamida littoralis delesserti. These are important species for local people as a food and also sport fishing. The aim of present study was investigate the seasonal variations of cadmium, iron, copper, chrome, cobalt, zinc, lead, nickel and manganese in water of Lake Gölbaşı from Southern East Mediterranean Area of Turkey. Materials and Methods Water samples were collected from selected three stations in Lake Gölbaşı from Southern East Mediterranean Area of Turkey, in October 3 and January, April and July 4 (Figure 1). Samples were collected from a depth of 0.51.0 m in 1 liter polyethylene bottles, which had previously had been washed with detergent, deionized water, 2 M concentrated nitric acid, deionized water again and finally medium water. Then were acidified with 0.5 ml highpurity concentrated HNO 3 (Merck), brought to laboratory by

88 placing on ice, filtered through a 0.45 m filter. Standard solutions were prepared from stock solutions (Merck, multi element standard). Samples were analyzed three times for Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn by ICPAES Varian Liberty Series2. The absorption wavelengths for Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn were 228.8, 238.9, 267.7, 324.8, 259.9, 257.6, 231.6, 2.4, and 213.9 in nm, respectively. Metal contents were expressed as g l 1. To determine the differences between months at same site and sites in total for water samples, one way ANOVA were performed. Post hoc test (Duncan) was tested to determine statistically significant differences following ANOVA. Possibilities less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant (p<0.05). All statistical calculations were performed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Figure 1. Map of Lake Gölbaşı 3.

89 Results This study examined the seasonal variations of the concentrations of Cd, Fe, Cu, Zn, Cr, Co, Mn, Ni and Pb in water from the Lake Gölbaşı in Northern East Mediterranean Area of Turkey. Iron was found in the highest concentrations ranging from 226 to 7707 g l 1, and its concentrations were also higher than those of other metals in all stations and months (Table 1). Following Fe; Zn generally showed the second highest levels except Mn in July at stations A, B and C (also April), Cu in January and April at station B. In October, except Zn (maximum at station A) other metals were maximum at station C. On the other hand, Co, Ni and Pb at station A, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn at station B were minimum. In January, although Co, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni and Zn at station C, Cu and Pb at station B were maximum, Co, Fe, Mn and Zn at station B, Cr, Cu and Ni at station A, Pb at station C were minimum. In April, although Fe, Mn and Pb at station A, Co, Cu and Zn at station C, Cr at station B were minimum, Cr, Cu and Zn at station A, Co and Pb at station B, Fe and Mn at station C were maximum. In July, although Co, Cr, Fe, Ni, Pb and Zn at station A, Mn at atation B, Cu at station C were minimum, Mn at station A, Cu and Ni at station B, Co, Cr, Fe, Pb and Zn station C were maximum. There are statistically differences between the metal levels in different stations except Co, Cu and Pb (p<0.05). In addition, there are differences between the metal levels in different months from the same stations except Co at all stations, Cu and Pb at station A and B (p<0.05). The concentrations of metals in the water of Lake Gölbaşı were compared with other studies, world average and water quality criteria in Table 2. When compared with Turkish water quality criteria, the lake is acceptable as polluted water for Fe, as less polluted water for Cu and Co, and as clean water for Cd, Co, Cr, Mn, Pb and Zn (TEG, 1988). Although the concentrations of Cu, Fe and Zn measured in this were higher than Turkish permissible concentrations, others were lower than those (TKB, 2).

90 Table 1. The seasonal variations of the mean metal concentrations in the water from the Lake Gölbaşı (three water samples in each month for each station) Stations/ Metal concentrations, in g l 1* months Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Mn Ni Pb Zn A October3 nd 10.5 a 2.89 a 23.7 a 574 a 55.1 a 1.00 a 0.19 a 189 a January4 10.1 a 4.38 a 21.7 a 1126 b 17.9 a 4.70 a 2.18 a 26.9 bc April4 9.77 a 2.07 a 24.8 a 226 c 7.02 a 1.05 a 66.2 b July4 8.45 a 7.59 b 22.4 a 2303 d 1 b 9.00 a 1.39 a 16.4 c Total 9.7 x 4.23 x 23.1 x 1057 x 70.2 x 3.67 x 1. x 74.5 x B October3 10.9 a 2.07 ab 21.0 a 5 a 9.89 a 6.88 a 0.89 a 58.4 a January4 8.78 a 5.48 b 23.8 a 631 b 8.18 a 6.75 a 6.47 a.9 b April4 11.2 a 0.72 a 22.4 a 492 a 21.8 b 0.10 b 1.71 a 5.81 c July4 11.5 a 9.79 c 22.8 a 2499 c 73.5 c 14.5 a 5.14 a 30.1 b Total 10.6 x 4.52 x 22.5 x 1036 x 28.4 y 7.06 x 3.55 x 28.8 y C October3 13.5 a 19.8 a 27.1 a 2197 a 57.1 a 12.8 a 1.21 a 135 a January4 11.3 a 40.5 b 22.3 b 7707 b 27.4 b 88.3 b 1.13 a 48.3 b April4 9.59 a 1.40 c 22.3 b 505 c 28.3 c 4.24 c July4 12.0 a 15.2 a.9 b 3267 d 133 d 12.2 a 41.3 b 37.6 b Total 11.6 x 19.2 y 23.2 x 3419 y 122 z 28.3 y 10.9 x 56.3 z * Vertically, letters a, b and c show differences among different months at same stations; x, y and z between stations. Within columns, means with the same letter are not statistically significant, p>0.05 nd not detected. When compared with US EPA recommended water quality criteria, the metal concentrations measured in this study were lower than it except Cu, and Pb for CCC (US EPA, 1999). On the other hand, if compared with world average back ground concentrations, the concentrations of all metals measured in this river were higher (Klavins et al., 0). When other studies are considered, Co, Cr, Fe, Mn and Ni levels in Lake Toxema (LT), Cr, Fe, Mn and Zn levels in Gomti River (GR), Cr and Cu levels in Küçük Menderes River (KMR), and Fe and Mn levels in Atatürk Dam Lake (ADL) were lower than those obtained in this study (Table 2). On the other hand, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb and Zn levels in Dil Stream, Cu, Mn and Zn levels in Beyşehir Lake, Cu and Zn levels in ADL, Cu, Pb and Zn levels in LT, and Pb level in GR were higher than those found in this study.

91 Table 2. Comparison of the overall metal concentrations in the water of Lake Gölbaşı with other studies and water quality criteria ( g l 1 ) Studies and guidelines Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Mn Ni Pb Zn This study a 10.6 9.31 22.9 1837 73.5 13.1 5.21 53.2 TKB (2) b 10 1000 100 10 700 1000 300 100 3.0 TEG (1988) c Class I Class II Class III Class IV 3.0 5.0 10 >10 10 > 50 > 50 > 300 1000 5000 >5000 100 500 3000 >3000 50 > 10 50 >50 500 0 >0 US EPA (1999) d CMC * CCC * 4.3 2.2 16 11 13 9.0 470 52 65 2.5 1 1 An & Kampbell (3) e <2.0 4.0 24 119 7.0 5.0 15 59 Singh et al. (5) f 1.35.7 34117 1.35.3 917 1939 1132 Turgut (3) g 0.81 0.093 13.1 2.27 0.59 249 Pekey et all. (4) h 8.0 21 42 37 4030 1 700 Klavins et all. (0) ı 0.02 0.08 1.0 6.0 0.3 0.2 10 TekinÖzan (8) j 100 1002740 5 4 Karadede & Ünlü (0) k 252 62 3.94.1 1115.4 64197 a Mean g Küçük Menderes River, Turkey b Turkish Permissible Concentrations c Turkish Water Quality Criteria (Class I: clean water, Class II: less polluted water, Class III: polluted water, Class IV: heavily polluted water) d US EPA Recommended Water Quality Criteria e Lake Texoma, border of Oklahoma and Texas f Gomti River, India h Dil Deresi (Stream), Turkey I Background concentrations, world average j Beyşehir Gölü, Turkey k Atatürk Baraj Gölü, Turkey * CMC and CCC: Criteria Maximum Concentration and Criterion Continuous Concentration.

92 Acknowledgment This study was supported The Research Fund of Mustafa Kemal University both financially and for laboratory analysis. References An, Y.J., Kampbell, D.H., 3. Total, dissolved and bioavailable metals at Lake Texoma Marinas. Environmental Pollution, 122:253259. Karadede, H., & Ünlü, E., 0. Concentrations of some heavy metals in water, sediment and fish species from the Atatürk Dam Lake (Euphrates), Turkey. Chemosphere, 41: 1371 1376. Klavins, M., Briede, A., Rodinov, V., Kokorite, I., Parele, E., Klavina, I., 0. Heavy metals in Rivers of Latvia. The Science of the Total Environment, 262:175183. MacDonald, D.D., Ingersoll, C.G., Berger, T.A., 0. Development and evaluation of consensusbased sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Archives Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 39:31 Matta, J., Milad, M., Manger, R., & Tosteson, T., 1999. Heavy metals, lipid peroxidation, and cigateratoxicity in the liver of the Caribben barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda). Biological Trace Element Research, 70:6979. Pekey, H., Karakas, D., Bakacoglu, M., 4. Source apportionment of trace metals in surface waters of polluted stream using multivariate statistical analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 49:809818. Singh, K.P., Mohan, D., Singh, V.K., Malik, A., 5. Studies on distribution and fractionation of heavy metals in Gomti River sediments A tributary of the Ganges, India. Journal of Hydrology, 312:1427. TEG., 1988. Turkish Environmental Guidelines, Publications of Turkish Foundation of Environment, Ankara. TekinÖzan, S., 8. Determination of heavy metal levels in water, sediment and tissues of tench (Tinca tinca L., 1758) from Beyşehir Lake (Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 145:95302.

93 TKB., 2. Fisheries laws and regulations. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Conservation and Control General Management, Ankara. Turgut, C., 3. The contamination with organochlorine pesticides and heavy hetals in surface water in Küçük Menderes River in Turkey. Environment International, 29: 2932. US EPA., 1999. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria Correction Office of Water, EPA 822Z99001.