Investment in refining capacities in Serbia

Similar documents
Maximize Conversion and Flexibility

SOCAR TURKEY AEGEAN REFINERY

Sulphur in Nigerian Diesel

ASimple Guide to Oil Refining

Refining of Crude Oil - Process

Oil Refinery Processes A Brief Overview

Opportunities for optimization of refineries using. Thermal Conversion technologies

Suncor Denver Refinery Overview

CRG CONSERVE RESOURCES GROUP ECO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES. NEW State of the Art. Advanced OIL REFINERY TECHNOLOGY & PROCESSES

********** An short and simple explanation of how oil is converted into gasoline and then brought to you, the consumer.

Mini Oil Refinery Review. Rifka Aisyah

OIL MARKETS AND THEIR ANALYSIS IEA ENERGY TRAINING WEEK PARIS, APRIL 2013

Outlook for Russia s downstream industry, infrastructure development and evolving export strategy

Yu. K. Vail and L. N. Gorshkova UDC

AM Cost Effective Solutions for Reduction of Benzene in Gasoline

Industry Description and Practices. Waste Characteristics

Fact Sheet Technology. Bergius-Pier Process (1)

PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT

FLEXICOKING technology for upgrading heavy oil and utilization of by-products

Manufacturing Light Oil From Heavy Crude Ratqa Field, North Kuwait Dr. Luis C. Luzardo M. Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) Heavy Oil Development Group

Glossary of Energy Terms

Delayed Coking. Chapter 5

FUEL OIL Crude Condensate Naphtha Ethane Reformate

The. Brendan P. Sheehan, Honeywell Process Solutions, USA, and Xin Zhu, UOP, a Honeywell Company, USA, explore energy optimisation in plant processes.

Hydrogen plays a critical

TITLE PAGE: Feasibility Study for a Petroleum Refinery for The Jicarilla Apache Tribe.

Upgrading of Heavy Oils with FLEXICOKING. ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company Tim Hilbert

The California GHG Emissions Reporting Tool

Gas Detection for Refining. HA University

PISA. Calculating new replacement values in property insurance

Process Gas Monitoring in Petroleum Refineries

Petroleum Refinery Life Cycle Inventory Model (PRELIM) PRELIM v1.0

Saudi Aramco Project Development

Hydrocracking Process Description and CRITERION / ZEOLYST Hydrocracking Catalyst Applications

SLOVNAFT LCF Operation experience

Plutonio Crude oil from Angola

Downstream upgrade challenges and solutions

TIGAS Topsøe s s Improved Gasoline Synthesis

Refinery Equipment of Texas. Mini - Refinery Feasibility Overview

Special Supplement to HYDROCARBON PROCESSING. Integrated Solutions for. GS En(A) Shell Global Solutions

BP Texas City Refinery

TABLE OF CONTENT

16,215* 64,860 46% 13% 20% 17% 23% 39% 26% 55% 11% 29% TOTAL WORLDWIDE READERSHIP PTQ IS WITHIN... REQUESTED BY WORLDWIDE CIRCULATION.

The Canada GTL Project

Optimal Model-Based Production Planning for Refinery Operation

Petroleum refining water/wastewater use and management

Refinery Evaluation Model

20,000 Barrel Per Day Crude Oil Refinery

Kearl oil sands project

Emergency Isolation Valves at Pump Suction: Application for Flammable Liquids

Oil market in Serbia and Montenegro

Petrochemical Industry Ethylene Plant

A STUDY OF ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION

BorsodChem MCHZ, Czech Republic. 6,000 Nm 3 /h HTCR Topsøe Hydrogen Plant A Case Story: 18 Months from Engineering to Operation

Case for Business Intelligence Concepts. Vladimir Rajacic Vladimir Vukojevic Aleksandar Kasa Marko Narancic Borko Rakic Ioannis Sdroulias

Investment Options for Crude & Condensate Stabilization and Splitting

Fuel Properties - Effect on Aircraft and Infrastructure

THE NEW GASIFICATION PROJECT AT ENI SANNAZZARO REFINERY AND ITS INTEGRATION WITH A 1050 MWe POWER PLANT

SARAS Preliminary FY 2015 and Q results

B U S I N E S S P L A N

4. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL

Energy Efficiency Improvement in the Petroleum Refining Industry

FUEL IMPROVEMENT IN COTE D IVOIRE THROUGH REFINERY UPGRADE

INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE PETROLEUM SECTOR

Hydrogen management has

ECONOMICS PROCESS ECONOMICS PROGRAM. Report No by JOHN L. CHADWICK. February A private report by the STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Oxygen enrichment. Oxygen enrichment for intensification of air oxidation reactions. Vol. 1. Refineries.

Martin RICHEZ. Franck ZANONCELLI

Evolving Gasification technology to provide Innovative Low Carbon Solutions for the European Market

TABLE OF CONTENT

Economic Impact and Small Business Analysis for Petroleum Refinery NESHAP Heat Exchange Systems

New Technologies and Alternative Feedstocks in Petrochemistry and Refining DGMK Conference October 9-11, 2013, Dresden, Germany

Energy and Water Statistics. Released Date: Novermber 2015

Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel 2010

REFINERIES, CHEMICAL and PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, TANK FARMS

ČESKÁ RAFINÉRSKÁ. Refinery of the Third Millenium

The Relation Between Gasoline Quality, Octane Number and the Environment

Design Guidelines for Chemical Treatments in Distillation Columns

Automotive Base Oil Presentation

Enhancing Nitrification in an Oil Refinery WWTP with IFAS

PRAXAIR, INC. Hydrogen: The Growth Story Continues. Charles Miller, Vice President Dan Yankowski, Vice President. February 9, 2005

PETROLEUM COKE VS STEAM COAL

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

Allocation of Costs, and Non Arm s Length Valuation of Shared Goods, on Oil Sands Projects

Sulfur Tail Gas Thermal Oxidizer Systems By Peter Pickard

Downstream Economics - Finance & Management

Relationship between Values of Business Processes and Need for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems in Oil Refineries.

EXPERT WITNESS AND DISPUTE SUPPORT Property Damage and Business Interruption Insurance Claims

Design Guidelines for Using Distillation Simulation Software in the Field

The Petroleum Refining Industry

TABLE OF CONTENT

Effective Process Planning and Scheduling

Technological Strategy Maps for the Petroleum Energy Resource Field

IBP 2778_10 HIGH EFFICIENCY ON CO2 REMOVAL IN NATURAL GAS WITH UCARSOL SOLVENTS Thiago V. Alonso 1. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Main areas of services are:

PETROCHEMICAL / CHEMICAL RELATED SERVICES PRIMARY CONTACTS. Peter Bartlett. Donald L. Flessner

THE EUROPEAN REFINERY INDUSTRY UNDER THE EU EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME

Downstream Oil and Gas Questionnaire Version 1.0

Transcription:

Investment in refining capacities in Serbia Ivan Souček, Dmitry Vasiliev NIS a.d. Energy Community 6th Oil Forum Belgrade, Serbia 30 September 2014 1

CONTENT Refining Industry current challenges NIS Pancevo Oil Refinery - History Modernisation program Assessment and Introduction MHC/DHT complex construction overview Base Oils Project Novi Sad Bottom of the Barrel project - Pančevo Conclusions 2

Refining Industry current challenges Brent refining margin: 01/2006 03/2013 Refinery Closures and Regional Development 3

NIS Pancevo Oil Refinery - History In the first first phase phase of development of development of the Pancevo of the Oil Pancevo Refinery (1968) Oil following Refinery units (1968) were built: following units were built: 1. Crude distillation unit I; 2. Visbreaking unit; 3. Platforming unit; 4. Hydrodesulphurization; 5. Gas treatment unit I; 6. Naphtha redistillation unit; 7. Aromatics extraction unit; 8. Merox unit for gasoline; 9. Merox for Jet fuel I, II; 10. Sour water treatment plant; 11. Waste alkali treatment plant. In the second phase of NIS RNP development (1980- In 1983), the the second new units phase were of built: NIS RNP development (1980-1983), the new units were built: 1. Crude distillation unit II; 2. Vacuum distillation unit; 3. Fluid catalytic cracking unit; 4. Hydrodesulphurization unit; 5. Sulphur recovery unit; 6. Gas treatment unit II; 7. LPG Merox unit; 8. Alkylation unit; 9. Merox for light cracked naphtha; 10. Merox for light cracked naphtha; 11. Bitumen unit; 12. Sulfolane aromatic extraction unit. 4

MHC/DHT complex construction overview Development program - Phase 1 2002-2003: Refinery modernization Feasibility studies: ABB Lummus, JGC, Shell, AMEC-UOP-PEL. 2003-2004: BEDP: Chevron Lummus, WorleyParsons, FW,... FEED: ABB Lummus 2005: Pre-qualification procedure for engineering company for realization of EPC Phase Works was done in the 3 years period: 10.2009: ЕРСМ Contract signature 06.2010: Commencement of work at the construction site 10.2011: Completion of the main equipment installation (9-month delay from the original schedule recorded) 02.2012: Supplemental Agreement signed providing delay reduction down to 3 months (Мechanical Сompletion 22 August 2012) 04.2012: Мechanical Сompletion of the SARU Unit 06.2012: Start up of reconstructed GFU, MC of the Flare, MC of the Power Distribution Station 220kW, MC of LPG Park, MC of the Control Room, MC of the Sulfur Granulation Unit, MC of the N2, MC of the Water Treatment Unit,MC of the instrument gas, condensate, fuel gas, water treatment, fire protection systems, MC of the PSA Unit. 08.2012: Мechanical Сompletion of the МНС/DHT Complex 11.2012: Ready for Start-up 5

Modernization program (Phase 1) Modernization program (Phase 1) Building of new units: MHC/DHT, Hydrogen generation unit (HGU+PSA) Sulphur recovery unit (SRU), Spent sulphuric acid regeneration unit (SARU) Amine regeneration unit (ARU), Sour water striper unit (SWSU) Reconstruction of existing units: Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), Gas concentration unit (GCU) Off-site and utilities: Common control room, Tank farm storage, Loading and unloading oil derivatives unit, Cooling water and condensate units New flare, fuel gas, energy distribution and other offsite and utilities Main goals of NIS Pancevo modernization Main program: goals of NIS Pancevo modernization program: Oil derivatives production according European standards (EURO 5) Oil derivatives production for domestic market and export, Increasing production of white derivatives Energy consumption optimization To achieve competitive level of Solomon indexes Total investment cost: over 500 MM EUR Period of realization, EPC phase: 2009 2012 Fulfillment (scope- and time wise) of Gazpromneft obligation according Agreement between Republic of Serbia and Russian Federation related to modernization of refining capacities. 6

Hydrocracking/Hydrotreating (MHC/DHT) construction Project Construction of the hydrocracking of VGO/hydrotreating of diesel fractions integrated system creates solutions for the following tasks: Increase in the production of diesel Euro-5 fuel quality due to conversion of VGO. Processing of diesel fractions with high content of S, N compounds, of the unsaturated compounds with low cetane number, to create a high-octane diesel fuel with ultra-low sulfur content. Reduce the costs of constructing a new plant for diesel fuel hydrotreating with a block for de-aromatization of diesel fraction of the catalytic cracking and visbreaking units. The possibility of share of VGO between catalytic cracking and hydrocracking units in accordance with demand for gasoline and diesel fuel. There is a possibility of increasing the conversion of hydrocracking feed from 40% to 50% due to re-circulation of the hydrocracked residue into the process. Facilities, located in the hydrocracking complex, occupy minimum area, but the equipment layout makes it possible to 7 perform remedial works on the equipment at no additional cost. Hydrocracking/Hydrotreating МHC/DHT capacity: Vacuum gasoil 1.48 mil.t/y (MHC) Diesel/LCO fractions 1.52 mil. t/y The complex capacity selection criteria: Capacity of Oil Refinery Pancevo - oil 4.8 mil. t/y Capacity of FCC 1 mil. t/y (feed: MHC unconverted oil) Euro 5 diesel fuel processing capacity increase, taking into consideration diesel fraction hydrotreating from the visbreaking and catalytic cracking units Technology: Chevron ЕРСМ contractor: CB&I Lummus Global

Hydrogen Generation Unit (HGU).Construction of Spent Sulfuric Acid Regeneration Unit(SARU) Technology: NG and light hydrocarbons Steam Reforming + PSA purging The unit capacity is 6.9 t/h of hydrogen (77,000 Nm3/h) ЕРС contractor: Heurtey Use of modern technologies from Haldor Topsoe, Purpose: to recycle spent sulphuric acid produced during the processing of high-octane component in the alkylation process of C4 fractions. The product sulphuric acid unit capacity - 562 kg/h ЕРС contractor: TKV Kovoprojekta 8

Comparison of motor fuel quality Comparison of gasoline quality, before and after modernization: Characteristics Before modernization After modernization Sulphur, max, mg/kg 650 10 Benzene, max, % (v/v) 5 1 Total aromatics, % (v/v) 65 35 Pb, mg/l 13 0 Comparison of diesel quality, before and after modernization: Characteristics Before modernization After modernization Sulphur, mg/kg 5.000 (in average) max. 10 Polycyclic aromatics max, % (m/m) not limited 11 9

Base Oils project Novi Sad (Phase 2) NIS in cooperation with CLG executed extended BDP for Base Oils project utilising available quantity of naphthenic (regionally available) crude oils and UCO from MHC unit of refinery Pancevo. Project is now in FEED/EPC phase under execution of Foster Wheeler expecting compeltion of the project (ready for Start-up in the middle of 2016). State-of-art technologies are applied in the new production scheme allowing to produce high-quality of Base oils in total quantity of 181 kt/y 10 10

Bottom of the Barrel (Phase 3) NIS in cooperation with APS Engineering (in continuation of previously made analysis and taken decisions) launched elaboration of the Feasibility study originally requesting to elaborate 4 main technology otions: DCU/Residue hydrocracking/solvent Deasphalting/Deep hydroconversion with sub-options of integration with energy production and all options allows integration of Pancevo and Novi Sad refinery and production of Base Oils there. APS Engineering finally executed evaulation of 14 options covering the above basic streams and DCU with processing secondary streams on existing units (esp. MHC/DHT) was finally selected as the best option for Engineering phase. Current project status: Current project status: Final approval by Shareholders :7.4.2014 30.6.2014. Launch tender for BDP/FEED: 20.05.14. Bids delivery by 3 world-class engineering companies: 4.8.2014. Establishing the Project office Further steps: Further steps: Completion of Bids technical evaluation: 09/2014 Completion of analysis of Project Economical effectiveness: 09/2014 Commercial negotiations and selection of the best Bidder: 10/2014 Contract signature for elaboration of BDP and FEED:11/2014 Kick-off-Meeting: 12/2014 Elaboration of BDP/FEED: 10 months 11 11

Development program - Phase 3 In the future Refinery configuration, the feeds that shall be sent to Delayed Coker Unit will be the following: Vacuum Residue from Vacuum Distillation Unit Slurry oil from Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit. The main products of Delayed Coker will have the following destination: Fuel Gas, to be used inside the unit as fuel for furnaces; the excess of fuel gas can be routed to refinery fuel gas system. LPG, (as mixture of propylene, propane, butylenes and butanes with some impurities like dienes), to be sent to LPG storage after proper treatment (amine washing, caustic treatment, etc..); Coker Naphtha, to be sent to existing Diesel Hydrotreater (DHT), before to be used for gasoline production; Light Coker Gasoil (LCGO) to be sent to existing DHT, before to be used for diesel production; Heavy Coker Gasoil (HCGO) to be sent to Mild Hydrocracking (MHC) as feedstock; The produced coke will be sold on the market as coke fuel grade and a dedicated Coke Handling unit has to be foreseen for coke management. 12 Crude & Vacuum Distillations Crude & Vacuum Distillations Simplified Block Scheme of Delayed Coker addition - Operation Block 1 (100 days/year) S-300 S-4300 MHC S-4400 DHT (*) Naphtha & LCGO DCU Bitumen S-0250 Slurry Heavy Naphtha HCGO Coke (*) Minor Modification foreseen in Stabilizer Section only (*) Minor Modification foreseen in Stabilizer Section only S-2300 FCC S-2450 / S- 4450 SRU UCO Tank UC1 Tank S-2400 Simplified Block Scheme of Delayed Coker addition - Operation Block 2 (230 days/year) S-300 S-4300 MHC S-4400 DHT (*) Naphtha & LCGO DCU Bitumen S-0250 Slurry Heavy Naphtha HCGO Coke S-2300 FCC S-2450 / S- 4450 SRU UCO Tank UC1 Tank S-2400 S-2950 /S- 4950 Amine S-2950 /S- 4950 Amine HCGO Tank RNS Lube New or Revamped Units RNS Lube HCGO Tank New or Revamped Units

Development program - Phase 3 The PROJECT has been and will be developed through the following phases: STEP I Feasibility Study (executed by 07/2013) Assess the most effective technology for processing, optimise of refinery capacity ensuring satisfaction of market demand, products slates and specific constraints at domestic and export markets, ensuring elimination or minimization of fuel oil and other black products and ensuring quality of products as per Euro standards; Ensure the compliance with Local and European environmental and safety regulations Achieve the best economic performance of NIS Refineries and assess the optimal investment plan STEP II FEED CONTRACTOR Selection (to be completed by 10/2014) The subsequent phase carried out and aimed to select the FEED CONTRACTOR STEP III - BASIC/FEED Design (expected duration is 10 months) III-a: FEED Propaedeutic Analysis, to select final Configuration and review proposed capacity of conversion unit III-b: BASIC DESIGN/FEED Design for the selected Configuration and Licensor STEP IV EPC (or EPCM) CONTRACTOR Selection (expected duration is 6 months) The subsequent phase aimed to select the EPC (EPCM) CONTRACTOR who will realize the plant modifications and the new installations. STEP V EPC (or EPCM) (expected duration is 24 months) During this phase detail engineering, procurement, new units construction and existing units & facilities reconstruction will be carry out by the selected EPC (EPCM) CONTRACTOR. 13

Dynamics and structure of the refining products processing at NIS for the period 2014-2018 LPG Gasoline Naphtha JET Diesel Lubrificants Fuel oil Bitumen Coke/pitch Fuel and loss 4% 7% 100 4% 13% 13% 25% 2013 0% 4% 6% 20% 2016 100 3% 0% 9% 12% 11% 13% 3% 3% 14% DCU allows to improve product basket 3% by elimination of production of Heavy Fuel Oils and improve conversion to 31% 34% 94 % when more effectivelly utilise installed capacities 41% 1% Heavy Fuel oil is replaced by 4% increased production of Diesel (increase of by 30%) and fuel coke 100 4% 3% 7% 4% 4% 2018 100% 14

Final Crude oil processing scheme: Phase 2 and 3 impact Crede Oil Crude processing in RNP Fuel Coke Crude processing in hydroskimming configuration Delayed Coker Automotive Fuel Unconverted oil from hydrocracker Hydrocracker FCC Base oils in RNS 15

Conclusions NIS operating 2 refineries in Serbia, introducing 3-phased investment program, producing already fully EURO quality standard motor fuels (possibly incl. bio-components) and improving impact on environment is recognizable player in the refining industry in the region. NIS recognizing current challengies in front of European and regional refining industry is continuing investment programs for improving its profitability and achieving reduction of quantity of black products, placing on the market most demanded refining derivatives and taking into account that viable refinery should demonstrate the following chracteristics: Capacity suitable to serve respective market to be utilised more than 90% Complexity - NCI>10 operating State-of-the-art technology HSSE standards meeting local requirements and international practices 16