Educator Scoring Tool for GED Ready Reasoning Through Language Arts (RLA) Extended Response

Similar documents
English II Writing. Persuasive Writing Rubric

Grade 4. Expository Writing Rubric

The 2014 GED Reasoning Through Language Arts Test. Extended Response Resource Guide for Adult Educators: Taxation and Revenue

INTERNET ACCESS AT SCHOOL

A Teacher s Guide: Getting Acquainted with the 2014 GED Test The Eight-Week Program

Rubrics for Assessing Student Writing, Listening, and Speaking High School

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: English/Language Arts Practice Test Scoring Guide Grade 11 Performance Task

by Nicole Page, Holly Scott, and Charlotte Davis

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium:

Common Core Writing Rubrics, Grade 3

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Assessment

1. Define and Know (D) 2. Recognize (R) 3. Apply automatically (A) Objectives What Students Need to Know. Standards (ACT Scoring Range) Resources

10th Grade Language. Goal ISAT% Objective Description (with content limits) Vocabulary Words

Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Assessment. Interpreting Your Score

NAEP released item, grade 8

LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition, Levels A C, correlated to the South Carolina College and Career Readiness Standards, Grades 3 5

English I. Expository Scoring Guide. April 2014

Student Guide for Usage of Criterion

English II. Persuasive Scoring Guide. March 2015

FCAT Writing. Technical Assistance Paper BASELINE WRITING ASSESSMENT

Grade 6 English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors

Montgomery County Public Schools Advanced English Semester A Exam Review

EXJ 201. Show a little understanding of the persuasive purpose of the task but neglect to take or to maintain a position on the issue in the prompt

Appendix 14: Sample Writing Frames

English Language Proficiency (055)

Online Resources to Help Students Review for the VPT-English

Bilingual Education Assessment Urdu (034) NY-SG-FLD034-01

CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS FOR OKLAHOMA EDUCATORS (CEOE )

A + dvancer College Readiness Online Alignment to Florida PERT

How To Write A Task For Ielts

FUNCTIONAL SKILLS ENGLISH - WRITING LEVEL 2

A Writer s Reference, Seventh Edition Diana Hacker Nancy Sommers

PREP-009 COURSE SYLLABUS FOR WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

COM207: CREATIVE WRITING: FICTION SYLLABUS LECTURE HOURS/CREDITS: 3/3

Montgomery County Public Schools English 9B Exam Review

AP English Literature & Composition 2002 Scoring Guidelines

Interpretation of Test Scores for the ACCUPLACER Tests

SIXTH GRADE UNIT 1. Reading: Literature

Grading Benchmarks FIRST GRADE. Trimester st Student has achieved reading success at. Trimester st In above grade-level books, the

Minnesota K-12 Academic Standards in Language Arts Curriculum and Assessment Alignment Form Rewards Intermediate Grades 4-6

Please see current textbook prices at

MS Health Care Administration ( )

Writer moves somewhat beyond merely paraphrasing someone else s point of view or

Evaluating the Elements of a Piece of Practical Writing The author of this friendly letter..

English /10 Released Exam August 2010 Form A Provincial Examination Answer Key

Demonstrating Understanding Rubrics and Scoring Guides

Rubric for Public Speaking

Six Traits Writing Strategies

Test Specifications for Written Composition

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 6

Language Arts Literacy Areas of Focus: Grade 5

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES

MBA Business Administration ( )

LDC Template Task Collection 2.0

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

Year 1 reading expectations (New Curriculum) Year 1 writing expectations (New Curriculum)

Eligibility: Essay Instructions: summarize analyze print

Livingston Public Schools Scope and Sequence K 6 Grammar and Mechanics

Causes and Effects of French Revolution

Writing an Introductory Paragraph for an Expository Essay

ELA I-II English Language Arts Performance Level Descriptors

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Strand: Reading Literature Topics Standard I can statements Vocabulary Key Ideas and Details

Writing Rubrics. Eighth Grade. Based on the California State Writing Standards. Created by Miller seventh grade team 4/05..

AK + ASD Writing Grade Level Expectations For Grades 3-6

3rd Grade - ELA Writing

MS Human Resource Management ( )

Building with the 6 traits

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Common Core Writing Rubrics, Kindergarten

Grade 4 Writing. Expository Scoring Guide. March 2015

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

Oxford Learning Institute University of Oxford

The Old Man and The Sea

Common Core State Standards Sample Student Writing Scored with 6+1 Traits Rubric

Performance Indicators-Language Arts Reading and Writing 3 rd Grade

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

Sections: Enc :35 3:50 p.m. - AC-221 (82172) / Enc :05 5:20 p.m. AC-220 (84866)

FSD Grade 2 READING. Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text.

Certificate Programs

Released 2014 Assessment: Language 1, Writing. Item-Specific Rubrics and Sample Student Responses with Annotations

Virginia English Standards of Learning Grade 8

To: GMATScore GMAT Course Registrants From: GMATScore Course Administrator Date: January 2006 Ref: SKU ; GMAT Test Format & Subject Areas

Narrative Writing Conference Planner

AP ENGLISH LITERATURE AND COMPOSITION 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

FOR TEACHERS ONLY The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Albert Pye and Ravensmere Schools Grammar Curriculum

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Grading Rubrics PHD Program MGMT 7702 The nature of management research

Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening June 1, 2009 FINAL Elementary Standards Grades 3-8

ELAGSEKRI7: With prompting and support, describe the relationship between illustrations and the text (how the illustrations support the text).

AP ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND COMPOSITION 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

Transcription:

2014 GED Test Resources Educator Scoring Tool for GED Ready Reasoning Through Language Arts (RLA) Extended Response This tool was designed to help teachers better understand how their students responses to the RLA Extended Response (ER) task might be scored on the 2014 GED test. The tool breaks down each dimension (or bulleted skill descriptor) in the RLA Multi- Trait Extended Response Scoring Rubric into several sub-dimensions that trained scorers may consider when determining a trait score for a test-taker s response. While the rubric itself was derived directly from career- and college-readiness instructional standards (such as the Common Core State Standards and others), these sub-dimensions have been created and vetted by expert educators to help describe the fine-grained components essential to writing well-constructed text-based arguments. A couple things to keep in mind when using tool: Each test-taker response will receive three scores one for each of the three traits in the rubric. Though each trait is broken into multiple dimensions (in tool we have provided even greater detail in the sub-dimensions), each trait score is determined holistically. That is, dimensions and sub-dimensions can balance each other. In other words, a response can demonstrate such a high level of skill with one dimension that it compensates for a somewhat lower level of skill with another dimension or vice versa. Each trait score is determined by the quality of the writing, not merely by the presence or absence of specific elements. For instance, a response that receives a score of 2 on Trait 1 (Creation of Arguments and Use of Evidence) may have a few elements that seem consistent with a 1-level response. However, because the response is so strong in other elements, it can still receive an on-balance score of 2 for Trait 1. The Educator Scoring Tool is intended to be an aid, helping you analyze your students responses to the GED Ready TM - RLA Extended Response prompts in a manner similar to what trained scorers use. You may find that as you become more familiar with the rubric, you can use tool as a general guide but do not need to fully complete it for every testtaker response you score. With practice, you will most likely discover that you can quickly determine all three trait scores for a specific response by simply reading the response three times (in order to consider each of the traits separately). www.gedtestingservice.com GED and GED Testing Service are registered trademarks of the American Council on Education ( ACE ). They may not be used or reproduced without the express written permission of ACE or GED Testing Service. The GED and GED Testing Service brands are administered by GED Testing Service LLC under license from the American Council on Education.

Instructions: Read each response at least once for each trait. Then, select the sub-dimension descriptor that most accurately describes the response you are scoring. Place a the score box next to the appropriate sub-dimension descriptor. To tabulate each trait score: 1) Give 2 points for each sub-dimension on which the response received a score of 2, give 1 point for scores of 1, and give 0 points for scores of 0. 2) Tally the total of points you have awarded. 3) Divide the total of points by the of sub-dimensions in the trait. Note: For the RLA Extended Response, Trait 1 has 12 sub-dimensions, Trait 2 has 15 sub-dimensions and Trait 3 has 14 sub-dimensions. The you find through tabulation is likely to be a good indication of trait score the response should receive. However, you may find it helpful to step back and view the response as a whole one more time. Sometimes, a response is greater (or less than) the sum of its parts! Let your judgment as an experienced educator be your guide. GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 2

Trait 1: Creation of Arguments and Use of Evidence Dimensions and Sub-dimensions DIMENSION: Generates text- based argument(s) and establishes a purpose that is connected to the prompt (sub- dimensions Sub- dimen sions Score 0 Score 1 Score 2 1 makes no clearly- stated claims makes at least one clearly- stated claim or claims are strongly implied claims are explicit and clearly stated. There may be multiple explicit claims made 2 attempted or vague claims are illogical and are not text- based one in at least one claim is logical and text- based, while other claims may be tied to the larger issue rather than to a close reading of the text itself two in claims are logical and based on a close reading of the text 3 attempted or vague claims do not support an overall stance implied or clearly- stated claims may support an overall stance. Stance may be vague, unclear or inconsistent explicit claims support a clear and consistent stance 4 attempted or vague claims lack explanation such that the criteria for analyzing the issue or evaluating argumentation is unclear at least one claim is explained such that the criteria for analyzing the issue or evaluating the argumentation is evident claims are explained such that the criteria for analyzing the issue or evaluating the argumentation is evident GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 3

DIMENSION: Cites relevant and specific evidence from the source text(s) to support argument (may include few irrelevant piece of evidence or supported claims) (s 5 6 7 overall stance may lack connection to the prompt or deviate severely cites few or no pieces of evidence directly from the source text may include off- topic or tenuously tied information not drawn from the source text OR one in overall stance is connected to the prompt. May wander off purpose occasionally and briefly. cites some evidence from the source text may include some on- topic information not drawn from the source text two in overall stance is well- connected to the prompt and remains focused throughout the response multiple pieces of specific evidence are cited from the source text although some evidence may be drawn from outside knowledge of the topic, the majority of the evidence cited is drawn directly from the source text 8 any evidence from the source text that is cited minimally or does not support the claims and overall stance evidence from the source text generally supports the claims and overall stance evidence chosen is largely relevant and is used in service of the argument's overall stance and supports the internal claims 9 sections of text may be copied from the source text with little or no commentary given evidence chosen is commented upon, but commentary may be general, vague or tenuously tied to the overall argument commentary on most pieces of cited evidence is provided, and commentary generally supports the overall stance GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 4

DIMENSION: Analyzes the issue and/or evaluates the validity of the argumentation within the source texts (e.g. distinguishes between supported and unsupported claims, makes reasonable inferences about the underlying premises or assumptions, identifies fallacious reasoning, evaluates the credibility of sources, etc.)* (s TOTALS 10 11 12 0 * x the issue described in the source text is minimally or not analyzed the argumentation developed in the source texts is minimally or not evaluated may demonstrate minimal or no understanding of the arguments given in the source texts one in 1 * x the issue in the source texts is partially or simplistically analyzed the argumentation in the source texts is partially or minimally analyzed analysis given may be limited or partially inaccurate two in 2 * x the issue in the source texts is analyzed thoroughly and specifically the validity of the argumentation in the source texts is evaluated thoroughly, citing specific techniques that the author uses to convey his or her message analysis given is largely accurate and reflects clear understanding of the source texts FINAL TRAIT SCORE Sum of total points to left Divide total above by of s (12) *Responses need not BOTH analyze the issue AND evaluate the validity of the argumentation. A response can do one OR the other with accuracy and specific reasoning and achieve a high score. High- scoring responses may also attempt to do both. GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 5

Trait 2: Development of Ideas and Organizational Structure Dimensions and Sub-dimensions DIMENSION: Contains ideas that are well- developed and generally logical; most ideas are elaborated upon (s Sub- dimen sions Score 0 Score 1 Score 2 1 ideas are insufficiently developed ideas are inconsistently or simplistically developed multiple ideas are well- developed and more than one idea may have multiple extensions 2 Ideas may be illogical one in ideas may reflect simplistic or vague reasoning two in the ideas are generally logical in relation to the source texts DIMENSION: Contains a sensible progression of ideas with clear connections between details and main points (sub- dimensions 3 4 5 6 there is minimal or no elaboration on main ideas contains an unclear or no progression of ideas details may be irrelevant to the main idea details may be absent one in some ideas may be elaborated upon (i.e. more than one) some evidence of a progression of ideas (i.e. some ideas lead logically one to the next) details may be implicitly tied or lack full connection to the main idea details may be disjointedly connected to each other or inconsistently used in service of the two in most ideas are elaborated upon contains a sensible progression of ideas (i.e. one idea clearly leads into the next) details are clearly connected to main ideas details are chosen carefully to enhance logic and overall flow GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 6

progression of ideas DIMENSION: Establishes an organizational structure that conveys the message and purpose of the response; applies traditional devices appropriately (s 7 8 establishes an ineffective or no discernable organizational structure groups ideas ineffectively (e.g. ideas may appear as a list) one in establishes an organization structure ideas may be grouped inconsistently or be only partially effective at conveying the message of the response two in organizational structure is fully established and clearly apparent the organizational structure enhances the message and purpose of the response DIMENSION: Establishes and maintains a formal style and appropriate tone that demonstrate awareness of audience and purpose of task (sub- dimensions 9 10 11 does not apply transitional devices or does so inappropriately uses an informal style uses a tone inappropriate for the task (e.g. overly conversational or list- like in approach) one in transitional devices are used inconsistently may inconsistently maintain a formal style may inconsistently apply an appropriate tone two in transitional devices are applied appropriately establishes and maintains a formal style throughout the response establishes and maintains an appropriate tone for on- demand academic writing 12 limited or no awareness of audience and purpose a general awareness of audience and purpose and maintains an awareness of audience and purpose of the task GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 7

DIMENSION: Chooses specific words to express ideas clearly (s TOTALS 13 14 15 0 * x may frequently misuse words may overuse slang ideas may be expressed vaguely or repetitiously one in 1 * x may occasionally misuse words may occasionally use slang but it does not overly detract from the overall message some idea may be expressed vaguely two in 2 * x chooses specific words to convey meaning words are chosen purposefully and even the occasional slang term contributes to the overall message ideas are expressed clearly and specifically FINAL TRAIT SCORE Sum of total points to left Divide total above by of s (15) Trait 3: Clarity and Command of Standard English Conventions* Dimensions and Sub-dimensions DIMENSION: Demonstrates largely correct sentence structure and a general fluency that enhances clarity (sub- dimensions Sub- dimen sions Score 0 Score 1 Score 2 1 sentence structures are largely repetitive and/or simplistic some sentence structure may be frequently repeated, but the response still some variety varied sentence structure within a paragraph or paragraphs GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 8

2 multiple significant errors in subordination, coordination and parallelism one in subordination, coordination and parallelism are largely correct with a few significant errors two in correct subordination, coordination and parallelism 3 frequent wordy and/or awkward constructions may demonstrate occasional wordiness and/or awkwardness avoids wordiness and awkward sentence structure 4 transitional words and conjunctive adverbs are either absent, used inappropriately or do not contribute to overall clarity transitional words and conjunctive adverbs are used inconsistently and may show occasional problems with clarity uses transitional words, conjunctive adverbs and other words that support logic and clarity 5 multiple significant errors with run- on sentences, fused sentences and/or sentence fragments a few run- on sentences, fused sentences and/or sentence fragments avoids run- on sentences, fused sentences and sentence fragments GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 9

DIMENSION: Demonstrates competent application of conventions (s 6 frequent errors with commonly confused words and homonyms, including contractions with commonly confused words and homonyms, including contractions understanding of the usages of commonly confused words and homonyms, including contractions 7 frequent errors with subject- verb agreement one in with subject- verb agreement two in appropriate application of subject- verb agreement 8 frequent errors with pronoun usage with pronoun usage appropriate use of pronoun usage (e.g. pronouns and their antecedents agree, unclear pronoun references are avoided and pronoun cases are used properly) 9 word order may be largely inappropriate or confusing largely correct word order with correctly placed modifiers, but correct word order and modifiers are placed correctly GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 10

10 frequent errors with capitalization s with capitalization proper use of capitalization (e.g. proper nouns, titles and the beginnings of sentences) 11 frequent errors with apostrophes one in with apostrophes two in appropriate use of apostrophes with possessive nouns 12 frequent errors with punctuation s with punctuation appropriate use of punctuation (e.g. commas in a series or in apposotives and other non- essential elements, end marks, and appropriate punctuation for clause separation) GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 11

DIMENSION: Errors do not interfere with comprehension; overall, standard usage is at a level appropriate for on- demand draft writing (s 13 contains severe and frequent errors in mechanics and conventions that interfere with comprehension frequent errors in mechanics and conventions that occasionally interfere with comprehension some errors in conventions, but they do not interfere with comprehension 14 standard usage is at an unacceptable level for on- demand draft writing OR one in standard usage is at a minimally acceptable level of appropriateness for on- demand draft writing two in standard usage is appropriate for on- demand draft writing TOTALS 0 * x response is insufficient to demonstrate level of mastery over conventions and usage 1 * x 2 * x FINAL TRAIT SCORE Sum of total points to left Divide total above by of s (14) * Because test- takers will be given only 45 minutes to complete Extended Response tasks, there is no expectation that a response should be completely free of errors to receive a score of 2. GED Testing Service www.gedtestingservice.com 12