How To Choose Between An Am And Fdm



Similar documents
Redeye On Demand. Direct Digital Manufacturing

FDM Material Properties

PRECISION PROTOTYPING THE ROLE OF 3D PRINTED MOLDS IN THE INJECTION MOLDING INDUSTRY

Tim Smith - Sales Manager.

Prototyping Process Choosing the best process for your project

A NEW MINDSET IN PRODUCT DESIGN

FDM for Robotic End of Arm Tooling

INJECTION BLOW MOLDING WITH FDM

Rapid Prototyping. Training Objective

Rapid Prototyping Technologies. May, 2016

New Advances in Rapid Prototyping using Inkjet-based 3D Printing

BENEFITS OF 3D PRINTING VACUUM FORM MOLDS

Fused Deposition Modeling: A Technology Evaluation

How the uprint Rapidprotyping Machine Works

Tutorial: Rapid Prototyping Technologies

The Prototyping Challenges with Micro Molding: A Comparative Study of Prototyping Methods for Micro Molding Applications

prepared by Gabe Landes for T. Purdy 2009

Cura for Type A Machines Quick Start Guide

MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY IN IMPRESSIVE 3D

How To Build A 3D Model From Scratch

3 D Printing Threat or Opportunity? 13:45 p.m./29 April 2014

WPI Rapid Prototype Guidelines --Read entire document before submitting an order--

Choosing optimal rapid manufacturing process for thin-walled products using expert algorithm

Ningbo Yinzhou Keao Prototyping & Mould Factory Services include : CNC machining prototypes,

Use of 3D Printers in Proton Therapy

Printing Technology White Paper. Why Thermal Outclasses Laser Printer for Label Printing

DENTAL CAD/CAM 3D PRINTERS

3D Printer Overview 2013

Detailed Design Review. P15611: Digital Microfluidics Packaging

How to Effectively Move from 3D Printing to Injection Molding. Tony Holtz Technical Specialist, Proto Labs

Additive Manufacturing: Processes and Standard Terminology

Chapter 5 POWDER-BASED RAPID PROTOTYPING SYSTEMS

Advanced Manufacturing Choices

GLOBAL MANUFACTURING. ARAUJO, Anna Carla AUG, 2015 Mechanical Engineering Department POLI/COPPE/UFRJ

LARGE FORMAT PRINT SOLUTIONS. Large Format Print Solutions for CAD

THERMOFORMING OVERVIEW PROCESS DESCRIPTION VACUUM FORMING MATERIALS APPLICATION GUIDE: Time Required Cost Skill Level

On-Demand Printing Technologies

It s Not Just a Label It s Your Business. Why the right barcode label is essential to your success

Allison Rae Paramount Industries Rhode Island School of Design ID 87. Prototyping Overview

The Future of PCB Printing? An Introduction to Ink Jet Printing

Rapid prototyping. CAD / lecture. October 5, TO&I Vermelding onderdeel organisatie

Copyright 2003 T. A. Grimm & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.

MAKERBOT FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

RAPID PROTOTYPING. Learning Objectives: By the end of the lecture the student should be able to: Explain the fundamentals of Rapid Prototyping

3D Printing with Desktop Stereolithography

3M Scotch-Weld EPX Two-component structural adhesives and applicator guns

Choosing the Right Rapid Prototype Source for Your Product Development Program. Phillips Plastics Corporation November 2009

Thermal Paper Construction

Injection Molding Design Guide. Table of Contents

The Anatomy of a Label

As published in PIM International

COLORJET PRINTERS. Brilliant full-color parts with ProJet CJP 3D printers

CAST IRON THE BASICS. Heatline - Cast Iron Radiators SMOOTH FLAT FILE TO REMOVE ANY SWARF. ONE TIME. ASSEMBLY. JOINTS SHOULD BE TIGHTENED.

3D Printer Extruder. Application Note. Martez Steverson ECE 480. Design Team 8 3/28/14. Abstract

Z Corporation 3D Printing Technology. Fast, Affordable and Uniquely Versatile

COURSE: ADVANCED MANUFACTURING PROCESSES. Module No. 5: OTHER PROCESSES

Chapter 2 Printing Printing Procedure...2-1

3D Printing: Systems, Materials, Tips & Tricks for Research Prototypes and Beyond. Lessons from the Velo Gripper project

ZBuilder Ultra. Delivers the capabilities of a highend rapid prototyping system at a fraction of the cost Z Corporation 2

Good Boards = Results

Uncompromising Customer Service. Baumann TM Sanitary and Aseptic Process Valves

DESIGN OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS BY RAPID PROTOTYPING TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION

Food Safety Starts with Workplace Safety Workplace Safety Products For Food and Beverage Processing Facilities

SCREEN PRINTING INSTRUCTIONS

05, The third building which will be occupying 6,000 sq meters will be finished built soon, totaling to more than 16,000 sq meters..

MAKING A BETTER MARK WITH INK JET As substrates, industry regulations and customer demands change, fluids are also evolving

MANUFACTURING THE FUTURE

A new level in digital inkjet printing

Construction of human knee bone joint model using FDM based 3D Printer from CT scan images.

Brief Report on machines available in the 3D Printers market and their characteristics

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM IN RAPID PROTOTYPING TECHNOLOGY Arkadiusz Rzucidło, Grzegorz Budzik, Łukasz Przeszłowski

Plastics & Rubber Testing Solutions

3D Printed Injection Molding Tool ("PIMT") Guide. Objet Ltd.

Hitachi U-4100 UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (341-F)

Large format print solutions.

INNOVATIVE PLASTICS ULTRASONIC WELDING

DEVELOPMENT. Shorter time to market More product variants Increasing design complexity. Rapid. Prototyping PRODUCTION

Enjoy easy, fast and versatile scanning

Taking flexibility to new heights

TRITTICO ORIGINAL BY BRAVO A WHOLE WORKSHOP IN A SINGLE MACHINE

Wall-Mounting your HP computer. User Guide

Product Line DUST. The family of hermetic luminaires

Automotive Applications of 3D Laser Scanning Introduction

Investigating Methods of Prototyping with ABS

Latex 3000 Tips and Tricks

Tool Design and Concurrent Engineering using Rapid Tooling Construction Methods

Monochrome Print Features: True 600 dpi print resolution Produces 3,3 A0 size prints or copies per minute 100% efficient No waste toner

HIGH PERFORMANCE UV FLATBED PRINTERS

Document scanning. Done right. TM

HP Color LaserJet CM1312 MFP Series Paper and Print Media Guide

Transcription:

FDM AND POLYJET 3D PRINTING DETERMINING WHICH TECHNOLOGY IS RIGHT FOR YOUR APPLICATION By Fred Fisc Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM ) and PolyJet are two of the most advanced and effective additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing technologies available. They span the range from budget-friendly, desktop modeling devices to large-format, factory-floor equipment that draw from the capital expenditure budget, and can produce a range of output from precise, finely detailed models to durable production goods. While te is crossover in applications and advantages, these two technology platforms remain distinct and bring different benefits. Understanding the differences is the baseline for selecting the right technology for your application, demands and constraints. FOR A 3D W ORLD TM White Paper

THE TECHNOLOGIES Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): machines to take advantage of each system s strength. However, for those with a budget that forces the selection of only one system, consider operations, part characteristics and material options. Tmoplastic filament feeds through a heated head and exits, under high pressure, as a fine thread of semi-molten plastic. In a heated chamber, this extrusion process lays down a continuous bead of plastic to form a layer. This layering process repeats to manufacture tmoplastic parts. PolyJet 3D Printing: FDM process COMPARE AND CONTRAST Comparing three categories between FDM and PolyJet will address the common decision-making criteria. Operations address the operating environment, work flow and time. Part characteristics cover items that address output quality. Material options consider the physical properties available from FDM and PolyJet processes. Operations Speed A carriage with four or more inkjet heads and ultraviolet (UV) lamps traverses the work space, depositing tiny droplets of photopolymers, materials that solidify when exposed to UV light. After printing a thin PolyJet process layer of material, the process repeats until a complete 3D object is formed. These well-established technologies create models or finished goods for industries that span jewelry and architecture to aerospace and consumer electronics manufacturing. Complete setup for the systems that use these technologies range from $9,900 to over $600,000. Build speed, while a flawed measure of performance, tends to be a priority for many. Te are too many factors to make qualified speed generalizations of any AM technology, including FDM and PolyJet. At times, PolyJet is faster, but this is not always true. When evaluating time from file preparation through finished part delivery over many jobs, you will discover that, on average, FDM and PolyJet have similar (and very competitive) total elapsed times. For more information on build time, read the Stratasys white paper The Truth About Speed: Is the Hare Really the Fastest? PolyJet detail Durable FDM part A system that builds slower may have an overall faster completion time. Te truly is something for everyone and every application; so much so that many companies operate both FDM and PolyJet 2

eit a fully automated, but longer, soak in a tank to remove soluble supports or a manual step that removes rigid, breakaway supports with simple hand tools. Objet Studio is simple to use Pre-process Both technologies offer very simple just a few mouse clicks front-end file processing that can make ready-to-print files in less than five minutes. One difference: FDM s production 3D printers add sophisticated user controls that adjust the part-building process to match the demands for the application. All build parameters are open to the user. When selecting a technology, evaluate the operational needs for your business. For example, is the staffing level low? If so, it s best to go fully automated with FDM. If quick turnaround is paramount, choose PolyJet. Office environment FDM Automated support removal Unlike some AM technologies, te is no need for sealed-off labs and OSHA respiratory protection for eit of the Stratasys technologies. Te is no powder, which can go airborne, or sensitivity to humidity and temperature, PolyJet support removal and all systems need only minimal plumbing or electrical work. Power and access to water and drain lines (for post-processing work) is all that is required. Both FDM and PolyJet come in office-friendly sizes. Te is one exception: The biggest systems, Fortus 900mc and Objet 1000, have large footprints, so they need to be placed in a large work area. Insight software for FDM 3D Printers allows control over all build parameters, such as fill density. At the machine, both FDM and PolyJet can be printing parts within 10 minutes of a file upload. Post-process All similarities between FDM and PolyJet cease when it comes to support removal and part cleaning. PolyJet gives you a quick, manual step to remove the gel-like support material: spraying with a waterjet. With FDM, you have Ease of use In addition to the simplicity of file setup, te are several ot factors that contribute to the ease of use of both FDM and PolyJet. Material changeovers: Simply remove one material and slide a new material cartridge into the 3D printer. Setup for a build: Insert a build sheet (FDM only), bring the system up to operating temperature, push start and walk away. When complete: Open the door/hood and remove parts just seconds after a job completes. 3

Operating expense Operating expenses are a bit hig for PolyJet, so if the budget is your primary consideration, FDM may be a better choice. The key factor to determine operating expense is consumables, both in hardware and materials. For FDM, you will routinely replace build trays (or sheets) and extrusion nozzles. However, these are less expensive than the sophisticated printheads that are replaced after 2,000 hours (or more) of PolyJet 3D Printing. Also, the total material cost per cubic inch of part is less with FDM. In the cartridge, the technologies have comparable material costs by weight. Yet, FDM has a lower cost per part because it needs only minimal support material. PolyJet systems need more support material to restrain the tiny liquid droplets. Part Characteristics Surface finish PolyJet gives you a near-paint-ready surface right out of the 3D printer. With a little wet-sanding and polishing, it can deliver a smooth, glossy surface that is ready for any process we even minor surface imperfections are glaring, such as electroplating for a mirror-like finish. That s not true for FDM. The extrusion process can produce visible PolyJet offers smooth surfaces layer lines on side walls and tool paths on top and bottom surfaces. These can be eliminated, but that requires additional post-processing, such as an automated finishing station or some manual finishing. Resolution & feature detail High resolution and fine feature detail are hallmarks of the PolyJet process. Using 600 x 600 dpi printing in 16- to 32-micron layers, PolyJet can reproduce very small features and fine-grained textures. So if feature resolution is a prime consideration, PolyJet is your best bet. Accuracy For dimensional accuracy, the published specifications show that comparable FDM and PolyJet platforms have similar results for parts when they are removed from the systems. However, over time and under a load, FDM materials are more dimensionally stable, which is critical when used for production parts. Size Note: The following specifications have been rounded for simplicity. For exact specifications, refer to the product spec sheets. PolyJet and FDM machines offer build volumes ranging from 5 x 5 x 5 inches ( 127 x 127 x 127 mm) to 39 x 31 x 20 inches (1000 x 800 x 500 mm), and they have comparable mid- and large-size options. The difference is only in the small-volume category. With FDM te is an entry-level 5 x 5 x 5-inch option with a footprint small enough to sit on a desktop. PolyJet s smallest is 9 x 8 x 6 inch (240 x 200 x 150 mm), and that 3D printer is best placed on a stand near the work area. For maximum part size, consider the orientation in the 3D printer. For example, the two largest machines, the FDM 900mc and the Objet1000, have similarly sized build envelopes, but the tallest part in the Fortus 900mc is 36 inches. The tallest for the Objet1000 is 20 inches. The opposite is true for width: The Fortus 900mc offers 24 inches and the Objet1000 offers 31 inches. Materials For many, the greatest distinction between FDM and PolyJet comes from materials. Combined te are nearly 600 options, ranging from real tmoplastic to tmoplastic-like resin, rigid to flexible, and opaque to transparent. PolyJet offers product realism across a wide band of requirements. With its unique, unmatched Digital Materials (two materials blended at the printhead), te are over 450 options offering a range of hues, transparency, strength, rigidity and flexibility. For example, flexible, rubber-like parts can be printed with Shore A 4

hardness ratings of 27 to 95. Anot factor that contributes to product realism is multi-material printing. Any part can have up to 46 distinct material properties, so applications like flexible overmolding of rigid structures can be reproduced in one print job. If a breadth of material properties is what you need, PolyJet is the best platform. Durable FDM tmoplastic parts Rubber-like and transparent materials are available for PolyJet PolyJet offers multi-color options PolyJet bio-compatible material On the ot hand, if your applications demand real tmoplastics The pairing of FDM and PolyJet enables Stratasys to handle with functionality and durability, FDM is the correct platform for you. much of the spectrum of industry applications. For those with Ten material options range from the commonly used plastic, like demands that align with FDM benefits and ots that align with ABS, to the highly advanced, like ULTEM 9085 resin. Material PolyJet benefits, the best alternative may be to follow the lead of options include: anti-static, FST rating (flame, smoke and toxicity), ot companies that employ both technologies. chemical resistance and very high temperature resistance. FDM can also make soluble patterns for challenging manufacturing jobs. Both FDM and PolyJet offer bio-compatible materials with USP Plastic Class VI to ISO 10993 ratings. They can be used for hearing aids, dental procedures, and surgical guides and fixtures as well as food and pharmaceutical processing. AM spans the concept, design and production components of product development in industries that range from medical appliances to industrial goods. Each application shares requirement as well as distinct demands. It is these applicationspecific demands that ultimately decide which is the best tool for the job, FDM or PolyJet 3D Printing. 5

FDM AND POLYJET s rtie ope r P l ma T l& ica em h C al, nic a h c Me g i H PC-ISO Soluble ULTEM ENGINEERING NYLON 12 Hig Me cha nic al, Ch em ica l PC &T ma l Pr ope rtie s PC-ABS ABS-M30i ABS-ESD7 SR-110 SR-100 SR-30 HIGH PERFORMANCE PPSF Medical & Bio Static Compatible Dissipative PERFORMANCE STANDARD ABS-M30 Digital ABS RGD525 ABSplus Durus ABSi Endur Vero Tango Opaque Opaque Hearing Aid VeroDent Plus VeroDent MED610 Rubber-Like Medical & Bio Compatible Transparent PRECISION PERFORMANCE POLYJET TECHNOLOGY PRECISION FDM TECHNOLOGY Real tmoplastics POLYJET Smooth TECHNOLOGY surface finish and fine details FDM TECHNOLOGY Real tmoplastics Strong, stable & durable parts VeroClear RGD720 Acrylic Plastics & Elastomers Final product look & feel Strong, stable & durable parts Smooth surface finish & fine details Final properties Final product product mechanical mechanical properties Final product look & feel Multi-Material printing Low total cost of ownership Multi-Material printing Stratasys FDM and Polyjet technology offer hundreds of material options. 6

Operations PolyJet 3D Printing Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Process Time Pre-process Post-process Office Environment Ease of Use Characteristics Surface Finish Feature Detail Accuracy Size Materials Flexible Durable Transparent High-performance Bio-compatible Stratasys www.stratasys.com info@stratasys.com 7665 Commerce Way Eden Prairie, MN 55344 +1 888 480 3548 (US Toll Free) +1 952 937 3000 (Intl) +1 952 937 0070 (Fax) 2 Holtzman St. Science Park, PO Box 2496 Rehovot 76124, Israel +972 74 745-4000 +972 74 745-5000 (Fax) ISO 9001:2008 Certified 2014 Stratasys Inc. All rights reserved. Stratasys, Stratasys logo, Digital Materials, PolyJet, Objet, Objet1000, Fortus, Fortus 900mc, ABSplus, ABS- ESD7, ABS-M30, ABS-M30i, ABSi, Durus, FullCure, Nylon 12, PC-ISO, SR-30, SR-100, Tango, Vero, VeroDent and VeroClear are trademarks or registered trademarks of Stratasys Inc., registered in the United States and ot countries. ULTEM is a registered trademark of SABIC or affiliates. All ot trademarks belong to their respective owners. Product specifications subject to change without notice. Printed in the USA. SSYS-WP-SSYS-InkjetComparison-03-14 For more information about Stratasys systems, materials and applications, call 888.480.3548 or visit www.stratasys.com