Relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle



Similar documents
SYNCHRONIZATION OF CATTLE

licle by expressing estrus (heat) and producing an LH surge. The LH surge causes ovulation, which begins the heifer s first cycle.

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Influence of Nutrition on Reproduction in the Beef Cow Herd

G. Cliff Lamb. North Florida Research and Education Center, Marianna, Florida University of Florida. Introduction

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return Calculation Decision Aids

2016 Protocols for Synchronization of Estrus and Ovulation in Beef Cows and Heifers

Animal Sciences. Timed-Artificial Insemination in Beef Cows: What are the Options?

Beef Cattle Breeds and Biological Types Scott P. Greiner, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Beef Cattle Frame Scores

The Costs of Raising Replacement Heifers and the Value of a Purchased Versus Raised Replacement

Four Systematic Breeding Programs with Timed Artificial Insemination for Lactating Dairy Cows: A Revisit

Replacement Heifers Costs and Return on Investment Calculation Decision Aids

COW/CALF MANAGEMENT Minimizing Calving Difficulty in Beef Cattle

Ovarian Cysts in Dairy Cattle

GnRH Based Estrus Synchronization Systems for Beef Cows

Comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation before fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows 1

BREEDING SOUNDNESS EVALUATION OF BULLS

COMPARISON OF FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION VS. NATURAL SERVICE IN BEEF COWS: REPRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY AND SYSTEM COST

THE STIMULATION OF OVULATION DURING HIGH TEMPERATURE, AN TECHNIQUE OF FERTILITY INCREASING IN COWS

Pregnancy Rates Per Artificial Insemination for Cows and Heifers Inseminated at a Synchronized Ovulation or Synchronized Estrus 1

Net feed intake: Potential selection tool to improve feed efficiency in beef cattle

Beef Cattle Feed Efficiency. Dan Shike University of Illinois

Replacement Policy and Management Michael McHugh Chief Sheep Specialist, Teagasc, Ballyhaise, Co. Cavan

Artificial Insemination (AI) and Oestrus Synchronisation of Beef Cattle

Economics of Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination. Dr. Les Anderson and Paul Deaton University of Kentucky

Cattlemen s Corner Beef Newsletter

Inducing and Synchronizing Estrus in Pre-Pubertal Gilts

R E S T R I C T E D B R E E D I N G A N D R O T A T I O N A L G R A Z I N G

Summary of Product Characteristics

Abbreviation key: NS = natural service breeding system, AI = artificial insemination, BV = breeding value, RBV = relative breeding value

The Menstrual Cycle. Model 1: Ovarian Cycle follicular cells

In Vitro Fertilization as a tool for the Genetics Improvement. History and Future Prospects.

Mean EPDs reported by different breeds

Reproduction and its Hormonal Control

ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION: A REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT TOOL by Mel DeJarnette, reproduction specialist Revised February 2004

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

BREAK-EVEN COSTS FOR COW/CALF PRODUCERS

Section 6: Cow-Calf Cash Flow Enterprise Budget Analysis 101

THE WHY, HOW-TO, AND COST OF PROGRAMED AI BREEDING OF DAIRY COWS. J. S. Stevenson

BOER GOAT EMBRYO TRANSFER

REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING Crossbreeding Systems for Beef Cattle

SYNCHRONIZATION OF BOS INDICUS-INFLUENCED CATTLE FOR TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION

STRATEGIES TO OPTIMIZE USE OF AI IN COW/CALF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: FOCUS ON FIXED-TIME AI PROTOCOLS FOR COWS 1

Terms: The following terms are presented in this lesson (shown in bold italics and on PowerPoint Slides 2 and 3):

EFFICIENCY OF TREATMENT OF FOLLICULAR CYSTS IN COWS

Beef Cattle. Production MP184 DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE R E S E A R C H & E X T E N S I O N

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

SOME PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION OF BEEF CATTLE

Accelerated Replacement Heifer Feeding Programs

Improvement of the economic position of the farm or ranch

Beef - Key performance indicators. Mary Vickers

What is the Cattle Data Base

Herd Navigator and reproduction management

FERTILITY AND AGE. Introduction. Fertility in the later 30's and 40's. Am I fertile?

Successful Timed AI Programs: Using Timed AI to Improve Reproductive Efficiency in High Producing Dairy Cattle

Characterization of the Beef Cow-calf Enterprise of the Northern Great Plains

Fran Fr k Aherne Alberta Pig Company Canada

Response of Dairy Cows to Supplements of Energy and Protein in Early and Mid Lactation

Evaluations for service-sire conception rate for heifer and cow inseminations with conventional and sexed semen

CREEP FEEDING BEEF CALVES

Unit 3 REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS AND THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE

Focus on Preventing Disease. keeping an eye on a healthy bottom line. Cattle Industry

Managing Cow-Calf Production Costs: What To Do Before The Money Runs Out By J. Walter Prevatt, Auburn University

Inheritance of Color And The Polled Trait Dr. R. R. Schalles, Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University

A POWERFUL IN VITRO FERTILIZATION

Getting It Right With A.I. and Estrus Synchronization Willie Altenburg, Fort Collins Colorado

Beef Cattle Handbook

Livestock Budget Estimates for Kentucky

Timing is everything. Ovulation Tracking. Patient Information Booklet

How To Run A Blade Farming Scheme

Body Condition, Nutrition and Reproduction of Beef Cows

EFFECT OF AGRADO ON THE HEALTH AND PERFORMANCE OF TRANSPORT-STRESSED HEIFER CALVES. Authors:

Payback News. Beef Cows-The Cheapest Mineral Isn t

AN ACCELERATED FEEDING STUDY

Management of goats at pasture. Barry W Norton School of Land and Food, University of Queensland, Australia

Creep-Feeding Beef Calves

Increasing Profitability Through an Accelerated Heifer Replacement Program

Creep Feeding Beef Calves Dan E. Eversole, Extension Animal Scientist, Virginia Tech

Headquarters in Sioux Center, IA 1

REPRODUCTION OF BOS INDICUS BREEDS AND CROSSES

Victims Compensation Claim Status of All Pending Claims and Claims Decided Within the Last Three Years

Cattleman s Top Cut Sale Mid-Tex Livestock Auction, Navasota, Texas November 12, 2011 * 12:00 Noon

Overview of Artificial Insemination of Kentucky Meat and Dairy Goats Terry Hutchens, Extension Associate University of Kentucky (G10307)

Dr. G van der Veen (BVSc) Technical manager: Ruminants gerjan.vanderveen@zoetis.com

FEEDLOT MANAGEMENT Matching Cattle Type and Feedlot Performance

Australian Santa Gertrudis Selection Indexes

Arizona Ranchers Management Guide

DAIRY BEEF IMPLANT STRATEGIES: THE BENEFIT OF TBA-CONTAINING IMPLANTS FOR HOLSTEIN STEERS. Court Campbell, Ph.D., Fort Dodge Animal Health

Scope for the Use of Pregnancy Confirmation Data in Genetic Evaluation for Reproductive Performance

Distillers Grains for Beef Cattle

Endocrinology of the Female Reproductive Axis

Monitoring of the dairy cow for optimizing health and production - energy and protein status

Transcription:

Relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle M.P. Davis and R.P. Wettemann STORY IN BRIEF The relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight was evaluated in Angus x Hereford heifers born in the spring of 1997 (n = 12), 1998 (n = 12), and 2003 (n = 10). Weight at puberty was calculated from shrunk body weights taken before and after the onset of luteal activity as determined from concentrations of progesterone in plasma. Mature body weight was a shrunk body weight in mid-gestation, adjusted to a body condition score (BCS) of 5. Mature weights were taken at 5 to 7 yr of age. Weights at puberty were similar (P = 0.27) for heifers born in the springs of 1997, 1998 and 2003 (316, 316, and 335 kg, respectively). Mature body weight of the cows was similar (P = 0.90) for cows born in all years. This research determined that the percentage of mature body weight at puberty averaged 56% and was similar (P = 0.44) for heifers in the three years. There was minimal variation in the percentage of mature weight at puberty and 79% of the heifers initiated the first ovarian cycles between 51 and 60% of the mature weight. Additional studies are necessary to determine the influence of breed of heifer on the percentage of mature body weight at the initiation of ovulation and estrus cycles. Key Words: Angus x Hereford, heifer, mature weight, puberal weight INTRODUCTION Age at which a heifer calves for the first time is an important factor that determines the profitability of a beef herd. Heifers that reach puberty prior to the breeding season have a greater ability to calve at 2 y of age and wean more pounds of beef in their reproductive lifetime compared with heifers that calve at 3 y of age (Lesmeister et al., 1973). When puberty is not attained before the start of the breeding season, fertility (Byerley et al., 1987) and potential income for cow-calf producers are reduced (Werth et al., 1991). Manipulation of the diet, rate of gain, and plasma metabolites and hormones can hasten the onset of puberty (Yelich et al., 1996). Management decisions should be made to hasten the onset of puberty in heifers, increase the number of pubertal heifers prior to the breeding season, and increase the number of heifers that calve at 2 y of age to improve profitability. The relationship between body weight at puberty and mature weight in beef cattle is not established. An accurate determination of the percentage of mature weight that a beef heifer needs to achieve for puberty to occur will allow producers to manage heifers to increase the number that are pubertal prior to breeding season. There are both genetic and environmental components that influence mature weight in beef cattle. Mature weight is heritable and can be altered by selection (Kaps et al., 1999). Selection for weaning weight and yearling weight will indirectly increase mature weight. Environment, including type of nutrient consumption, may influence mature weight of beef cattle. Brahman heifers that grazed Bermuda grass had greater mature weights than Braham cattle that grazed fescue (Sandelin et al., 2002).

Development of replacement heifers is critical for profitable beef production. An understanding of the relationship of weight at puberty with mature weight will allow development of management strategies to enhance performance. Beef producers must consider resources and environmental conditions when developing feeding programs for replacement heifers to increase the probability that heifers will calve at 2 y of age. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between weight at puberty of individual Angus x Hereford heifers and mature weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS Weights at puberty and mature weights were obtained for Angus x Hereford heifers born in the spring of 1997 (n = 12), 1998 (n = 12) and 2003 (n=10). Heifers were at least 75% Angus and 25% or less Hereford, and were maintained in the research herd and used for a variety of projects to study reproductive physiology at the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station. Weights obtained at 5 to 7 yr of age were taken after cows were withdrawn from feed and water for 16 h and BW was adjusted to a BCS of 5 (Tennant et al., 2002). Weight at puberty was expressed as shrunk body weight (restriction of feed and water for 16 h) and determined by extrapolation of body weights taken monthly for 1997 and 1998 heifers and at 8- to 12-wk intervals before and after the onset of puberty for the 2003 heifers. Blood was collected weekly from heifers into tubes containing EDTA, placed on ice, and centrifuged at 1,800 x g within 4 h after collection. Plasma was aspirated and stored at -20 C until progesterone was quantified (Vizcarra et al., 1997) with a solid phase RIA (Coat-A-Count progesterone kit, Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA) to determine the onset of ovarian luteal activity. Concentration of progesterone greater than 0.5 ng/ml for two consecutive samples was the criterion to determine the onset of puberty. Date of the first of the two consecutive samples with progesterone greater than 0.5 ng/ml was considered age at the onset of puberty. Percentage of mature weight at puberty was determined for each animal. Differences in weight at puberty, mature weight and percentage of mature weight at puberty for the year of birth were analyzed as one-way ANOVA using GLM procedures of SAS. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between weight at puberty and mature weight. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Weights at puberty and maturity are in Table 1. Spring born heifers in 1997, 1998 and 2003 attained puberty at similar (P = 0.27) body weights (316, 316, and 335 kg, respectively). Heifers born in all years had similar (P = 0.90) mature weights (577 ± 9 kg). Heifers initiated puberty at 56% of the mature weight and year did not influence (P = 0.44) percentage of mature weight at puberty. Regression analysis of mature weight and weight at puberty for spring born heifers revealed that mature weight accounted for 32% of the variation in weight at puberty (P < 0.001). There was minimal variation in the percentage of mature weight at puberty in the heifers (Figure 1). Seventy-nine percent of the heifers attained puberty at 51 to 60 percent of the mature weight. Only 9% of the heifers initiated the first normal ovarian cycles at greater than 69% of the mature

weight. Twelve percent of the heifers were estrus before they attained 50% of the mature weight. Prepubertal growth of the heifers in this experiment was similar to normal management used in the beef industry of the Great Plains. When evaluating the relationship between weight at puberty and mature body weight of cows, comparisons should be made between cows of similar age, because age at which mature weight is determined can influence the percentage of mature weight at which the heifer reaches puberty. Body weight of a cow can vary as much as 100 kg during a production year, and BCS can be used to adjust for the amount of fat or body composition of a cow. In this study, Angus x Hereford heifers reached puberty at approximately 56% of the mature weight that was determined at 5 to 7 y of age and at a BCS of 5. Breed of heifers may influence the percentage of mature BW at puberty. Additional studies are necessary to determine if different breeds and crossbred heifers initiate ovarian luteal activity at approximately 56% of their mature weight. The specific percentage of mature weight at which a heifer attains puberty can be used in management of heifers to increase the probability that heifers will become pregnant and calve by 2 y of age. In the current study, the percentage of mature weight the heifer attained puberty was consistent when the value was calculated using 5 to 7 yr old cows to determine maturity and adjusting body weight to a BCS of 5. This is an easy to obtain measurement that producers could use to increase reproductive performance, productive life, and profitability of a cow herd. Table 1. Weight at puberty, mature weight, and percentage of mature weight at the attainment of puberty in beef cattle Items Birth Year SE P-value 1997 1998 2003 Cows, no. 12 12 10 Weight at puberty, kg 316 316 335 13 0.27 Mature weight, kg a 577 571 582 15 0.90 Percentage of mature weight at puberty 55 56 58 1 0.44 a Mature weights of cows at mid-gestation at 5 to 7 yr of age and adjusted to a BCS of 5.

Figure 1. Percentage of heifers that became puberal at different percentages of mature weight. LITERATURE CITED Byerley, D.J., J.G. Beraradinelli, R.B. Staigmiller, and R.E. Short. 1987. Pregnancy rates of beef heifers bred either on puberal or third estrus. J. Anim. Sci. 65:645-650. Kaps, M., W.O. Herring, and W.R. Lamberson. 1999. Genetic environmental parameters for mature weight in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1436-1442. Lesmeister, J.L., P.J. Burfening, and R.L. Blackwell. 1973. Date of first calving in beef cows and subsequent production. J. Anim. Sci. 36:1-6. Sandelin, B.A., A.H. Brown Jr., M.A. Brown, Z.B. Johnson, D.W. Kellog, and A.M. Stelzleni. 2002. Genotype x environment interaction for mature size and rate of maturing for Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal cross cows grazing Bermuda grass or endophyte infected fescue. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3073-3076. Tennant, C.J., J.C. Spitzer, W.C. Bridges Jr., and J.H. Hampton. 2002. Weight necessary to change body condition scores in Angus cows. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2031-2035.

Vizcarra, J.A., R.P. Wettemann, T.D. Braden, A.M. Turzillo, and T.M. Nett. 1997. Effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency on serum and pituitary concentrations of lutienizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone, GnRH receptors and messenger ribonucleic acids for gonadotropin subunits in cows. Endocrinology 138:594-601. Werth, L.A., S.M Azzam, M.K. Nielsen, and J.E. Kinder. 1991. Use of a simulation model to evaluate the influence of reproductive performance and management decisions on net income in beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 69:4710-4721. Yelich, J.V., R.P. Wettemann, T.T. Marston, and L.J. Spicer. 1996. Luteinizing hormone, growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-i, insulin and metabolites before puberty in heifers to at two rates. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 13:325-338. Copyright 2009 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station