Kathmandu Valley Er Surya Raj Kadel (Project Implementation Directorate PID) Anamnagar, Kathmandu, Nepal



Similar documents
NEP: Kathmandu Valley Water Supply Improvement Project (Additional Financing) Small Works Package No 01/21

On-site Treatmentt for Domestic Wastewater in Thailand Suwanna. K. Boontanon Mahidol Univ. 2

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Small Wastewater Treatment Systems

Alternative Options to Large Scales of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facilities Management in Thailand

Supplementary Materials: The Status of Domestic Water Demand: Supply Deficit in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

Type of Sewer Systems. Solomon Seyoum

MAP KEYS GLOSSARY FOR THE DRAINAGE AND WATER REPORT

PRESENTATION. Improving the performance of Public Water Utilities A case study of Bangalore N.C. MUNIYAPPA, Chairman, BWSSB LOCATION MAP OF BANGALORE

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

The City of Boulder 75 th Street Wastewater Treatment Facility

4.2 Option 1 Expand Existing Lagoon System

TOWN OF LAKESHORE CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT FOR LAKESHORE EASTERN COMMUNITIES SEWAGE WORKS

Wastewater Treatment in Kathmandu, Nepal

Collection and disposal of wastewater

Terms of Reference. Aqaba Water and Wastewater Utility Asset Valuation

Bay Park Sewage Treatment Plant Super Storm Sandy Recovery

INDEX. Introduction 3. The Septic System 3. What Does The Septic Tank Do? 4. Where It All Goes 5. Problems 7. Some Dontʼs 8

Facility Classification Standards

PRODUCT SELECTOR Pollution Control, Pumping and Rainwater Harvesting Systems

TALLINN WATER TREATMENT AND SEWERAGE Tuuli Myllymaa

Water Recycling in action in South Australia: a review of agricultural and municipal reuse schemes and innovation.

Altoona Water Authority. Infrastructure Overview

Description of the Water Conserv II Facility

St. John s Harbour Clean-Up Phase 2. Project Description

DESCRIPTION OF STORMWATER STRUCTURAL CONTROLS IN MS4 PERMITS

How To Improve The Infrastructure Of The City Of Germany

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Alberta Environment Standards for Advanced Waste Systems

Guidance on applying for approval of installation of a commercial onsite wastewater system

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

Murcia. Capital and most populous city of the Region de Murcia. Seventh largest city in Spain.

E nv i ro n m e nta l. Biotec 5-7. Sustainable, Reliable, Affordable

Outline. Background. NFPA 820 Applicability to Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Hazardous Area Classifications. Treatment Plant Area Classifications

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

Who is responsible for making sure that wastewater is treated properly?

Biological wastewater treatment plants of BIOGEST

CHAPTER Section 1 Inventory of Existing Sanitary Sewer Collection and Treatment Facilities

Environmental Science 101 Waste. Fall Lecture Outline: Terms You Should Know: Learning Objectives: Reading Assignment: Chlorinated.

Environmental Compliance Audit Report. MFF 0054-VIE: Water Sector Investment Program Tranche 2

DRAFT Public Outreach Document for What s an SSMP?

Module 6 : Quantity Estimation of Storm Water. Lecture 6 : Quantity Estimation of Storm Water

High-Rate Retention Treatment Facility for CSO Control in Windsor Riverfront East

Advanced Wastewater Treatment Process

A NOVEL ION-EXCHANGE/ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY FOR THE TREATMENT OF AMMONIA IN WASTEWATER

Solid Waste Treatment Facility Solid Waste Permit Application

Equipment and Instrument Tagging Requirements

Mega Manila: Partnership in Action

Georgia Department of Public Health. Georgia Onsite Sewage Management Systems. Background and Use of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Georgia

Viet Nam Da Nang Waste water management

RULE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - WASTEWATER COLLECTION AND SEPARATION SYSTEMS

Urban Water Supply Sector Reform in Kathmandu Valley. Dol Prasad Chapagain

Rehabilitation of Wastewater Treatment Plant of Sakhnin City in Israel by Using Advanced Technologies

aquateam Aquateam - Norwegian Water Technology Centre A/S Report no: Project no: O Project manager: Dr. Bjørn Rusten.

Aeration Efficiency Guide

Saudi Aramco Project Development

DIRECT POTABLE REUSE: A PATH FORWARD:

Director of Utilities. Manager. Regulatory Compliance Supervisor. Distribution Supervisor. Utilities Analyst. Account Clerk. Water

Grit Removal Identification and Removal Methods

Kathmandu Valley Profile Briefing Paper

IVAR's object is to build and operate joint municipal treatment plants for water, sewerage and solid waste. The company's vision is to ensure that

Emerging Technologies in Wastewater Collection Systems

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Population Wastewater Flows...

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Life cycle energy analysis of water use system in Ara river watershed

California Wastewater

Migrating Guelph Wastewater s Data Monitoring Program to a Web-Based Reporting System:

Water Management in Helsinki. Water supply. Mikael Sillfors

Energy Audits Waste Water Treatment Plants

GUIDELINES FOR LEACHATE CONTROL

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Asset Management Answering the 5 Core Questions

Repairs Made With Under Pressure Installations Can Offer Reduced Risks And Expenses

Glossary of Wastewater Terms

Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Systems. Water and Wastewater Utility Operation and

Private Sector Participation in Solid Waste Management in Kathmandu

REGION OF PEEL PUBLIC WORKS DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS & PROCEDURES MANUAL

CHAPTER 8 CIVIL DESIGN

Report Naga City: Septage treatment and wastewater concept for Del Rosario

Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

The Importance of Master Planning Ibrahim S. Nassar, P.E. Facilities Planning Department Saudi Aramco

Improving on-site domestic wastewater treatment systems - West Coast Lagoons Project

St. Petersburg, FL: Vehicle Use of Recycled Natural Gas Derived from Wastewater Biosolids

Oasis Clearwater ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS WASTEWATER TREATMENT ENGINEERS

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH FACT SHEET NO. 500

SEPTIC TANK SYSTEMS. Single purpose septic tank receives toilet wastes (blackwater) or sullage (greywater) only.

The Flow Regulator. Flow regulation

4 Water supply description

EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Waste Production of KMC. Waste Management Policy & Laws. Solid Waste Management in Kathmandu City. Katmandu Metropolitan city at a glance.

Prof. Shyam R. Asolekar Centre for Environmental Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai, Mumbai

Transcription:

Waster and wastewater management of Kathmandu Valley Er Surya Raj Kadel (Project Implementation Directorate PID) Anamnagar, Kathmandu, Nepal 1

Presentation Outline Present Status of Demand and Supply Development Scenario Wastewater Management Present and Future Development Challenges 2

3

Kathmandu Valley 4

Present Issues of Wastewater Management in Kathmandu Valley Population Growth regarding Kathmandu Valley

Water Supply Situation Total Population of Kathmandu Valley- 25 million With temporary residents- 40 million Water Demand 360 MLD: Production: 95 MLD (min): 154 MLD (Max) Water Losses (NRW): 48% Actual Availability to consumer : 15% of demand Non uniformity / inequality in Supply Untreated Water: Unsafe for drinking Tanker Supply by Public/Private vendor Maximum exploitation of Ground Water by people 6

Present Status For Core areas 35 Surface Sources 78 Tube Wells (Only 59 in operation) 20 Treatment plants (117 MLD) 39 Pumping Stations Reservoir 41500 m3 1400 km of Pipe lines Other several small systems 7

Organization Involved Kathmandu Upatyaka Khanepani Limited (Operator) Department of Water supply and Sewerage (GoN) Municipalities/Village Development Committees District Development Committees INGos, NGOs, Bilateral Organisations, Embassys 8

Water Supply Demand and Supply 400 350 320 320 350 350 360 Demand : 529 MLD By 2030 300 M L D 250 200 150 111 119 119 114 124 Avg Demand Avg Supply 100 50 0 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11 2009/10 2008/09 Fiscal Year 9

C o n n e c t i o n s 195000 190000 185000 180000 175000 170000 165000 160000 155000 150000 Nos of connections 190531 184720 181042 173709 166686 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 Fiscal Year 10

Melamchi Water Supply Project Tunnel : 26 Km I st Phase: 170 MLD 2 nd Phase: 170 MLD 3 rd Phase: 170 MLD WTP : 1 st Phase 85 MLD : 2 nd Phase 85 MLD 11

Location of Project Area, Bulk Distribution System and Service Reservoir BDS -2 (Gaushal to Tinkune) Project Area 10 Zones = 46 Sub-Zones 11 DNIs = 14 Sub-Zones 1 Pilot = 1 Sub-Zone 1 Demo = 1 Sub-Zone 30 Remaining Sub-Zones Katunje Reservoir ( Bhaktapur) 12

Summary of Bulk Distribution and Service Reservoir Packages Bulk Distribution System : 57 km (300-1400mm Dia DI Pipe) 4 Packages (Running) 6 service Reservoir (65000 cum Capacity) 2 Reservoir already constructed (5800 m3) 2 Under Tendering (9000 m3) Existing 37000 m3; Under construction 65000 m3 To be Constructed 30000 m3 Distribution Network: 502 km (HDPE, DI Pipes) 3 Packages (Running) 502 Km

Basic Characteristics 1. 11 Distribution network design is based on (47 DMA District Metering Units) basis. 2. DI pipes are of diameter 150mm and above upto 1000mm. 3. PE100- PN 6 pipes of diameter 75mm, 90mm and 110mm. 4. Reticulation pipe where DI pipe is in the design. 5. Both side pipe if the road width more than 7m. 6. No HH connection from DI pipes. 7. All HDPE pipes are connected with electro fusion joints. 8. Household connections from electro fusion saddle joint, brass ferrule, compression joint with HDPE pipe and small pieces of GI pipe and fittings above ground. Above ground there will be corporation stops before and after water meter. 9. Performance assessment NRW within 15% in each DMA, which is tied up with payment. 10. SCADA Friendly. 135 LPCD for permanent and 40 LPCD for temporary Residents 14

History of Wastewater Management in Kathmandu Valley 1800 AD Malla Period: For surface drainage and kitchen sullage Between 1898 and 1950 Rana dynasty: Further development of combined sewer, brick sewers typically 600 mm circular sections or 1050 x 1050 mm oval sections, these were constructed with a flushing system using gates to allow sudden release of flows.

History of Wastewater Management in Kathmandu Valley World Bank / IDA projects were under taken in three phases First (1976-1983), Second (1980-1985), Third (1980-1988) phase, Two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were constructed Treatment System: Stabilisation Pond Kodku ( 1982 ) Capacity: 1.1 MLD Dhobighat (1982 ) Capacity: 15.4 MLD Various interceptors were also constructed GTZ Projects: Hanumanghat WWTP (1975) : Sallaghari WWTP (1983) Capacity: 0.5 MLD 2 MLD

Present Status of Wastewater Infrastructure in Kathmandu Valley Sewer Lines: Aproximately 1350 kms Interceptors (Excluding interceptors constructed recently by HPDBIC) Approximately 35 Kms Functionional WWTP No. - 1 Name - Guheswori WWTP Capacity - 16.2 MLD Status - Not fully fuctional due to load sheddeing Dedicated Electricity Supply Line - Process undergoing for installation of dedicated line

Details Slide 42

Technology choice 1. Sewerage Network System System Options Separate System Combined System Wherever possible Separate System Wherever not possible Combined system ooverflow structure are proposed to flow storm water to river. INTERCEPTOR PLAN 19

Project Components Wastewater Treatment Plants Package 1 Guheshwori WWTP Package 2 Gokarna WWTP Dhobighat WWTP Kodku WWTP Sallaghari WWTP Interceptor Sewers 2 Packages along tributary of Bagamati River Sewer Network 2 Packages covering Kathmandu, Lalitpur, Bhaktapur and Kritipur

Kathmandu Valley Existing Sewerage Network and Major WWTP Guheshwori Dhobighat Kodku Sallaghari

Selection of Appropriate Technology Factors Capital costs, Operation and maintenance costs Land requirement Sustainability Location (Urban, Semi urban, Rural) Social acceptability 22

Footprint: Abandon previously utilized systems like aerated lagoons and stabilization ponds which require large footprint Deodorization: Consider technologies which causes less nuisance regarding odour escaping to surrounding area: Covered Stringent Quality Effluent : Use of the tertiary treatment for polishing water from biological treatment in holy areas such as Gokarna and Guheswori Modern Technology: Consider technologies which require less footprint so that larger capacity WWTPs can be constructed in available land/space - ASP Sludge Digestion: Consideration of modern technology like centrifuge/ filter press in place of sludge drying beds for sludge dewatering

Incremental Investment : Phase wise implementation of treatment plant construction and Sewerage Network improvement is mainly focused. Augmentation of River System (Presentation Slide for River Flow augumenation.pptx) Design Build and Operate Contract procedure Opportunities /Risk and Uncerta Reuse of Effluent water and sludge cake. Septage Management

Generate Electricity by Methane Gas from Anaerobic Digester treatment of Dhobighat, Kodku and Sallaghari WWTP Sludge Anaerobic Digester Gas Storage 10

Be Harmony with Surrounding Area :Good Neighbour Provide Recreational area and public park for population on reserved area in WWTP or water front WWTPs not only treat wastewater but also provide site for relaxation and recreation 8

Gauging Stations Proposed WWTP Locations Base Flow m3/s Effluent Discharge of WWTP (Phase Bagmati I/Phase River II) 0.32m3/s Dhobighat 0.43/1.27m3/s 0.32m3/s 0.22m3/s 0.38/0.50m3/s Guheshwori 0.12m3/s Gaurigha t Kodku 0.10m3/s 0.20/0.41m3/s 0/0.07m3/s Gokarna 0.16m3/s 0.16m3/s Sundarijal 0.16m3/s Sallaghari 0.03m3/s 0.32m3/s Khokana 3.41m3/s WWTP Capacity Phase I Phase II Future Total Guhweshori 32.4 10.6 43.0 Sallaghari 14.2 14.2 Kodku 17.5 17.5 35.0 Dobighat 37.0 73.0 110.0 Sub Total 101.1 101.1 202.2 Khokana 294.7 294.7 Total 101.1 101.1 294.7 496.9

Flow Augmentation Scenario after WWTP and Nagmati Dam Gauging Stations Proposed WWTP Locations Base Flow m3/s Effluent Discharge of WWTP (Phase Bagmati I/Phase River II) 1.07/1.40 m3/s Dhobighat 0.43/1.27m3/s 1.50/2.80 m3/s 0.38/0.50m3/s Guheshwori 0.61/0.73m3/s Gaurigha t 1.07/1.40 m3/s Kodku 0.26m3/s 0.20/0.41m3/s 0/0.07m3/s Gokarna 0.23m3/s 0.16m3/s Sundarijal 0.16m3/s Sallaghari 0.19m3/s 4.91/7.21m3/s Khokana 3.41m3/s

Total Catchment Area A = 195.2 km 2 29

Guheshwori 2.2 Guheshwori WWTP PLAN Layout Summary PLAN Capacity Site Area WWTP Area Summary 32.4 MLD 50,000 m2 28,583m2 (53.12%) Equalization tank PTF: 2 Tanks PST: 4 Tanks A/T: 2 Tanks SST: 2 Tanks Sludge Treatment (thickening-digestiondewatering process) Biogas & Power Generation (300KWH)

Grit Removal By-pass to river Grit Removal 2.2 Guheshwori WWTP PLAN Process Flow Diagram Influent Inlet Chamber PTF Screen Grit Chamber ET PST A/T SST DF Discharg e to River Primary Sludge Secondary Sludge LEGEND Wastewater Flow Sludge Flow By-Pass Flow GAS Line Return flow Septic sludge Flow Return flow Septic sludge Degritting & Decilting Facility Gravity Thickener Anaerobic Digester Mechanical Thickener Gas Holder Bio-Gas Generation NOTE PTF : Pre-Treatment Facility PST : Primary Sedimentation Tank A/T : Aeration Tank SST : Secondary Sedimentation Tank DF : Disinfection Facility Centrifuge Dewatering Lime Mixing Sludge Cake (Agricultural Use or Landfill)

Conceptual Design of Guheswori WWTP A A B C C G B F h E D A. Pre-Treatment Facilities B. Primary Sedimentation Tank C. Oxidation Ditch D. Tertiary Treatment E. Tunnel Discharge F. Deodorization G. Bio Gas GenerationA H. Photovoltaic (Future) 2

Kodku Ent. 12,600m2 Ent. Ent. Ent.

Dhobighat Ent. Ent. Ent. 64,500m2 Ent. Ent.

Proposed Works Under KVWWMP Wastewater Treatmant Plant 2 Packages Interceptors 2 Packages Sewer Network 2 Packages Package 1: Guheswori Package 2: Sallaghari,Kodku, Dhobighat Manohara and Hanumante Intercepters Package 1: KMC Package 2: All other Municipalities inside

Service Area & Design Criteria Service Area Coverage 5 Municipalities 17 VDCs Estimation Criteria for Discharge rate Service Area Total Area Parameter Unit 2015 2020 2030 Population connected to off-site system % 70 75 80 Domestic sewage lpcd 80 80 96 Nondomestic sewage % 10 10 10 Infiltration rate % 10 10 10 Peak factor of Domestic Sewage - 2.5 2.5 2.5 Coverage Area (ha) (ha) (%) Kathmandu M. 5,194.15 5,194.15 100.0 Lalitpur Sub-M. 1,518.65 1,518.65 100.0 Bhaktapur M. 670.61 670.61 100.0 Kirtipur M. 1,539.35 1,539.35 100.0 Madhyapur Thimi M. 1,125.98 1,125.98 100.0 32 VDCs in Kathma (previous) partly 10 VDCs in Lalitpur partly 7 VDCs in Bhaktapur Partly 14,058.35 6,275.62 44.6 3,975.52 2,273.96 57.2 3,959.76 924.91 23.4 Total 32,042.37 19,523.23 60.9

WWPTs Expansion Plan Category 2015 2020 2030 Remarks Total Discharged 159.2 221.2 496.8 Total Cap. Of WWTP 16.2 101.1 502.8 Guheshwori WWTP Sallaghari WWTP Kodku WWTP Dhobighat WWTP Khokana WWTP Surplus Cap. -143.0-110.1 6.0 Discharged 12.0 17.5 42.9 Bagmati Existing : 1 Capacity 16.2 32.4 48.6 Surplus Cap. 4.2 14.9 5.7 Discharged 7.3 8.7 14.0 Capacity - 14.2 14.2 Surplus Cap. -7.3 5.5 0.2 16.2MLD 1 nt Ext. : 16.2MLD 2 nd Ext. : 16.2MLD Total Cap. : 48.6MLD Bhaktapur Discharged 9.9 14.4 35.0 Kodku 1, Capacity - 17.5 Balkumari 35.0 17.50MLD 2 nd Surplus Cap. -9.9 3.1 - Ext Discharged 38.6 52.3 109.9 Bagmati 2(partially) Capacity - 37 110.0 Sundarighat Surplus Cap. -38.6-15.3 Kodku 2, 0.1 Manohara Discharged 91.4 128.4 294.9 Bagmati 2(partially) Capacity - - 295.0 Tuckcha, Dhobi khola Surplus Cap. -91.4-128.4 0.1 Bishnumati, Nakhu, Bhalku Rate(ML D) 600 500 400 300 200 100 WWTP Extension Plan Khokana : 295.0 Gheshwori : ext 16.2 Total 48.6 Total Discharged Sallaghari : 14.2 Kodku : 17.5 Dhobighat : 37 Guheshwori : ext 16.2 0 Total 32.4 2015 2020 2025 2030 year

Present Issues of Wastewater Management in Kathmandu Valley Development of Wastewater Infrastructure without Masterplan Involvement of various organisations Aged system for sewer conveyance Inadequate capacity of Sewers Cross connections between domestic sewer and stormwater sewer Non- Priority area of Development

WWM : Issues and Challenges Septage Management for gnerated from 22000 households Contract Bidding Procedure (DBO manageable or not) Phasewise Construction: Challenge for fund generation Institutional Capacity Not Sufficient Electric Power Problem for 24 hours operation Conducive Environment for large Project?? Opportunities Need of Valley River Restoration Environmental Sanitation improvement Wastewater Generation increased 40

41