Results & Key Findings



Similar documents
Results & Key Findings

Winning Marketing Claims

TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING

CHAPTER 14 ORDINAL MEASURES OF CORRELATION: SPEARMAN'S RHO AND GAMMA

Market research questionnaire cheat sheet

The College Strategic Process

EDUCATION POST 2015 Parent Attitudes Survey

Sample Satisfaction Surveys

2011 R&D/Innovation and Product Development Priorities Survey Results

Lesson 2: Constructing Line Graphs and Bar Graphs

TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION... 5 PURPOSE... 5 SCOPE... 6 RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS... 6

HR Strategy Survey Instrument for Key Leaders

Impact / Performance Matrix A Strategic Planning Tool

Sales Checkpoint Performance Feedback System

How to Develop an Effective Customer Satisfaction Survey

Employee Engagement Survey Results. SampleCo International. Executive Summary. Sample Report

3D Group Research. Thank you for your interest in the research conducted by 3D Group consultants. This is a partial report.

1 One Dimensional Horizontal Motion Position vs. time Velocity vs. time

OPEN STANDARDS BENCHMARKING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MEASURE LIST

MERCER 360 MAIN CHARACTERISTICS

Airport Council International

This chapter provides information on the research methods of this thesis. The

360 Degree Feedback Report. Harry Trout

Charles Darwin University Library Client Survey Report

Sub-question 6: What are student and faculty perceptions concerning their frequency of use of the DDP?

Net Promoter Score, Net Promoter and NPS are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Satmetrix Systems and Fred Reichheld

Building Energy Efficiency Opportunity Report

Lab: Graphing Activities TOTTEN

Hosting Motivation and Satisfaction Study:

The Effect of Information Technology (IT) Support on Innovations Concepts: A study of Textile Sector in Pakistan

Creating An Anonymous Survey

Three daily lessons. Year 5

LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

360 feedback. Manager. Development Report. Sample Example. name: date:

Chapter 10. Key Ideas Correlation, Correlation Coefficient (r),

Investor Questionnaire

America s Oral Health

Market Research: 8 Sure-Fire Ways to Make Sure Your Business, Product or Service Idea is Successful from the Start!

Community/School Partnerships: A National Survey

2014 Judicial Performance Survey Report 19th Judicial District

1.New product introductions

2016 Credit Card Monitor Report

2015 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

The Management Diamond. Geir Fuglaas,

What really drives customer satisfaction during the insurance claims process?

1. LEADERSHIP 90 INFORMATION & ANALYSIS STRATEGIC QUALITY PLANNING 4. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT 150

Predictive Marketing for Banking

Bar Charts, Histograms, Line Graphs & Pie Charts

Discovery Education ASSESSMENT

Financial services marketers: Are your sales aids actually aiding sales?

Customer Satisfaction Survey of Indian Tribal Governments. Office of Indian Tribal Governments Tax Exempt Government Entities Division

Benefit Cost Savings Through Strategic Evaluation TINA MARIE WOHLFIELD, SPHR, SHRM-SCP MASB FALL CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 23, 2015

How To Understand Your Customer Experience

Tips To Select and Implement CRM To Improve Your Bottom Line

Strategic HR Partner Assessment (SHRPA) Feedback Results

Asset Criticality Ranking A Best Practice Overview

SURVEY ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS. SURVEY ANALYSIS Scale Interpretation Tabulated Data Reports Report Legend 14-15

Evaluation of On-Site Supervisors Survey

Patient Satisfaction Surveys

Is a Traditional Drawing Exercise for Plant and Seed Identification Still Effective for Millennial Students?

Beef Demand: What is Driving the Market?

ITIL V3: Making Business Services Serve the Business

Future of Marketing The Channel Surfing Customer. Karen Ganschow

Statistics Revision Sheet Question 6 of Paper 2

Newspaper Multiplatform Usage

MPF Sustainability Panel

AGENDA ITEM C2: STUDENT DEVELOPMENT BOARD RULE PROGRAM REVIEW BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING: APRIL 28, 2011

Designing a Metrics Dashboard for the Sales Organization By Mike Rose, Management Consultant.

Top Trends in Voluntary Benefits

Flex Program Member Assessment Satisfaction Member Needs Education

What does sustainability mean for biofuel producers today? How will it affect your business tomorrow?

CRM Systems and Customer Survey Measurement A Panoramic View of Customers by Jamie Baker-Prewitt, Ph.D.,Vice President, Burke, Inc.

The responses to this assessment will help you identify key opportunities to derive full value from the Net Promoter system process.

CONSUMER AWARENESS AND SATISFACTION SURVEY 2014

BE 2015 A BUSINESS EXCELLENCE INITIATIVE EXCELLENCE IN CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT SELF ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

Linking Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Employee Ambassadorship Session 1: Ambassadorship Concept/Framework Introduction and Rationale

Grade 4 - Module 5: Fraction Equivalence, Ordering, and Operations

TAXREP 01/16 (ICAEW REP 02/16)

2016 NICE-BCG CX SURVEY

Quantitative vs. Categorical Data: A Difference Worth Knowing Stephen Few April 2005

Architecting Customer Experience to Engage and Transform the Organization David Wheable Vice President and Principal Consultant

HISTOGRAMS, CUMULATIVE FREQUENCY AND BOX PLOTS

UNC Leadership Survey 2012: Women in Business

To provide a brief summary of results from the 2015 National NHS Staff Survey

Appendix A: Annotated Table of Activities & Tools

The Healthcare Leadership Model Appraisal Hub and 360 report. Facilitator user guide

Strategic Account Planning How to Get from Good to Great?

A preview of The BI Survey 12: The Results. For more information, visit:

Department of Police and Public Safety. Customer Satisfaction Survey Report Spring 2011

Higher Education Enrollment Marketing

This improved version will be available starting February 4, Feedback Report Prepared for. 4 Feb 2013

STAFF. Summary of Results _University of Minnesota Crookston_STAFF. HumanResources. Office of

FINDING THE RISK IN RISK ASSESSMENTS NYSICA JULY 26, Presented by: Ken Shulman Internal Audit Director, New York State Insurance Fund

What Tech Buyers Think TM

Qualities of a High Perf o r m a n c e Finance Executive: An Aggregation of Skills. John Trakselis, Principal M. Wood Company

NMSU Administration and Finance Custodial Services/Solid Waste and Recycling

Executive Cover Memo. The Allround brand is in a favorable position, but the cold medicine is also becoming a

Responsibility and Accountability in Institutional Governance

American Sentinel University DNP Practice Experience Quick Start Guide

Service Satisfaction Survey Summary Report

Transcription:

Results & Key Findings Sample Customer Service Assessment (Overview) 310.652.5678 fax 310.652.5677 www.profitablesolutions.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS METHODOLOGY.. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alignment Comparison.. 1 Degree of Impact.... 2 SURVEY RESULTS Courtesy.. 3 Product/Service.. 3 Responsiveness... 4 Customer Service....... 4 Competence.. 4 Convenience.. 5 Reliability..... 5 Value..... 5 1997-2001 Virtual CEO, Inc.

Methodology The assessment employs a six-point interval scale to assess your organization s performance measured against 35 statements. Each statement requires a response ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Or the participant may choose a Don t Know/Not Applicable response. Responses from all participants are aggregated resulting in performance mean scores. The Results & Key Findings report is designed to reflect: Utilization 1. Alignment: Group perception of performance in each category. 2. Priorities: The areas your participants perceive to be the Key Issues. 3. Performance: How your organization s performance is currently viewed in the areas of Resource, Knowledge and Value 4. Focus: The areas your participants perceive to be both High-Impact and Low-Performance. 1. Review the Degree of Impact Summary in order to: Establish a broad understanding of how you prioritized issues. Identify how you rated their performance. 2. Review the detail report pages to validate and gain further understanding of the performance scores. 3. Validate and compare your observations with those of your customers. 4. Select your top issues, define solutions, and craft an action plan to improve performance. 5. Six to twelve months later retake the assessment and benchmark against previous results. Customer Service For additional support or technical assistance please contact: F.A.A.S.T. Results Key Findings - Customer Service Report - Sample CO - 09 May, 2001

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alignment Comparison This report compares the responses from each group and displays the level of alignment. Responsiveness Courtesy 6.00 5.00 4.00 Products/Services # Customer Priorities Perf. 1 Products/Services 2.58 2 Competence 2.70 3 Courtesy 2.46 4 Reliability 3.13 5 Responsiveness 2.47 6 Convenience 2.65 7 Value 2.88 8 Customer Service 2.88 Reliability 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Value # Employee Priorities Perf. 1 Products/Services 3.42 2 Reliability 3.45 3 Competence 2.37 4 Courtesy 3.38 5 Convenience 3.05 6 Customer Service 2.83 7 Value 3.18 8 Responsiveness 3.43 Convenience Customer Service # Management Priorities Perf. 1 Reliability 4.30 2 Convenience 3.77 3 Competence 3.43 4 Customer Service 4.16 5 Courtesy 4.28 6 Product/Services 4.22 7 Responsiveness 4.46 8 Value 4.11 Competence Customer Employee Management 1 1997-2001 Virtual CEO, Inc.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Degree of Impact This section plots the 8 areas within the Customer Service Assessment. The vertical axis represents the performance score and the horizontal axis represents the order of importance priority, with the highest importance priority to the right. The importance ranking table reflects the assessment topics in order of weighted priority, as determined by the group, and indicates the performance mean score. 4.50 4.00 Lower Impact - Higher Score Higher Impact - Higher Score # Importance Ranking Impact Perf. 1 Products/Services 90.14% 2.58 2 Competence 69.19% 2.70 3 Courtesy 57.57% 2.46 4 Reliability 49.12% 3.13 5 Responsiveness 45.77% 2.47 6 Convenience 40.67% 2.65 7 Value 35.04% 2.88 8 Customer Service 30.81% 2.88 COMMENTS: 3.50 Reliability 3.00 Value Customer Service Convenience Competence 2.50 Mean: 2.72 Courtesy Products/Services Responsiveness 2.00 1.50 Lower Impact - Lower Score Higher Impact - Lower Score 2 1997-2001 Virtual CEO, Inc.

Survey Results This section of the report compares participant perceptions of the organization. Courtesy Employees greet me warmly and courteously. Employees are eager to serve. Employees remember and use my name. Employees introduce themselves by name. Employees take the time to acknowledge me even if they are busy. Employees demonstrate a sincere desire to understand my needs. Products/Services The selections of products/services offered meet my needs. Products/Services deliveries are fast and responsive. I am often asked for feedback regarding products/services I use. It is easy for me to buy their products/services. The quality of the products/services is excellent. FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE Positive Customer Mean Score: 2.46 DK 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scores Employee Mean Score: 3.38 Customer 0% 54% 3% 4% 13% 14% 6% 20% Management Mean Score: 4.28 Employee 0% 38% 8% 8% 25% 18% 5% 23% DK = Don't Know/Not Applicable Management 0% 6% 25% 16% 19% 22% 13% 34% 1 = Strongly Disagree Customer 0% 32% 23% 1% 7% 18% 11% 30% 2 = Disagree Employee 0% 35% 0% 0% 13% 25% 28% 53% 3 = Somewhat Disagree Management 0% 0% 13% 0% 13% 44% 31% 75% 4 = Somewhat Agree Customer 0% 54% 0% 1% 13% 15% 10% 25% 5 = Agree Employee 0% 33% 0% 10% 28% 20% 10% 30% 6 = Strongly Agree Management 0% 6% 13% 9% 25% 34% 13% 47% Customer 0% 31% 25% 1% 14% 14% 7% 21% Employee 0% 33% 3% 3% 18% 33% 13% 45% Management 0% 6% 6% 13% 25% 16% 34% 50% Customer 0% 55% 0% 11% 4% 13% 10% 23% Employee 0% 35% 0% 15% 8% 25% 18% 43% Management 3% 3% 13% 6% 22% 28% 25% 53% Customer 0% 32% 24% 4% 13% 13% 7% 20% Employee 0% 35% 3% 8% 15% 28% 13% 40% Management 3% 3% 9% 16% 16% 22% 31% 53% FREQUENCY OF RESPONSE Positive Customer Mean Score: 2.58 DK 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scores Employee Mean Score: 3.42 Customer 0% 39% 15% 6% 11% 14% 7% 21% Management Mean Score: 4.22 Employee 0% 35% 5% 5% 18% 33% 5% 38% Management 3% 6% 3% 19% 19% 38% 13% 50% Customer 1% 17% 39% 4% 15% 8% 7% 15% Employee 3% 35% 3% 5% 25% 15% 15% 30% Management 3% 3% 9% 19% 16% 28% 22% 50% Customer 0% 38% 20% 1% 10% 17% 7% 24% Employee 0% 33% 5% 5% 13% 25% 20% 45% Management 3% 3% 9% 16% 25% 28% 16% 44% Customer 0% 17% 37% 7% 10% 15% 7% 23% Employee 0% 33% 0% 5% 10% 30% 23% 53% Management 3% 0% 13% 0% 28% 44% 13% 56% Customer 0% 25% 15% 21% 13% 13% 6% 18% Employee 0% 35% 3% 8% 18% 25% 13% 38% Management 0% 6% 16% 13% 9% 44% 13% 56% 3 1997-2001 Virtual CEO, Inc.