Hybrid Poplar (Populus spp) 1



Similar documents
ENERGY. Sun Grant/Department of Energy- Office of Biomass Programs. Regional Biomass Feedstock Partnership Executive Summary March 2011

Supply Chain Comparison. COEE Project 1

Woody Biomass Supply and Demand 1

Emerging BioFuel Crops and Technology Kurt Thelen Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan ABSTRACT

Mobilizing agricultural crop residues for energy and higher value bio-products

Culture in field conditions - Challenges A South American point of view Roberto Campos Pura Natura, Argentina

THE PERFORMANCE OF EUCALYPTUS HYBRID CLONES AND LOCAL LANDRACES IN VARIOUS AGROECOLOGICAL ZONES IN KENYA

Liquid Biofuels for Transport

Report from Life Coastal Woodlands. Forest management methods in the coastal woodlands

BCAP Project Area 10: New York Willow. Mike Buckley ReEnergy Holdings. Tim Volk Justin Heavey SUNY-ESF

Energy Offices Meeting

Efficient forest biomass supply chain for biorefineries A project for cross border cooperation

UPM Grow with Biofore. Vesiyhdistyksen Jätevesijaoston seminaari Esa Laurinsilta

AGRICULTURE FOR FOOD AND FOR BIOENEGY: IS IT POSSIBLE?

What are biofuels? Pocket K No. 24. Biotechnology for Green Energy: Biofuels

Division of Forestry

The Feedstock Supply Chain and Centers of Energy Excellence Update

Eric Zeldin 1, Jason Fishbach 2, Michael Demchik 3

Moringa Oleifera a Multipurpose Tree:

Growing Giant Miscanthus in Illinois

DOE Office of Biological & Environmental Research: Biofuels Strategic Plan

CURLY BIRCH (Betula pendula var. carelica) AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN FINLAND

Ranger Report About Deforestation of the Rainforest

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

How To Improve Energy Efficiency In The Paper Industry

The Food-Energy-Water Nexus in Agronomy, Crop and Soil Sciences

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Crop rotation and legumes cultivation: Effective measures to increase the environmental performance and long-term viability of European agriculture.

4.0 Discuss some effects of disturbances on the forest.

FACT SHEET. Production Risk

By Gerald Urquhart, Walter Chomentowski, David Skole, and Chris Barber

Available study programs at Czech University of Life Sciences Prague

Research Roadmap for the Future. National Grape and Wine Initiative March 2013

Biorefinery 101: Maximizing Benefits and Minimizing Risks Associated with Implementing the Forest Biorefinery

Twelve years of short rotation forest studies in Estonia

DO WE VALUE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT?

The renewable materials company

Are My. Pine Trees. Ready To Thin?

Bengt Brunberg Manager Sustainability, BillerudKorsnäs Gävle, Sweden

Assessment of cork production in new Quercus suber plantations under future climate. Joana A Paulo Margarida Tomé João HN Palma

FEED The International Forum on Strategic Studies for Agriculture and Livestock Development and Respect for the Climate. Deborah La Franchi

Ecologically based weed management! Chuck Mohler! Cornell University!

Establishing ecologically sustainable forest biomass supply chains: A case study in the boreal forest of Canada

System of Rice Intensification (SRI)

Introduction to Integrated Pest Management. John C. Wise, Ph.D. Michigan State University MSU Trevor Nichols Research Complex

Country Report, SWEDEN

Determining the Use of Technology in World Food and Fiber Production

Assignment 8: Comparison of gasification, pyrolysis and combustion

DELIVERING THE BIOENERGY TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE TO THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY

Environmental Monitoring and Modeling of the Genetic Potential of Sugarcane Cultivars under Appropriate Water Availability in the Soil

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Speaker Summary Note

Data Mining and Meta-analysis as Tools to Evaluate the Impact of Management Practices on Dynamic Soil Properties

Enhancing Biodiversity. Proactive management of biodiversity in intensive agriculture

Managing Black Walnut

Bioenergy. A sustainable energy source.

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

UPM THE BIOFORE COMPANY

Introduction to Plant Propagation. Glenn T. Sako Assistant County Extension Agent CTAHR, UHM

The Future. Trees. climate change and the timber industry ROGER SEDJO

1 SEEDLING QUALITY. Seedling quality

Forest carbon sequestration and climate change. Dr Brian Tobin University College Dublin

FOREST RESTORATION MONITORING TOOL

Life Cycle Of A Plant Population

BIOMASS SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLLING

GMO. Investor Perspectives: Criteria and Issues in Supporting Indigenous Forestry Projects. June 4, 2002 Vancouver B.C. Renewable Resources LLC

Australian Pine Log Price Index

SDE+ sustainability requirements for solid biomass

Optimization of Biomass Harvesting and Supply Chain Logistics

Torrefied Bamboo: an alternative for sustainable biomass export

Forward. Contents. Bioenergy Development Plan

THE CHRISTMAS TREE INDUSTRY IN THE U.S.A. A STATUS REPORT M. L. McCormack, Jr. and Wolfgang Mieder

Bioenergy from agroforestry can lead to improved food security, climate change, soil quality and rural development

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

Biomass availability and supply for co-firing projects in Alberta. Dominik Roser, Ph.D.

GLOBAL WOOD AND WOOD PRODUCTS FLOW

Agroforestry and climate change. Emmanuel Torquebiau FAO webinar 5 February 2013

THE PRACTICAL, PROVEN PATH TO GREEN ENERGY. RTP rapid thermal processing from Envergent Technologies

Creating Green Jobs within the Environment and Culture sector.

Building a Sustainable Biofuels Business: an Overview of the Market and BP Biofuels

Propagules adapted to wind dispersal n Propagules water dispersed n

2 CHAPTER 1 Introduction

DSM Position on Sustainable Biomass

Direct sowing versus planting

III. THE MICROBIAL BIOMASS

Transcription:

Hybrid Poplar (Populus spp) 1 SHORT ROTATION WOODY CROPS FACTSHEET SERIES #1 BACKGROUND Due to its widespread geographic adaptation, rapid growth, ease of reproduction and coppicing ability, Populus species are ideal candidates for SRWCs. Populus is a widely researched tree genus and is the most studied genus among all SRWC taxa (Tuskan et al., 2006). Populus spp. and their hybrids (i.e., poplars) are a significant component of the total biofuels and bioenergy feedstock resource in the USA, Canada, and Europe. They are capable of producing in excess of ha -1 yr -1 by age six even in the harsh climate of the North Central region of the United States (Riemenschneider et al., 2001; Zalesny et al., 2009). BIOLOGY AND PRODUCTION SYSTEM There are 29 recognized Populus species worldwide, with 12 native to North America. They possess abundant genetic variation, occurring at the genus, sectional, species, and clonal levels (Berguson et al., 2010; Zalesny et al., 2011). Features that make them suitable for biomass production include their ease of rooting and vegetative propagation, quick establishment and fast growth, and ability to resprout following repeated harvesting (Fig1). Cuttings Poplar plantation establishment uses unrooted, hardwood stem cuttings approximately 20-30 cm in length. The use of Fig 1. Two-year old hybrid poplar trees planted in a loam soil in central Minnesota, US (Photo: Bernie McMahon, University of Minnesota-Duluth). vegetative propagation allow for easy and inexpensive planting stem cuttings from dormant material. Once harvested, cuttings are stored under refrigeration, and then planted in the field when soil temperatures reach levels appropriate to specific regions and genotypes. Spacing 1 Information presented in this factsheet series was taken from a peer reviewed book chapter by: Zamora D, Apostol K, Berguson W, Volk T, Wright J, Ogdahl E. (In Press). Short Rotation Woody Crops Production. In S. Jose (ed). Feedstock for Advance Biorefineries. CRC Publishing.

Plant spacing of poplars can vary widely depending on the intended end product. In situations where debarked wood is required (e.g., paper, oriented strand board, potentially biochemical liquid fuels), lower plant populations ranging from 750 to 1700 stems ha -1 are used to produce large diameter trees which facilitate debarking, typically on a ten to twelve year rotation. However, plantations oriented toward repeated coppice production of woody biomass for energy applications may be planted at higher densities ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 stems ha -1 (Al Afas et al., 2008). Plantations require intensive weed management during the first one to three years, until canopy closure is reached. Management and Harvesting Poplars can be managed in a number of ways, depending on the desired end product, management system, and target rotation age. More closely spaced systems have the potential advantage of reaching canopy closure more quickly and producing higher biomass yield. However, this advantage is partially offset by higher planting costs, thus affecting economics (Berguson et al., 2012). Populus fiber production systems are harvested every 7-15 years (Zalensy et al., 2011). Populus bioenergy plantations require shorter rotation periods, although more research on bioenergy rotation periods, as well as how yields from these compare to longer rotation periods, is needed. The most important drivers of poplar SRWC system productivity include proper species or hybrid selection for site conditions, correct site preparation, pest/disease resistance (Hansen, 1994; Berguson et al., 2010; Zalesny et al., 2011,) and weed control at establishment (Hansen, 1994; Kauter et al., 2003). Typical operational procedures may include tillage, fertilization, and irrigation (Sartori et al., 2007). Thinning is sometimes conducted at higher planting densities to provide a supply of biomass at intermediate points in the rotation. Populus species are typically harvested after several years, with a rotation period of five years or less for bioenergy crops. Rotation lengths for poplar are expected to range from 3-5 years in coppice regeneration as opposed to 5-15 years in more traditional single-rotation, single-stem plantations (Hansen et al., 1994; Berguson et al., 2010, Zalesny et al., 2011) (Fig 2). The means through which trees resprout after harvest, or coppicing, varies with species. Sprouting characteristics affect ease of harvest and machinery requirements as species that are restricted to stump sprouting retain the original planted row orientation. The ability for many Populus species to resprout after harvests defrays the cost of replanting in successful plantations. Fig 2. Twelve year old hybrid poplar plantation in a single-stem, single-harvest management system in Minnesota, US ready for harvest (Photo: Bernard McMahon, University of Minnesota, Duluth).

BREEDING AND GENETIC IMPROVEMENTS Genetic variation among both pure-species collections and hybrids is very high in Populus, which presents opportunities to improve biomass yield and nutrient efficiency. There are many possible breeding strategies that can be applied to the development of a hybrid poplar woody biomass crop (Riemenschneider et al., 2001). Yet, all breeding strategies derive from the need for a commercial variety to possess several attributes simultaneously such as an adventitious root system, rapid growth, and resistance to pests (US DOE, 2011). Elsewhere, interspecific hybridization may be necessary. This need for an aggregate genotype possessing all required commercial attributes gives rise to the several breeding programs found throughout North America (Table 1) and elsewhere in the world. Commercial genotypes have most, if not all, of the important traits affecting production. However, the number of commercial genotypes in use today is relatively low, and diversification, as well as yield improvement, is a goal of breeding programs (Berguson et al., 2010; US DOE, 2011; Zalesny et al., 2011). In the US, genetic improvement research varies considerable across the country (Table 2). BIOMASS PRODUCTION Biomass production is one of the criteria of assessing feasibility of Populus clones for bioenergy and bioproducts application. The sprouting ability of these species is also necessary to understand yield potential. It is currently understood that over 20,000 stems ha -1 of Populus can resprout after first-year thinnings from a combination of stump and root sprouts depending on the species. Populus species have great potential for biomass production. Certain genotypes of the Eastern cottonwood (P. deltoides) and its hybrids, for example, are capable of producing yields ranging from 9-20 Mg ha -1 yr -1 in the US (Wright, 2006; Berguson et al., 2010; Zalesny et al., 2011, Zamora et al., 2013) and other parts of the world (Table 3) with a wide range of environmental conditions suitable for their production, which differs based on climate, soil properties, and cultural practices.

Company Location Region of concentration Boardman, Oregon, USA Greenwood Resource Institute Alberta-Pacific Forest Products ArborGen University of Minnesota. Duluth -Natural Resources Research Institute Alberta, Canada USA, New Zealand, Australia and Brazil Area Table 1. Currently active Populus spp. breeding programs in North America. Focus USA 9,300 ha - Operating on a 15-year rotation with the output going into the saw log market. - Signed an agreement with ZeaChem, a cellulosic ethanol company, to supply them with feedstock from their hybrid poplar farm. Canada 8,000 ha - Growing hybrid poplar trees to feed pulp mills in Alberta, Canada and nearby regions. - Ensuring fiber supply availability in response to the deforestation activities in Alberta caused by Tar Sand development. Worldwide - Largest global supplier of seedling products and a leading provider of improved technologies to the commercial forest industry - Developing high value products through conventional breeding and genetic improvement. - Working to improve the sustainability of working forests while helping to meet the world s growing need for wood, fiber and energy. USA USA - Working to increase yield and genetic diversity of poplar for use as an energy crop - Collecting data from clonal trials, yield tests, spacing trials, and large-scale genetics tests with some locations containing over 900 genotypes.

Location Genetic improvement focus Authors Upper-Midwest DN34, DN5, and NM6 were found to be disease resistant and fast growing under a range of conditions. Large breeding program has produced new hybrid to increase growth rate, genetic diversity and disease resistance. Southern U.S. (Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley (LMAV) P. deltoides perform best on those sites that are high in nutrient availability and have consistent rainfall. Unlike pure P. deltoides, limited testing of hybrid poplars in the South has not determined the incidence of Septoria canker, a potentially serious disease of some poplars. Pacific Northwest Identify superior clones of P. trichocarpa and produce hybrids of P. deltoides and P. trichocarpa for commercial production Table 2. Genetic improvement of Populus spp in the United States based on geographical locations. Hansen et al., 1994; Berguson et al., 2010 Berguson et al., 2010 Stanton et al., 2002

Table 3. Biomass yield of Populus spp. across the globe. Country Varieties Rotation Biomass (Mg ha-1) Ghent, Belgium Populus trichocarpa x deltoides-hoogvorst annual 3.5 Reference Vande Walle et al., 2007 Nanjing, China P. deltoides Bartr. cv. `Lux', P. euramericana (Dode) Guinier cv. `San Martino', P. deltoides Bartr. cv. `Havard' annual 10.3 Fang et al., 1999 Jiangsu Province, China P. deltoides cv. 35 annual 8.8-15.2 Fang et al., 1999 Bihar, India P. deltoides G3 intercropping system annual 12.1 Das and Chaturvedi, 2005 Sweden P. balsamifera L., P. maximowiczii x P. trichocarpa, P. trichocarpa x P. deltoides, P. trichocarpa 4 years 141.9 Johansson and Karačić, 2011 Quebec, Canada 2 clones of P. maximowiczii x P. nigra (NM5 and NM6) 4 years 66.5 Labrecque and Teodorescu, 2005 Hungary P. trichocarpa x deltoides annual 16.3 Marosvölgyi et al., 1999 Scotland P. balsamifera var. Michauxii (Henry) x P. trichocarpa var. Hastata (Dode) Farwell annual 5.5 Proe et al., 1999 US Iowa 7300501 5 years 16.8 US Wisconsin 80X00601 5 years 8.5 US Minnesota D121 5 years 6.8 US-Iowa Eugenii 7 years 17.0 US-Iowa Eugenii 7 years 5.4 US-Iowa Cradon 10 years 30.0 Riemenschneider et al., 2001 Riemenschneider et al., 2001 Riemenschneider et al., 2001 Goerndt and Mize, 2008 Tufekcioglu et al., 2003 Goerndt and Mize, 2008 NEED FOR INFORMATION? Contact Diomy Zamora at zamor015@umn.edu or 612-626-9272 or Gary Wyatt at wyatt@umn.edu or 507-389-6748. 2015 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educator and employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this publication/material is available in alternative formats upon request. Direct requests to 612-624- 0772 or efans@umn.edu. Printed on recycled and recyclable paper with at least 10 percent postconsumer waste material.