Guide Specification for Laboratory Fume Hood Commissioning



Similar documents
SECTION TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING

CASE HISTORY #2. APPLICATION: Piping Movement Survey using Permalign Laser Measurement System

THE EFFECTS OF LAMINAR AIRFLOW IN SEMICONDUCTOR FABS ON THE VENTILATION DESIGN FOR EXHAUSTED ENCLOSURES

Accurate Air Flow Measurement in Electronics Cooling

FUME HOOD PERFORMANCE TESTING

VAV Laboratory Room Airflow The Lowdown on Turndown

1 One Dimensional Horizontal Motion Position vs. time Velocity vs. time

How To Test A Fume Cupboard

Fume Hood Questions and Answers

AIR DISTRIBUTION FOR COMFORT AND IAQ

LABORATORY GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS

CETA Application Guide for the Exhaust System Requirements of Class II, Type B Biosafety Cabinets CAG March 24, 2010

Chemical Fume Hoods. Environmental Health and Safety

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Collaborative Laboratory Commissioning and Sustaining the Optimal Building. By E. Lon Brightbill, P.E Facility Dynamics

Session 7 Bivariate Data and Analysis

Circulator Fan Performance Testing Standards BY CHRISTIAN TABER, BEMP, HBDP, MEMBER ASHRAE

Examples of Data Representation using Tables, Graphs and Charts

FREE FALL. Introduction. Reference Young and Freedman, University Physics, 12 th Edition: Chapter 2, section 2.5

Demand Based Static Pressure Reset Control for Laboratories

. Address the following issues in your solution:

ENHANCED LABORATORY HVAC SYSTEM

AMD-33 Air Measuring Station with VCD-33 Control Damper

Risk Assessment of Lab Bench Top Processes to Ensure Safety in Smart Labs

Pulverized Coal Pipe Testing and Balancing

Fume Cupboard Guidance

Learning Module 4 - Thermal Fluid Analysis Note: LM4 is still in progress. This version contains only 3 tutorials.

3D Interactive Information Visualization: Guidelines from experience and analysis of applications

1. Oscilloscope is basically a graph-displaying device-it draws a graph of an electrical signal.

Computerized Micro Jet Engine Test Facility

Module 1, Lesson 3 Temperature vs. resistance characteristics of a thermistor. Teacher. 45 minutes

SUMMARY of PRODUCTS. HVAC Systems Control Airflow, Space, & Building Pressurization. Accurate airflow measurement for demanding applications

INTERFERENCE OF SOUND WAVES

Metrics That Matter: Pam Greenley MIT EHS Associate Director Steve Lanou MIT Deputy Director, Sustainability

AABC Specifications for Testing and Balancing HVAC Systems

Lab #4 - Linear Impulse and Momentum

THE LEADER IN PERFORMANCE INDOOR AIR QUALITY MEASUREMENTS

FIRE ALARM AND DETECTION SYSTEMS SECTION 16721

In this chapter, you will learn to use cost-volume-profit analysis.

Control Device Requirements Charts For Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities

ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE Last Revised: July 2007

A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPRAOCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT USING CONVENTIONAL CCTV CAMERA

Geismar Site Reviewed: 07/05/16 Effective: 07/05/16 Supersedes: 08/04/14 Preparer: Owner: Approver: S/IH Team Leader S/IH Team Leader Manager LA Hub

Scientific Graphing in Excel 2010

Unit 9 Describing Relationships in Scatter Plots and Line Graphs

Agilent Automotive Power Window Regulator Testing. Application Note

This datalogger is ideal for the Food Industry where process profiling is crucial to production efficiency and energy use optimisation.

Using Carbon Dioxide as a Tracer Gas to Measure Air Change Rate in a Single Zone

SECTION TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION

Index-Velocity Rating Development for Rapidly Changing Flows in an Irrigation Canal Using Broadband StreamPro ADCP and ChannelMaster H-ADCP

Chapter 10. Flow Rate. Flow Rate. Flow Measurements. The velocity of the flow is described at any

pm4dev, 2015 management for development series Project Schedule Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS

Part 1: Background - Graphing

A. The Commissioning Authority (CxA) has been contracted or will be contracted directly with the Owner for this project.

Simulation in design of high performance machine tools

Chapter 3.5: Fans and Blowers

Welcome. Green HVAC Ductwork Done Right! John Reints, PE Eugene Smithart, PE

Exhaust Calculation Booklet

SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY

Basic Selection & Proper Application of Overhead Air Distribution Devices

FRICTION, WORK, AND THE INCLINED PLANE

OPTOFORCE DATA VISUALIZATION 3D

Residual Gas Analyzers

PortaSens ll G AS DETECTOR

Public Review Draft. ASHRAE Standard

Coal Handling Plant Alignment Standards For Shaft To Shaft Alignment. By Makarand Joshi M.Tech

Experiment: Static and Kinetic Friction

A Determination of g, the Acceleration Due to Gravity, from Newton's Laws of Motion

SECTION AIR INLETS AND OUTLETS

Translog-II: A Program for Recording User Activity Data for Empirical Translation Process Research

Biggar High School Mathematics Department. National 5 Learning Intentions & Success Criteria: Assessing My Progress

F-900 HOPEC Bench Hood Framed Vertical Sash

PERCENT OUTDOOR AIR (%OA) CALCULATION AND ITS USE

Advances in Thermal Dispersion Mass Flow Meter Accuracy

Reflection and Refraction

2013 MBA Jump Start Program. Statistics Module Part 3

Using Excel (Microsoft Office 2007 Version) for Graphical Analysis of Data

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

Mechanical Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Ductwork and Duct Accessories

1 of 7 9/5/2009 6:12 PM

Components HVAC General Standards HVAC Guidelines HVAC System Selection Life Cycle Cost Analysis

MEASURING RATES OF OUTDOOR AIRFLOW INTO HVAC SYSTEMS

EQUATIONS and INEQUALITIES

ANSI/AHRI Standard 880 (I-P) with Addendum Standard for Performance Rating of Air Terminals

HVAC Processes. Lecture 7

VOLU-probe/SS. Stainless Steel Pitot Airflow Traverse Probes. Accurate airflow measurement for demanding applications

Experiment 5: Magnetic Fields of a Bar Magnet and of the Earth

Cooktop Low-Profile Ventilation Hoods

Jitter Measurements in Serial Data Signals

MacroFlo Opening Types User Guide <Virtual Environment> 6.0

NEBB STANDARDS SECTION-8 AIR SYSTEM TAB PROCEDURES

Inspection and Testing of Water-Based Systems

Impedance 50 (75 connectors via adapters)

Graphing Quadratic Functions

Averaging Pitot Tubes; Fact and Fiction

COEFFICIENT OF KINETIC FRICTION

Describing, Exploring, and Comparing Data

Ultrasonic Wave Propagation Review

Transcription:

Guide Specification for Laboratory Fume Hood Commissioning 3 February, 1997 Application notes: This specification is intended to be used by qualified, experienced engineers and industrial hygienists as a guide for specifying the commissioning or testing of laboratory fume hoods. Modifications to it will be required to customize it to your particular application, project or facility. Simply cutting and pasting it into another document is insufficient. If you are unfamiliar with the ASHRAE 110 method then you should retain a laboratory consultant for assistance. Consult the following WWW page for more information: http://www.safelab.com/fact_sheets/fact7/fact7.htm. Word processing files of this document may be downloaded in several different formats from the page above using most web browsers. Comments embedded in this guide specification are enclosed in [brackets]. All references to the ANSI/ASHRAE 110-1995 Method of Testing Performance of Laboratory Fume Hoods shall be abbreviated as ASHRAE 110 herein. Comments and questions about this specification should be addressed to: Dale T. Hitchings, PE, CIH Hitchings Associates, PC, by e-mail at: dhitchings@safelab.com or by calling: 317-872-6600.

1. Scope: 1.1. The following fume hoods shall be commissioned using the method outlined herein: [Insert list of fume hoods to be commissioned here.] 2. Commissioning Contractor Qualifications. 2.1. The fume hood commissioning contractor shall have a Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) on staff and the testing technician shall either be certified to perform the ASHRAE 110 test by the International Laboratory Safety Institute [see note below] or shall demonstrate competency in this are by proving that they perform at least 100 of these tests per year and can provide references acceptable to the owner. Note: At this time, a certification organization is being formed to train, test, certify, and maintain the certifications of consultants and contractors who do laboratory design and fume hood testing and commissioning. The organization is called the International Laboratory Safety Institute. As soon as they are operating their training and certification programs, a phone number and address will be added. Until then, we suggest the following three firms who are properly qualified to do ASHRAE 110 testing, interpret the results and make recommendations for improving fume hood performance. They are: Hitchings Associates, PC 5320 W. 79 th St. Indianapolis, IN 46268 Phone: 317-872-6600 (Dale Hitchings is an expert in laboratory ventilation and has performed hundreds of ASHRAE tests and has performed significant research on applying and improving the method.) Exposure Control Technologies 120 Loch Haven Ln., Carey, NC 27511 Phone: 919-859-6572 (Tom Smith, President of ECT has performed more ASHRAE 110 tests than anyone on the planet and pioneered many of the automated data collection techniques outlined herein) Knutson Ventilation Consulting, Inc. 3404 W. 60 th St. Minneapolis, MN 55410 Phone: 612-928-0195 (Dr. Knutson co-developed the ASHRAE 110 method as part of an ASHRAE research project back in the late 1970 s and is imminently qualified.)]

3. Equipment and Supplies. 3.1. The commissioning contractor shall be properly equipped to perform this testing including, but not limited to: the equipment specified in section 4 of the ASHRAE 110 standard plus an automated data acquisition system capable of reading data from an analog velocity transducer and the tracer gas detector and producing graphical output. 3.2. All instruments used shall have been calibrated within the last year or within the time period specified by the instrument manufacturer. 3.3. The calibration gases used shall have certificates of analysis. 4. Test Conditions. 4.1. The test conditions outlined in section 5 of the ASHRAE standard shall be observed. 5. Test Procedures for All Fume Hoods 5.1. Exhaust System Stability Test. 5.1.1. This test shall be performed at least once on all manifolded exhaust systems to which fume hoods which are to be commissioned are connected. 5.1.2. Insert the velocity transducer into the exhaust duct (preferred) or insert it into the middle baffle slot of the hood normal to the back of the hood. 5.1.3. Orient the probe window parallel to the duct centerline if inserted into the duct or vertical if it is inserted into the baffle slot. 5.1.4. Take velocity readings to determine if the velocity is in the range of the transducer. If not, change the range of the transducer or relocate it to another location.

5.1.5. If excessive (high frequency) turbulence is experienced, relocate the transducer farther downstream from the nearest obstruction. 5.1.6. Start velocity acquisition and accumulate velocity data for 5-10 minutes. 5.1.7. Calculate the standard deviation of the velocity data and normalize by the mean to get the coefficient of variation (COV). 5.1.8. Analyze the velocity plot graphically and determine if system instability exists. Instability is normally manifested by large velocity variations (>10% above and below the mean) with a relatively low frequency (>10 seconds). The variations may be random or periodic. 5.1.9. If instability exists, investigate and correct the problem and repeat the stability test before proceeding with further testing. 5.1.10. Record the final COV data and the plot of the velocity on the test report. 5.2. Local Visualization Challenge (Low-Volume Smoke Test) 5.2.1. This test is to be performed per section 6.1.1. of the ASHRAE 110 standard. 5.2.2. The observations shall be classified using the following criteria and recorded on the test report. 5.2.2.1. Fail: Smoke observed escaping from the hood. 5.2.2.2. Poor: Reverse flow of smoke near opening. Lazy flow into opening along boundary. Observed potential for escape. 5.2.2.3. Fair: Some reverse flow, not necessarily at the opening. No visible escape.

5.2.2.4. Good: No reverse flows. Active flowstreams into hood around boundary. 5.2.3. If smoke escapes from the hood during this test it indicates a gross leak and testing shall be terminated until the cause of the leakage is determined and corrected. 5.3. Large-Volume Smoke Visualization Challenge (High-Volume Smoke Test) 5.3.1. This test is to be performed per section 6.1.2. of the ASHRAE 110 standard. 5.3.2. The observations shall be classified using the following criteria and recorded on the test report. 5.3.2.1. Fail: Smoke observed escaping from the hood. 5.3.2.2. Poor: Reverse flow of smoke near opening. Slow capture and clearance. Observed potential for escape. 5.3.2.3. Fair: Some reverse flow, not necessarily at the opening. Limited turbulent vortex in hood. All smoke captured and cleared readily. No visible escape. 5.3.2.4. Good: Good capture and quick clearance. Limited hood roll vortex. No reverse flows. No visible escape. 5.3.3. If smoke escapes from the hood during this test it indicates a gross leak and testing shall be terminated until the cause of the leakage is determined and corrected. 5.4. Face Velocity Measurements 5.4.1. Face velocity testing shall be performed per section 6.2 of the ASHRAE 110 standard with the following exceptions: 5.4.1.1. The instrument shall be a velocity transducer with a continuous analog output interfaced to a data acquisition

system and a computer with software capable of reading, storing and displaying graphically the velocity data. 5.4.1.2. Velocity data shall be taken at a frequency not less than the response time of the instrument and not greater than once per second. 5.4.1.3. Velocity data shall be taken for a minimum of 30 seconds at each traverse point. 5.4.1.4. The average, minimum, maximum, standard deviation, and grid coordinates for each traverse point shall be calculated and recorded on the test report. 5.4.1.5. The average face velocity shall be calculated from the data above and recorded on the test report. 5.4.1.6. The Turbulence shall be calculated by averaging the standard deviations of each traverse point and normalizing by the mean face velocity. Record this data on the test report. 5.4.1.7. The Profile shall be calculated by determining the standard deviation of the traverse point means and normalizing by the average face velocity. Record this data on the test report. 5.5. Tracer Gas Containment Test. 5.5.1. This test shall be performed per section 7 of the ASHRAE 110 standard with the following exception. 5.5.2. If the tracer gas detector has a detection limit below 0.01 ppm, a lower supply concentration of tracer gas may be substituted for pure gas. The concentration of the tracer gas in percent shall not be lower than:

Tracer Gas Supply Concentration >= (Detection Limit / 0.01) x 100 5.5.3. If the tracer gas detector cannot be programmed for the tracer gas supply concentration, the instrument output needs to be scaled. The scale factor is calculated as follows: Scale Factor = 100 / Tracer Gas Supply Concentration The actual control level is calculated as follows: Actual Control Level = Instrument Control Level x Scale Factor 5.5.4. If the tracer gas detector can be programmed for the tracer gas concentration, it will automatically perform the calculations in 5.5.3 above and the instrument readings should not be adjusted. 6. Test Procedures for All Variable-Air-Volume (VAV) Fume Hoods. 6.1. The tests in section 5 above shall also apply to VAV hoods. 6.2. VAV Linearity Test. 6.2.1. This test shall be performed per section 6.3 of the ASHRAE 110 standard except that the velocity measurements shall conform to section 5.4 above. 6.2.2. The average velocities at the three sash positions shall be calculated and recorded on the test report. A graph of average velocity vs. Sash position is recommended. 6.2.3. If any of the readings vary more than 10% from the mean of the three face velocity averages corrective action is indicated. Calibration of the VAV control is recommended. If this does not correct the problem, reconfiguring the VAV control sensor location or replacement of the control may be required. 6.3. Combination VAV Dynamic Tests.

Note: the VAV speed-of-response and VAV Sash Movement Effect tests are described separately below but may be performed simultaneously. 6.3.1. VAV Speed-of-Response Test 6.3.1.1. This test is performed per section 6.4 of the ASHRAE 110 standard with the following exceptions and modifications: 6.3.1.1.1. The velocity transducer is positioned per sections 5.1.2-5.1.5 above. 6.3.1.1.2. The sash movement procedure is performed while accumulating real-time velocity data. 6.3.1.1.3. The speed of response is determined by analyzing the duct/slot velocity graph with time on the horizontal axis and velocity on the vertical axis. A vertical line on the graph is located at the time the sash movement is initiated. A horizontal recovery line is added to the graph at a velocity equal to 90% of the final duct/slot velocity at the design sash opening. Another vertical line is placed at the intersection of the velocity trace and the recovery line. The distance between the two vertical lines (in seconds) is the speed of response for that single iteration. The average of three iterations is the speed of response for the aggregate test. 6.3.1.1.4. The individual iteration response times and the average shall be calculated and recorded on the test report. It is recommended that the actual velocity vs. Time graphs be included on the report as well.

6.3.1.1.5. This test may be performed simultaneously with the Sash Movement Effect test below and both the velocity and tracer gas concentration data may be represented on the same chart. 6.3.2. VAV Sash Movement Effect Test. 6.3.2.1. The tracer gas test is set up per section 7-7.11 of the ASHRAE 110 standard with the following exceptions: 6.3.2.1.1. The tracer gas data is accumulated in realtime by a data acquisition system. 6.3.2.1.2. The maximum and average spike magnitudes (if any) shall be calculated and recorded on the test report. It is recommended that the concentration vs. Time plots be included on the report as well. 6.3.2.1.3. This test may be performed simultaneously with the Speed-of-Response test above and both the velocity and tracer gas concentration data may be represented on the same chart. 7. Acceptable Test Criteria. 7.1 Exhaust System Stability Test 7.1.1. The COV of the duct/slot velocity shall not exceed 10% as described in section 5.1 above. 7.2 Low-Volume Smoke Test 7.2.1. The minimum acceptable test result is [Good/Fair/Poor - user choses] as described in section 5.2. above.

7.3 High-Volume Smoke Test 7.3.1. The minimum acceptable test result is [Good/Fair/Poor - user choses] as described in section 5.3. above. 7.4 Face Velocity Test 7.4.1. The acceptable face velocity range is [80-120 fpm - user choses] as described in section 5.2. above. 7.4.2. The maximum acceptable Turbulence is [10%] as described in section 5.4.1.6. above. 7.4.3. The maximum acceptable Profile is [15%] as described in section 5.4.1.7. above. 7.5 Tracer Gas Containment Test 7.5.1. The maximum acceptable Control Level is [AM/AU/AI 0.10 (0.1 ppm)] as described in section 5.5. above. 7.6 VAV Dynamic Tests 7.6.1. The maximum acceptable speed of response is [3.0 sec or the response time required to meet the Sash Movement Effect criteria listed in 7.6.2. below, whichever is smaller] as described in section 6.3.1. above. 7.6.2. The maximum acceptable average tracer gas spike magnitude is [1.0 ppm] as described in section 6.3.2. above. End of Specification