Fig. 1.1 Rectangular foundation plan.



Similar documents
In order to be able to design beams, we need both moments and shears. 1. Moment a) From direct design method or equivalent frame method

CHAPTER J DESIGN OF CONNECTIONS

SUBSTRUCTURE EXAMPLE. Full Height Abutment on Spread Footing

REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAMS: T-BEAMS AND DOUBLY REINFORCED BEAMS

The following excerpt are pages from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 2: Anchor Fastening, Edition 16.

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Earthquake Loss for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures Before and After Fire damage

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Two-Way Post-Tensioned Design

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Explanatory Examples on Indian Seismic Code IS 1893 (Part I)

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) (1)

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

Lecture 8 Bending & Shear Stresses on Beams

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

WATER CLOSET SUPPORTS TECHNICAL DATA

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL

Chapter 5 Single Phase Systems

Reinforced Concrete Design

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

TS150 Visible (exposed) fixing with screws on a timber sub-frame

SAFE. Post-Tensioned Concrete Design Manual DESIGN OF SLABS, BEAMS AND FOUNDATIONIS REINFORCED AND POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE

SHAFTS: TORSION LOADING AND DEFORMATION

Tension Development and Lap Splice Lengths of Reinforcing Bars under ACI

11 CHAPTER 11: FOOTINGS

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

MATERIALS AND MECHANICS OF BENDING

Suggested Answers, Problem Set 5 Health Economics

International Nursing and Rehab Center Addition 4815 S. Western Blvd. Chicago, IL

Design of FRP Reinforced and Strengthened Concrete

Measurement of Powder Flow Properties that relate to Gravity Flow Behaviour through Industrial Processing Lines

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

Classical Electromagnetic Doppler Effect Redefined. Copyright 2014 Joseph A. Rybczyk

Certificate of Foreign Intermediary, Foreign Flow-Through Entity, or Certain U.S. Branches for United States Tax Withholding and Reporting

Design Approach: 3) Full Sawn: In this case a rough surface is obtained with actual size equal to the nominal size.

i e AT 11 of 2006 INSURANCE COMPANIES (AMALGAMATIONS) ACT 2006

REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE DESIGN ASSISTANT TOOL FOR BEGINNERS. Kang-Kyu Choi

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

[TECHNICAL REPORT I:]

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 6 (5) (2013) Research Article

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

6. Fasteners and Fastening methods. Introduction. Fastener types. Fastener application. Screw thread terminology. Screw thread terminology (Fig. 6.

Effects of Inter-Coaching Spacing on Aerodynamic Noise Generation Inside High-speed Trains

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

HOW TO CALCULATE PRESSURE ANYWHERE IN A PUMP SYSTEM? Jacques Chaurette p. eng. April 2003

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

Page 1 of Sven Alexander Last revised SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250

protection p1ann1ng report

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

SPECIFICATIONS, LOADS, AND METHODS OF DESIGN

APE T CFRP Aslan 500

SLAB DESIGN EXAMPLE. Deck Design (AASHTO LRFD 9.7.1) TYPICAL SECTION. County: Any Hwy: Any Design: BRG Date: 7/2010

TeeJay Publishers Homework for Level F book Ch 59 - Pythagoras

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method

Capacity at Unsignalized Two-Stage Priority Intersections

User s Guide VISFIT: a computer tool for the measurement of intrinsic viscosities

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts

2014 Under section 501(c ), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations)

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Findings and Recommendations

Comprehensive Design Example 2: Foundations for Bulk Storage Facility

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Design Of Reinforced Concrete Structures ii Two-Way Slabs

Guidelines for the Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

Base Plate and Anchor Rod Design

Strategic Plan. Achieving our 2020 vision. Faculty of Health Sciences

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

CIS570 Lecture 4 Introduction to Data-flow Analysis 3

Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan

ETABS. Integrated Building Design Software. Concrete Shear Wall Design Manual. Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California, USA

Statics of Structural Supports

10.1 The Lorentz force law

i e SD No. 2016/0058 HARBOUR DUES (MERCHANT VESSELS) REGULATIONS 2016

Channel Assignment Strategies for Cellular Phone Systems

Computer Networks Framing

1.3 Complex Numbers; Quadratic Equations in the Complex Number System*

Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges

PCI BIG BEAM COMPETITION

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)

Report on. Wind Resistance of Signs supported by. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) Pillars

HEAT CONDUCTION. q A q T

Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Columns under Bidirectional Shear & Axial Loading

protection p1ann1ng report

THE PERFORMANCE OF TRANSIT TIME FLOWMETERS IN HEATED GAS MIXTURES

Henley Business School at Univ of Reading. Pre-Experience Postgraduate Programmes Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)

Flexural Strength of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete T-Beams

Transcription:

Footings Example 1 Design of a square spread footing of a seven-story uilding Design and detail a typial square spread footing of a six ay y five ay seven-story uilding, founded on stiff soil, supporting a 4 in. square olumn. The uilding has a 10 ft high asement. The ottom of the footing is 13 ft elow finished grade. The uilding is assigned to Seismi Design Category (SDC) B. Given: Column load Servie dead load D = 541 kip Servie live load L = 194 kip Seismi load E = ±18 kip (Column fore due to the uilding frame resisting the seismi load) Material properties Conrete ompressive strength f = 4 ksi Steel yield strength fy = 60 ksi Normalweight onrete = 1 Density of onrete = 150 l/ft 3 Fig. 1.1 Retangular foundation plan. Allowale soil-earing pressures D only: qall.d = 4000 psf D + L: qall,d+l = 5600 psf D + L + E: qall.lat = 6000 psf ACI 318-14 Proedure Computation Step 1: Foundation type 13.1.1 This ottom footing is 3 ft elow asement sla. Therefore, it is onsidered a shallow foundation. Step : Material requirements 13..1.1 The mixture proportion must satisfy the duraility requirements of Chapter 19 (318) and strutural strength requirements. The designer determines the duraility lasses. Please see Chapter of SP-17 for an in-depth disussion of the ategories and lasses. ACI 301 is a referene speifiation that is in syn with ACI 318. ACI enourages By speifying that the onrete mixture shall e in aordane with ACI 301 and providing the exposure lasses, Chapter 19 requirements are satisfied. Based on duraility and strength requirements, and experiene with loal mixtures, the ompressive strength of onrete is speified at 8 days to e at least 4000 psi.

referening 301 into jo speifiations. There are several mixture options within ACI 301, suh as admixtures and pozzolans, whih the designer an require, permit, or review if suggested y the ontrator. Example 1 provides a more detailed reakdown on determining the onrete ompressive strength and exposure ategories and lasses. Step 3: Determine footing dimensions 13.3.1.1 To alulate the footing ase area, divide the servie load y the allowale soil pressure. Area of footing = total servie load ( P) allowale soil pressure, q a Assuming a square footing. The unit weights of onrete and soil are 150 pf and 10 pf; lose. Therefore, footing self-weight will e ignored: D qall., D 541 k 135 ft (ontrols) 4 ksf D L 541 k+ 194 k 131 ft qall, DL 5.6 ksf D + L +E 541 k + 194 k + 18 k 16 ft q all., Lat 6 ksf l 135 ft 11.6 ft Therefore, provide 1 x 1 ft square footing. Step 4: Soil pressure The footing thikness is alulated in Step 5, footing design. Footing staility Beause there is no overturning moment, overall footing staility is assumed. Calulate fatored soil pressure P q u u Area

5.3.1(a) 5.3.1() 5.3.1(d) 5.3.1(e) Calulate the soil pressures resulting from the applied fatored loads. Load Case I: U = 1.4D Load Case II: U = 1.D + 1.6L Load Case IV: U = 1.D + E + L Load Case IV: U = 0.9D + E The load ominations inludes the seismi uplift fore. In this example, uplift does not our. U = 1.4D = 1.4(541 kip) = 757 kip 757 kip q u = 5.3 ksf 144 ft U = 1.D + 1.6L = 1.(541 kip) + 1.6(194 kip) = 960kip 960 kip q = 6.7 ksf 144 ft u (ontrols) U = 1.D + 1.0E + 1.0L = 1.(541 kip) + 18 kip + 1.0(194 kip) = 861 kip 861 kip q u = 6.0 ksf 144 ft U = 0.9D + 1.0E = 0.9(541 kip)+ 18 kip = 505 kip 505 kip q u = 3.5 ksf 144 ft 13.3..1 Beause the footing has equal dimension in plan, it will e designed in one diretion and symmetry is assumed. Step 5: One-way shear design Fig. 1. One-way shear in longitudinal diretion.

1..1() 7.5.1.1 7.5.3.1.5.1.1.5.5.1 7.4.3. 0.6.1.3.1 Shear redution fator: Vn Vu Vn V Vs Therefore: V fwd V And satisfying: u V The ritial setion for one-way shear is at a distane d from the fae of the olumn (Fig. 1.). The engineer ould either assume a value for d that satisfies the strength Eq. (.5.5.1) y iteration or solve Eq. (7.5.1.1). In this example, the first approah is followed: Assume that the footing is 30 in. thik. The over requirement is 3 in. to ottom of reinforement. Assume that No. 8 ars are used in the oth diretions and design for the more ritial ase (upper layer). Therefore, the effetive depth d: d = 30 in. 3 in. 1 in. 1 in./ = 5.5 in. ( l Vn Vu d) qu shear = 0.75 Assume Vs = 0 (no shear reinforement) V n = V (1 ft) 4 in. 5.5 in. Vu ( ) in. in. (1 ) 1 ft ft (1 ft)(6.7 ksf) = 31 kip V 0.75() 4000 psi (1 ft)(5.5 in.) (1 in./ft) = 348 kip V = 348 kip > Vu = 31 kip OK Therefore, assumed depth is adequate: h = 30 in.

Step 6: Two-way shear design.6.1..6.1.4.6.4.1.6..1.6.5.1.6.5. The foundation will not e reinfored with shear reinforement for two-way ation. Therefore, the nominal shear strength for two-way foundation without shear reinforement is equal to the onrete shear strength: vn = v Under punhing shear theory, inlined raks are assumed to originate and propagate at 45 degrees away and down from the olumn orners. The punh area is alulated at an average distane of d/ from olumn fae on all sides (Fig. 1.3). o = 4( + d) ACI 318 permits the engineer to take the average of the effetive depth in the two orthogonal diretions when designing the footing, ut in this example the smaller effetive depth will e used. The two-way shear strength equations for nonprestressed memers must e satisfied and the least alulated value of (a), (), and () ontrols: v 4 f (a) 4 v ( ) f () where is ratio of the long side to short side of olumn; = 1 v ( sd ) f () o Fig. 1.3 Two-way shear. o = 4(4 + 5.5) = 198 in. v 4(1.0)( 4000 psi) = 53 psi 4 v ( )(1.0)( 4000 psi) = 379.5 psi 1 (40)(5.5 in.) v ( )( 4000 psi) = 45 psi 198 in. Equation (a) ontrols; v = 53 psi

.6.5.3 1..1() 8.5.1.1 s = 40, onsidered interior olumn V 4 fod Use a redution fator of 0.75: V (0.75)4 fod Vu qu [(a) ( d ) ] Chek if design strength exeeds required strength: V Vu? V = 0.75 (53 psi)(198 in.)(5.5 in.) = 177 kip 1000 l/kip V = 0.75(177 kip) = 958 kip 4 in.+5.5 in. Vu [(1 ft)(1 ft) ( ) ](6.7 ksf) 1 in./ft 851 kip V = 958 kip > Vu = 851 kip Two-way shear strength is adequate. OK Step 7: Flexure design 13..71 The ritial setion is permitted to e at the fae of the olumn (Fig. 1.4). Fig. 1.4 Flexure in the longitudinal diretion. l Mu qu( ) ( ) / 4 in. 1 ft 1 in./ft M u (6.7 ksf)( ) (1 ft) /

..1.1 Set ompression fore equal to tension fore at the olumn fae: C = T Mu = 1005 ft-kip.3.1.1...1... 1..1(a) 8.5.1.1(a) 8.6.1.1 13.3.3.3(a) 1..1(a) 1.....4.1...4.3 C = 0.85f a and T = Asfy Af s y a and 0.85 f a Mn As f y ( d ) Sustitute for a in the equation aove. Use redution fator from Tale 1..1. Setting Mn Mu = 1005 ft-k and solving for As: Chek the minimum reinforement ratio: l = 0.0018 Chek if the tension ontrolled assumption and the use of = 0.9 is orret. To answer the question, the alulated tensile strain in reinforement is ompared to the values in Tale 1... The strain in reinforement is alulated from similar triangles (refer to Fig. 1.5): t = ( d ) a where: = β and a = 0.8As 1 A s(60 ksi) a 0.1As 0.85(5 ksi)(1 ft) = 0.9 (0.1)A M (0.9) (60 ksi)(5.5 in. s n As ) As = 8.91 in. As,min = 0.0018(1 ft)(1 in./ft)(30 in.) = 7.8 in. < As,req d = 8.91 in. OK Use 13 No. 8 ars distriuted uniformly aross the entire 1 ft width of footing. Note: Although not required y ode, some pratitioner distrute half the required ars in the mid third of the footing and distriute the remaining ars in the equally on oth sides. 0.1(13)(0.79 in. ) = 1.1 in. 0.85 0.003 t = (5.5 in. 1.1 in.) 0.06 1.1 in. t = 0.06 > 0.005

Setion is tension ontrolled and = 0.9 Fig. 1.5 Strain distriution aross footing. Step 8: Transfer of olumn fores to the ase 16.3.1.1.8.3..8.3.(a).8.3.() Fatored fores are transferred to the foundation at the ase of the olumn y earing on onrete and the reinforement dowels. The foundation is wider on all sides than the loaded area. Therefore, the nominal earing strength, Bn, is the smaller of the two equations. A Bn (0.85 fa1 ) A and 1 Bn (0.85 fa1 ) A Chek if.0 A where 1 A1 is the earing area of the olumn and A is the area of the part of the supporting footing that is geometrially similar to and onentri with the loaded area. A [(1 ft)(1 in./ft)] 6 A 1 (4 in.) Therefore, Eq. (.8.3.()) ontrols.

1..1(d) The redution fator for earing is 0.65: earing = 0.65 16.3.4.1 16.3.5.4 5.4.9. 5.3.1 Column fatored fores are transferred to the foundation y earing and through reinforement dowels. Provide dowel reinforement area of at least 0.005Ag and at least four ars. Bars are in ompression for all load ominations. Therefore, the ars must extend into the footing a ompression development length, ld, the larger of the two: l d f y r d 50 f (0.0003 fy rd) The footing depth must satisfy the following inequality so that the vertial reinforement an e developed within the provided depth: h l r d d 3 in. where Step 9: Footing details d, dwl, ars r = radius of No. 6 ent = 6d Development length B n (0.65)()(0.85)(4000 psi)(4 in.) Bn = 546 kip > 960 kip (Step 4) As,dowel = 0.005(4 in.) =.88 in. Use eight No. 6 ars 0.0(60,000 psi) ld (0.75 in.) 14.3 in. 4000 psi l 0.0003(60,000 psi)(0.75 in.) 13.5 in. d ld = 14.3 in. (ontrols) hreq d = 14.3 in. + 6(0.75 in.) + 0.75 in. + (0.75 in.) + 3 in. = 4.05 in. hreq d = 4.1 in. < hprov. = 30 in. OK OK 13..8.3 13..7.1 Reinforement development is alulated at the maximum fatored moment, whih ours at the olumn fae. Bars must extend

5.4.. 5.4..4 a tension development length eyond the ritial setion. 3 f y { t e l s d } d 40 K f tr d where tar loation; not more than 1 in. of fresh onrete elow horizontal reinforement eoating fator; unoated sar size fator; No. 8 and larger = spaing or over dimension to enter of ar, whihever is smaller tr = transverse reinforement index It is permitted to use Ktr = 0. Ktr But the expression: must d not e taken greater than.5. l d 3 60,000 psi (1.0)(1.0)(1.0) { } d 40 (1.0) 4000 psi.5 No. 6: = 8.5d d K tr = 3.5 in. 0 3.5.5 1.0 in. No.8 ars: 8.5(1.0 in.) = 8.5 in. > 1 in. OK ld in the longitudinal diretion: ld,prov. = ((1 ft)(1 in./ft) 4 in.)/ 3 in. ld,prov. = 57 in. > ld,req d = 8.5 in. OK use straight No. 8 ars in oth diretions.

Step 10: Detailing