Contaminants in oils and fats: analysis and regulations Florence LACOSTE ITERG (Pessac, France) f.lacoste@iterg.com French Technical Industrial Center Authority : French Ministry of Industry Staff : 80 2012 Budget : 6M ISO 9001:2008 & ISO 17025 1
Contents Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Mineral oil Phthalates 3-MCPD esters & glycidol esters Origins? Regulation? Recognized analytical methods? Risks? Regulation Methods Risks 2
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Environmental contamination Production process Regulation (EC) n 1881/2006 contaminants in foodstuffs Regulation Methods Risks 3
Oilseeds v PAHs origins in vegetable oils Extraction Crude oil + HAP * Grapeseed oil * Coconut oil * Pomace olive oil * Sunflower oil PAHs Deodorisation Active carbon Light PAHs Heavy PAHs Drying Refined oil (+ e HAP) 4
Structure of PAHs naphthalene acenaphthene acenaphthylene fluorene phenanthrene anthracene GT GT LIGHT PAHs fluoranthene pyrene benz(a)anthracene chrysene GT GT GT GT benzo(b)fluoranthene benzo(k)fluoranthene benzo(a)pyrene indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene GT GT HEAVY PAHs dibenz(ah)anthracene benzo(ghi)perylene GT : genotoxic 5
PAHs regulation: (EC) n 1881/2006 contaminants in foodstuffs PAHs Maximum levels oils and fats (µg/kg) Maximum levels coconut oil (µg/kg) Maximum levels cocoa butter (µg/kg) Sum of 4 PAHs: - benzo[a]pyrene - benz[a]anthracene - benzo[b]fluoranthene - chrysene 10,0 20,0 35,0 from 1.4.2013 until 31.3.2015 30,0 from 1.4.2015 benzo[a]pyrene 2,0 2,0 5,0 from 1.4.2013 6
Principle PAHs: determination methods PAH isolation: liquid chromatography (alumina, silica gel,c18-silica gel) or HPLC (donor-acceptor complex chromatography, size-exclusion chromatography) Analysis: HPLC/fluorescence or GC/MS ISO 15302 : benzo[a]pyrene in oils (LC + HPLC/FLD) ISO 15753 : 12 PAHs in oils (2 SPE + HPLC/FLD) ISO 22959 : 17 PAHs in oils (DACC on-line + HPLC/FLD) EN xxxx (JRC) : 4 PAHs in foodstuffs (SEC + SPE + GC/MS) Method ISO 15302 ISO 15753 ISO 22959 BaP LOQ (µg/kg) 0,1 0,2 0,1 Reproducibility (CVR%) 27 % (2,1µg/kg) 41% (3,21µg/kg) 10 % (2,6µg/kg) 7
% samples BaP : occurrence in vegetable oils 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Virgin olive oil Olive oil Pomace olive oil Grapeseed oil Sunflower oil 30 20 EU limit 2 µg/kg 10 0 <0,5 0,5-1 1-2 2-5 5-20 20-50 50-100 >100 Benzo[a]pyrene (µg/kg) EU Scoop Task (Oct 2004) 8
Screening 2012 : 21 vegetable oils 12 10 Edible oils: PAH4 Levels EU limit PAH4 : 10 µg/kg benzo(a)pyrene chrysene benz(a)anthracene benzo(b)fluoranthene 8 6 PAH4 en µg/kg 4 2 0 ITERG data (2012) 9
Mineral oil Environmental contamination (air, soil) Crop protection Transport & storage Production process Regulation (EC) n 1151/2009 - import of sunflower oil from Ukraine EFSA Scientific Opinion on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons in food (2012) Regulation Methods Risks 10
Mineral oil composition EFSA Scientific Opinion, 2012 Mineral oil: complex mixture of hydrocarbons MOSH: straight or branched alkanes & alkylated cycloalkanes MOAH: aromatic hydrocarbons including alkyl-substituted Hydrocarbon compound number in mineral oil > 100 000 for those with less than 20 carbon atoms! Different products & composition: diesel fuel, white oil, lubricant Technical grade mineral oil contain 15-35 % MOAH, which is minimised in food grade MOSH (white oils) 11
Mineral oil detected in vegetable oils 2008 contamination of sunflower oil from Ukraine with a mineral oil from unknown origin 2009 contamination of walnut oil with a food grade lubricant oil during refining process Natural hydrocarbons Mineral oil : unresolved complex mixture 2010 identification of compounds eluted as mineral oil in grapeseed oils 2011 contamination of milk fat with a food grade lubricant oil during production 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Contaminated Sunflower oil (MOSH analysis) 12
18,5 g Silica gel MOSH determination: pr ISO17780 Fractionation of the sample by liquid chromatography on silica gel impregnated with AgNO 3 Quantification with an internal standard (C18 or C20) GC/FID analysis on an short apolar column 1 g oil Vide 40 C On-column injection (2 µl) DB5 HT (15 m-0,25 mm-0,1 µm) Elution with hexane Solvent evaporation GC analysis 13
Lab mean value (mg/kg) Lab mean value (mg/kg) pr ISO17780 collaborative trial 2013 Trial 10 samples virgin olive oil + mineral oil refined pomace olive oil crude palm oil + diesel oil refined grapeseed oil 3 refined sunflower oil (+ mineral oil) crude soja oil + mineral oil margarine & mayonnaise + mineral oil Mineral oil Sample 2 Sample 8 Number of laboratories retained (p) 31 30 Mean (m) (mg/kg) 51,8 105,0 REF Laboratory result (mg/kg) 54 87 Repeatability limit (r) 19,3 15,3 Reproducibility limit (R) 51,7 47,4 100 80 60 40 20 0 170 150 130 110 90 70 50 Sample 2: 50 mg/kg spiked olive oil Mean value : 52 mg/kg 26 3 8 23 21 34 15 31 1 19 4 33 36 9 28 17 30 27 29 24 11 10 35 5 32 12 6 22 2 18 14 20 Laboratories Sample 8: 100 mg/kg spiked refined sunflower oil Mean value : 105 mg/kg 26 10 34 3 23 15 31 8 27 9 30 33 19 35 29 11 21 4 1 20 32 5 14 22 28 6 36 12 2 24 18 Laboratories Horrat value 4,1 2,0 content < 100 mg/kg dispersed results 14
Phthalates Transport & storage Production process Regulation EFSA Scientific Opinion on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (2005) (EC) n 10/2011 - plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food Regulation Methods Risks 15
Chemical structures of phthalates DEHP O C C O O O R 2 R 1 Oily visquous liquid MW: 390,6 g/mol BP: 385 C Water solubility: 3 µg/l High affinity for fat (log Kow : 7,5) Di-methyl PHT DMP R1=R2=methyl Di-ethyl PHT DEP R1=R2=ethyl Di-isobutyl PHT DIBP R1=R2=isobutyl Di-butyl PHT DBP R1=R2=butyl Di-hexyl PHT DHexP R1=R2=hexyl Benzyl butyl PHT BBP R1=benzyl R1=butyl Di-n-heptyl PHT DHepP R1=R2=heptyl Di-(2-ethyl hexyl) PHT DEHP R1=R2=ethyl-2 hexyl Di-n-octyl PHT DNOP R1=R2=octyl Di-isononyl PHT DINP R1=R2= isononyl Di-isodecyl PHT DIDP R1=R2=isodecyl 16
Phthalates are everywhere Toys Child-care articles Shoes-Boots-Gloves Out-door & rainwear Car undercoating Dashboard-Door panels-safety glass Flooring-Roofing- Wall covering Adhesives-Sealant-Rubber Paints-Shower curtains Wires & cables-fresheners Cosmetics : Perfume Hairspray-Deodorant Skin emollient-nail polish fingernail elongators Pharmaceuticals Medical devices : Catheters-Blood bag 17
(EC) n 10/2011 - Plastic materials & articles into contact with food BBP DINP DIDP Specific migration limit in food 30 mg/kg = 9 mg/kg To be used as Plasticizer in single-use material containing non-fatty foods except infant formulae DEHP 1,5 mg/kg Plasticizer in repeated use materials containing nonfatty DBP 0,3 mg/kg foods Material containing these phthalates cannot be used for oils & fats 18
1 g oil PDMS HS SPME Phthalates: ITERG s procedure Advantages of the method : No contamination, no solvent Rapid analysis (45 min) GC/MS DB5ms (30 m; 0,25 mm; 0,25 µm) Analysis Sensitive LOQ < 0,1 mg/kg (excepted DINP & DIDP) 5 50:500 4 3 2 1 m/z 111 (adipates) m/z 149 (phthalates) DMP DEP DBP DNPP DHexP DEHP 0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 25.0 minutes kcounts 200 150 100 50 0 DINP DIDP DNOP 25 26 27 28 29 30 minute s 19
5 4 mg/kg DEHP in oils & fats 43 3 2 1 0 ITERG data, 2009 20
3-MCPD esters & glycidol esters Production process (deodorisation) Regulation for free 3-MCPD (EC) n 1881/2006 contaminants in foodstuffs (20 µg/kg in soya sauce) Regulation for 3-MCPD esters EFSA statement related to 3-MCPD esters (2008) EFSA Scientific Report on 3MCPD occurrence in food in Europe (2013) Regulation Methods Risks 21
3-MCPD esters & glycidol esters Structure Hrncirik, OVID meeting, 2011 «free» 3-MCPD H 2 C HC H 2 C OH OH Cl 7 fatty acids C12 - C14 C16 - C18 C18:1 - C18:2 C18:3 H 2 C HC H 2 C O OH Glycidol 14 HO H 2 C H 2 C CH AG Cl 3-MCPD monoesters «bound» AG H 2 C H 2 C CH AG Cl 3-MCPD diesters «bound» 49 H 2 C HC H 2 C O AG Glycidol esters (GEs) 7 22
Occurrence of 3-MCPD in food EFSA Journal 2013; 11(9):3381 1 235 analytical results from 14 European countries 11 food groups No distinction in the data analysis between unbound 3-MCPD and 3-MCPD esters Vegetable fats and oils refined [MB (LB UB)] = [530 (460-600) μg/kg] Vegetable fats and oils unrefined [250 (200-310) μg/kg] Walnut oils [4 750 (4 740-4 750) μg/kg] Margarine and similar products [1 500 (1 480 1 530) μg/kg] High single values reported Infant formulae powder (300 μg/kg, N = 1) & Follow-on formulae powder (800 and 1 200 μg/kg, N = 2)
3-MCPD esters & glycidol esters Analysis strategy Pros Direct methods No chemical reaction Individual quantification of species Standards available Good sensitivity Indirect methods Cons Standards not available (60-70 different species) Expensive tools: HPLC/MS/MS Purification step needed Reactivity of the species (glycidol & MCPD) Global quantification of glycidol esters and 3-MCPD esters Standards AOCS-JOCS Cd 28-10 for GEs From Masukawa et al., JAOCS, 2010 AOCS Cd 29a-13 for 2- and 3-MCPD & GEs From Ermacora & Hrnirick, JAOCS, 2012 AOCS Cd 29b-13 for 2- and 3-MCPD & GEs From Kuhlmann, EJLST, 2011 AOCS Cd 29c-13 for 3-MCPD & GEs From DGF C-VI 18, 2010 & Weisshar, 2008 24
25
3-MCPD esters & Glycidol esters Correlation between DAG & 3MCPD Hydrogenated soyabean oil Hydrogenated Palm oil Refined Shea Crude Shea Refined palm oil Commercial mix of 4 refined oil Walnut oil Refined grapeseed oil Refined peanut oil Refined rapeseed oil Refined sunflower oil Joffre et al. (2009) DAG 3MCPD 3-MCPD content in mg/kg 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Difficult to find a correlation between DAG & 3-MCP esters (Lack of information concerning chloride content may explain these results) 26
Conclusions Research of contaminants is part of multiple controls conducted by fat and oil industry to fulfill the EC regulation n 1881/2006. In the absence of regulation, the detection of contaminants must be addressed in partnership with authorities according to the toxicity of molecules. Risks are rather limited due to the efficient elimination during oilrefining steps However some contaminants can be formed during the production process of vegetable oils such as 3-MCPD & glycidyl esters. 27
A special thanks to. ITERG Analysis Department team 28