Procedure for the Determination of the Permeability of Clayey Soils in a Triaxial Cell Using the Accelerated Permeability Test



Similar documents
METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

PERMEABILITY TEST. To determine the coefficient of permeability of a soil using constant head method.

Drained and Undrained Conditions. Undrained and Drained Shear Strength

Soil Mechanics. Outline. Shear Strength of Soils. Shear Failure Soil Strength. Laboratory Shear Strength Test. Stress Path Pore Pressure Parameters

Soil Mechanics SOIL STRENGTH page 1

EXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD

LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO

DIRECT SHEAR TEST SOIL MECHANICS SOIL MECHANICS LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MORATUWA SRI LANKA

Figure CPT Equipment

Experiment 3 Pipe Friction

PART I SIEVE ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL RETAINED ON THE 425 M (NO. 40) SIEVE

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 632 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Hydraulic Conductivity Tests for Soils. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University

CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS

Interpretation of clogging effects on the hydraulic behavior of ion treated geotextiles

Soil Suction. Total Suction

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY 3, CE 427 DRYING OF SOLIDS

Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils

Trace Dissolved Oxygen Sensor

SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF COARSE AGGREGATE AASHTO T 85

SOIL-LIME TESTING. Test Procedure for. TxDOT Designation: Tex-121-E 1. SCOPE 2. APPARATUS 3. MATERIALS TXDOT DESIGNATION: TEX-121-E

Period #16: Soil Compressibility and Consolidation (II)

American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers

How To Model Soil On Gri

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

Standard Test Procedures Manual

CEEN Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory Session 7 - Direct Shear and Unconfined Compression Tests

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL

Barometric Effects on Transducer Data and Groundwater Levels in Monitoring Wells D.A. Wardwell, October 2007

Constant Rate of Strain Consolidation with Radial Drainage

POWDER PROPERTIES LABORATORY

Secondary Consolidation and the effect of Surcharge Load

Consolidation Characteristics of Wastewater Sludge

DryWeight BulkVolume

Standard Test Procedures Manual

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Load Frames

Unit 24: Applications of Pneumatics and Hydraulics

METHOD A7 THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF GRAVEL, SOIL AND SAND

CHAPTER 7: CAPILLARY PRESSURE

Permeable Pavement Construction Guide

METHOD A10 (a) THE DETERMINATION OF THE IN-PLACE DRY DENSITY OF SOIL OR GRAVEL BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

Experiment # 3: Pipe Flow

HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING TEST

LAB 24 Transpiration

Head Loss in Pipe Flow ME 123: Mechanical Engineering Laboratory II: Fluids

Benchmarking Multi-Dimensional Large Strain Consolidation Analyses D. Priestley 1, M.D. Fredlund 2 and D. van Zyl 3

Gas Well Deliverability Testing

Embankment Consolidation

Transpiration of Plants

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

APCO SLOW CLOSING AIR/VACUUM VALVES

Lymon C. Reese & Associates LCR&A Consulting Services Tests of Piles Under Axial Load

V47 Series Temperature Actuated Modulating Water Valves

State of Illinois Department Of Transportation CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR S CHECKLIST FOR STORM SEWERS

THE DETERMINATION OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF MATERIALS USING THE VIBRATORY HAMMER COMPACTION

CFD SIMULATION OF SDHW STORAGE TANK WITH AND WITHOUT HEATER

SPECIFICATION FOR PIPE SUBSOIL DRAIN CONSTRUCTION

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

When to Use Immediate Settlement in Settle 3D

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

A LAMINAR FLOW ELEMENT WITH A LINEAR PRESSURE DROP VERSUS VOLUMETRIC FLOW ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting

. Address the following issues in your solution:

PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

TECHNICAL REPORT ON SCALA DYNAMIC CONE PENETROMETER IRREGULARITY

Math Matters: Dissecting Hydrometer Calculations

Calibration of Volumetric Glassware

CSUS Department of Chemistry Experiment 8 Chem.1A

DISSOLVED OXYGEN PROBE

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

MIME 3330 Mechanics Laboratory LAB 5: ROTATING BENDING FATIGUE

Measurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus

Schneps, Leila; Colmez, Coralie. Math on Trial : How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, p i.

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

Installation, Maintenance, & Repair Series 4000B/LF4000B

COMPARISON OF SATURATED-UNSATURATED SHEAR STRENGTH AND HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY BEHAVIOR OF A COMPACTED SANDY-CLAY TILL

Permeable Pavement Operation & Maintanence Guide

FLUID MECHANICS IM0235 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS - CB _1

SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE OEDOMETRIC CONSOLIDATION STRAIN RATE BEHAVIORS OF SATURATED CLAY

CONSOLIDATION

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES

Make sure you look at the reminders or examples before each set of problems to jog your memory! Solve

How To Use A Corona Mdi 110

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

THE LABORATORY NOTEBOOK

ME Heat Transfer Laboratory. Experiment No. 7 ANALYSIS OF ENHANCED CONCENTRIC TUBE AND SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERS

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DEEP FOUNDATIONS

Hollow Cylinder Apparatus (GDS SS-HCA)

Index-Velocity Rating Development for Rapidly Changing Flows in an Irrigation Canal Using Broadband StreamPro ADCP and ChannelMaster H-ADCP

IDEAL AND NON-IDEAL GASES

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Soil and waste for high-rise

STANDARD CLEANING AND CALIBRATION PROCEDURE FOR TGA-50(H) AND TGA-51(H)

Dimensional analysis is a method for reducing the number and complexity of experimental variables that affect a given physical phenomena.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Transcription:

Procedure for the Determination of the Permeability of Clayey Soils in a Triaxial Cell Using the Accelerated Permeability Test R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 Dr E. J Murray Research Contractor: Murray Rix Limited Further copies of this report are available from: Environment Agency R&D Dissemination Centre WRc, Frankland Road, Swindon, Wilts. SN5 8YF Tel: 01793 865000 Fax: 01793 514562 E-mail: publications@wrcplc.co.uk R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2

Publishing Organisation Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, BRISTOL BS32 4UD Tel: 01454 6244 00 Fax: 01454 624409 Website: www.environment-agency.gov.uk Environment Agency 2002 ISBN : 1857055217 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Environment Agency. Its officers, servants or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance upon the views contained herein. Dissemination status Internal: Released to Regions External: Released to Public Domain Statement of Use The output and recommendations from this research project will be taken forward and implemented by the Agency s National Landfill Liner Group. Dissemination to geotechnical specialists working within the Agency who are responsible for technical assessment and approval of landfill engineering designs and to the landfill industry, contractors, consultants and soil testing labs. Keywords Accelerated, Permeability, British Standard, Landfill, Liner, Clay, Triaxial Cell. Research Contractor: This document was produced under R&D Project No.P1-398 by : Dr Edward John Murray, Murray Rix Limited, 13 Willow Park, Upton Lane, Stoke Golding, Nr. Nuneaton, Warwickshire,CV136EU Tel : (01455) 213311 Fax : (01455) 213969 E-Mail: ted@murrayrix.co.uk The Environment Agency s Project Manager: Mr John Davis, Wrens Court, 15-17 Lower Queen Street, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands B72 1RT Tel: 0121 2412071 Fax: 01212412022 E-Mail: john.davis@environment-agency.gov.uk R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 2

1. GENERAL 1.1 The following outlines the test procedure to be adopted in the Accelerated Permeability Tests (AP tests) in determining the permeability of clayey soils. The procedure is consistent with that adopted in the Environment Agency R&D Contract Project No. P1-3398 Validation of the Accelerated Permeability Test as an Alternative to the British Standard Triaxial Permeability Test. 1.2 The limitations in the recommended use of the test for landfill linings and cappings is detailed in both the Project Record and Technical Report of Environment Agency R&D Contract Project No. P1-3398. An interpretation of the AP test permeability results in relation to the British Standard constant head triaxial test (BS 1377:1990 Part 6, Method 6) is also detailed in these documents. 1.3 In the AP test, the preparation of specimens, equipment to be used and testing requirements shall be in accordance with B.S.1377: 1990 other than as detailed in the following. 1.4 The basic test does not include measurements to assess the incremental volume and moisture content (or density) changes of the specimen during the test, or determination of the degree of saturation from B value determinations. However, included are procedures for the volumetric and moisture content determinations, and a procedure for the determination of the degree of saturation at the end of the AP test. It should be noted that the procedures for assessing volume and moisture content change of the specimen during the test are prone to errors using conventional laboratory equipment and require very careful appraisal of the data to obtain meaningful results. Included are comments on volume and moisture content error corrections should the Engineer desire such measurements to be made, though these would not be considered a standard requirement of the AP test. 2. SAMPLE PREPARATION 2.1 Each compacted specimen prepared for permeability testing shall have a nominal diameter of 100mm and length of 100mm. 2.2 Measurements of the length and diameter of the specimens prepared for permeability testing shall be made to the nearest 0.1mm. The diameter shall be recorded at 2 perpendicular diameters at the top, base and near the mid-length of the specimen. Measurements of the length shall be made along 3 lines approximately 120 apart around the curved surface of the specimen. 2.3 The weight of the specimens shall be measured and recorded to the nearest 0.01g and the densities determined to an accuracy of 0.001Mg/m 3. R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 3

3. SETTING UP THE TEST IN THE TRIAXIAL CELL 3.1 Two volume-change indicators are to be used in each test: one on each of the back pressure lines. These volume-change indicators are to record the volume of water leaving and entering the specimen. A third volume-change indicator on the cell line will be necessary if measurements of the volume change of the specimen are required. Where volume change burettes are to be used, these should be flushed out prior to use. In this operation, work the indicators at least twice to their limits of travel replacing escaped water with freshly de-aerated water from the pressure system. 3.2 If a separate base porous disc is used in the triaxial test, slide the saturated disc onto a layer of water on the triaxial base pedestal without entrapping air. Remove any surplus water standing on the disc, ensuring that the pores remain saturated. Place the specimen on the disc without delay and without entrapping air. 3.3 If a base pedestal with a bonded-in porous disc is used, ensure that the porous disc is saturated without any free water standing above it. Place the specimen on the base pedestal without delay and without entrapping air. 3.4 Place the saturated porous disc, with excess water removed, on top of the specimen. 3.5 Place the soaked rubber membrane, after allowing surplus water to drain off, around the specimen using a membrane stretcher. An unused leak-free membrane shall be used for every test. The membrane shall be soaked overnight before use. 3.6 Seal the membrane to the base pedestal using two rubber O-rings. Note 1: A smear of silicone grease on the curved surface of the pedestal and top cap improves the seal and is to be used. Grease shall not be allowed to come into contact with the porous disc. 3.7 Remove air pockets from between the membrane and the specimen by lightly stroking upward. No further water shall be inserted between the specimen and the membrane. 3.8 Fit two O-rings around the drainage lead connected to the top loading cap. 3.9 Open the back pressure valve momentarily to moisten the top cap and fit it onto the porous disc without entrapping air. Seal the membrane on to the top cap with the two O-rings rings, using the split-ring stretcher. As for the base pedestal, a smear of silicone grease shall be used to improve the seal (see Note to 3.6). 3.10 Ensure that the specimen axis is vertical and that the top drainage line will not interfere with fitting the cell body. 3.11 Assemble the cell body with de-aerated water, ensuring that all the air is displaced through the bleed hole. 3.12 Keep the bleed plug open until the cell is to be pressurised, in order to maintain the pressure at atmospheric. R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 4

3.13 Check that the volume change indicators have sufficient travel. Make adjustments as necessary. 3.14 The pressures to be used in the test shall be as follows: Outlet (top) back pressure 300kPa Inlet (bottom) back pressure 425kPa Cell confining pressure 550kPa Note 2: The water flow direction is upwards being in at the bottom of the specimen and out at the top. 3.15 Pressurise the cell by opening the cell pressure valve slowly. Note 3: Note 4: If volume change of the specimen is to be determined, the cell shall be calibrated and the volume of water used in the cell recorded to allow a measure to be made of the volume change of the specimen during the pressurising of the cell. The testing of the Environment Agency R&D Research Project No. P1-398, highlights errors which may occur in triaxial cell permeability testing using standard laboratory equipment. A major potential error is in the reading of the cell volume change indicator set prior to opening of the taps to the pressure lines. The influence of trapped air bubbles and seating/assembly errors may be eradicated by careful examination of the volume measurements and redefining the zero reading. 4. ACCELERATED PERMEABILITY TEST PROCEDURE 4.1 Open the inlet (bottom back pressure) valve, then slowly open the outlet (top back pressure) valve. Note 5: Note 6 : Corrections may be necessary in the initial zero readings of the volume change indicators set prior to opening of the taps to the pressure lines. This does not influence the determination of the onset of steady state flow conditions but does influence the apparent uptake or reduction of water in the specimen. The liberation of air from solution can also influence volume flow measurements. Initially the volume change indicators will vary, possibly indicating net negative flow of water from or into the specimen, but should settle down. 4.2 Monitor the rate of flow in and out of the specimen at suitable time intervals to obtain a continuous uninterrupted plot including any initial negative flow of water. Continue the test until the relationship of both volume change indicators are linear and parallel and both volume change indicators indicate a roughly similar rate of flow. Note 7: The following conditions should be satisfied unless material specific testing shows otherwise R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 5

Minimum flow time for steady state conditions of 2500min Minimum test duration time, following the establishment of steady state conditions, of 2500mins to ensure linearity of flow plots and that the top and bottom flow plots are roughly parallel. The ratio of the maximum to minimum of inflow and outflow rates should not be greater than 1.7. 4.3 If required, monitor the volume change of the specimen at suitable time intervals to obtain a continuous uninterrupted plot of volume change during the testing. 4.4 Plot a graph of cumulative flow of water Q (in ml), as recorded from each volume change indicator as ordinates, against time (in mins) as abscissa, on a linear scale. 4.5 If required, sufficient measurements shall be made to allow determine of the volume change of the specimen, the moisture content change of the specimen and the density change of the specimen throughout the test including during any saturation check. 4.6 If required by the Engineer, a saturation check shall be carried out by determination of the B value in accordance with section 5. 4.7 Record the temperature in the vicinity of the triaxial cell to 0.5 C. 4.8 Stop the permeability test by closing both the back pressure valves (inlet then outlet). 5. SATURATION CHECK 5.1 If not already inserted, connect a pore water pressure transducer to the inflow base line. 5.2 With the inlet and outlet valves closed, allow the pore water pressure in the specimen to equalise and until it has not shown a change of more than 1kPa over a period of at least one hour. 5.3 Increase the cell pressure by 100kPa. 5.4 The pore pressure within the specimen as indicated by the transducer will increase. Monitor the pore pressure until it is steady and does not show a change of more than 1kPa over a period of at least one hour. Record the time and pore pressure. 5.5 Determine the pore pressure parameter B from the following and record it. B = δu/δσ 3 Where, δu = the change in pore pressure δσ 3 = change in cell pressure = 100kPa δu = u 300kPa R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 6

Note 8: The criterion B 0.95 is usually accepted as an indication of near-saturated conditions at the start of a BS test. However, in carrying out the saturation check at the end of the AP test the specimen will have been consolidated and in stiff clays it is recognised that it may not be possible to obtain a ratio of B 0.95. A value of B 0.90 which remains unchanged after two further successive increments of cell pressure and back-pressure is then considered acceptable. 5.6 Where necessary, ensure that the specimen volume-change indicator is read during the saturation check stage and that the measurements provide a continuation of those during the permeability test. 6. CALCULATIONS 6.1 Calculate the cross-sectional area of the soil specimen A (in mm 2 ) from the measurements prior to testing. 6.2 From the cumulative flow plot of section 2.4, determine the mean slope of the linear portions. This slope equals the mean rate of flow q (in ml/min), during steady flow conditions in the test. 6.3 Determine the pressure difference (p 1 p 2 ), Where, p 1 = the inlet back pressure, p 2 = the outlet back pressure. 6.4 Calculate the coefficient of permeability in the vertical direction, k v (in m/s), from the equation, k v = (1.63 x q x L) x R t x10-4 A(p 1 -p 2 )- p c Where, q = the mean rate of flow through the soil specimen (in ml/min), L is the length of the specimen prior to testing (in mm) (p 1 -p 2 ) is the pressure difference between the pressure applied to the top and base pressure lines (in kpa) p c is the pressure loss in the system (in kpa) for the rate of flow q, obtained from the calibration graph. R t is the temperature correction factor for the viscosity of water. 7. MEASUREMENTS OF SPECIMENS AFTER TESTING 7.1 Measurements of the length and diameter of the specimen to the nearest 0.1mm shall be made after testing. As for the measurements prior to testing, the diameter shall be recorded at 2 perpendicular diameters at the top, base and near the mid-length of the specimen. Measurements of the length shall be made along 3 lines approximately 120 apart around the curved surface of the specimen. R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 7

7.2 The weight of the specimen after testing shall be measured and recorded to the nearest 0.01g and the density determined to an accuracy of 0.001Mg/m 3. 8. REPORTING OF RESULTS 8.1 The test report for each specimen tested shall include the following information: (i) Confirmation of methodology employed in specimen preparation and testing highlighting any deviation from the procedures detailed above; (ii) The results of all calibration checks and allowances for potential errors; (iii) Initial specimen dimensional measurements; (iv) Comments on the initial specimen condition and structure which might influence permeability measurements; (v) Initial bulk density, dry density, moisture content and air voids content of the specimen; (vi) Results of the measurements from the volume-change indicators; (vii) The coefficient of permeability k (in m/s), at 20 C, to 2 significant figures; (viii) The mean effective stress at which the permeability was measured; (ix) The hydraulic gradient across the specimen during the test; (x) The volume of the specimen, the density of the specimen and the moisture content of the specimen at regular intervals throughout the test if required by the Engineer; (xi) Final specimen dimensional measurements; (xii) Comments on the final specimen condition and structure which might influence permeability measurements; (xiii) Final bulk density, dry density and overall moisture content of the specimen; (xiv) The results of the Saturation Check if required by the Engineer; (xv) The laboratory is requested to provide any additional information or observations that it considers relevant. R&D Technical Report P1-398/TR/2 8