Die Management- und Unternehmensberatung der Gesundheits- und Sozialwirtschaft Network of Nursing Educators (SANCO/1/2009) Presentation for the meeting of the orking Group on Health orkforce (12 April 2013) Der gemeinsame eg zum Ziel Bochum Berlin Stuttgart München
Structure Mission and objectives of the project Project partners and staff Pilot network Main challenges Situation in participating countries examples ebsite Next steps chart 2
Objectives of the project The specific objective of the project is to create and service a pilot network of nurse educators and regulators to carry out the following tasks: ork package 1: To produce a map of the EU in terms of the different legislative frameworks for the employment and duties of HCA ork package 2 & 3:To examine the scope of the skills and competences required of HCA within the EU ork package 4: ork package 5: To exchange and map best practices in training for HCA and to take into account opportunities for the cross-border mobility of HCA To make recommendations for training requirements for HCA and for educational support of informal carers chart 3
Project Partners and Staff Project partner Staff Main responsibilities contec Gesellschaft für Organisationsentwicklung mbh, Germany Dr. Grit Braeseke (Project management) Kati odtke Birger Dreher, M. A. Jessica Hernández Project management, -organisation, literature research, data collection, technical support (data base, home page ) DBfK Deutscher Berufsverband für Pflegeberufe, Germany Gertrud Stöcker Medical University rocław, Fachbereich Sozialmedizin und Public Health Poland Jacqueline Filkins (Professor), UK Preusker Health Care Ltd OY, Finland ZAB Zentrale Akademie für Berufe im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Germany Prof. Dr. Ludmila aszkiewicz Jacqueline Filkins (Professor) Dr. Uwe Preusker Juliane Birkenstock Soliciting nurse educators and regulators to create the network, nursing expertise, evaluation best-practice-examples, make recommendations for training requirements chart 4
Participating Countries 8 15 2 10 5 7 4 11 6 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Czech Republic 5. Denmark 6. Finland 7. Germany 8. Ireland 9. Italy 10. The Netherlands 11. Poland 12. Slovenia 13. Spain 14. Switzerland 15. United Kingdom 14 12 1 13 9 3 chart 5
Process, roles and responsibilities Pilot Network 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Czech Republic 5. Denmark 6. Finland 7. Germany 8. Ireland 9. Italy 10. The Netherlands 11. Poland 12. Slovenia 13. Spain 14. Switzerland 15. United Kingdom knowledge, information, data, best-practice examples, recommendations Project Partners DBfK University rocław Professor Jacqueline Filkins Preusker Healthcare Ltd OY ZAB GmbH contec GmbH pool revision, synthesis, recommendations contec GmbH Accesible data on internet account mapping of data, visualization on internet domain chart 6
Main challenges common understanding Target group in focus of the project: persons working within healthcare with a qualification below the standard of registered nurses defined by the Directive 2005/36/EC. For a list of the occupations above our target group see annex II of the Directive. In some countries there is a clear differentiation between the operational areas of the occupational group in focus of the project and that of registered nurses. This differentiation is based in law where the title nurse is protected in law and is connected to higher level studies. This leads to a differentiation in levels of responsibilities and competencies and is therefore of interest to the project. chart 7
hat is the staff working in supporting roles to nursing called? 8 2 5 7 4 1 6 1. Austria - Pflegehelfer/Pflegehelferin 2. Belgium - Aide soignante 3. Bulgaria - Sanitary 4. Czech Republic - Medical Assistants 5. Denmark - Social and Healthcare Assistant 6. Finland - Practical Nurse 7. Germany - Gesundheitsund Krankenpflegehelfer/in 8. Ireland - Health Care Assistant 9. Italy - Auxiliary Staff, Social and Health Auxiliary orkers 9 3 chart 8
hat is the staff working in supporting roles to nursing called? 13 15 10 14 12 11 10. The Netherlands - Carers individual Health care; assistants Health and welfare; care assistant 11. Poland - Guardian Medical 12. Slovenia - nurse assistant 13. Spain - Assistant Practitioners, "Auxiliares de clinica» 14. Switzerland - ASSC : Assistant(e) en soins et santé communautaire, Fachfrau/Fachmann Gesundheit, EFZ Sek: II Assistent / Assistentin Gesundheit und Soziales EBA 15. United Kingdom - Health Care Assistants, Health Care Support orkers, Nursing Assistants, Nursing Auxiliaries, Clinical Support orkers and Assistant (or Associate) Practitioners chart 9
chart 10
Is there a compulsory license requirement to practice for this occupational group? * No Yes 8 15 2 10 14 14 5 7 4 1 12 11 6 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Czech Republic 5. Denmark 6. Finland 7. Germany 8. Ireland 9. Italy 10. The Netherlands 11. Poland 12. Slovenia 13. Spain 14. Switzerland 15. United Kingdom 13 9 3 chart 11
Is there compulsory registration for this occupational group? No Yes 8 15 10 2 14 6 5 7 11 4 1 12 13 9 3 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Czech Republic 5. Denmark 6. Finland 7. Germany 8. Ireland 9. Italy 10. The Netherlands 11. Poland 12. Slovenia 13. Spain 14. Switzerland 15. United Kingdom chart 12
Is there a compulsory educational preparation for that occupational group? No Yes 6 8 5 15 10 2 14 7 7 11 4 1 12 13 9 3 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Czech Republic 5. Denmark 6. Finland 7. Germany 8. Ireland 9. Italy 10. The Netherlands 11. Poland 12. Slovenia 13. Spain 14. Switzerland 15. United Kingdom chart 13
Country profiles chart 14
Comparison of country data 1. Austria 2. Belgium 3. Bulgaria 4. Czech Republic 5. Denmark 6. Finland 7. Germany 8. Ireland 9. Italy 10. The Netherlands 11. Poland 12. Slovenia 13. Spain 14. Switzerland 15. United Kingdom chart 15
ebsite www.hca-network.eu chart 16
Future navigation on the ebsite Country profile Individual request of information Name Registratio n Legislation Etc. Countr y X Country n chart 17
ork package 4 (June 2012 June 2013) Database Brussels Oct. 2012 Oct. 2013 Discussion Evaluation Jan - May 2013 Sorting of data May2013 chart 18
9 Categories for recommendations and best-practices Permeability (possibility to access HCA education with prior work experience and followed by progressing after HCA education to further education possibilities such as nurse education) Curriculum for HCA education (nationwide core curriculum? theory and praxis, ) Additional details to the HCA educational process: duration, theory/practice balance, use of IT/ electronic learning support Assessment criteria for HCA education (methodology of assessment for theoretical and practical work, on-going assessment or examination, who performs the assessment ) Does the HCA education meet the needs of todays and future health system? (Relationship between generalization and specialization/ broad basic knowledge, possibility to specialize, possibility to change between long term care, outpatient and inpatient sector ) Registration of HCA (present situation) chart 19
ork relationships between HCA and RN (registered nurses): is there a demonstrable line of accountability from HCA to RN (ultimate decision-making responsibility for action: does it rest with the RN or HCA? Level of authority of HCA to act independently) EU mobility for HCA Guidance and/or support of informal carers by HCA (are there guidelines to follow, can HCA make referrals independently etc.) For each category there shall be given the following information: Category XY Definition/Description Recommendation Justification of the recommendation Best-practice findings relevant to the category chart 20
ork-package 5 (December 2012 October 2013) Draft recommendations for training requirements for HCA Project partners May 2013 Project partners Dec. 2013 Final Report Draft recommendations for educational support for informal carers Project partners May 2013 Stakeholder Conference in Brussels Nov. 2013 chart 21
Die Management- und Unternehmensberatung der Gesundheits- und Sozialwirtschaft contec der gemeinsame eg zum Ziel Contact: Dr. Grit Braeseke Project manager Telefone +49 234 452 7341 Mobile +49 160 715 0255 grit.braeseke@contec.de www.contec.de Bochum Berlin Stuttgart München