Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee



Similar documents
GRAIN SORGHUM PERFORMANCE TRIALS IN OKLAHOMA, 2011

The Relationship Between Grain Yield and Silage Yield in Field Corn in Northern Illinois INTRODUCTION

Irrigation Scheduling on Small Grains using AZSCHED for Windows - Safford Agricultural Center, 2003

Comparison of Weed Management Strategies with Roundup Ready Corn. J. A. Ferrell and W. W. Witt

Fred Below & Adam Henninger. Crop Physiology Laboratory Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

PERFORMANCE OF RYEGRASS VARIETIES IN ALABAMA,

2014 Flax Weed Control Trial

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Summary: Objective: Materials and Methods:

Yield Response of Corn to Plant Population in Indiana

Mid-Atlantic Grain and Forage Journal

Summary: Objective: Materials and Methods:

Sulfur Fertilization of Corn. Jeff Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center December 2013

Will It Sprout? Seed Germination Test

Using Technology and Big Data to Improve Profits. Matt Darr, Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

EFFECT OF AVAIL ON CORN PRODUCTION IN MINNESOTA

Maize is a major cereal grown and consumed in Uganda and in the countries of Kenya, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda

Soybean roulette: improving the odds for maximizing soybean yields

Arkansas Corn. and Grain Sorghum Performance Tests. R.D. Bond J.A. Still D.G. Dombek

CropManage: Online Irrigation and Nutrient. Web Based Software for Lettuce Production

CORN IS GROWN ON MORE ACRES OF IOWA LAND THAN ANY OTHER CROP.

Mississippi MISSISSIPPI AGRICULTURAL & FORESTRY EXPERIMENT STATION MELISSA J. MIXON, INTERIM DIRECTOR

Ethanol Usage Projections & Corn Balance Sheet (mil. bu.)

Rain on Planting Protection. Help Guide

IHARF Box 156 Indian Head, SK. S0G 2K0 Ph: (306)

Harvesting Dry Bean John Nowatzki, NDSU Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Forage Sorghum Production Guide

How To Make A Drought Tolerant Corn

THE SCIENCE THE FUTURE OF CANADIAN CANOLA: APPLY THE SCIENCE OF AGRONOMICS TO MAXIMIZE GENETIC POTENTIAL.

Soybean Marketing & Production College, Minneapolis, MN. isafarmnet.com

Goldmine Report : pg132aventisharvestaid. Cotton Harvest Aid Demonstration Chris Bubenik, 2001

2015 WISCONSIN SOYBEAN VARIETY EVALUATION PROGRAM Department of Agronomy University of Wisconsin - Madison

POTASSIUM. Functions of Potassium in Plants. Potassium Deficiency Symptoms

Irrigation and Nitrogen Management Web- Based Tool for Lettuce Production

Using Web-based Software for Irrigation and Nitrogen Management in Onion Production: our Research Plan for 2013

Adapt-N Guided Hands-on Exercise

Growing Balaton - Horticultural Considerations

Weed Control in Field Corn with Postemergence Herbicides

PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC.

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Roberts & McPherson)

2015 Kentucky Soybean Variety Performance Test Nomination Form University of Kentucky

SULFUR AND MICRONUTRIENT RESPONSES ON CORN AND SOYBEANS George Rehm Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St.

Multiple Peril Crop Insurance

CRANBERRY ETNA. Etna is a cranberry bean with early maturity, high yield potential and a large seed size.

Big Data & Big Opportunities

Communications for Research & Extension Centers

Hybrid Rye for Biogas Trial Results 2012/13 KWS UK

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Hail Damaged Corn and Soybean

A TALE OF TWO BIOMASS BOILERS

How Crop Insurance Works. The Basics

#1: Threshold and Injury Calculations the Theory. #2: Putting Economic Injury Levels and Action Thresholds to Use. Related Topics

BREEDING AND GENETICS

various P levels for the past two years. Treatments were a one time application

Is Lower Priced Urea a Bargain?

Table 3. List of descritors for maize

Grain Sorghum Production South and Southwest Texas

SOIL HEALTH COVER CROPS RELAY CROPPING

Matt Erickson Economist American Farm Bureau Federation March 5, 2014

Plant Physiology Critical Stages in the Life of a Corn Plant

Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture

Ukraine Crop Update. Spring Sowing Ahead of Average. CROP-UKR14-01 May 8, 2014

The High Plains Dairy Conference does not support one product over another and any mention herein is meant as an example, not an endorsement.

Corn Silage Gary Bates, Associate Professor, Plant and Soil Science

Big Data: Challenges in Agriculture. Big Data Summit, November 2014 Moorea Brega: Agronomic Modeling Lead The Climate Corporation

How To Manage Alfalfa

Corn and Soybean Production Calendar

Establishing a website to aid growers in harvesting and irrigation decisions: PeanutFARM

Forage Options and Drought Risk: A South Dakota Case Study

Grain Yield and Grain Protein

COVER CROPS FOR RASPBERRY PLANTINGS

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

Update on Nitrogen Management Field Studies with Strawberries and Leafy Vegetables

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT WITH DRIP AND SPRINKLER IRRIGATION

Assessing Hail and Freeze Damage to Field Corn and Sorghum J. E. Bremer, C. D. Coffman, and S. D. Livingston*

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

NO-TILL AND NITROGEN FIXING INOCULANTS

Humidtropics Kiboga/Kyankwanzi Soybean production training

All Approved Insurance Providers All Risk Management Agency Field Offices All Other Interested Parties

Enterprise Budget Small-Scale Commercial Hops Production in North Carolina

Tennessee Agricultural Production and Rural Infrastructure

Remote Sensing Applications for Precision Agriculture

Digital Agriculture: Leveraging Technology and Information into Profitable Decisions

GROUNDWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

2015 Certified Bermudagrass Preliminary Buyers Guide

Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice cultivation

CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. Implementation of Sustainable Agricultural Initiatives

So far the effort, outlined in the state s Nutrient Reduction Strategy to reduce hypoxia in the Gulf, has been voluntary.

Evaluation of Biofertilizer and Manure Effects on Quantitative Yield of Nigella Sativa L.

Guidelines for Estimating Wheat Straw Biomass Production Costs. Average Crop Residue Zone in Manitoba

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

Agrisoma: Creating Sustainable Energy Solutions Founded in Agriculture

Soil Sampling for Nutrient Management

Chapter 4 and 5 solutions

Corn. Corn was an important crop for people who lived in. Corn Plant Development. Emerson Nafziger Department of Crop Sciences

EFFECT OF MOISTURE STRESS ON COMBINING ABILITY VARIATION FOR BIRD RESISTANCE TRAITS IN SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.)

IRRIGATING TOBACCO. J. Michael Moore

Soybean Growth and Development

Transcription:

Grain Sorghum Hybrid Tests in Tennessee 2010 Fred L. Allen, Coordinator, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Richard Johnson, Research Associate, Agronomic Crop Variety Testing & Demonstrations Agronomic Crop Variety Testing and Demonstrations Department of Plant Sciences Institute of Agriculture University of Tennessee Knoxville Telephone: (865)974-8821 FAX: (865)974-1947 email: allenf@utk.edu Variety test results are posted on UT s website at: http://varietytrials.tennessee.edu/ and www.utcrops.com 1

Acknowledgments This research was funded by the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station and UT Extension with partial funding from participating companies. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following individuals in conducting these experiments: Dept. of Plant Sciences Kara Warwick, Graduate Research Assistant Jennifer Lane, Graduate Research Assistant Virginia Sykes, Graduate Research Assistant Research and Education Centers: East Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Robert Simpson, Center Director Mr. Bobby McKee, Sr. Farm Crew Leader Mr. Lee Ellis, Research Assistant Highland Rim, Springfield Dr. Barry Sims, Center Director Mr. Brad Fisher, Research Associate Milan Dr. Blake Brown, Center Director Mr. Jason Williams, Research Associate Mr. James McClure, Research Associate Ames Plantation Rick Carlisle, Center Director Marshall Smith, Research Associate Jamie Evans, Research Associate Table of Contents Experimental Procedures 3 Interpretation of Data 3 Research and Education Center Information 3 Research and Education Center Tests 4 Hybrid Characteristics 7 Seed Company Contact Information 7 2

2010 PERFORMANCE OF GRAIN SORGHUM HYBRIDS IN TENNESSEE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTERS Experimental Procedures: The grain sorghum variety trial was conducted in each of the physiographic regions of the state. The trial was conducted at the East Tennessee (Knoxville); Highland Rim (Springfield); Milan (Milan) and Ames Plantation (Grand Junction) Research and Education Centers (REC). The trial contained five hybrids at each location. The tests were fertilized with 90 pounds of nitrogen per acre. A portion of the nitrogen was applied prior to seeding and the remainder was applied as a side-dress. The plot size was two rows, 30 feet in length with 30 inch row spacing. Plots were replicated three times at each location in a randomized complete block design. Plots were seeded at the rate of approximately 87,600 seed per acre (approx. 7 lbs/a). Table 1 contains the test location information on planting and harvest dates and soil types. Tables 2 and 3 contain the Research and Education Center Test data for 2010. Tables 4 and 5 contain the twoyear data, Tables 6 and 7 contain the three-year data. Table 8 contains the phenotypic trait data for the grain sorghum hybrids tested in 2010. The contact information for sorghum seed companies is listed in Table 9. Interpretation of Data: The tables on the following pages have been prepared with the entries listed in order of performance, the highest-yielding entry being listed first. All yields presented have been adjusted to 14% moisture. At the bottom of the tables, LSD values stand for Least Significant Difference. The mean yields of any two varieties being compared must differ by at least the amount shown in order to be considered different in yielding ability at the 5% level of probability of significance. For example, given that the LSD for a test is 850 lbs/a and the mean yield of Hybrid A was 4200 lbs/a and the mean yield of Hybrid B was 5000 lbs/a, then the two hybrids are not statistically different in yield because the difference of 800 lbs/a is less than the minimum of 850 lbs/a required for them to be significant. Similarly, if the average yield of Hybrid C was 5900 lbs/a then it is significantly higher yielding than both Hybrid B and Hybrid A, because the difference between B and C (900 lbs) and the difference between A and C (1700 lbs) exceeds the LSD value of 850 lbs. Also, the coefficient of variation (C.V.) values are shown at the bottom of each table. This value is a measure of the error variability found within each experiment. It is the percentage that the square root of error mean square is of the overall test mean yield at that location. For example, a C.V. of 10% indicates that the size of the error variation is about 10% of the size of the test mean. Similarly, a C.V. of 30% indicates that the size of the error variation is nearly one-third as large as the test mean. A goal in conducting each yield test is to keep the C.V. as low as possible, preferably below 20%. Growing Season: The 2010 growing season was characterized by a wet spring resulting in some flooded fields followed by hotter and dryer than normal conditions. Hot dry conditions in August and September advanced harvest by approximately two weeks ahead of the normal pace. Table 1. Location information from Research and Education Centers where the grain sorghum hybrid tests were conducted in 2010. Seeding Research & Education Center Location Planting Date Harvest Date Rate Soil Type East Tennessee Knoxville May 7, 2010 October 1, 2010 87,600 Sequatchie Silt Loam Highland Rim Springfield May 14, 2010 September 16, 2010 87,600 Mountview Silt Loam Milan Milan May 13, 2010 September 13, 2010 87,600 Loring Silt Loam Ames Grand Junction April 28, 2010 October 12, 2010 87,600 Lexington Silt Loam 3

Table 2. Mean yields of five grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in four environments in Tennessee during 2010. Avg. Yield Avg. Yield ± Std. Err. ± Std. Err. Spring Brand Hybrid (n=4) (n=4) Knoxville Hill Milan Ames bu/a -------------------------------- lbs/a---------------------------------- DeKalb DKS54-00 109 ± 2 5991 ± 130 6935 6490 6548 3990 Dekalb DKS53-67 107 ± 2 5899 ± 130 7520 6867 5416 3793 DeKalb DKS44-20 107 ± 3 5875 ± 139 6924 6857 5339 4380 Garst 5464 106 ± 2 5822 ± 130 7028 6799 5947 3513 DeKalb DKS49-45 99 ± 3 5449 ± 139 6946 5789 4972 4087 Avg. (lbs/a) 106 5831 6937 6540 5593 4058 L.S.D..05 (lbs/a) 7 377 713 1019 706 877 C.V. (%) 7.7 7.7 5.7 8.6 6.9 10.6 All yields adjusted to 14%; lbs / ac 55 = bushels per acre Table 3. Overall mean yields and agronomic characteristics of five grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in four environments in Tennessee during 2010. Avg. Yield Moisture Test Head Bird Head Grain ± Std. Err. at Harvest Weight Blast Height Lodging Damage Type Mold # Brand Hybrid (n=4) (n=4) (n=1) (n=1) (n=3) (n=2) (n=2) (n=2) (n=1) bu/a % lbs/bu score in. score score score score DeKalb DKS54-00 109 ± 2 13.1 57.1 1.0 59 1.1 1.3 3.0 2.2 Dekalb DKS53-67 107 ± 2 13.3 58.4 1.0 54 1.0 1.2 2.5 2.3 DeKalb DKS44-20 107 ± 3 12.9 56.5 1.0 55 1.2 1.3 2.2 2.5 Garst 5464 106 ± 2 12.5 56.9 1.0 56 1.0 1.3 3.0 2.8 DeKalb DKS49-45 99 ± 3 12.8 57.2 1.0 58 1.0 1.3 2.3 2.2 Average 106 12.9 57.2 1.0 56 1.1 1.3 2.6 2.4 Bushel weight of No. 2 sorghum equals 55 lbs. DAP = days after planting Head blast = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of florets on the head are filled with grain and no mold; 5 = 95+% of florets unfilled with grain or moldy or both. Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at an angle 45 ; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle 45. Bird damage = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = no bird feeding; 5 = 95+% of grain removed by birds. Head Type - 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = compact head; 5 = open head. # Grain Mold = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of grain has no mold; 5 = 95+% of grain or moldy. 4

Table 4. Mean yields of three grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in four environments for two years (2009-2010) in Tennessee. Avg. Yield Avg. Yield ± Std. Err. ± Std. Err. Spring Brand Hybrid (n=8) (n=8) Knoxville Hill Milan Ames bu/a ------------------------- lbs/a---------------------------------- DeKalb DKS54-00 126 ± 2 6929 ± 118 8790 6620 8245 4059 DeKalb DKS44-20 121 ± 2 6665 ± 123 8681 6504 7343 4134 Dekalb DKS53-67 119 ± 2 6557 ± 118 8471 6792 7165 3802 Avg. 122 6717 8647 6639 7584 3998 L.S.D..05 (lbs/a) 8 441 759 908 918 1092 C.V. (%) 8.6 8.6 5.6 8.8 7.6 17.3 All yields adjusted to 14%; lbs / ac 55 = bushels per acre Table 5. Overall mean yields and agronomic characteristics of three grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in four environments for two years (2009-2010) in Tennessee. Avg. Yield Moisture Test Pollen Head Bird Head Grain ± Std. Err. at Harvest Weight Shed Blast Height Lodging Damage Type Mold # Sprouting * Brand Hybrid (n=8) (n=8) (n=2) (n=1) (n=1) (n=6) (n=4) (n=4) (n=4) (n=2) (n=2) bu/a % lbs/bu DAP score in. score score score score score DeKalb DKS54-00 126 ± 2 14.7 55.7 74 1.0 59 1.0 1.2 2.9 2.5 3.4 DeKalb DKS44-20 121 ± 2 14.5 55.7 74 1.0 55 1.1 1.2 2.6 2.5 3.1 Dekalb DKS53-67 119 ± 2 14.8 57.6 76 1.0 55 1.0 1.1 2.4 2.3 2.8 Average 122 14.6 56.3 75 1.0 56 1.0 1.2 2.6 2.4 3.1 Bushel weight of No. 2 sorghum equals 55 lbs. Head blast = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of florets on the head are filled with grain and no mold; 5 = 95+% of florets unfilled with grain or moldy or both. Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at an angle 45 ; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle 45. Bird damage = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = no bird feeding; 5 = 95+% of grain removed by birds. Head type = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = compact head; 5 = open head. # Grain Mold = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of grain has no mold; 5 = 95+% of grain or moldy. * Sprouting = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of grain has no sprouting; 5 = 95+% of grain has sprouted. 5

Table 6. Mean yields of three grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in three environments for three years (2008-2010) in Tennessee. Avg. Yield Avg. Yield ± Std. Err. ± Std. Err. Brand Hybrid (n=9) (n=9) Knoxville Springfield Milan bu/ac --------------------------- lbs/a--------------------------- DeKalb DKS54-00 134 ± 2 7346 ± 128 8567 5802 7670 Dekalb DKS53-67 129 ± 2 7091 ± 124 8335 5934 7004 DeKalb DKS44-20 129 ± 2 7083 ± 124 8472 5767 7011 Avg. 130 7174 8458 5834 7228 L.S.D..05 (lbs/a) 10 565 1372 828 879 C.V. (%) 9.4 9.4 9.5 10.1 8.6 All yields adjusted to 14%; lbs / ac 55 = bushels per acre Table 7. Overall mean yields and agronomic characteristics of three grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in three environments for three years (2008-2010) in Tennessee. Avg. Yield Moisture Test Pollen Head Bird Head Grain ± Std. Err. at Harvest Weight Shed Blast Height Lodging Damage Type Mold # Sprouting * Brand Hybrid (n=9) (n=9) (n=3) (n=2) (n=3) (n=9) (n=6) (n=6) (n=5) (n=2) (n=1) bu/a % lbs/bu DAP score in. score score score score score DeKalb DKS54-00 134 ± 2 15.7 56.3 73 1.0 58 1.0 1.5 2.9 2.5 2.8 Dekalb DKS53-67 129 ± 2 15.8 58.5 73 1.0 54 1.0 1.5 2.7 2.3 2.0 DeKalb DKS44-20 129 ± 2 15.4 56.6 71 1.0 54 1.1 1.5 2.8 2.5 2.2 Average 130 15.6 57.1 72 1.0 56 1.0 1.5 2.8 2.4 2.3 Bushel weight of No. 2 sorghum equals 55 lbs. Head blast = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of florets on the head are filled with grain and no mold; 5 = 95+% of florets unfilled with grain or moldy or both. Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at an angle 45 ; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle 45. Bird damage = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = no bird feeding; 5 = 95+% of grain removed by birds. Head type = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = compact head; 5 = open head. # Grain Mold = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of grain has no mold; 5 = 95+% of grain or moldy. * Sprouting = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95+% of grain has no sprouting; 5 = 95+% of grain has sprouted. 6

Table 8. Characteristics of grain sorghum hybrids evaluated in yield tests in Tennessee during 2010 provided by participating seed companies. Grain Green Bug Released or Brand Hybrid Color Maturity Head Type Resistance Experimental Comments DeKalb DKS44-20 Bronze Med --- --- R --- DeKalb DKS49-45 Bronze Med --- --- R --- Dekalb DKS53-67 Bronze Med-Late --- --- R --- DeKalb DKS54-00 Bronze 110 Semi-Compact C,E,I R For high yield environments, residue proven Garst 5464 Bronze Med-Late Semi-Compact --- R --- Table 9. Contact information for grain sorghum seed companies participating in yield tests in Tennessee during 2010. Company Contact Phone Email Web site Address Monsanto 800-335-2676 www.asgrowanddekalb.com (Asgrow, Dekalb) Garst Steve Sick 402-616-6534 steve.sick@syngenta.com www.garstseed.com 7