The Power of the KPSS Test for Cointegration when Residuals are Fractionally Integrated



Similar documents
Testing against a Change from Short to Long Memory

Testing against a Change from Short to Long Memory

The VAR models discussed so fare are appropriate for modeling I(0) data, like asset returns or growth rates of macroeconomic time series.

Minimum LM Unit Root Test with One Structural Break. Junsoo Lee Department of Economics University of Alabama

Non-Stationary Time Series andunitroottests

Unit root properties of natural gas spot and futures prices: The relevance of heteroskedasticity in high frequency data

Overview of Violations of the Basic Assumptions in the Classical Normal Linear Regression Model

Chapter 5: Bivariate Cointegration Analysis

Solución del Examen Tipo: 1

Performing Unit Root Tests in EViews. Unit Root Testing

Capturing Cross-Sectional Correlation with Time Series: with an Application to Unit Root Test

FULLY MODIFIED OLS FOR HETEROGENEOUS COINTEGRATED PANELS

Are the US current account deficits really sustainable? National University of Ireland, Galway

2. Linear regression with multiple regressors

Econometrics Simple Linear Regression

Unit Root Tests. 4.1 Introduction. This is page 111 Printer: Opaque this

Unit Labor Costs and the Price Level

1 Short Introduction to Time Series

TOURISM AS A LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH FACTOR: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION FOR GREECE USING CAUSALITY ANALYSIS. Nikolaos Dritsakis

Department of Economics

The Effect of Infrastructure on Long Run Economic Growth

Forecasting GILT Yields with Macro-Economic Variables: Empirical Evidence from the UK

Chapter 1. Vector autoregressions. 1.1 VARs and the identi cation problem

Chapter 6: Multivariate Cointegration Analysis

TEMPORAL CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STOCK MARKET CAPITALIZATION, TRADE OPENNESS AND REAL GDP: EVIDENCE FROM THAILAND

Sales forecasting # 2

Time Series Analysis

Alternative Bootstrap Procedures for Testing Cointegration in Fractionally Integrated Processes

Keywords: Baltic stock markets, unit root, Engle-Granger approach, Johansen cointegration test, causality, impulse response, variance decomposition.

1 Teaching notes on GMM 1.

Department of Economics

Modeling Real Private Consumption Expenditure in Bulgaria after the Currency Board Implementation ( )

Time Series Analysis: Basic Forecasting.

Chapter 3: The Multiple Linear Regression Model

Vector Time Series Model Representations and Analysis with XploRe

PPP Hypothesis and Multivariate Fractional Network Marketing

Powerful new tools for time series analysis

Time Series Analysis

Stock Returns and Equity Premium Evidence Using Dividend Price Ratios and Dividend Yields in Malaysia

Non Parametric Inference

Seemingly Unrelated Regressions

The information content of lagged equity and bond yields

FDI and Economic Growth Relationship: An Empirical Study on Malaysia

INDIRECT INFERENCE (prepared for: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition)

Statistical Tests for Multiple Forecast Comparison

Globalization and long-run co-movements in the stock market for the G7: an application of VECM under structural breaks

Testing The Quantity Theory of Money in Greece: A Note

Time Series Analysis 1. Lecture 8: Time Series Analysis. Time Series Analysis MIT 18.S096. Dr. Kempthorne. Fall 2013 MIT 18.S096

Probabilistic properties and statistical analysis of network traffic models: research project

On Marginal Effects in Semiparametric Censored Regression Models

Volume 35, Issue 1. Testing the International Crude Oil Market Integration with Structural Breaks. Kentaka Aruga Ishikawa Prefectural University

Semi Parametric Estimation of Long Memory: Comparisons and Some Attractive Alternatives

Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models

Univariate and Multivariate Methods PEARSON. Addison Wesley

SHORT RUN AND LONG RUN DYNAMICS OF RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION: HOMOGENEOUS AND HETEROGENEOUS PANEL ESTIMATIONS FOR OECD

Using instrumental variables techniques in economics and finance

Granger Causality between Government Revenues and Expenditures in Korea

IEOR 6711: Stochastic Models I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Tuesday, September 11 Normal Approximations and the Central Limit Theorem

Introduction to General and Generalized Linear Models

Detekce změn v autoregresních posloupnostech

Is a Brownian motion skew?

COURSES: 1. Short Course in Econometrics for the Practitioner (P000500) 2. Short Course in Econometric Analysis of Cointegration (P000537)

Panel Data Econometrics

Is Infrastructure Capital Productive? A Dynamic Heterogeneous Approach.

Simple Linear Regression Inference

11. Time series and dynamic linear models

Fractionally integrated data and the autodistributed lag model: results from a simulation study

Cointegration And Causality Analysis of Government Expenditure And Economic Growth In Nigeria

HYPOTHESIS TESTING: POWER OF THE TEST

The following postestimation commands for time series are available for regress:

ECON 142 SKETCH OF SOLUTIONS FOR APPLIED EXERCISE #2

Energy consumption and GDP: causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets

Unit Root Tests with Wavelets

Bootstrap Methods in Econometrics

Testing for Granger causality between stock prices and economic growth

FORECASTING DEPOSIT GROWTH: Forecasting BIF and SAIF Assessable and Insured Deposits

A Century of PPP: Supportive Results from non-linear Unit Root Tests

Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm

Chapter 4: Vector Autoregressive Models

From the help desk: Bootstrapped standard errors

Financial Integration of Stock Markets in the Gulf: A Multivariate Cointegration Analysis

The Engle-Granger representation theorem

Bias in the Estimation of Mean Reversion in Continuous-Time Lévy Processes

How do oil prices affect stock returns in GCC markets? An asymmetric cointegration approach.

EXPORT INSTABILITY, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ASIAN COUNTRIES: A TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

Quadratic forms Cochran s theorem, degrees of freedom, and all that

Estimating an ARMA Process

Is the Forward Exchange Rate a Useful Indicator of the Future Exchange Rate?

LONG MEMORY IN THE GREEK STOCK MARKET

Australian Dollars Exchange Rate and Gold Prices: An Interval Method Analysis

What is What?: A Simple Time-Domain Test of Long-memory vs. Structural Breaks

Lecture 2: ARMA(p,q) models (part 3)

IS THERE A LONG-RUN RELATIONSHIP

Econometric Methods for Panel Data

Ridge Regression. Patrick Breheny. September 1. Ridge regression Selection of λ Ridge regression in R/SAS

Business cycles and natural gas prices

Red Signals: Trade Deficits and the Current Account

Chapter 10: Basic Linear Unobserved Effects Panel Data. Models:

Online Appendix. Supplemental Material for Insider Trading, Stochastic Liquidity and. Equilibrium Prices. by Pierre Collin-Dufresne and Vyacheslav Fos

Two Topics in Parametric Integration Applied to Stochastic Simulation in Industrial Engineering

Transcription:

The Power of the KPSS Test for Cointegration when Residuals are Fractionally Integrated Philipp Sibbertsen 1 Walter Krämer 2 Diskussionspapier 318 ISNN 0949-9962 Abstract: We show that the power of the KPSS-test against integration, as measured by divergence rates of the test statistic under the alternative, remains the same when residuals from an OLSregression rather than true observations are used. The divergence rate is independent of the order of integration of the cointegrating regressors which are allowed to be I(1 + d X ) in our set up. Keywords: Keywords: cointegration, power, long memory, KPSS-Test. JEL-Classification: C 12; C 32 1 Universität Hannover, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Abteilung Statistik Königsworther Platz 1, 30167 Hannover Fax-Nr. +49-511- 762 3923 E-Mail: sibbertsen@statistik.uni-hannover.de 2 Universität Dortmund, Fachbereich Statistik 44221 Dortmund E-Mail: walterk@statistik.uni-dortmund.de

1 Introduction and Summary This paper is concerned with the Kwiatkowski Phillips Schmidt Shin (1992, KPSS) procedure for testing the null hypothesis that there is at least one cointegrating relationship among m I(1) variables z t1,..., z tm. If all potential cointegrating relationships are known, this simply amounts to applying the standard KPSS test to these relationships. If a cointegrating relationship has to be estimated, one applies the KPSS test to the residuals from this regression. Lee and Schmidt (1996) show that the KPSS test statistic diverges when the residuals from the cointegrating relationship are I(d) processes with 0.5 < d < 0.5; Marmol (1997) shows that the KPSS test is also consistent against I(d) processes with d 0.5. However, both Lee and Schmidt (1996) and Marmol (1997) assume that the true cointegrating relationship is known. These authors assume in addition that the cointegrating variables z t1,..., z tm are I(1). We extend this approach by allowing them to be fractionally integrated i. e. to be I(1 + d X ) where 1/2 < d X < 1/2 denotes the order of integration of the cointegrating regressor. Therefore, we relax the standard I(1)/I(0) approach in cointegration not only for the residuals but also for the cointegrating regressor. Practical experience shows that the classical approach is often too restrictive as many time series show a behaviour which is somewhat between I(1) and I(0) such as stationary long memory or non-stationary but still mean-reverting time series. This wide range of persistence characteristic is parsimoniously captured by I(d) processes where d can take any value between 1/2 and 1. The value d = 1/2 characterizes the border between stationarity and non-stationarity. The case where the cointegrating relationship has to be estimated has been considered in great detail by Phillips and Ouliaris (1990), but only for tests of the complementary null hypothesis that there is no cointegration. The behaviour of tests for this null hypothesis when the residuals are fractionally integrated has been considered by Krämer and Marmol (2004) but again under the assumption of I(1) cointegrating regressors. Below we consider the 1

null hypothesis that cointegration does exist. It emerges that the divergence rates under the alternatives from Lee and Schmidt (1996) and Marmol (1997) remain the same. We also prove that the divergence rate does not depend on the order of the cointegrating regressors. This is a rather surprising result. Our approach extends previous results in two directions. First, we allow the cointegrating regressors to be fractionally integrated. This extends especially the results of Krämer and Marmol (2004). Second, we consider the KPSSprocedure when the cointegrating relationship is unknown and has to be estimated which extends the previous results concerning the KPSS-test by Marmol (1997) and Lee and Schmidt (1996). 2 Power under the alternative Other than Krämer and Marmol (2004), Marmol (1997) and Lee and Schmidt (1996) who assume the cointegrating regressors to be I(1) we consider the regression model y t = β z t + u t, (1) where the m-vector z t is defined by z t = t s=1 x s and x s I(d X ). This implies that z t I(1 + d X ) and that all elements of the m-vector of regressors are integrated to the same order. We then postulate that y t I(1 + d X ), but that u t I(d u ) where 1/2 < d u < 1/2 < 1 + d X, implying what is called fractional cointegration. We consider the null hypothesis that there is exactly one cointegrating relationship. The KPSS procedure for testing this hypothesis is based on the statistic where ˆη = 1 T 2 T St 2 /s 2 (l), (2) t=1 S t = t u i ū, (3) i=1 2

s 2 (l) = 1 T t ū) T t=1(u 2 + 2 T l T w sl (u t ū)(u t s ū) (4) s=1 t=s+1 and where w sl = 1 s l+1 s2 (l) is the Newey West estimator of the long run variance of the residuals. Its consistency in our long memory set up follows from Hosking (1996) for l = 0. Therefore, we restrict our attention to the case l = 0 and disregard the estimation of the variance when computing the rates of divergence below. If the u t s are known and u t I(0), we have ˆη 1 d V (r) 2 dr, (5) 0 where V (r) is a standard Brownian Bridge (see Kwiatkowski et al. 1992, or Lee and Schmidt 1996 for details). We consider the limiting distribution of ˆη when the residuals u t in (5) are I(d) with 0 < d u < 1. For the case where the u t s are known, and 0 < d u < 0.5, Lee and Schmidt (1996, Theorem 3) show that ˆη t = O p (T ) 2du. (6) For the case where d u 0.5, Marmol (1997) shows that ˆη t = O p (T ), (7) so that the KPSS test is consistent against both stationary and nonstationary long memory alternatives. So far, however, it has remained an open problem whether the above divergence rates carry over to the case where the u t s are replaced by OLS residuals. We consider this case in what follows by computing the divergence rate of the KPSS-test under fractional alternatives and allowing the regressors to be likewise fractionally integrated. This extends the usual situation of I(0) regressors. But it can be shown that the structure of the regressors has no influence on 3

the divergence rate of the test statistic. THEOREM: Assume that x t I(d X ), 1 2 < d X < 1 2 and u t I(d u ), 0 < d u < 1 + d X and that the regressors are strictly exogenous. Then the rate of divergence of the KPSS test is of order O p (T 2du ) irrespective of d X. REMARK: In the case of endogenous regressors we have to assume also d X + d u > 0 to obtain the result. In the case of d X + d u 0 the rate of convergence of ˆβ is of order O p (T 1+2d X ) and therefore the considerations below are no longer valid. For details see Davidson (2004). PROOF: We have: û = u Z (Z Z) 1 Z u. (8) From Davidson (2004) we obtain for the least squares estimator of the cointegration parameter T 1+d X d u ( ˆβ β) d M, (9) with a matrix M which is specified in Davidson (2004). In addition we obtain from Marinucci and Robinson (2000) that [λt ] T 3/2 d X z t t=1 d B d (λ), (10) where B d (λ) denotes fractional Brownian motion with parameter d = d X + 1. Using the relation û t = u t ( ˆβ β)z t (11) we obtain that T 1/2 du [λt ] t=1 u t converges in distribution to some random variable, say ξ(λ). The rate of convergence follows from (9), (10) and the 4

application of Slutsky s Theorem to (11). The rate of convergence for the test statistic follows from the continuous mapping theorem, applying the same arguments as in Lee and Schmidt (1996). REMARK: The limiting distribution in this case is not Gaussian. The theorem shows that under the alternative of fractionally integrated cointegration residuals we obtain divergence rates independent of the structure of the regressors themselves. Furthermore, the limiting distribution is non- Gaussian. The KPSS-test is thus powerful against fractional alternatives even when the cointegrating relationship has to be estimated and whether the regressors themselves have long memory or not. References Davidson, J. (2004) : Convergence to stochastic integrals with fractionally integrated integrator processes: Theory and applications to cointegrating regression. Working Paper, Cardiff Business School, Cardiff. Hosking, J. (1996) : Asymptotic distribution of the sample mean, autocovariances and autocorrelations of long-memory time series. Journal of Econometrics 73, 261 284. Krämer, W. and Marmol, F. (2004): The power of residual-based tests for cointegration when residuals are fractionally integrated. Economics Letters 82, 63 69. Kwiatkowski, D.; Phillips, P.C.B.; Schmidt, P. and Shin, Y. (1992): Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics 54, 159 178. 5

Lee, D. and Schmidt, P. (1996): On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally integrated alternatives. Journal of Econometrics 73, 285 302. Marinucci, D. and Robinson, P. M. (2000): Weak convergence of multivariate fractional processes. Stochastic Processes and their applications 86, 103 120. Marmol, F. (1997): Searching for fractional evidence using unit root tests. Mimeo, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid. Phillips, P.C.B. and Ouliaris, S. (1990): Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration. Econometrica 58, 165 193. Phillips, P.C.B. and Perron, P. (1988) : Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335 346. 6