Perception and Individual Decision Making



Similar documents
Chapter 12: Decision Making, Creativity, and Ethics

Organizational Behavior and Organizational Change Decisions. Roger N. Nagel Senior Fellow & Wagner Professor. Lehigh University

Social Perception and Attribution

Decision-Making and Emergency Responses

Accountability for Others being responsible for the consequences of the actions of those whom you manage.

Mgmt 301 Managers as Decision Makers. Exploring Management. [Nathan Neale]

The following is not a comprehensive list, but it includes the most relevant

Guidance on Professional Judgment for CPAs

Do not copy, post, or distribute.

Keith R. Dutton, M.S., SPHR. Connor M. Walters, Ph.D., CFLE. Department of Management & Quantitative Methods

Work in the 21 st Century: An Introduction to Industrial- Organizational Psychology. Chapter 6. Performance Measurement

Role Expectations Report for Sample Employee and Receptionist

Essentials of Negotiation

LINCOLN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS BA 320 ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR AND ADMINISTRATION. Course Units: 3 units (45 lecture hours)

Millennial Leaders: Myths and Reality. Pinsight s Research Report

Clive W Pack Managing Principal Louis A Allen Associates (Aust) Pty Ltd. March 1990.

This improved version will be available starting February 4, Feedback Report Prepared for. 4 Feb 2013

The Relationship between the Fundamental Attribution Bias, Relationship Quality, and Performance Appraisal

Grade 12 Psychology (40S) Outcomes Unedited Draft 1

Managing Performance An Introduction/Refresher. March 15, 2000

Emotional Intelligence Style Report

Performance Appraisal and it s Effectiveness in Modern Business Scenarios

MANAGING FOR THE UNEXPECTED

Supervisor Manufacturing Industry

MARKET ANALYSIS OF STUDENT S ATTITUDES ABOUT CREDIT CARDS

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications

Performance Appraisal Handbook

Conflict in Organizations

National Quali cations SPECIMEN ONLY

From Performance Management to Leading Performance. Kati Vilkki and Esther Derby

KEY CONCEPTS AND IDEAS

Reviewing Applicants. Research on Bias and Assumptions

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

11 Psychology MI-SG-FLD011-02

Chapter Four. Ethics in International Business. Introduction. Ethical Issues in International Business

Leadership, Change, and Organizational Effectiveness. Martin M. Chemers University of California, Santa Cruz

The Knowing Doing Gap

Retaliation: The Cost to Your Company and Its Employees

Chapter 2 The Ethical Basis of Law and Business Management

Call topics. September SAF RA joint call on Human and organizational factors including the value of industrial safety

Consulting with a Racial Equity Lens Tool

Cultural Competency: Is it a level of consciousness or just (plain ol ) common sense?

Assessment, Case Conceptualization, Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning Overview

Gender Stereotypes Associated with Altruistic Acts

What holds women back? Gender barriers at work Olga Epitropaki, PhD

Implementing Performance Management In Turbulent Times

A Practical Guide to Performance Calibration: A Step-by-Step Guide to Increasing the Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Appraisal

THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT

Critical issues in succession planning Professor David Clutterbuck

Employee Work Passion What s important in creating a motivating work environment and whose job is it?

360-Degree Assessment: An Overview

Chapter 6: Conclusion

A New Approach for Evaluating Of Performance Appraisal

What is Sport Psychology?

SigmaRADIUS Leadership Effectiveness Report

EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS

Chapter 6 Appraising and Managing Performance. True/False Questions

Essentials of Organizational Behavior BUS351

Part I: Decision Support Systems

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs): Successful completion of the course should lead to the following outcomes:

Leading Self. Leading Others. Leading Performance and Change. Leading the Coast Guard

The Transpersonal (Spiritual) Journey Towards Leadership Excellence Using 8ICOL

Oregon University System

An Organizational Analysis of Leadership Effectiveness and Development Needs

Behaving Intelligently: Leadership Traits & Characteristics Kristina G. Ricketts, Community and Leadership Development

Motivation Questionnaire

Why Healthcare Leaders Need to Take a New Look at Diversity in Their Organizations

CRITICAL THINKING REASONS FOR BELIEF AND DOUBT (VAUGHN CH. 4)

Training Module: Managing Diversity

Chapter Five Socialization. Human Development: Biology and Society. Social Isolation

CHAPTER 4: PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION

ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

Management 341 Organizational Behavior - Management Spring 2015 Syllabus and Course Schedule

23/12/2014. Job analysis. Performance standards. The performance appraisal system. Assessing performance. Performance review

Mindset: The New Psychology of Success Carol S. Dweck, Ph.D.

Police Supervision: A 360-Degree View of Eight Police Departments. Stephen D. Mastrofski Dennis P. Rosenbaum Lorie Fridell

Business Ethics. By: Aims Community College - Oil & Gas Dept.

COMPETENCY ACC LEVEL PCC LEVEL MCC LEVEL 1. Ethics and Standards

Kotters Eight Steps of Change

Introduction to Social Psychology: Psychology 260, Section 005 SAMPLE SYLLABUS

Occupational Solution

Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople

ENCOURAGING STUDENTS IN A RACIALLY DIVERSE CLASSROOM

Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014

SECTION 1: Example Exercise Outcomes. Instructions and Questions Booklet. AssessmentDay. Practice Assessments

360-degree feedback. ADDIE model. Apprenticeship. Assessment center. MODULE 5: Training and Development DEFINITION 2013 SHRM

I m good, she s good: The relationship between. Self-Esteem and Attitudes Towards Women in the Work Force. Alexandria Peach. McKendree University

Sally Sample 24 August 2010

Structured Interviewing:

360 0 Performance Appraisal

Social Bias: Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination Sabrina Keene, MSP*

Assessment of Core Courses and Factors that Influence the Choice of a Major: A Major Bias?

Ignoring base rates. Ignoring base rates (cont.) Improving our judgments. Base Rate Neglect. When Base Rate Matters. Probabilities vs.

Core Capacity Analysis Of Top Performing Agents at Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices

Ethical Theories ETHICAL THEORIES. presents NOTES:

Transcription:

Robbins & Judge Organizational Behavior 13th Edition Perception and Individual Decision Making Bob Stretch Southwestern College 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-0

Chapter Learning Objectives After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Define perception and explain the factors that influence it. Explain attribute theory and list the three determinants of attribution. Identify the shortcuts individuals use in making judgments about others. Explain the link between perception and decision making. Apply the rational model of decision-making and contrast it with bounded rationality and intuition. List and explain the common decision biases or errors. Explain how individual differences and organizational constraints affect decision-making. Contrast the three ethical decision criteria. Define creativity and discuss the three-component model of creativity. 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-1

What is Perception? A process by which individuals organize and interpret their sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their environment. People s behavior is based on their perception of what reality is, not on reality itself. The world as it is perceived is the world that is behaviorally important. 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-2

Factors that Influence Perception See E X H I B I T 5-1 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-3

Attribution Theory: Judging Others Our perception and judgment of others is significantly influenced by our assumptions of the other person s internal state. When individuals observe behavior, they attempt to determine whether it is internally or externally caused. Internal causes are under that person s control External causes are not person forced to act in that way Causation judged through: Distinctiveness Shows different behaviors in different situations. Consensus Response is the same as others to same situation. Consistency Responds in the same way over time. 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-4

Elements of Attribution Theory See E X H I B I T 5-2 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-5

Errors and Biases in Attributions Fundamental Attribution Error The tendency to underestimate the influence of external factors and overestimate the influence of internal factors when making judgments about the behavior of others We blame people first, not the situation Self-Serving Bias The tendency for individuals to attribute their own successes to internal factors while putting the blame for failures on external factors It is our success but their failure 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-6

Frequently Used Shortcuts in Judging Others Selective Perception People selectively interpret what they see on the basis of their interests, background, experience, and attitudes Halo Effect Drawing a general impression about an individual on the basis of a single characteristic Contrast Effects Evaluation of a person s characteristics that are affected by comparisons with other people recently encountered who rank higher or lower on the same characteristics 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-7

Another Shortcut: Stereotyping Judging someone on the basis of one s perception of the group to which that person belongs a prevalent and often useful, if not always accurate, generalization Profiling A form of stereotyping in which members of a group are singled out for intense scrutiny based on a single, often racial, trait. 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-8

Specific Shortcut Applications in Organizations Employment Interview Perceptual biases of raters affect the accuracy of interviewers judgments of applicants Formed in a single glance 1/10 of a second! Performance Expectations Self-fulfilling prophecy (Pygmalion effect): The lower or higher performance of employees reflects preconceived leader expectations about employee capabilities Performance Evaluations Appraisals are often the subjective (judgmental) perceptions of appraisers of another employee s job performance Critical impact on employees 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-9

Perceptions and Individual Decision Making Problem A perceived discrepancy between the current state of affairs and a desired state Decisions Choices made from among alternatives developed from data Perception Linkage: All elements of problem identification and the decision making process are influenced by perception. Problems must be recognized Data must be selected and evaluated 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-10

Decision-Making Models in Organizations Rational Decision-Making The perfect world model: assumes complete information, all options known, and maximum payoff. Six step decision-making process Bounded Reality The real world model: seeks satisfactory and sufficient solutions from limited data and alternatives Intuition A non-conscious process created from distilled experience that results in quick decisions Relies on holistic associations Affectively charged engaging the emotions See E X H I B I T 5-3 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-11

Common Biases and Errors in Decision-Making Overconfidence Bias Believing too much in our own ability to make good decisions especially when outside of own expertise Anchoring Bias Using early, first received information as the basis for making subsequent judgments Confirmation Bias Selecting and using only facts that support our decision Availability Bias Emphasizing information that is most readily at hand Recent Vivid 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-12

More Common Decision-Making Errors Escalation of Commitment Increasing commitment to a decision in spite of evidence that it is wrong especially if responsible for the decision! Randomness Error Creating meaning out of random events - superstitions Winner s Curse Highest bidder pays too much due to value overestimation Likelihood increases with the number of people in auction Hindsight Bias After an outcome is already known, believing it could have been accurately predicted beforehand 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-13

Individual Differences in Decision-Making Personality Conscientiousness may effect escalation of commitment Achievement-strivers are likely to increase commitment Dutiful people are less like to have this bias Self-Esteem Gender High self-esteem people are susceptible to self-serving bias Women analyze decisions more than men rumination Women are twice as likely to develop depression Differences develop early 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-14

Organizational Constraints Performance Evaluation Managerial evaluation criteria influence actions Reward Systems Managers will make the decision with the greatest personal payoff for them Formal Regulations Limit the alternative choices of decision makers System-imposed Time Constraints Restrict ability to gather or evaluate information Historical Precedents Past decisions influence current decisions 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-15

Ethics in Decision Making Ethical Decision Criteria Utilitarianism Decisions made based solely on the outcome Seeking the greatest good for the greatest number Dominant method for businesspeople Rights Decisions consistent with fundamental liberties and privileges Respecting and protecting basic rights of individuals such as whistleblowers Justice Imposing and enforcing rules fairly and impartially Equitable distribution of benefits and costs 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-16

Ethical Decision-Making Criteria Assessed Utilitarianism Pro: Promotes efficiency and productivity Con: Can ignore individual rights, especially minorities Rights Pro: Protects individuals from harm; preserves rights Con: Creates an overly legalistic work environment Justice Pro: Protects the interests of weaker members Con: Encourages a sense of entitlement 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-17

Improving Creativity in Decision Making Creativity The ability to produce novel and useful ideas Who has the greatest creative potential? Those who score high in Openness to Experience People who are intelligent, independent, self-confident, risktaking, have an internal locus-of-control, tolerant of ambiguity, low need for structure, and who persevere in the face of frustration 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-18

The Three Component Model of Creativity Proposition that individual creativity results from a mixture of three components Expertise is the foundation Creative-Thinking Skills are the personality characteristics associated with creativity Intrinsic Task Motivation is the desire to do the job because of its characteristics Intrinsic Task Motivation Expertise Creative- Thinking Skills See E X H I B I T 5-4 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-19

Attributions Global Implications There are cultural differences in the ways people attribute cause to observed behavior Decision-Making No research on the topic: assumption of no difference Based on our awareness of cultural differences in traits that affect decision making, this assumption is suspect Ethics No global ethical standards exist Asian countries tend not to see ethical issues in black and white but as shades of gray Global companies need global standards for managers 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-20

Summary and Managerial Implications Perception: People act based on how they view their world What exists is not as important as what is believed Managers must also manage perception Individual Decision Making Most use bounded rationality: they satisfice Combine traditional methods with intuition and creativity for better decisions Analyze the situation and adjust to culture and organizational reward criteria Be aware of, and minimize, biases 2009 Prentice-Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 5-21

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall