Particle Physics. Bryan Webber University of Cambridge. IMPRS, Munich. 19-23 November 2007



Similar documents
Measurement of Neutralino Mass Differences with CMS in Dilepton Final States at the Benchmark Point LM9

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

Theoretical Particle Physics FYTN04: Oral Exam Questions, version ht15

Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC

How To Find The Higgs Boson

variables to investigate Monte Carlo methods of t t production

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 28 Jun 2010

Advanced Computer Graphics. Rendering Equation. Matthias Teschner. Computer Science Department University of Freiburg

Middle East Technical University. Studying Selected Tools for HEP: CalcHEP

Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in the l+ Jets Channel Using the Matrix Element Method

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 1 Oct 2003

ATLAS NOTE ATLAS-CONF July 21, Search for top pair candidate events in ATLAS at s = 7 TeV. The ATLAS Collaboration.

Top rediscovery at ATLAS and CMS

Monte Carlo Simulation

Parton showering effects in central heavy-boson hadroproduction

Probability and Statistics Prof. Dr. Somesh Kumar Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Towards running complex models on big data

STRING THEORY: Past, Present, and Future

How To Teach Physics At The Lhc

From Jet Scaling to Jet Vetos

LCG MCDB Knowledge Base of Monte Carlo Simulated Events

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 31 Aug 2015

Polarization codes and the rate of polarization

FCC JGU WBS_v0034.xlsm

Cross section, Flux, Luminosity, Scattering Rates

Study of the B D* ℓ ν with the Partial Reconstruction Technique

To discuss this topic fully, let us define some terms used in this and the following sets of supplemental notes.

t th signal: theory status

Statistical Machine Learning

Highlights of Recent CMS Results. Dmytro Kovalskyi (UCSB)

Monte Carlo-based statistical methods (MASM11/FMS091)

Progress in understanding quarkonium polarization measurements

arxiv:hep-lat/ v1 30 Oct 1992

Lloyd Spencer Lincoln Re

Jets energy calibration in ATLAS

Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Monte Carlo and Empirical Methods for Stochastic Inference (MASM11/FMS091)

Quantitative Methods for Finance

A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b-jet tagging in ATLAS

Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Made Simple

Neural networks in data analysis

Proof of the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy

Tutorial on Markov Chain Monte Carlo

Part 4 fitting with energy loss and multiple scattering non gaussian uncertainties outliers

A Sarsa based Autonomous Stock Trading Agent

7.6 Approximation Errors and Simpson's Rule

Numerical Matrix Analysis

Basics of Statistical Machine Learning

Language Modeling. Chapter Introduction

arxiv: v2 [hep-ph] 20 Jun 2013

The Bonferonni and Šidák Corrections for Multiple Comparisons

Workflow Requirements (Dec. 12, 2006)

Jürgen R. Reuter, DESY. J.R.Reuter Status Report on WHIZARD ALCW 2015, KEK,

Service courses for graduate students in degree programs other than the MS or PhD programs in Biostatistics.

Theory versus Experiment. Prof. Jorgen D Hondt Vrije Universiteit Brussel jodhondt@vub.ac.be

Generating Random Numbers Variance Reduction Quasi-Monte Carlo. Simulation Methods. Leonid Kogan. MIT, Sloan , Fall 2010

Signal to Noise Instrumental Excel Assignment

Other GEANT4 capabilities

Choices, choices, choices... Which sequence database? Which modifications? What mass tolerance?

MATH 132: CALCULUS II SYLLABUS

Lecture 3. Turbulent fluxes and TKE budgets (Garratt, Ch 2)

State of Stress at Point

U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, Notes on Algebra

SIMPLIFIED PERFORMANCE MODEL FOR HYBRID WIND DIESEL SYSTEMS. J. F. MANWELL, J. G. McGOWAN and U. ABDULWAHID

Chapter 10. Bidirectional Path Tracing

Factoring & Primality

Creating Synthetic Temporal Document Collections for Web Archive Benchmarking

Physik des Higgs Bosons. Higgs decays V( ) Re( ) Im( ) Figures and calculations from A. Djouadi, Phys.Rept. 457 (2008) 1-216

Delphes, a framework for fast simulation of a general purpose LHC detector

a 11 x 1 + a 12 x a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x a 2n x n = b 2.

arxiv:hep-ph/ v2 4 Oct 2003

AP Physics 1 and 2 Lab Investigations

MATLAB and Big Data: Illustrative Example

Basic Equations, Boundary Conditions and Dimensionless Parameters

LOGNORMAL MODEL FOR STOCK PRICES

Distributed computing of failure probabilities for structures in civil engineering

The Normal Approximation to Probability Histograms. Dice: Throw a single die twice. The Probability Histogram: Area = Probability. Where are we going?

Numerical methods for American options

Biasing. 7 th FLUKA Course NEA Paris, Sept.29-Oct.3, 2008

Basic Data Analysis. Stephen Turnbull Business Administration and Public Policy Lecture 12: June 22, Abstract. Review session.

1 Portfolio Selection

Statistical Machine Translation: IBM Models 1 and 2

Practical Calculation of Expected and Unexpected Losses in Operational Risk by Simulation Methods

Pricing complex options using a simple Monte Carlo Simulation

Best Practices in Model Development and Maintenance Adam Rose Product Manager, XP Solutions

Top-Quark Studies at CMS

Contrôle dynamique de méthodes d approximation

Elasticity Theory Basics

PATTERN RECOGNITION AND MACHINE LEARNING CHAPTER 4: LINEAR MODELS FOR CLASSIFICATION

Transcription:

Monte Carlo Methods in Particle Physics University of Cambridge IMPRS, Munich 19-23 November 2007 See also ESW: QCD and Collider Physics, C.U.P. 1996 http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/theory/webber/qcdupdates.html http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/theory/webber/qcd_03/ Thanks to Mike Seymour, Torbjörn Sjöstrand, Frank Krauss, Peter Richardson,...

Monte Carlo Event Generation Basic Principles Event Generation Parton Showers Hadronization Underlying Event Event Generator Survey Matching to Fixed Order Beyond Standard Model

Lecture1: Basics The Monte Carlo concept Event generation Examples: particle production and decay Structure of an LHC event Monte Carlo implementation of NLO QCD

Integrals as Averages Basis of all Monte Carlo methods: Draw N values from a uniform distribution: Sum invariant under reordering: randomize Central limit theorem:

Convergence Monte Carlo integrals governed by Central Limit Theorem: error c.f. trapezium rule Simpson s rule but only if derivatives exist and are finite:

Importance Sampling Convergence improved by putting more samples in region where function is largest. Corresponds to a Jacobian transformation. Hit-and-miss: accept points with probability = ratio (if < 1)

Stratified Sampling Divide up integration region piecemeal and optimize to minimize total error. Can be done automatically (eg VEGAS). Never as good as Jacobian transformations. N.B. Puts more points where rapidly varying, not necessarily where larger!

Multichannel Sampling

Multi-dimensional Integration Formalism extends trivially to many dimensions Particle physics: very many dimensions, e.g. phase space = 3 dimensions per particles, LHC event ~ 250 hadrons. Monte Carlo error remains Trapezium rule Simpson's rule

Summary Disadvantages of Monte Carlo: Slow convergence in few dimensions. Advantages of Monte Carlo: Fast convergence in many dimensions. Arbitrarily complex integration regions (finite discontinuities not a problem). Few points needed to get first estimate ( feasibility limit ). Every additional point improves accuracy ( growth rate ). Easy error estimate.

Phase Space Phase space: Two-body easy:

Other cases by recursive subdivision: Or by democratic algorithms: RAMBO, MAMBO Can be better, but matrix elements rarely flat.

Simplest example e.g. top quark decay: Particle Decays p t p l p b p ν Breit-Wigner peak of W very strong: must be removed by Jacobian factor

Associated Distributions Big advantage of Monte Carlo integration: simply histogram any associated quantities. Almost any other technique requires new integration for each observable. Can apply arbitrary cuts/smearing. e.g. lepton momentum in top decays: charged neutral

Cross Sections Additional integrations over incoming parton densities: can have strong peaks, eg Z Breit-Wigner: need Jacobian factors. Hard to make process-independent.

Leading Order Monte Carlo Calculations Now have everything we need to make leading order cross section calculations and distributions Can be largely automated MADGRAPH GRACE COMPHEP AMEGIC++ ALPGEN But Fixed parton/jet multiplicity No control of large logs Parton level Need hadron level event generators

Event Generators Up to here, only considered Monte Carlo as a numerical integration method. If function being integrated is a probability density (positive definite), trivial to convert it to a simulation of physical process = an event generator. Simple example: Naive approach: events with weights Can generate unweighted events by keeping them with probability : give them all weight Happen with same frequency as in nature. Efficiency: = fraction of generated events kept.

Structure of LHC Events 1. Hard process 2. Parton shower 3. Hadronization 4. Underlying event We ll return to this later...

Monte Carlo Calculations of NLO QCD Two separate divergent integrals: Must combine before numerical integration. Jet definition could be arbitrarily complicated. How to combine without knowing? Two solutions: phase space slicing and subtraction method.

Illustrate with simple one-dim. example: x = gluon energy or two-parton invariant mass. Divergences regularized by dimensions. Cross section in d dimensions is: Infrared safety: KLN cancellation theorem:

Phase space slicing Introduce arbitrary cutoff : Two separate finite integrals Monte Carlo. Becomes exact for but numerical errors blow up compromise (trial and error). Systematized by Giele-Glover-Kosower. JETRAD, DYRAD, EERAD,...

Exact identity: Subtraction method Two separate finite integrals again.

Subtraction method Exact identity: Two separate finite integrals again. Much harder: subtracted cross section must be valid everywhere in phase space. Systematized in S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, Nucl. Phys. B485 (1997) 291. S. Catani, S. Dittmaier, M.H. Seymour and Z. Trocsanyi, Nucl. Phys. B627 (2002) 189. any observable in any process analytical integrals done once-and-for-all EVENT2, DISENT, NLOJET++, MCFM,

Summary Monte Carlo is a very convenient numerical integration method. Well-suited to particle physics: difficult integrands, many dimensions. Integrand positive definite event generator. Fully exclusive treat particles exactly like in data. need to understand/model hadronic final state. N.B. NLO QCD programs are not event generators: Not positive definite. But full numerical treatment of arbitrary observables. We ll discuss later how to combine/match NLO and EGs