The Two-Body Problem



Similar documents
Orbital Mechanics. Angular Momentum

Math 1302, Week 3 Polar coordinates and orbital motion

Lecture L17 - Orbit Transfers and Interplanetary Trajectories

Mechanics 1: Conservation of Energy and Momentum

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

Binary Stars. Kepler s Laws of Orbital Motion

Astromechanics Two-Body Problem (Cont)

Orbital Dynamics with Maple (sll --- v1.0, February 2012)

Planetary Orbit Simulator Student Guide

Chapter 6 Circular Motion

Lecture L22-2D Rigid Body Dynamics: Work and Energy

Notes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 13.

Chapter 15 Collision Theory

Chapter 6. Work and Energy

Orbital Mechanics and Space Geometry

Newton s derivation of Kepler s laws (outline)

Physics 1A Lecture 10C

Chapter 9 Circular Motion Dynamics

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

Physics 53. Gravity. Nature and Nature's law lay hid in night: God said, "Let Newton be!" and all was light. Alexander Pope

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

G U I D E T O A P P L I E D O R B I T A L M E C H A N I C S F O R K E R B A L S P A C E P R O G R A M

2. Orbits. FER-Zagreb, Satellite communication systems 2011/12

8.012 Physics I: Classical Mechanics Fall 2008

Isaac Newton s ( ) Laws of Motion

Chapter 6 Work and Energy

DIRECT ORBITAL DYNAMICS: USING INDEPENDENT ORBITAL TERMS TO TREAT BODIES AS ORBITING EACH OTHER DIRECTLY WHILE IN MOTION

circular motion & gravitation physics 111N

USING MS EXCEL FOR DATA ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION

Gravitational Potential Energy

Niraj Sir GRAVITATION CONCEPTS. Kepler's law of planetry motion

Linear algebra and the geometry of quadratic equations. Similarity transformations and orthogonal matrices

Magnetic Dipoles. Magnetic Field of Current Loop. B r. PHY2061 Enriched Physics 2 Lecture Notes

Newton s Law of Gravity

5. Forces and Motion-I. Force is an interaction that causes the acceleration of a body. A vector quantity.

How To Understand The Theory Of Gravity

STATICS. Introduction VECTOR MECHANICS FOR ENGINEERS: Eighth Edition CHAPTER. Ferdinand P. Beer E. Russell Johnston, Jr.

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System

v v ax v a x a v a v = = = Since F = ma, it follows that a = F/m. The mass of the arrow is unchanged, and ( )

Mechanics lecture 7 Moment of a force, torque, equilibrium of a body

PHYSICS 111 HOMEWORK SOLUTION, week 4, chapter 5, sec 1-7. February 13, 2013

Chapter 4. Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion. continued

Orbits of the Lennard-Jones Potential

Some Comments on the Derivative of a Vector with applications to angular momentum and curvature. E. L. Lady (October 18, 2000)

PEDAGOGY: THE BUBBLE ANALOGY AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GRAVITATIONAL FORCES AND ROCKET THRUST IN SPATIAL FLOW THEORIES OF GRAVITY *

Lecture 07: Work and Kinetic Energy. Physics 2210 Fall Semester 2014

Solutions to Problems in Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Second Edition. Chapter 7

From Aristotle to Newton

Section 1 Gravity: A Force of Attraction

Newton s Laws. Newton s Imaginary Cannon. Michael Fowler Physics 142E Lec 6 Jan 22, 2009

Physics Midterm Review Packet January 2010

Orbital Dynamics: Formulary

Name: Earth 110 Exploration of the Solar System Assignment 1: Celestial Motions and Forces Due in class Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2015

Problem Set 5 Work and Kinetic Energy Solutions

Torque Analyses of a Sliding Ladder

Uniformly Accelerated Motion

Astrodynamics (AERO0024)

FLUID MECHANICS. TUTORIAL No.7 FLUID FORCES. When you have completed this tutorial you should be able to. Solve forces due to pressure difference.

Lecture L5 - Other Coordinate Systems

Astronomy 1140 Quiz 1 Review

Chapter 18 Static Equilibrium

Acceleration due to Gravity

Gravitation and Newton s Synthesis

Gauss Formulation of the gravitational forces

Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

Problem Set V Solutions

Displacement (x) Velocity (v) Acceleration (a) x = f(t) differentiate v = dx Acceleration Velocity (v) Displacement x

Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great.

Center of Gravity. We touched on this briefly in chapter 7! x 2

PROBLEM SET. Practice Problems for Exam #1. Math 1352, Fall Oct. 1, 2004 ANSWERS

8. Potential Energy and Conservation of Energy Potential Energy: When an object has potential to have work done on it, it is said to have potential

Correct Modeling of the Indirect Term for Third-Body Perturbations

SOLID MECHANICS TUTORIAL MECHANISMS KINEMATICS - VELOCITY AND ACCELERATION DIAGRAMS

Orbital Dynamics of the Moon

FRICTION, WORK, AND THE INCLINED PLANE

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. An Introduction

Centripetal Force. This result is independent of the size of r. A full circle has 2π rad, and 360 deg = 2π rad.

Section 4: The Basics of Satellite Orbits

Name Class Period. F = G m 1 m 2 d 2. G =6.67 x Nm 2 /kg 2

Notes on Elastic and Inelastic Collisions

Physics 111: Lecture 4: Chapter 4 - Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion. Physics is about forces and how the world around us reacts to these forces.

The Technical Archer. Austin Wargo

4 Gravity: A Force of Attraction

Use Geometry Expressions to find equations of curves. Use Geometry Expressions to translate and dilate figures.

Lecture 17. Last time we saw that the rotational analog of Newton s 2nd Law is

AP1 Oscillations. 1. Which of the following statements about a spring-block oscillator in simple harmonic motion about its equilibrium point is false?

Work. Work = Force x parallel distance (parallel component of displacement) F v

Physics 53. Kinematics 2. Our nature consists in movement; absolute rest is death. Pascal

2 Session Two - Complex Numbers and Vectors

ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ENGINEERS

2.2 Magic with complex exponentials

Physics 235 Chapter 1. Chapter 1 Matrices, Vectors, and Vector Calculus

Problem Set #8 Solutions

9. Momentum and Collisions in One Dimension*

Introduction to Netlogo: A Newton s Law of Gravity Simulation

Q3.2.a The gravitational force exerted by a planet on one of its moons is 3e23 newtons when the moon is at a particular location.

Transcription:

The Two-Body Problem Abstract In my short essay on Kepler s laws of planetary motion and Newton s law of universal gravitation, the trajectory of one massive object near another was shown to be a conic section. However, the frame of reference was a coordinate system centered at one of the masses (typically the heavier). Unfortunately, since even a heavier object will exhibit some acceleration toward the lighter one, such a frame cannot be regarded as inertial, meaning that Newton s laws are not entirely valid (without the introduction of fictitious forces ). The present treatment of eliminates this objection; however, relativistic effects are still not considered. Two-Body Problem Relative to Inertial Frame We consider the motions of two massive objects which we ll call planets relative to an inertial frame of reference, subject only to the mutual forces of gravitation. For convenience, we ll refer to the bodies as planets. Thus, we have a planet of mass whose position vector is x 1 as well as a planet of mass with position vector x 2. In terms of x 1 and x2, the center of mass is located with position vector ( ) 1 ( ) R = x1 + x2, M where M = +. mass mass center of mass x 1 R Figure 1: Two-Body Diagram The force applied to each of the planets has, by Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation, magnitude F = G, r 2 where r = x 1 x 2 is the distance between the planets, and where G is the universal gravitational constant, whose measured value in SI units is approximately G = 6.67 10 11 N /kg 2. Since these forces are opposite each other, Newton s Second Law immediately implies that ( + ) d2 2 R = m1 2 x1 + 2 x2 = 0. x 2

This already says that the center of mass of the two-body system exhibits no acceleration relative to the inertial frame of reference. Therefore the moving center of gravity can itself be taken as an inertial frame of reference. Equations Relative to Center of Mass Since a non-rotating coordinate system having origin at the center of mass of our two-body system is an inertial frame, we shall ignore the movement of the center of mass and concentrate only on the movements of the planets relative to their common center of mass. Given this, we ll re-define the center-of-mass coordinate system mass - R R mass position vector R to be that pointing from the center of mass to Planet 1 (having mass ). Knowing how Figure 2: Center-of-mass frame Planet 1 moves about the center of mass will dictate Planet 2 s motion as well, since Planet 2 s position vector R. This configuration is depicted in Figure 2. The task, then, is is just to compute how the position vector R of Planet 1 evolves with time. Rather than letting r be the distance between the two planets, we let r be the length of the position vector ( R. With) this understanding, the distance between the two m1 + planets is simply r. Using Newton s law of universal gravitation, and denoting by r the unit vector in the direction of R, we immediately obtain 2 G R = ( ) 2 r. + r 2 This gives the acceleration of Planet 1 in this frame of reference: a = 2 R = Gm 3 2 ( + ) 2 r 2 r. Now comes the math! Let s gather together all the constants into a single

constant by defining Gm 3 2 K = ( + ) 2, leaving us with the task of solving the second-order differential equation a = 2 To deal with the above differential equation, we let r be the unit vector in the direction of R and let s be the d unit vector in the direction of r. From r r = 1, we get 0 = d ( r ) r = 2 r d r, which implies that r s = 0. d Next, from r = (cos θ, sin θ), get dθ r = ( sin θ, cos θ) = dθ s. R = K r 2. (1) Note: R=(rcos θ, rsin θ) center-of-mass coordinate system mass - R unit vector s in direction of d R R Figure 3: Polar coordinates θ mass unit vector r in direction of R Likewise, it follows that d s = dθ r, from which we obtain the velocity vector for Planet 1: v = d d ( ) R = r r = dr r +r ( d r ) = dr r +r dθ s. (2)

The acceleration is the time derivative of Equation (2): ( ) d d dr dθ a = v = r +r s = d2 r dr dθ θ r +2 s +r s r 2 ( 2 ( ) ) 2 r dθ = r 2 ( ) 2 dθ r ) r + (2 dr dθ + θ rd2 2 However, recalling from Equation (1) that a = K r 2 r, we extract two equations of interest: and r 2 r ( ) 2 dθ = K (3) r 2 2 dr dθ + θ rd2 = 0. (4) 2 We can immediate extract useful information from Equation (4), namely that ( d r 2dθ ) = 2r dr dθ + θ r2d2 = 0. 2 This means that the quantity L = r 2dθ Next, define the variable u = L2 Kr. is a constant. and that dθ = L r = K2 u 2. 2 L 3 We have, using the Chain Rule, that dr = d ( L 2 dθ Ku ) dθ = L2 dθ du Ku 2 dθ = K du L dθ. Differentiate again and obtain r = d ( ) dr dθ 2 dθ = K u dθ L dθ 2 = u 2 u K3 L 4 dθ 2 s

Substitute into Equation (3) and get K3 u 2 ( ) ( u L 2 K 2 L 4 dθ u 2 ) 2 = K3 u 2. 2 Ku L 3 L 4 Dividing by the common factor of K3 u 2 L 4 results in the inhomogeneous secondorder differential equation: u dθ + u = 1. 2 The general solution of this has the form u = u(θ) = 1 + e cos(θ θ 0 ), where e and θ 0 are constants of integration which can be determined from the initial conditions. In turn, we now know that the radial distance of Planet 1 from the center of mass is given, in terms of θ, by where the constants K and L are r = L2 Ku = L 2 K(1 + e cos(θ θ 0 )), (5) K = Gm 3 2 ( + ) 2, and L = r2dθ. The Center-of-Mass Inertial Frame and the Eccentricity The two-body problem will have in all four initial conditions: the two initial positions of the planets and the two initial velocities. Correspondingly, there are four constants of integration which occur: the initial position and velocity of the center of mass relative to the original inertial frame, and the constants e and θ 0 appearing in Equation (5). The motion of the center of mass is easily determined. If x 1 (0) and x 2 (0) are the initial positions of Planets 1 an, respectively, then the initial position of the center of mass is R (0) = 1 + ( x1 (0) + x2 (0)).

Likewise, if v 1 (0) and v 2 (0) are the initial velocities of Planets 1 and 2, then the combined system has total momentum (which is conserved) p = m1 v1 (0) + v2 (0), Configuration at t=0 y initial velocity of Planet 1 velocity of frame (relative to v moving frame) center-of-mass u1 (0) coordinate system mass mass u2 (0) and so the center of mass will move with constant velocity 1 v = p. + This means that relative to the moving frame, the initial velocities of Planets 1 an are u1 (0) = v 1 v and initial velocity of Planet 2 (relative to moving frame) Figure 4: Initial conditions relative to moving frame u 2 (0) = v 2 v, respectively. Finally, we choose the x-axis of our moving frame so as to pass through the center of mass of Planet 1 at time t = 0. All of this is indicated in Figure 4 above. For the remainder of the section we shall be operating exclusively in the moving inertial center-of-mass frame. Referring to Figure 4 we let r 0 be the initial distance of Planet 1 from the center of mass. Next we let α be the angle that u 1 makes with the positive x-axis of the moving frame. Since at time t = 0 we have θ = 0, Equation 5 at time t = 0 now reads r 0 = Equation (6) now can be written as L 2 K(1 + e cos θ 0 ). (6) e cos θ 0 = L2 Kr 0 1. (7) Next we take the time derivative of Equation (5) and get: dr = L 2 e sin(θ θ 0 ) dθ K[1 + e cos(θ θ 0 )] 2 ; at t = 0 this simplifies to x u 0 cos α = Kr2 0e sin θ 0 L 2 L r 2 0 = Ke sin θ 0, L

where u 0 is the magnitude of the vector u 1 (0). Therefore, e sin θ 0 = Lu 0 cos α K Squaring and adding Equations (7) and (8) leads to (8) ( ) L e 2 2 2 = 1 + L2 u 2 0 cos 2 α (9) Kr 0 K 2 Equation (9) can be written purely in terms of the initial data once we realize that the constant L can be expressed as giving rise to Since K is the constant L = r 2dθ = r 0u 0 sin α, ( e 2 r0 u 2 0 sin 2 α = K ) 2 1 + r2 0u 4 0 cos 2 α. K 2 K = Gm2 1 ( + ) 2, we see that the eccentricity of the orbit of Planet 1 (and hence of Planet 2) about the moving center of mass can be expressed purely in terms of the initial data r 0, u 0, the angle α, the masses and and the gravitational constant G. One Planet s Orbit Relative to the Other In the above, we have shown that each member planet of a two-body system will orbit about the system s center of mass in either an ellipse, a parabola, or a hyperbola, depending on the eccentricity. A question that remains is whether one planet s orbit about the other will likewise be a conic section. If we can show this, then Kepler s First Law will be validated, namely that the planets in the solar system orbit about the sun in elliptical orbits.

g( x) = 1- x 2 4 f( x) = - 1- x 2 4 The demonstration is actually easier than one might think! Figure 5 depicts both the center-of-mass coordinate system, with planet 1 s orbit about the center of mass, as well as the moving coordinate system centered at Planet 1. We are to show that, in polar coordinates based at Planet 1, the orbit of Planet 2 is also a conic section with the same eccentricity. If r is the polar distance from the center of mass to Planet 1, then in terms of the radial angle θ, we have already shown that r = r=distance of Planet 1 from center of mass d=distance of Planet 1 + from Planet 2 = ( )r L 2 K(1 + e cos(θ θ 0 )). Since the distance d between Planets 1 an is given by d = ( + )r, moving coordinate system at Planet 1 y r θ θ center of mass L 2 x r= K(1+ecos(θ θ 0 )) Figure 5: Coordinate System at Planet 1 it follows that the polar distance s from Planet 1 to Planet 2 must be (note the minus sign!): L 2 ( + ) s = K (1 + e cos(θ θ 0 )), which also describes a conic section with the same eccentricity e.