Key Priorities for Sub-GHz Wireless Deployment



Similar documents
Maximizing Range and Battery Life in Low-Cost Wireless Networks

ZigBee Propagation for Smart Metering Networks

XBEE PROTOCOL COMPARISON

communication over wireless link handling mobile user who changes point of attachment to network

DT3: RF On/Off Remote Control Technology. Rodney Singleton Joe Larsen Luis Garcia Rafael Ocampo Mike Moulton Eric Hatch

Environmental Monitoring: Guide to Selecting Wireless Communication Solutions

Demystifying Wireless for Real-World Measurement Applications

Microchip Technology. February 2008 Valerio Moretto Slide 1

Design of a Wireless Medical Monitoring System * Chavabathina Lavanya 1 G.Manikumar 2

Wireless Ethernet LAN (WLAN) General a/802.11b/802.11g FAQ

Application Note AN-00126

Understanding Range for RF Devices

11 Internet of Things (IoT) Protocols You Need to Know About

Intelligent Street lighting management using ZigBee. Martin SCHULTE-HOBEIN Field Application Engineer, EMEA Digi International

The Internet of Things: Opportunities & Challenges

SmartDiagnostics Application Note Wireless Interference

IOT WPAN technologies IoT binnen handbereik. EA IoT 2015 Pepijn Herman

Application Note AN-00125

What s so smart about Smart-hopping?

Antennas & Propagation. CS 6710 Spring 2010 Rajmohan Rajaraman

ZigBee Technology Overview

Guide for Performing a Wireless Site Survey. 2.4 GHz IEEE g/802.11b/

UG103-13: Application Development Fundamentals: RAIL

IEEE Sub-1 GHz-Lösungen für Sensornetzwerke mit optimierter Funkabdeckung Dr. Wolf Wireless GmbH

ZIGBEE ECGR-6185 Advanced Embedded Systems. Charlotte. University of North Carolina-Charlotte. Chaitanya Misal Vamsee Krishna

Tranzeo s EnRoute500 Performance Analysis and Prediction

Comparison of 2.4-GHz proprietary RF and Bluetooth 4.0 for HIS applications Page 1 of 6

Use case possibilities with Bluetooth low energy in IoT applications

Improving SCADA Operations Using Wireless Instrumentation

Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Omni Antenna vs. Directional Antenna

UG103.1 APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT FUNDAMENTALS: WIRELESS NETWORKING

Overcoming Challenges of Connecting Intelligent Nodes to the Internet of Things

LoRa FAQs. 1 of 4 Semtech. Semtech Corporation LoRa FAQ

EE4367 Telecom. Switching & Transmission. Prof. Murat Torlak

Short range low power wireless devices and Internet of Things (IoT)

Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) and the 5GHz Unlicensed Band

Introduction to Silicon Labs. November 2015

The cost and performance benefits of 80 GHz links compared to short-haul GHz licensed frequency band products

Logitech Advanced 2.4 GHz Technology

Wireless Medical Telemetry Laboratory

APPLICATION NOTE. RF System Architecture Considerations ATAN0014. Description

Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and the Internet of Things

Performance Evaluation of a UWB-RFID System for Potential Space Applications Abstract

Medical Device Connectivity

M2M I/O Modules. To view all of Advantech s M2M I/O Modules, please visit

Attenuation (amplitude of the wave loses strength thereby the signal power) Refraction Reflection Shadowing Scattering Diffraction

Applying Mesh Networking to Wireless Lighting Control

Next Generation Gigabit WiFi ac

Spring Final Project Report

What is ? Why are standards important?

Secure and Reliable Wireless Communications for Geological Repositories and Nuclear Facilities

LTE Evolution for Cellular IoT Ericsson & NSN

SmartMesh Wireless Sensor Networking for Industrial IoT

Understanding Device Level Connection Topologies

AN Application Note: FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz. FCC Regulations for ISM Band Devices: MHz

is the power reference: Specifically, power in db is represented by the following equation, where P0 P db = 10 log 10

Defining the Smart Grid WAN

IPv6 Based Sensor Home Networking

Interference Identification Guide. Table of Contents

ALLION USA INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER WIRELESS GATEWAY COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Freescale Development Kits IEEE Wireless design made simple. freescale.com/802154

Logitech Advanced 2.4 GHz Technology With Unifying Technology

Technologies Supporting Smart Meter Networks

Introduction to Z-Wave. An Introductory Guide to Z-Wave Technology

Zigbee-Based Wireless Distance Measuring Sensor System

Wireless LAN advantages. Wireless LAN. Wireless LAN disadvantages. Wireless LAN disadvantages WLAN:

Short-range Low Power Wireless Devices and Internet of Things (IoT)

Application Note Noise Frequently Asked Questions

Whitepaper. Next Generation Gigabit WiFi ac

AN437. Si4432 RF PERFORMANCE AND FCC COMPLIANCE TEST RESULTS. 1. Introduction. 2. Relevant Measurements to comply with FCC

Home Automation and Cybercrime

Wireless The answer to all our communications needs?

Presented by: Robert Buczkiewicz, Director, Hardware Development, LS Research Sai Yelisetty, Director Sales & Marketing, DSP Group Arik Gur, Product

Avaya WLAN 9100 External Antennas for use with the WAO-9122 Access Point

Reti wireless in banda ISM e complementarieta con le reti cellulari

The Energy Harvesting Tipping Point for Wireless Sensor Applications

Achieving New Levels of Channel Density in Downstream Cable Transmitter Systems: RF DACs Deliver Smaller Size and Lower Power Consumption

LoRaWAN. What is it? A technical overview of LoRa and LoRaWAN. Technical Marketing Workgroup 1.0

Communication Architecture for AMI and other Smart Grid/Smart City Applications. Presented By: Reji Kumar Pillai President - ISGF

CWNA Instructor Led Course Outline

SkyWay-Mobile. Broadband Wireless Solution

The influence of Wi-Fi on the operation of Bluetooth based wireless sensor networks in the Internet of Things

The Economics of Gigabit 4G Mobile Backhaul

Network Communications System. Redefining Intelligent Utility Communications

HOME ALARM MONITORING NETWORK GOH SWEE TIAN

Rolf de Vegt, July 8, IEEE802.11ah Benefits and Use Cases

Unmatched RF Spectrum Analysis

Prof. Matti Latva-aho,

Propsim enabled Mobile Ad-hoc Network Testing

Design Considerations for DVT and Manufacturing Test of Wireless Devices

REMOTE KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM RECEIVER DESIGN

APPLICATION NOTE. Atmel AT02845: Coexistence between ZigBee and Other 2.4GHz Products. Atmel MCU Wireless. Description. Features

RF Safety Compliance and Duty Cycle for OpenWay CENTRON 4G-LTE Meters December 2015

OpenWay Radio Frequency FAQ

ZHONE VDSL2 TECHNOLOGY. Access Technology for the Future. November 2009 CONTENTS

Transcription:

Key Priorities for Sub-GHz Wireless Deployment Silicon Laboratories Inc., Austin, TX Introduction To build an advanced wireless system, most developers will end up choosing between two industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) radio band options 2.4GHz or sub-ghz frequencies. Pairing one or the other with the system s highest priorities will provide the best combination of wireless performance and economy. These priorities can include: Range Power consumption Data rates Antenna size Interoperability (standards) Worldwide deployment Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and ZigBee technologies are heavily marketed 2.4GHz protocols used extensively in today s markets. However, for low-data-rate applications, such as home security/automation and smart metering, sub-ghz wireless systems offer several advantages, including longer range, reduced power consumption and lower deployment and operating costs. Sub-GHz radios Sub-GHz radios can offer relatively simple wireless solutions that can operate uninterrupted on battery power alone for up to 20 years. Notable advantages over 2.4GHz radios include: Range The narrowband operation of a sub-ghz radio enables transmission ranges of a kilometer or more. This allows sub-ghz nodes to communicate directly with a distant hub without hopping from node to node, as is often required using a much shorter-range 2.4GHz solution. There are three primary reasons for sub-ghz superior range performance over 2.4GHz applications: As radio waves pass through walls and other obstacles, the signal weakens. Attenuation rates increase at higher frequencies, therefore the 2.4GHz signal weakens faster than a sub-ghz signal. 2.4GHz radio waves also fade more quickly than sub-ghz waves as they reflect off dense surfaces. In highly congested environments, the 2.4GHz transmission can weaken rapidly, which adversely affects signal quality. Even though radio waves travel in a straight line, they do bend when they hit a solid edge (like the corner of a building). As frequencies decrease the angle of diffraction increases, allowing sub-ghz signals to bend farther around an obstacle, reducing the blocking effect.

The Friis Equation demonstrates the superior propagation characteristics of a sub-ghz radio, showing that path loss at 2.4GHz is 8.5dB higher than at 900MHz. This translates into 2.67x longer range for a 900MHz radio since range approximately doubles with every 6dB increase in power. To match the range of a 900MHz radio, a 2.4GHz solution would need greater than 8.5dB additional power. Low interference The airways are crowded with colliding 2.4GHz signals from various sources, such as home and office Wi-Fi hubs, Bluetooth-enabled computer and cell phone peripherals and microwave ovens. This traffic jam of 2.4GHz signals creates a lot of interference. Sub-GHz ISM bands are mostly used for proprietary low-duty-cycle links and are not as likely to interfere with each other. The quieter spectrum means easier transmissions and fewer retries, which is more efficient and saves battery power. Low power Both power efficiency and system range are functions of the receiver sensitivity plus the transmission frequency. The sensitivity is inversely proportional to channel bandwidth, so a narrower bandwidth creates higher receiver sensitivity and allows efficient operation at lower transmission rates. For example, at 300MHz, if the transmitter and receiver crystal errors (XTAL inaccuracies) are both 10 ppm (parts per million), the error is 3kHz for each. For the application to efficiently transmit and receive, the minimum channel bandwidth is two times the error rate, or 6kHz, which is ideal for narrowband applications. The same scenario at 2.4GHz requires a minimum channel bandwidth of 48kHz, which wastes bandwidth for narrowband applications and requires substantially more operating power. In general, all radio circuits running at higher frequencies, including low-noise amplifier, power amplifier, mixer and synthesizer, need more current to achieve the same performance as lower frequencies. Range, low interference and low power consumption are basic advantages of sub-ghz applications over 2.4GHz apps. One of the disadvantages often cited is that the antennas are larger than those used in 2.4GHz networks. The optimal antenna size for 433MHz applications, for instance, can be up to seven inches. However, antenna size and frequency are inversely proportional. If node size is an important design consideration, developers can raise the frequency (up to 950MHz) in order to employ a smaller antenna. Figure 1: As radio frequencies are reduced, antenna sizes increase proportionally

2.4GHz vs. sub-ghz application trends Both 2.4GHz and sub-ghz technologies are expanding in the consumer, industrial and automotive marketplaces. The 2008 2.4GHz TAM was 172 million units while the sub-ghz TAM was almost three times that number at 492 million. The figure below illustrates how sub-ghz and 2.4GHz applications have dominated in specific applications. Remote keyless entry (RKE) is a common sub-ghz application, where low-data-rate transmission at a fairly long range (100+ meters) and very long battery life are high priorities. The same is true for remote garage door openers (GDO) and tire pressure monitoring systems (TPMS). Figure 2: Wireless frequency trends in consumer, industrial and automotive applications There are several markets, such as toys, medical equipment, security systems and building automation, where both wireless options are used in the same system. For example, in building security, 2.4GHz radios are needed to serve high-data-rate video cameras while proximity, pressure and acceleration sensors are networked using a sub-ghz protocol. Range, power consumption, antenna size and data rate are not the only design considerations for wireless applications. Worldwide deployment and software stack size and cost also have to be addressed. Worldwide deployment Global compliance is an important design consideration for a number of wireless applications. For instance, video game manufacturers who market their products worldwide can use 2.4GHz radios for all their consoles because it is a global ISM allocation. Similarly, wireless applications using the 433MHz band share a global sub-ghz ISM allocation, with Japan being the sole major market

exception. In addition, 915MHz is used extensively in North America and Australia, 868MHz is deployed across all of Europe and 315MHz is available in North America, Asia and Japan. Standard vs. proprietary solutions A number of standard solutions for the radio PHY, MAC, and stack layers are available for 2.4GHz and sub-ghz applications. 802.15.4 (PHY/MAC), ZigBee, Bluetooth, 6LoWPAN, Wi-Fi and RF4CE are widely used 2.4GHz solutions. Sub-GHz standards-based solutions include ZigBee (currently the only protocol offering both 2.4GHz and sub-ghz versions in the 868MHz and 900MHz bands), EnOcean, io-homecontrol, ONE-NET, INSTEON and Z-Wave. While standard solutions offer the advantage of vendor-independent interoperable nodes, they normally will increase each node s cost and footprint. For example, a 2.4GHz ZigBee radio node will cost approximately $2.00 (USD) and the software stack will require about 128KB of embedded memory. Conversely, proprietary sub-ghz nodes generally target low-cost systems, with each node costing approximately 30-40% less and requiring 4KB memory for the stack (in this case, Silicon Labs EZMacPRO ). With specialized functions and small software stacks, proprietary solutions can achieve smaller die sizes and reduced memory footprints. What s more, the less complex stacks simplify deployments and lower maintenance costs. Therefore, proprietary sub-ghz solutions can offer among the least expensive point-to-point localized networks, such as a garage door opener or home automation system. The opportunities for more extensive long-range sub-ghz mesh networks, proprietary or standards-based, are growing by leaps and bounds with the emergence of smart grid technology. Sub-GHz application for smart grid technology Smart grid technology is 21 st century electronics enhancing the functionality of the 20 th century energy grid infrastructure, enabling two-way communication between homes and businesses and their utility companies. Sub-GHz communication offers distinct advantages in a number of smart grid applications. For instance, its longer range allows more homes and businesses to communicate with fewer hubs, which saves deployment and maintenance costs for the utilities provider. In addition, battery-powered gas and water meters can operate for years without changing batteries. There are major standardization efforts underway for smart energy applications around the world (802.15.4G, Wireless MBUS, etc.) with sub-ghz being the dominant frequency band for long range communications links from the meter to the utility. Automated metering system Automated electronic meters offer utilities providers the benefits of improved reliability and accuracy, ease of calibration, improved security and advanced billing features. The full system can take advantage of long-range, low-cost wireless communication for the effective data exchange the smart grid requires.

Figure 3: Automated metering system for a smart grid application In the above example, the automated metering system supports four kinds of smart meters: The electricity meter supports multi-rate metering by measuring the kilowatt hours consumed and the power factor of the load and by recording the time the electricity was used. The gas and water meters use positive displacement flow meters that measure the number of times a unit volume of fluid or gas moves through the meter. Low operating power is critical as these meters are usually battery powered. Heat meters enable utilities to bill customers by the number of BTUs or kilowatts used, which are calculated by measuring the flow of hot water through the system and recording its input and exit temperatures. These meters are primarily used by industrial customers. Each of these meters, equipped with a sub-ghz radio, can quickly and inexpensively transmit data to a metering aggregator (or hub) that acts as a gateway to the utility company. The aggregator, in turn, can communicate from the utility provider back to individual meters through the same sub-ghz network. This enables more efficient use of available water and energy and provides more accurate billing services for the customer.

Conclusion Sub-GHz wireless networks can provide an extremely cost-effective solution in any low-data-rate system, from simple point-to-point connections to much larger mesh networks, where long range, robust radio links and extended battery life are leading priorities. Higher regulatory output power, reduced absorption, less spectral pollution and narrowband operation increase transmission range. Better circuit efficiency, improved signal propagation and a smaller memory footprint reduce overall power consumption, which can result in years of battery-powered operation. Silicon Laboratories' is a world leader in mixed-signal RF integration. The company s EZRadio and EZRadioPRO family of low-power, low-data-rate, low-cost IC products supports sub-ghz point-to-point, star and mesh networks as well as complex, standards-based mesh network applications. Combining these radios with Silicon Labs mixed-signal MCUs and audio, power and timing ICs will provide the core technology for a more efficient and economical wireless network applications for both consumer and industrial monitoring and control.