GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Similar documents
LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

EXAMPLE 1 DESIGN OF CANTILEVERED WALL, GRANULAR SOIL

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

The University of Toledo Soil Mechanics Laboratory

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Earth Pressure and Retaining Wall Basics for Non-Geotechnical Engineers

Geotechnical Investigation Test Report

5/1/2013. Topics. The challenge is to better maintain native characteristics of soils during and after construction

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

Specification Guidelines: Allan Block Modular Retaining Wall Systems

Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

SOIL MECHANICS Assignment #4: Soil Permeability.

Area No. 8 Test Pit No. 191

INTRODUCTION TO SOIL MODULI. Jean-Louis BRIAUD 1

20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS. Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

DIRT DWELLING. and your. Pin Foundations Inc., 2008

How To Model A Shallow Foundation

Appendix D.1. Testing Requirements for Infiltration, Bioretention and Sand Filter Subsoils

PDHonline Course S151A (1 PDH) Steel Sheet Piling. Instructor: Matthew Stuart, PE, SE. PDH Online PDH Center

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF SOILS AASHTO Designation T 88 (Mn/DOT Modified)

FUNDAMENTALS OF CONSOLIDATION

Trench Rescue by Buddy Martinette

Determination of Thermal Conductivity of Coarse and Fine Sand Soils

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

The Verdura Wall check with your local building department

METHODS FOR ACHIEVEMENT UNIFORM STRESSES DISTRIBUTION UNDER THE FOUNDATION

RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION GUIDELINE Johnson County, KS

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

SECTION EARTH MOVING

PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

PHYSICAL AND PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS

MANUAL OF PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION VOLUME I JANUARY An Equal Opportunity Employer

A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil

DESIGN OF PILES AND PILE GROUPS CONSIDERING CAPACITY, SETTLEMENT, AND NEGATIVE SKIN FRICTION

EFFECT OF GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT ON LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF A COARSE SAND BED

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

PE Exam Review - Geotechnical

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

UNDER DRAINAGE AND FILTER DESIGN

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

CHAPTER 9 FEM MODELING OF SOIL-SHEET PILE WALL INTERACTION

FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION

vulcanhammer.net This document downloaded from

Estimation of Compression Properties of Clayey Soils Salt Lake Valley, Utah

Designed and Engineered to Perform

GRADATION OF AGGREGATE FOR CONCRETE BLOCK

Bearing Capacity (Daya Dukung Tanah)

PILE FOUNDATIONS FM 5-134

SECTION 55 PIPE FOR STORM DRAINS AND CULVERTS (FAA D-701)

PROCUREMENT SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION CITY OF HOUSTON SURFACE WATER TRANSMISSION PROGRAM CONTRACT 74A-1 WATERLINE COH WBS NO. S HOUSTON, TEXAS

Type of Force 1 Axial (tension / compression) Shear. 3 Bending 4 Torsion 5 Images 6 Symbol (+ -)

Soils, Foundations & Moisture Control

ALLOWABLE LOADS ON A SINGLE PILE

Laterally Loaded Piles

1. ASTM C Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units 2. ASTM C 1372 Standard Specification for Dry-Cast Segmental Retaining Wall Units

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

CHAPTER 9 LONG TERM MONITORING AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

CE 366 SETTLEMENT (Problems & Solutions)

G-126 (Continued) MTA Westside Subway Extension Los Angeles, California. Figure: A-2.22c

SECTION PAVEMENT DESIGN

IRC 2009 CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR CIP CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS SUPPORTING LIGHT FRAME CONSTRUCTION IN SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY B (WITH QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS)

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

Appendix A Sub surface displacements around excavations Data presented in Xdisp sample file

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

CHAPTER: 6 FLOW OF WATER THROUGH SOILS

Formwork for Concrete

Westeros Design Project

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Assoc. Prof. Derin N. URAL. 2/16/2009 Mechanics of Soils 1

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

Creep Characteristics and Shear Strength. of Recycled Asphalt Blends. Jeffery M. Schaper

Figure A-1. Figure A-2. continued on next page... HPM-1. Grout Reservoir. Neat Cement Grout (Very Flowable) Extension Displacement Plate

PART 3 DEFINITION OF ROCKFILL VERSUS EARTHFILL MATERIAL

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

Gasketed PVC Sewer Pipe Durable, Flexible, Reliable Waterworks Products

ESTIMATION OF UNDRAINED SETTLEMENT OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ON LONDON CLAY

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

SOIL COMPACTION BASICS

APPENDIX A PRESSUREMETER TEST INTERPRETATION

Chapter - 3 Design of Rectangular Beams and One-way Slabs

DIVISION 300 BASES SECTION 304 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE DESCRIPTION MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

Basic Soil Erosion and Types

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Transcription:

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION...3 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System...3 1.1.1 Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils:...4 1.1.2 Fine Grained(Cohesive) Soil Charts using the USCS System:..4 1.1.3 Consistency of Fine Grained Soils:...5 1.2 USDA Soil Classification System...5 1.3 AASHTO Soil Classification System:...6 2. PHASE RELATIONSHIP EQUATIONS:...7 2.1 Shear Strength of Soils...7 2.2 Bearing Capacity of Soils...7 3. STRESSES IN SOILS...9 3.1 Various Loading Conditions:...9...9...9 4. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS...10 4.1 Conventional Footings...10 4.11Geotechnical Analysis...10 4.12 Structural Design:...10 4.2 Strap or Cantilever Footings:...11 4.3 Trapezoidal Footings:...12 5. SOIL CONSOLIDATION EQUATIONS...14 5.1 Instant Settlement of footings:...14 5.2 Primary Consolidation:...14 5.3 Overconsolidated Soils...14 5.4 Time rate of settlement...15 5.41 Coefficient of consolidation...15 6. RETAINING STRUCTURES:...16 6.1 Horizontal Stresses: Active, At Rest and Passive...16 6.2 Basement Wall with surcharge:...17 6.3 Braced Excavations:...17 6.4 Forces on Struts:...18 6.5 Cantilever Sheetpiles in Sand...20 6.6 Cantilever Sheetpiles in Clay...21 6.6 Anchored Sheetpiles in Sand (Also called Bulkheads)...22 6.7 Anchored Sheetpiles in Clay (Also called Bulkheads)...24 7. PILE FOUNDATIONS...25 8. Post Tensioned Slabs:...28 9. Asphalt Mix Design:...30 10. Concrete Mix Design:...33

1. SOIL CLASSIFICATION 1.1 USCS: Unified Soil Classification System Coarse Grained soils have less than 50% passing the # 200 sieve: Symbol Passing the #200 Cu= D Cc = D 60 30 D 10 ) 2 30 D( D 60 Soil Description GW < 5% 4 or higher 1 to 3 Well graded gravel GP < 5% Less than 4 1 to 3 Poorly graded gravel GW-GM 5 to12% 4 or higher 1 to 3 but with <15% sand GW-GM 5 to12% 4 or higher 1 to 3 but with 15% sand GW-GC 5 to12% 4 or higher 1 to 3 but with <15% sand GW-GC 5 to12% 4 or higher 1 to 3 but with 15% sand Well graded gravel with silt Well graded gravel with silt and sand Well graded gravel with clay or silty clay Well graded gravel with clay and sand GC >12% N/A N/A,<15%sand Clayey Gravel GC > 12% N/A N/A,>15%sand Clayey Gravel with sand GM-GC >12% N/A N/A,<15%sand Clayey Silt with gravel GM-GC >12% N/A N/A, 15%sand Clayey Silt with sand SW < 5% 6 or higher 1 to 3 Well graded sand SP < 5% Less than 6 1 to 3 Poorly graded sand SM >12% N/A N/A Silty Sand or Sandy Silt SC >12% N/A N/A Clayey Sand or Sandy Clay SC-SM >12% N/A N/A Silty Clay with Sand Where: Cu = Uniformity Coefficient; gives the range of grain sizes in a given sample. Higher Cu means well graded. Cz = Coefficient of Curvature is a measure of the smoothness of the gradation curve. Usually less than 3. D10, D3, & D60 are the grain size diameter corresponding to 10%, 30% and 60% passing screen.

1.1.1 Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils: SPT or N value Relative Density % Relative Density 0 3 Very loose 0 15 4 10 Loose 15 35 11 30 Medium dense 35 65 31 50 Dense 65-85 > 50 Very dense 85-100 1.1.2 Fine Grained(Cohesive) Soil Charts using the USCS System:

1.1.3 Consistency of Fine Grained Soils: SPT or N value Cohesion, C or Su Consistency < 2 < 500 psf Very soft 2 4 500 1000 psf Soft 5 8 1000 2000 psf Firm 9 15 2000 4000 psf Stiff 16-30 4000 8000 psf Very stiff >30 > 8000 psf Hard 1.2 USDA Soil Classification System The percent SAND,SILT,and CLAY lines are drawn and their intersection gives the soil classification.

1.3 AASHTO Soil Classification System: CLASSIFICATION OF HIGHWAY SUBGRADE MATERIALS (With suggested subgroups) General Classification Granular Materials (35% or less passing No. 200) Silt-Clay Materials (More than 35% passing #200) Group Classification A-1 A-2 A-3 A-1-a A-1-b A-2-4 A-2-5 A-2-6 A-2-7 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-7-5 A-7-6 Sieve Analysis, Percent Passing: No. 10 No. 40 No. 200 0-50 0-30 0-15 0-50 0-25 51-100 0-10 0-35 0-35 0-35 0-35 36-100 36-100 36-100 36-100 Characteristics of fraction passing # 40: Liquid Limit Plasticity Index Group Index 0-6 0 N.P. 0 0-40 41+ 0-10 0-10 0-40 11+ 0 0-4 41+ 11+ 0-40 41+ 0-40 41+ 0-10 0-10 11+ 11+ 0-8 0-12 0-16 0-20 Usual Types of Significicant Constituent Materials Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand Fine Sand Silty or Clayey Gravel and Sand Silty Soils Clayey Soils General Rating as Subgrade Excellent to Good Fair to Poor Cohesive soils classification in AASHTO System:

2. PHASE RELATIONSHIP EQUATIONS: Dry Unit Weight, γd Bulk or Wet or Total Unit Weight, γm or γw or γt or γ Saturated Unit Weight, γs or γsat 2.1 Shear Strength of Soils 2.2 Bearing Capacity of Soils Hansen B.C. Factors:

Terzaghi B.C. Factors

Note:If Df/B > 1, terzaghi s B.C. factors do not apply. Use Hansen s B.C. factors. For example, if depth of footing (Df) is 3 ft but footing width (B) is 2.75 ft. 3. STRESSES IN SOILS 3.1 Various Loading Conditions: Strip

4. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS 4.1 Conventional Footings Q 4.11Geotechnical Analysis qall = Q / Bx1 for Continuous Footings qall = Q / BxL for Rectangular Footings qall = Q / BxB for Square Footings qall < qu / 3 from Bearing Capacity Calculations e < B/6, where e=eccentricity Df > 1.0 ft minimum Df > frost depth Df > setback distance for footings on slope Df > scour depth Df > high moisture variations depth(expansive soils) 4.12 Structural Design: Layer 1 1 1B C= Cc Layer 2 1+Eo 2B Layer 3 GWT 3B Given: A Continuous footing with γm = 100 pcf, Df = 5 ft, qall = 4,000 psf, D.L=22 k/ft, L.L.=12 k/ft, f c=3 ksi, fy= 60 ksi. Design the footings using the ACI code: 2 Df B q all

4.2 Strap or Cantilever Footings: Strap Footing with varying beam thickness Strap Footings with constant beam thickness

4.3 Trapezoidal Footings:

5. SOIL CONSOLIDATION EQUATIONS 5.1 Instant Settlement of footings: or 5.2 Primary Consolidation: or 5.3 Overconsolidated Soils or or

5.4 Time rate of settlement (i=immediate, c=consolidation, & s=secondary) 5.41 Coefficient of consolidation, Cv:

6. RETAINING STRUCTURES: 6.1 Horizontal Stresses: Active, At Rest and Passive

6.2 Basement Wall with surcharge: 6.3 Braced Excavations:

6.4 Forces on Struts:

Bottom Heave Calculations:

6.5 Cantilever Sheetpiles in Sand

6.6 Cantilever Sheetpiles in Clay

6.6 Anchored Sheetpiles in Sand (Also called Bulkheads)

6.7 Anchored Sheetpiles in Clay (Also called Bulkheads)

7. PILE FOUNDATIONS 7.1 Single Piles Equations:

7.2 Group capacity of piles: Example:

7.3 Settlement of Group Piles: 8. Post Tensioned Slabs: Edge Lift:

Center Lift: The Structural Engineer also needs Kv (given in immediate settlement section), effective PI(pp 138 of Geotechnical DVD book) and other climatic constants that are from building codes(given).

9. Asphalt Mix Design:

AC Mix design Formulas:

When weighing in Water: When weighing in Air: Open Graded Mixtures:

10. Concrete Mix Design: Fineness modulus:

Yield: Relative Yield: Modulus of Rupture: = (7.5 f c) or