Asphalt Institute Technical Bulletin. Laboratory Mixing and Compaction Temperatures



Similar documents
NorthEast Transportation Training and Certification Program (NETTCP) Course Registration Form

Asphalt Pavement Association Of Michigan Selecting the Right Mix Atrium Drive, Suite 202 Okemos, MI

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Rubber Mixtures Using the Dynamic Modulus (E*) Test

Hello viewers welcome to lesson 4.7 which is on pavement materials part IV and in this lesson we will be covering bituminous binders.

research report Investigation of Proposed AASHTO Rut Test Procedure Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Virginia Transportation Research Council

Evaluation of Rheological Measurements for Unmodified and Modified Asphalt Cements

Fluid Mechanics: Static s Kinematics Dynamics Fluid

Comparison of Results of SHRP and Conventional Binder Tests on Paving Asphalts

PUMPS STEAM TURBINES BUILDING & FIRE WASTEWATER SERVICE PUMP CLINIC 22 VISCOSITY

COMPACTING BITUMINOUS SPECIMENS USING THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC)

SIZE OF A MOLECULE FROM A VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT

Rutting Based Evaluation of Asphalt Mixes

Rheological Properties of Topical Formulations

Testing and appraisal of Lucobit polymer effect as an additive on asphalt mixture performance

SECTION 334 (Pages ) is deleted and the following substituted: SECTION 334 SUPERPAVE ASPHALT CONCRETE

EVALUATION OF ASPHALT BINDER CHARACTERISTICS OF TYPICAL ONTARIO SUPERPAVE CRM AND RAP-HMA MIXTURES

This document establishes MSHA s Standard Test Procedure (STP) for the Determining the Viscosity of a Hydraulic Fluid in Saybolt Universal Seconds.

New Simple Performance Tests for Asphalt Mixes

Development of a Crumb Rubber Modified (CRM) PG binder Specification

DEVELOPMENT OF A TESTING TEMPERATURE TO BE USED WITH THE HAMBURG WHEEL TRACKING DEVICE ON ASPHALT MIXTURES THAT UTILIZE PERFORMANCE GRADE BINDERS

Ch 2 Properties of Fluids - II. Ideal Fluids. Real Fluids. Viscosity (1) Viscosity (3) Viscosity (2)

SEAUPG Annual Meeting Williamsburg, VA Thursday, November 19, 2015

CHAPTER 2: LIQUID VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT

Determination of Acceleration due to Gravity

Performance Graded Asphalt Binders Bob Horan, P.E. Consulting Engineer Mechanicsville, VA

Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) on Performance-Related Properties of Asphalt Binders. Hussain U. Bahia 1 and Robert Davies 2

VISCOSITY OF A LIQUID. To determine the viscosity of a lubricating oil. Time permitting, the temperature variation of viscosity can also be studied.

Manufacturing Equipment Modeling

Test Report No. 48/2005. Degussa AG Paul-Baumann-Straβe Marl. Binder tests of bitumen modified with Road+

Displacement (x) Velocity (v) Acceleration (a) x = f(t) differentiate v = dx Acceleration Velocity (v) Displacement x

Mechanical Principles

The ratio of inertial to viscous forces is commonly used to scale fluid flow, and is called the Reynolds number, given as:

A View From The Bureau of Materials & Physical Research. IAPA March 2015 Matt Mueller, PE BMPR Illinois Dept of Transportation

Standard Test Method for Consistency of Paints Measuring Krebs Unit (KU) Viscosity Using a Stormer-Type Viscometer 1

Journal bearings/sliding bearings

NOTE: FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING CONTRACTOR MIX DESIGN, THE DESIGN PROCEDURES ARE SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS OF THE CONTRACT.

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures from Rt.33 in Rochester, NY

Recycling with CRM. John D Angelo D Angelo Consulting, LLC Phone johndangelo@dangeloconsultingllc.com

PART TWO GEOSYNTHETIC SOIL REINFORCEMENT. Martin Street Improvements, Fredonia, Wisconsin; Keystone Compac Hewnstone

Lecture 24 - Surface tension, viscous flow, thermodynamics

Florida s Experience with Crumb Rubber

WATERPROOFING FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Oh No, We Got an Airport Job! Contractor Quality Control. Investment in Staff, Labs and Equipment. We ve Come A Long Way.

ENGINEERING COUNCIL CERTIFICATE LEVEL

SOLID MECHANICS DYNAMICS TUTORIAL PULLEY DRIVE SYSTEMS. This work covers elements of the syllabus for the Edexcel module HNC/D Mechanical Principles.

LOW TEMPERATURE TESTING OF ELASTOMERS

CREEP AND REPEATED CREEP-RECOVERY AS RUTTING PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR AIRPORT HMA MIX DESIGN

PHYSICS FUNDAMENTALS-Viscosity and flow

MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES HNC/D PRELIMINARY LEVEL TUTORIAL 1 BASIC STUDIES OF STRESS AND STRAIN

6 QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

Principles of Resolving Test Result Differences. Presented by Cindy Rutkoski Rocky Mountain Asphalt Education Center Instructor

Physical Quantities, Symbols and Units

Solution for Homework #1

Evaluation of Fiber-Reinforced Asphalt Mixtures Using Advanced Material Characterization Tests

Torsion Tests. Subjects of interest

Analysis of Stresses and Strains

High-Speed Nondestructive Testing and Intelligent Construction Systems

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

Evaluation and Implementation of a Heavy Polymer Modified Asphalt Binder through Accelerated Pavement Testing

Experiment 3 Pipe Friction

A drop forms when liquid is forced out of a small tube. The shape of the drop is determined by a balance of pressure, gravity, and surface tension

CE 3500 Fluid Mechanics / Fall 2014 / City College of New York

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Chapter 11. h = 5m. = mgh mv Iω 2. E f. = E i. v = 4 3 g(h h) = m / s2 (8m 5m) = 6.26m / s. ω = v r = 6.

SPECIAL NOTE FOR ASPHALT WATERPROOFING MIX FOR BRIDGE-DECK OVERLAYS AND ADJACENT APPROACHES

PENETRATION OF BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

Refractive Index Measurement Principle

HEAVY OIL FLOW MEASUREMENT CHALLENGES

The Viscosity of Fluids

For Water to Move a driving force is needed

VARIATIONS IN ASPHALT ADHESION AS A FUNCTION OF AGGREGATE TYPE

VISUAL PHYSICS School of Physics University of Sydney Australia. Why do cars need different oils in hot and cold countries?

The AASHO Road Test site (which eventually became part of I-80) at Ottawa, Illinois, was typical of northern climates (see Table 1).

CONTROL VALVE PRESSURE DROP AND SIZING

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

PHY231 Section 2, Form A March 22, Which one of the following statements concerning kinetic energy is true?

ICC-ES Evaluation Report

Practice Test SHM with Answers

Performance Evaluation of Jet Fuel Resistant Polymer-Modified Asphalt for Airport Pavements

Inspections: Central Laboratory of the Regions

Viscosity. Desmond Schipper Andrew R. Barron. 1 Introduction

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON ROAD SURFACE REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPRESSWAYS AND HIGH SPEED ROADS

Operation Manual For NDJ-8S Digital Rotary Viscometer

Unit 4 Practice Test: Rotational Motion

CE 204 FLUID MECHANICS

OUTCOME 3 TUTORIAL 5 DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR HOT MIX ASPHALT

On Bituminous Mix Design

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

A H M 531 Penetration & Ring & Ball & Ductility & Flash & Fire point By: Mu'men Al-Otoom

Definitions...1. Asphalt Rubber Makeup...1. Wet Process High viscosity...1 Wet Process No Agitation...2 Dry Process...2

Physics Notes Class 11 CHAPTER 2 UNITS AND MEASUREMENTS

Practice Problems on Boundary Layers. Answer(s): D = 107 N D = 152 N. C. Wassgren, Purdue University Page 1 of 17 Last Updated: 2010 Nov 22

Servo Motor Selection Flow Chart

ASPHALT CORE DAMS An embankment dam with asphaltic concrete core is an appropriate dam type for the very highest future dams ICOLD Bulletin 84 (1992)

Introduction to Solid Modeling Using SolidWorks 2012 SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial Page 1

METHOD OF TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF PERMEABILITY OF GRANULAR SOILS

Transcription:

ASPHALT INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE OFFICES AND RESEARCH CENTER Research Park Drive P.O. Box 14052 Lexington, KY 40512-4052 USA Telephone 859-288-4960 FAX No. 859-288-4999 Asphalt Institute Technical Bulletin Laboratory Mixing and Compaction Temperatures For years, asphalt mix design procedures have used equiviscous temperature ranges for selecting laboratory mixing and compaction temperatures. The Asphalt Institute's Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete and Other Hot-Mix Types (MS-2) began recommending laboratory mixing and compaction temperature ranges based on viscosity as early as 1962. At that time, viscosity ranges were specified based on Saybolt-Furol viscosity. Beginning in 1974, the Asphalt Institute switched viscosity measurements to the more fundamental unit of centistokes. In 1974, the MS-2 manual recommended viscosity ranges of 170 ± 20 centistokes for mixing temperatures and 280 ± 30 centistokes for compaction temperatures when performing a Marshall mix design. Twenty years later, the same ranges have been recommended for Superpave mixture design, except that the units have been converted to metric (Pascal-seconds). The Asphalt Institute's Superpave Mix Design (SP-2) manual documents this change. The purpose of using equiviscous mixing and compaction temperatures in laboratory mix design procedures is to normalize the effect of asphalt binder stiffness on mixture volumetric properties. In this manner, a particular asphalt mixture of the same aggregate gradation will exhibit very similar volumetric properties with a softer asphalt binder, such as an AC-10, as with a harder asphalt binder, such as an AC-40. The practice of normalizing the effect of binder stiffness on volumetric properties of the mixture comes from common production practices. A hot-mix plant that produces the asphalt mixture for placement on the road, increases the mix temperature with a stiffer asphalt binder to achieve the same coating and compaction obtained with a softer asphalt binder. A major concern of many asphalt technologists is the appropriate mixing and compaction temperature ranges (viscosity ranges) for modified asphalt binders. The equiviscous ranges used in Marshall mix design, and now in Superpave mix design, were established for neat, or unmodified, asphalt binders. A national study, NCHRP 9-10, "Superpave Protocols for Modified Asphalt Binders", includes a task to recommend mixing and compaction temperatures for modified asphalt binders. This research is expected to be completed by 2000. Mixing and compaction temperatures can be determined by measuring the asphalt binder viscosity at a minimum of two temperatures. In the past, absolute viscosity (60 C) and kinematic viscosity (135 C) measurements were used. The two measured data points were plotted on a graph of viscosity (log-log centistokes) versus temperature (log degrees Rankine) for the particular asphalt binder. For graphing purposes, the temperature is converted from Celsius to Rankine ( R = 1.8* C + 492). Since absolute viscosity is usually reported in poises, it is necessary to convert to kinematic viscosity using the following relationship: h centistokes @ 60 C = h poises @ 60 C x 100 / (0.98 x G b )

where G b is the specific gravity of the asphalt binder at 15 C. With Superpave Performance Grade (PG) technology, the terminology has changed slightly. However, for convenience the viscosity range values remain at basically the same magnitude, but with different units. Using AASHTO MP1, Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binders, viscosity is measured with the rotational viscometer in units of centipoise. The viscosity is then reported in SI units, Pascal-seconds (Pa-s), using the following conversion: 1 poise = 0.1 Pa-s or 1 centipoise = 0.001 Pa-s h Pa-s = h centipoise x (0.001 Pa-s / 1 centipoise) / (CF x G b ) where CF is a temperature-volume correction factor calculated as: Rotational Viscometer CF = 1.0135-0.0006 (T test ); with T test in C. Assuming a binder specific gravity of 1.01 to 1.03, the product of the temperature-volume correction and the binder specific gravity varies from 0.92 to 0.96 at temperatures in the range of 135 C to 160 C. Since the product of the temperature-volume correction and the binder specific gravity (CF x G b ) is typically close to 1.0, most engineers assume: h Pa-s» 0.001 x h centistokes Mixing and compaction temperatures are typically reported as ranges of approximately 5 to 7 C. In normal laboratory practice, mixing and compacting is performed at temperatures near the middle of these ranges. Therefore the above assumption should be adequate for achieving equiviscous temperature ranges. For this reason, Asphalt Institute's Superpave Level 1 Mix Design (SP-2) recommends these viscosity ranges: 0.17 ± 0.02 Pa-s for mixing temperatures and 0.28 ± 0.03 Pa-s for compaction temperatures in Superpave mix design. In the Superpave system, the mixing and compaction temperature ranges are also typically determined by measuring an asphalt binder's viscosity at two temperatures. To meet the requirements of AASHTO MP1, the rotational viscosity is determined at 135 C. This measurement establishes one point on the temperature-viscosity graph. To establish the second point, the temperature in the Rotational Viscometer (RV) can be increased to 165 C and additional measurements can be made. The time necessary to reset the temperature, allow the sample to achieve temperature equilibrium, and take the measurements should be less than 30 minutes.

As an alternate method, the complex dynamic shear viscosity, or g *, can also be found using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) measurement and the following equation: g * Pa-s = G* / w where, w is the angular velocity. In Superpave PG specification measurements, w is specified to be 10 radians per second. By definition, the coefficient of viscosity, or simply viscosity, is actually the ratio of shear stress to rate of shear; it is a measure of the resistance of a liquid to flow. The complex shear modulus, or G*, measured in the DSR is the ratio of peak shear stress to peak shear strain. The equations for shear stress, t, and shear strain, g, are as follows: t max = 2 T max / p r 3 and g max = q max r / h where, T max is the maximum applied torque (N-m), r is the specimen radius (m), q max is the maximum rotation angle (radians), and h is the specimen height (m). G* = t max / g max, in units of N/m 2, or Pa, at the peak angle in radians. Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) Therefore, by dividing the measured G*, in Pa, by the w of 10 radians per second, the viscosity can be determined in Pa-s. For most practical purposes, G* @ G*/sin d at the normal high DSR operating temperatures (e.g. 58, 64, and 70 C) where d is high (> 82, almost purely viscous) and sin d is about 0.99. This is a useful assumption, since the determination of G*/sin d is already required for the original binder to be classified using AASHTO MP1. The results of the high temperature DSR test can then be converted directly to viscosity units by dividing by the angular velocity (10 rad/s). This conversion provides one point on the temperature viscosity graph. The second point is established from the rotational viscosity at 135 C, also required by AASHTO MP1. For example, if the measured G*/sin d of an asphalt binder is 1.212 kpa at 64 C, then this is equal to 1212 Pa. To convert to viscosity units, the complex shear modulus is divided by 10 rad/s. In this case, the viscosity is calculated to be approximately 121.2 Pa-s.

Double Log Scale (Pa-s) The resulting graph of the viscosity-temperature relationship is usually assumed to be linear when viscosity is plotted on a double log scale (Pa-s) and temperature is plotted on a log scale ( C). This assumption can be verified by making measurements at other temperatures and adding data points to the graph. Some modified asphalt binders may not exhibit a linear trend. An example Superpave temperature-viscosity graph is shown. If the plot of these viscosities produces a mixing temperature higher than 175 C, it may indicate that the asphalt is modified. Because of their distinctive characteristics, modified asphalts can frequently be mixed and compacted at higher viscosities than conventional binders. While this is generally true, many modified asphalt binders may be successfully mixed at temperatures much lower than 175 C. It should be noted that temperatures above 175 C may lead to binder thermal degradation and should not be used. The binder supplier should be consulted for recommendations on appropriate mixing and compaction temperatures for modified binders for the laboratory and the field. In summary, two methods may be used to develop the temperature-viscosity graph and determine mixing and compaction temperatures: (1) RV measurements at 135 C and 165 C, or (2) RV measurement at 135 C and DSR measurement at the highest PG temperature where the original binder meets the specification. The advantages of Method (1) are the following: The temperature differential between the two viscosity readings is 30 C, approximately one-half of the temperature differential of the alternate method. The assumption of linearity made when developing the temperature-viscosity graphs is more appropriate within a smaller temperature range. The temperatures selected for viscosity measurements, 135 C and 165 C, represent a range where most asphalt mixtures will be mixed and compacted during production. The advantages of Method (2) are the following: The two tests (DSR at high PG temperature and RV at 135 C) do not require any additional testing. The temperatures for these viscosity measurements represent a range that is similar to the absolute and kinematic viscosity measurements used previously.

A blank copy of the viscosity-temperature chart is attached for duplication and use as desired. Note Set printer to print in landscape mode. The temperatures determined using the procedures discussed in this bulletin are not intended for field production. Depending on the gradation (fines content) of the mixture, the type of plant and the mixing time, the appropriate field mixing temperature for proper coating may be 10 to 30 C lower than the laboratory temperature determined by this method. The field compaction temperature is affected by several factors: air temperature, base temperature, wind speed, haul distance, roller type, and lift thickness. The field compaction temperature, usually in the same range as the laboratory compaction temperature, controls all of the plant operations for the project. The field mixing temperature is often adjusted to compensate for one or more of these factors affecting compaction. For modified asphalt binders, the field mixing temperature for proper coating is usually higher than that for unmodified binders. Mixes with modified binders can also be expected to support the roller passes at a higher temperature. In addition, the cessation temperature of mixes with modified binders, where all rolling should be completed, is also usually higher and reached more quickly. Higher frequencies of vibration and heavier rollers may facilitate the compaction sequence. However, some modified mixtures have been successfully constructed with no changes from the standard compaction sequence. Field mixing temperatures for these mixes should not be increased to super-elevated temperatures to provide more rolling time.