CONTENTS Policies and Definitions..... 1.0 Procedure... 2.0 APPENDICES Change Notification..... 1 Training Requirements..... 2 Procedure Administration.... 3 1.0 POLICIES AND DEFINITIONS 1.1 Scope This procedure defines and establishes instructions for implementing the requirements of ASQR-09.2, UTC Production Part Approval Process (UPPAP). The roles and responsibilities described within this procedure apply to the manufacturing of production hardware. 1.2 Policies This procedure defines the process for validating manufacturing processes that produce HS hardware in meeting all engineering, quality and delivery requirements. Assessments required for the purpose of completing a PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) Review have detailed instructions defined in HT0990, Manufacturing Process Reviews. Minimum PPAP training requirements are described in Appendix 1. The term Control Build Review is synonymous with the PPAP process described here in this procedure, utilizing the same checklists, forms and protocols. COPYRIGHT HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION (HS). YOU MAY NOT POSSESS, USE, COPY OR DISCLOSE THIS DOCUMENT OR ANY INFORMATION IN IT, FOR ANY PURPOSE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, TO DESIGN, MANUFACTURE OR REPAIR PARTS, OR OBTAIN ANY GOVERNMENT APPROVAL TO DO SO, WITHOUT HS S EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION. NEITHER RECEIPT NOR POSSESSION OF THIS DOCUMENT ALONE, FROM ANY SOURCE, CONSTITUTES SUCH PERMISSION. POSSESSION, USE, COPYING OR DISCLOSURE BY ANYONE WITHOUT HS S EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION IS NOT AUTHORIZED AND MAY RESULT IN CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL LIABILITY. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS NO TECHNICAL DATA. ECCN: EAR99 Page 1 of 18
1.3 Definitions Catalog Part: A supplier of standard parts (e.g., MS, AN, AS, etc) does not need to comply with UPPAP requirements unless formally required to, by the member. Control Build Review: A part process review that was the precursor to the PPAP review. CTQ Features: Reference HSC16199 for definition of Critical-to-Quality Features. Engineered Item (Buy Parts): A product that is designed and built by a Producer. The Producer maintains design authority and configuration control for the product. Engineered Item Supplier: A supplier who designs and manufactures components and/or end items (LRUs) based on an HS specification. Also known as Suppliers of Designed Equipment (SDE). FSP: Reference HSC16199 for definition of Flight Safety Part. IPD Team: An Integrated Product Development Team, also known as a Design-to- Build Team, is responsible for the overall coordination of a new program from development, into production and finally through field service. Typically, the IPD Team is composed of a Design Engineer, Project Engineer, Enterprise Quality Engineer, Supplier Development Engineer, Manufacturing Engineer, Procurement Buyer, Producibility Engineer and Service Engineer. Make Part: Parts that are designed by Hamilton Sundstrand and produced by HS or supplier. Manufacturing Process Reviews: A series of assessments designed to validate Hamilton Sundstrand products meet Customer requirements and company commitments relating to quality, capability, capacity and overall readiness. Process Certification requirements per this procedure are assessed as part of the MPR (Manufacturing Process Review) system. The governing MPR document is HT0990. Member Focal Point: Main technical interface supporting UTC PPAP activities as defined in ASQR-09.2. Objective Evidence Package: The collection of all PPAP documentation and supporting evidence. Process Control Plan: The Process Control Plan follows the PFMEA and Process Flow steps, and provides step by step details on how the process is controlled to product specification and how to respond to potential issues in the event of nonconformances. Process Readiness Study: Reference HT0990 for definition. PPAP Element: The 19 sections listed in the PPAP submission requirements. The elements of PPAP submission depends on the required submission level. PPAP 1 Review: Reference HT0990 for definition. PPAP 2 Review: Reference HT0990 for definition. Producer: An HS Operating unit and/or Supplier who provides goods and services. Page 2 of 18
Supplier Tracking & Analysis Tools: An HS web based system used to manage PPAP schedules, assessments and action item tracking. Transition Coordinator: The person assigned to the transition team to coordinate PPAP requirements with the PEG Group. Transition Team: A team assigned to manage specific product sourcing changes. 1.4 Abbreviations And Acronyms ASQR: Aerospace Supplier Quality Requirement CTQ: Critical-to-Quality DFMEA: Design Failure Modes Effects Analysis DQR: Designated Quality Representative EC: Engineering Change EQE: Enterprise Quality Engineer FPRB: Frozen Process Review Board FSC: Flight Safety Characteristic FSP: Flight Safety Part HS: Hamilton Sundstrand IPD: Integrated Product Development MPR: Manufacturing Process Review OQE: Operations Quality Engineer PCP: Process Control Plan PD: Procurement Data PEG: Preparation & Execution Group PFMEA: Process Failure Modes Effects Analysis PO: Purchase Order SDE: Supplier Development Engineer SPC: Statistical Process Control SQA: Supplier Quality Assurance STAT: Supplier Tracking & Analysis Tools UPPAP: UTC Production Part Approval Process 1.5 Environment, Health and Safety Policy Hamilton Sundstrand is committed to conducting its operations in such a manner as to protect the health and safety of its employees, its neighbors and the natural environment. Each employee plays an important role in improving performance, not only by understanding and following established procedures, but also by recommending improved practices, where appropriate. Page 3 of 18
There are no specific precautions associated with this Standard Procedure; however associates are encouraged to bring unsafe conditions and practices to the attention of supervision to ensure prompt resolution of potential hazards. 2.0 PROCEDURE 2.1 PPAP Strategy Appling UPPAP at Hamilton Sundstrand is comprised of four specific strategic categories, as described below. 1. NEW PROGRAMS. UPPAP will be applied on new programs, either driven by Customer contract, or based on management directive. Parts will be selected utilizing a risk based approach including criteria such as supplier performance, part criticality, and producer maturation with the product or processes used in the manufacture of the product. 2. TRANSITIONS: Manufacturing source transitions represent an inherent level of risk, thus UPPAP will be applied as a risk mitigation tool. The new source will have to demonstrate process readiness and adequacy prior to serial production. 3. ENGINEERING CHANGES: Engineering changes that meet the level of a Class I change can utilize UPPAP as a means to assure key aspects of the production process have been addressed that have a positive impact relative to the change. 4. ESCAPE MITIGATION: Depending on the nature of the escape, UPPAP may be applied as a means of assuring any changes resulting from the root cause corrective action plan have been properly implemented to prevent future occurrences. Page 4 of 18
2.2 Document Flowdown L1 1 (Requirements) (Policy) ASQR-09.2 DP400 UTC QMS PPAP L2 2 (Implementation (Requirements& Flowdown) Assessment) HT1000 HSC16199 Management HS PPAP & (Internal Implementation Procedure) (Published) L3 3 HT0990 Manufacturing Process Reviews (currently in ballot) (Assessments) (Published) (Key Flowdown Documents) (Requirements Implementation; HSC16199 HSM17 PR9103 Management & Control of HS Manufacturing Supplier CTQ s Product Process Release Control (Process Control Elements) (DQR Instructions) (EPD: 3/28/06) (EPD: 3/28/06) Page 5 of 18
2.3 PPAP Overview The Four Key Milestones The HS Production part Approval Process will be implemented in a structured manner utilizing the Four Key Milestones as summarized below. Sections 2.4 thru 2.7 will define the detailed roles & responsibilities for each sub-milestone. MILESTONE 4 MILESTONE Approval 4 MILESTONE 4 MILESTONE 3 MILESTONE Validation MILESTONE 3 3 MILESTONE MILESTONE 2 Preparation MILESTONE 2 MILESTONE MILESTONE MILESTONE 1 Definition 1 Definition Milestone 1: DEFINITION Define PPAP parts Define PPAP elements Define PPAP levels Update Quality notes Issue Purchase Order Milestone 2: PREPARATION HS PPAP package preparation Schedule PPAP 1 Review PPAP training Conduct PPAP 1 Review Producer prepares PPAP package Milestone 3: VALIDATION Producer submits PPAP Package for approval Conduct PPAP 2 Review Determine gaps Provide feedback to Producer Producer re-submits updated package Milestone 4: APPROVAL Sign off UPPAP Form 1 Update PPAP database Forward Form 1 to Producer Page 6 of 18
2.4 MILESTONE 1 - DEFINITION OVERVIEW: Milestone 1 involves the identification of applicable part numbers, elements, and oversight levels. Milestone 1 involves the upfront planning for PPAP that includes training and scheduling of the reviews. Actor EQE Transition Coordinator IPD/Transition Team PEG OQE PEG EQE/OQE Action 2.4.1 Define PPAP Parts New Program Parts/Transition Parts Coordinate the following IPD Team PPAP actions. Coordinate the following Transition Team PPAP actions. Obtain bill of material (BOM) for the specific program component responsible for. Determine which parts from the BOM have PPAP applicability. Recommended criteria is as follows: Part complexity New part design New manufacturing process Functionality Previous failures, quality escapes on part or similar designed part Impact to safety List all part numbers on Form QC-1000.1, PPAP Decision Matrix Tool. Submit QC-1000.1 form with PPAP part numbers to PEG Group. Receive part number applications for PPAP: Make parts from OQE/Transition Coordinator Buy parts from EQE Receive list of Make parts from EQE. Determine detail components requiring PPAP for the LRU make component (e.g., fuel control). Forward list of Make-Internal (e.g., fuel control assembly) and Make-External (e.g., valve, sleeve, housing, etc.) parts to PEG. Perform part risk assessment using the QC-1000.1 form to determine the applicable PPAP Elements and oversight levels. Engineering Changes Initiate PPAP implementation request to PEG Group for Page 7 of 18
SDE/EQE/OQE PEG PEG Buyer 2.4.2 2.4.3 Class I engineering changes. Escape Mitigation Initiate PPAP implementation request to PEG Group for major escapes where a PPAP2 Review would be beneficial. Define PPAP Elements and Levels Determine PPAP elements and levels using PPAP Decision Tree. Update Quality Notes and Issue PO Add the PPAP requirement to the purchase order master quality note as follows: The requirements of ASQR-09.2, UTC Production Part Approval Process, are in effect for this part number. Notify corresponding Buyer that a quality note update exists for the subject part number. Issue revised or new purchase order to supplier. 2.5 MILESTONE 2 PREPARATION OVERVIEW: Milestone 2 involves the preparation activities needed in order to execute a successful PPAP review. These activities include conducting a PPAP 1 Review, training the Producer and finally creation of the PPAP Objective Evidence Package. Actor PEG PEG SDE Action 2.5.1 HS PPAP Package Preparation Initialize PPAP Objective Evidence Package (Form QC- 0990.28) for the Producer from the appropriate parts list that was submitted. The key actions to initialize the PPAP are: Fill out all the Producer identification and part characterization data. Define which PPAP Elements are required. Define which PPAP Elements the Producer must submit objective evidence back to HS if not a Level 1 PPAP Review as defined in HT0990. Forward to SDE/OQE to use with Supplier or plant site cell. Initialize PPAP record for the part number and Producer in the STAT Tool. 2.5.2 Schedule PPAP 1 Review Coordinate with the SDE, Supplier Quality Planning Group and the OQE (for in plant PPAP applications) to schedule the PPAP 1 Review in the STAT Tool. Contact supplier to set up on-site or teleconference. Page 8 of 18
SDE/OQE SDE/OQE DQR/OQE DQR OQE OQE/DQR PRO 2.5.3 2.5.4 2.5.5 Forward Producer PPAP Objective Evidence Package. PPAP Training Provide the Producer with PPAP Training per App. 2. Access PPAP training material via the HS Supplier Portal or Learning Portal. Conduct PPAP 1 Review Conduct PPAP 1 Review with the Producer per HT0990 and PPAP 215 training course number 996971. Producer Prepares and Approves PPAP Package Use PPAP Objective Evidence Package (Form QC-0990.28). For supplier PPAP part, Producer DQR, per HSM17, required to ensure package is reviewed using PPAP 2 Review Checklist, Form QC-0990.26. For internally made PPAP part, OQE required to ensure package is reviewed using PPAP 2 FAI Review Checklist, Form QC-0990.26. Ensure for Element 8, Process Readiness Study, the following: Form QC-0990.27 is used Only Tab 1 of QC-0990.27 need be submitted in Tab 8, PRS. This is the PRS roll-up score. Approve PPAP Objective Evidence Package Complete UTC Approval Form 1 Sign UTC Approval Form 1 and submit per Section 2.6.1. 2.6 MILESTONE 3 VALIDATION OVERVIEW: At the heart of Milestone 3 is conducting a validation of the PPAP 2 Review package. Depending on the level of oversight established, this review may be conducted at HS or on-sight with the Producer. Gap closure plans will be established for any review that identifies incomplete or deficient elements. Actor Action PRO 2.6.1 Producer Submits PPAP Package for Approval PROCESS FOR SUPPLIER PRODUCED PARTS Per HT0990, Supplier will forward their completed PPAP Objective Evidence Package (Form QC-0990.28) to the Supplier Development Engineer so they can conduct the PPAP 2 Review. Page 9 of 18
PROCESS FOR INTERNALLY PRODUCED PARTS Per HT0990, Internal Plant Site area will forward their completed PPAP Objective Evidence Package (Form QC- 0990.28) to the supporting Operations Quality Engineer so they can conduct the PPAP 2 Review. SDE OQE PRO 2.6.2 Conduct PPAP 2 Review Per HT0990 PROCESS FOR SUPPLIER PRODUCED PARTS - Receive completed PPAP Objective Evidence Package from Supplier. - Conduct the PPAP 2 Review per HT0990 on the received PPAP Objective Evidence Package. - If required, provide gap analysis feedback to the Producer, Buyer and EQE. - Upload open PPAP 2 Review action items into the STAT Tool. - Archive PPAP Objective Evidence Package in STAT Tool. PROCESS FOR INTERNALLY PRODUCED PARTS - Receive completed PPAP Objective Evidence Package from internal plant site cell. - Conduct the PPAP 2 Review per HT0990 on the received PPAP Objective Evidence Package. - If required, provide gap analysis feedback to the Producer and EQE. - Upload open PPAP 2 Review action items into the STAT Tool. - Archive PPAP Objective Evidence Package in STAT Tool. Submit completed PPAP Objective Evidence Package to Customer MFP. Update PPAP Objective Evidence Package when action items are established by the MFP performing the PPAP 2 Review. SDE/OQE SDE/OQE 2.6.3 Determine Gaps Document any gaps and associated corrective actions (i.e., incomplete elements, deficiencies, etc.) on PPAP 2 -FAI Checklist (Form QC-0990.26). Summarize action items onto UTC Approval Form 1. 2.6.4 Provide Feedback to Producer Follow instructions in HT0990, PPAP 2 Review section. 2.6.5 Producer Re-Submits Updated Package Follow instructions in HT0990, PPAP 2 Review section. Page 10 of 18
2.7 MILESTONE 4 APPROVAL OVERVIEW: Milestone 4 is the final leg of the PPAP process where the Producer s PPAP Package is approved. The MFP will sign the UTC Approval Form and communicate back to the Producer whether or not the approval stands on its own or requires follow-up action. Actor SDE SDE OQE SDE SDE OQE SDE SDE OQE Action 2.7.1 Forward for Customer Review If package is fully complete with no gaps: Forward to EQE if Buy part for PPAP approval. Forward to OQE if Make part for PPAP approval. Forward to EQE if Make part but at final LRU level for PPAP approval. If package is not fully complete but with acceptable gap closure plan: Forward to EQE if Buy part for PPAP Interim Class approval. Forward to OQE if Make part for PPAP Interim Class approval. Forward to EQE if Make part but at final LRU level for PPAP Interim Class approval. If package is rejected outright upon initial review by SDE/OQE then the following actions shall take place: Inform EQE/Buyer if Buy part and work with supplier on a gap closure plan. Forward to OQE if Make part and work with supplier on a gap closure plan. Forward to EQE if Make part but at final LRU level and work with plant site area on a gap closure plan. Page 11 of 18
EQE/OQE 2.7.2 Customer Interim Class Assignment and Dispositioning Update UTC Approval Form 1 with the appropriate Interim Class per Table 1 below: EQE/OQE EQE OQE EQE SDE/OQE PEG SDE/OQE 2.7.3 2.7.4 Table 1 Interim Approval per ASQR-09.2 Sign and date UTC Approval Form 1. Forward UTC Approval Form 1 to SDE for Buy supplier parts. Forward UTC Approval Form 1 to SDE for Make supplier parts. Forward UTC Approval Form 1 to OQE for Make internally made parts. Update PPAP Database Update STAT Tool with completed UTC Approval Form 1. Update PPAP Objective Evidence Package (Form QC- 0990.28) in the STAT Tool when receiving additional and/or modified Producer data supporting PPAP Elements that were not closed out. Upload completed PPAP Objective Evidence Package (Form QC-0990.28) into STAT Tool Database. Forward completed UTC Approval Form 1 to Producer. Ongoing PPAP Maintenance Monitor open PPAP action items in STAT Tool resulting from Interim Class approvals and/or rejected PPAP 2 Reviews. Work to close open PPAP action items in STAT Tool. Page 12 of 18
2.8 CHANGE CONTROL OVERVIEW: This section describes the procedure for handling process changes that may require a delta or ful-up PPAP Review to a part that previously was approved. Actor Supplier Mgt. and/or DQR Plant Site Area M.E./Cell Leader EQE/SDE SDE/ PEG SDE/OQE SDE/OQE/EQE 2.8.1 2.82 2.83 Action Producer Notifies MFP of Changes that may Impact Engineering Design, Quality or Delivery Requirements WHEN PRODUCER IS AN EXTERNAL SUPPLIER Inform SDE and/or Buyer for any changes per Table 2, Appendix 1. Note that changes reflected in Table 3, Appendix 1, do not require notification. The supplier shall notify the SDE using the UPPAP Notification, ASQR-09.2 Form 2 when any situation described below occurs. WHEN PRODUCER IS AN INTERNAL PLANT SITE AREA Inform EQE for any changes per Table 2, Appendix 1. Note that changes reflected in Table 3, Appendix 1, do not require notification. The Plant Site Area shall notify the EQE using the UPPAP Notification, ASQR-09.2 Form 2 when any situation described below occurs. Determine Change Impact and Take Appropriate Action Decide if contents of Change Notification merit a new PPAP review (delta or full-up). Forward UTC Change Notification Form 2 to PEG Group with request to schedule new PPAP. Schedule New PPAP Follow instructions located in Section 2.5 for PPAP scheduling. Follow instructions located in Section 2.6 for PPAP execution. Follow instructions located in Section 2.7 for PPAP disposition and approval. Page 13 of 18
Appendix 1 Change Notification TABLE 1 When Change Notification is Required Requirement 1. Use of other construction or material than was used in the previously approved part or product. 2. Production from new or modified tools (except perishable tools), dies, molds, patterns, etc., including additional or replacement tooling. 3. Production following refurbishment or rearrangement of existing tooling or equipment. Clarification or Examples For example, other construction as documented on a deviation (permit) or included as a note on the design record and not covered by an engineering change as described in Table I.3.2 #3. This requirement only applies to tools which due to their unique form or function, can be expected to influence the integrity of the final product. It is not meant to describe standard tools (new or repaired), such as standard measuring devices, drivers (manual or power), etc. Refurbishment means the reconstruction and/or modification of a tool or machine or to increase the capacity, performance, or change its existing function. This is not meant to be confused with normal maintenance, repair or replacement of parts, etc., for which no change in performance is to be expected and post repair verification methods have been established. Rearrangement is defined as activity which changes the sequence of product/process flow from that documented in the process flow diagram (including the addition of a new process). Minor adjustments of production equipment may be required to meet safety requirements such as, installation of protective covers, elimination of potential ESD risks, etc. These changes can be made without customer approval unless the process flow is changed as a result of this adjustment. 4. Production from tooling and equipment transferred to a different plant location or from an additional plant location. Production process tooling and/or equipment transferred between buildings or facilities in one or more locations. Page 14 of 18
Appendix 1 Change Notification TABLE 1 When Change Notification is Required (continued) Requirement 5. Change of subcontractor for parts, non-equivalent materials, or services (e.g.: heat-treating, plating) that affect customer fit, form, function, durability, or performance requirements. Clarification or examples Suppliers are responsible for approval of subcontracted material and services that do not affect customer fit form, function, durability, or performance requirements. 6. Production produced after the tooling has been inactive for volume production for twelve months or more. For product that has been produced after tooling has been inactive for twelve months or more: Notification is required when the part has had no active purchase order and the existing tooling has been inactive for volume production for twelve months or more. The only exception is when the part has low volume, e.g. service or specialty vehicles. However, a customer may specify certain PPAP requirements for service parts. 7. Product and process changes related to components of the production product manufactured internally or manufactured by subcontractors that impact fit, form, function, performance, and/or durability of the salable product. Additionally, the supplier shall concur with any requests by a subcontractor before submission to the customer. Any change that affects customer requirements for fit, form, function, performance, and/or durability requires notification to the customer. NOTE: The fit, form, function, performance, and/or durability requirements should be part of customer specifications as agreed on during contract review. 8. Change in test/inspection method new technique (no effect on acceptance criteria) For change in test method, supplier should have evidence that the new method provides results equivalent to the old method. Page 15 of 18
Appendix 1 Change Notification TABLE 2 When Change Notification is Not Required Requirement 1. Changes to component level drawings, manufactured internally or manufactured by subcontractors, that do not impact the design record for the product supplied to the customer. 2. Tool movement within the same plant (used in equivalent equipment, no change in process flow, no disassembly of the tool) or equipment movement within the same plant (same equipment, no change in process flow). 3. Changes in equipment (same type equipment for same process flow with same basic technology or methodology). Clarification or Examples Changes do not affect customer fin, form, function, durability or performance requirements. Based on lean manufacturing initiatives, some equipment is designed for mobility, i.e. on wheels with quick disconnects. Cell configurations or location within a department may be changed without affecting process flow. No change made to process flow or control plan. Examples are new equipment, additional equipment, replacement, or change in equipment size. New equipment that combines processes requires notification per table 2. 4. Identical gage replacement. Gages replaced as a part of a gage maintenance or calibration system. 5. Rebalance of operator job content with no change in process flow. 6. Changes resulting in reduced RPN on PFMEA (with no change to process flow). Lean manufacturing allows for rebalancing job content to eliminate bottleneck issues. Example include added controls, increased sample size and frequency, and error-proofing installation. Page 16 of 18
Appendix 2 PPAP Training Requirements Refer to the following matrix for Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) training courses recommended for Enterprise Quality Engineers, Manufacturing Engineers, Operations Quality Engineers, Design Engineers, Project Engineers, Supplier Development Engineers, Supplier Quality Representatives, Purchasing Buyers, and Management. COURSE NAME COURSE ID # WHO DESCRIPTION # HOURS PPAP 101 Awareness PPAP 201 Implementation 992797 996411 Anyone needing a general overview of the UPPAP per ASQR-09.2 Anyone deemed an MFP per ASQR-09.2 or performing any of the functions as described in this procedure What is PPAP? Why is it being implemented? In-depth on Four Key Milestones, use of all forms & checklists, conducting the PPAP assessments, and roles & responsibilities 2.0 8 PPAP 215 Supplier Implementation 996971 Specifically the functions as described in this procedure In-depth on 4 Key Milestones, use of all forms & checklists, and roles & responsibilities 4 PPAP 301 Process Certification - Implementation Reference the UTC Learning Portal (Type in PPAP 301 ) This training leads to certifying HS associates to take on the role of the MFP (per ASQR-09.2) who will review and approve PPAP packages submitted to HS by a Producer. In-depth training on the 19 UPPAP elements with a focus on DFMEA and PFMEA. The training discusses what is acceptable versus not acceptable when the MFP is reviewing a PPAP element for compliance to ASQR-09.2 24 PC 201 Process Certification - Implementation 017157 Engineers (Design, Manufacturing, Quality, Project, Supplier Quality) In-depth on Four Key Milestones, SPC Charts, Gage & Process Capability, Intro. To DOE 24 Page 17 of 18
Appendix 3 Procedure Administration 1. Document Changes Revision Description of Change Effective Date 0 Initial Release. 01OCT2011 2. Document Owner HSC Operations Quality Director, HSC SQA Manager 3. Originally Written by P. Teti and J. DeFazio 4. Next Higher Document ASQR-09.2, UTC Production Part Approval Process 5. Superseded Document None 6. Applicability Includes all European Aerospace Companies (EAC) and North American Aerospace (NAA) Hamilton Sundstrand business entities. Excludes all Aerospace Maintenance Activities (AMA), Industrial (IND) and Space Systems (SS) Hamilton Sundstrand business entities. 7. Distribution Online 8. Documents Referenced HS15000, Flight Safety Parts HSC16199, Management and Classification of Critical to Quality Characteristics HSM17, Supplier Product Release Programs HT0990, Manufacturing Process Reviews Manual #996411, PPAP 201 Training Manual 9. Forms Authorized QC-1000.1, PPAP Decision Matrix 10. Forms Referenced All PPAP forms authorized by this procedure can be found in Documentum. 11. Audit Requirements Procedure Requirement PR009, Aerospace Quality Audit Program 12. Key Functional Responsibilities See Section 2.0, Procedure. 13. Equipment List None Page 18 of 18